Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/243,608

COHERENT MATRIX OF DIGITAL IMAGING SYSTEMS ON CHIP

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Sep 07, 2023
Priority
Sep 09, 2022 — provisional 63/375,097
Examiner
WALSH, RYAN D
Art Unit
2852
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Exo Imaging Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
912 granted / 1049 resolved
+18.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+5.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 2m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
1065
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
§103
40.4%
+0.4% vs TC avg
§102
38.4%
-1.6% vs TC avg
§112
10.4%
-29.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1049 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 9–12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kim et al. (US Pub. # 20160209502), hereinafter referred to as Kim. Regarding claim 9, Kim teaches, “A method of imaging a target object, the method comprising: providing a plurality of ultrasound transducer assemblies (Fig. 3; 11k (11e, 11f) & 11l (11g, 11h)), each ultrasound transducer assembly comprising a plurality of ultrasound transducer elements (abstract, first and second ultrasound elements); tiling the plurality of ultrasound transducer assemblies into a matrix or array configuration (see Fig. 3) that defines one or more gaps (g4, g5) between the plurality of transducer assemblies; processing receive signals (Fig. 1, ref. # 13) of each transducer element; synthesizing receive signals by defining one or more virtual elements for the one or more gaps between the transducer assemblies (abstract & claim 1; para. [0083–0103, 0233, 0234]); and acquiring an image of the target object using the tiled plurality of ultrasound transducer assemblies (abstract; para. [0102–0109, 0166]).” Regarding claim 10, Kim teaches, “wherein the matrix or array configuration is a 1-dimensional array, a 2-dimensional matrix or array, a curved matrix array, a piece-wise curved matrix or array, or a flat matrix or array (Fig. 3; para. [0135]).” Regarding claim 11, Kim teaches, “wherein each ultrasound transducer assembly further comprises an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC) integrated thereon (para. [0150]).” Regarding claim 12, Kim teaches, “wherein each ultrasound transducer assembly of the plurality is adjusted for relative tilt and offset with respect to a common coordinate system for the plurality of ultrasound transducer assemblies (see para. [0170, 0171]; steering description is an adjustment as claimed and implicit for this type of tiled array).” Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1–2, 4–8, 13–14, 16–18, and 20–22 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claims 1–2, and 4–8, the prior art does not teach or suggest the claimed, “(v) defining one or more virtual elements for one or more gaps between the ultrasound transducer assemblies and generating synthesized receive signals for the one or more virtual elements using the processed receive signals of one or more transducer elements of the plurality; and (vi) forming a dynamically focused receive beam based on the processed receive signals of the one or more transducer elements and synthesized receive signals of the one or more virtual elements.” Regarding claims 13–14, 16–18, and 20–22, the prior art does not teach or suggest the claimed, “generate synthesized receive signals for the one or more virtual elements using the processed receive signals of one or more transducer elements, and form a focused receive beam based on the processed receive signals of the one or more transducer elements and the synthesized receive signals of the one or more virtual elements.” Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 9–12 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RYAN D WALSH whose telephone number is (571)272-2726. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 8:30am-6:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Walter Lindsay can be reached at 571-272-1674. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RYAN D WALSH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2852
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 07, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jul 09, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 09, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12736427
PRESSURE SENSOR, SYSTEM FOR MOUNTING AND DEMOUNTING OF THE PRESSURE SENSOR AND USE OF THE PRESSURE SENSOR
2y 9m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12733455
INSPECTION DEVICE, MOUNTING APPARATUS, INSPECTION METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM
3y 2m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12716432
METHOD FOR REAL-TIME HYDRAULIC CYLINDER DRIFT MONITORING
2y 6m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12716815
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SURGE MARGIN TESTING OF GAS TURBINE ENGINE USING AN UNDERSIZED LOAD COMPONENT
2y 8m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12716186
COMPLEX SOIL ROTATIONAL PENETROMETER DEVICE
2y 4m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+5.6%)
2y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1049 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month