Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/245,713

SURGICAL ASSISTANCE DEVICE AND SURGERY SUPPORT SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 16, 2023
Priority
Oct 29, 2020 — JP 2020-181155 +1 more
Examiner
GHIMIRE, SHANKAR RAJ
Art Unit
3795
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Nagoya Denki Educational Foundation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
222 granted / 289 resolved
+6.8% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
328
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
45.9%
+5.9% vs TC avg
§102
25.5%
-14.5% vs TC avg
§112
25.6%
-14.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 289 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 05/26/2026 has been entered. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 04/27/2026 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Response to Amendment Claims 1-20 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 1-4, 6-9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Charles (US 20150272694) in view of Austin (US 20180368656). Regarding claim 1, Charles discloses a surgical assistance device (Rotatable surgical camera; FIGS. 4A-4B, 4C, annotated below; Para [0224]) for capturing an image inside a body cavity, the surgical assistance device comprising: N image capturing units (One or more cameras 8015 disposed on the inner surface; para [0225]; FIG. 4C; Camera pair 8009; camera pair 8011; camera pair 8010; Para [0224]); a plurality of holding parts (Holding part of camera 8015; FIGS. 4C, 4A-4B, annotated below), each of the plurality of holding parts holding each of the image capturing units (Prism for holding each of the camera. FIG. 4B, 4C); and a base member (Rotatable stage 8005, FIGS. 4A-4B, 4C, annotated below; ring 8008; FIG. 4B; Para [0216]), wherein the base member has a cylindrical structure (FIG. 4A) having an outer peripheral surface, an inner peripheral surface, an upper end surface, and a lower end surface (FIG. 4A), wherein each of the plurality of holding parts includes an upper end on an upper end surface side of the base member, and a lower end on a lower end surface side of the base member (camera 8015 can be included inside the base member at 8016; para [0225]; This provides the ends of the holding parts on the side of the base member.), wherein N is an integer that is greater than one (One or more camera 8015; Para [0225]; FIG. 4B), and wherein N virtual lines each passing through each of the plurality of holding parts holding the N image capturing units are defined as reference lines for arrangement such that the N virtual lines are substantially parallel to each other (Annotated FIG. 4B), and substantially perpendicular to: a virtual plane formed by the upper end surface or a lower end surface of the base member, a virtual plane derived from the upper end surface or the lower end surface of the base member by a least-squares method, or a virtual plane derived from the upper ends or the lower ends of the plurality of holding parts by a least-squares method (N virtual lines are perpendicular to virtual plane derived from the upper ends or the lower ends of the plurality of holding parts by a least-squares method; FIGS. 4A, 4B), wherein a center line is defined as a line connecting a center of the image capturing unit and a center of an image capturing range of the image capturing unit (FIG. 4C), wherein each of the image capturing units is arranged such that the center line is oriented to outside of the base member at an angle that is greater than or equal to 0 degree and less than or equal to 10 degrees relative to each of the reference lines passing through each of the plurality of holding parts (Considering the definition “line passing through a center of the image capturing range of the image capturing unit is defined as a center line” of the center line as recited in the claim, any line that passes through the center of the image capturing range can be considered as the center line. Center of image capturing range is away from the camera and based on definition it is a “single” point such as shown in FIG. 4B, 4C annotated. A user can draw any line from this single point (because a second point to define a line is not required based on the definition in the claim) making an angle between 0-degree -10 degree with the virtual line which satisfies the claim requirement.). Charles does not expressly disclose wherein the image capturing range of each image capturing unit is facing away and outward from a center of the base member. Austin is directed to surgical visualization system (abstract ) and teaches a plurality of camera (cameras 520a) mounted on a frame (FIGS. 14A1-a annotated below; 510a) wherein the image capturing range of each image capturing unit is facing away and outward from a center of the base member (FIG. FIGS. 14A1-a; Para [1449]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Charles to include cameras 8015 (FIG. 4C) in the circumference of the base member in accordance with teaching of Austin so that more vertical and central view of the camera could be provided. PNG media_image1.png 605 1185 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 256 352 media_image2.png Greyscale Regarding claim 2, Charles discloses wherein the plurality of holding parts are formed as separate components from the base member (Prisms where the sensors are positioned are formed as separate components; FIGS. 4C, 4B). Regarding claim 3, Charles discloses wherein at least one of the N image capturing units has a variable angle of the center line with respect to the reference line (The cameras may be configured to have tip and/or tilt adjustment such that the attitude or orientation of the camera may be adjusted. Para [0204]). Regarding claim 4, Charles discloses wherein the plurality of holding parts formed as the separate components from the base member are formed rotatably relative to the base member (The cameras may be configured to have tip and/or tilt adjustment such that the attitude or orientation of the camera may be adjusted. FIG. 4C; Para [0204]). Regarding claim 6, Charles discloses wherein each of the image capturing units is arranged such that the center line is oriented to outside of the base member at an angle that is greater than or equal to 5 degrees and less than or equal to 10 degrees relative to each of the reference lines passing through each of the plurality of holding parts (Image capturing units are arranged to be oriented greater than or equal to 5 degrees and less than or equal to 10 degrees. Considering the definition “line passing through a center of the image capturing range of the image capturing unit is defined as a center line” of the center line as recited in the claim, any line that passes through the center of the image capturing range can be considered as the center line. Center of image capturing range is away from the camera and it is a “single” point such as shown in FIGS. 4B, 4C annotated. A user can draw any line from this single point (because the second point to define a line is not required based on the definition in the claim) making an angle between 5-degree -10 degree with the virtual line which satisfies the claim. A user can draw a line from this one point making an angle between 5-degree -10 degree with the virtual line which satisfies the claim requirement.). Regarding claim 7, Charles discloses the surgical assistance device wherein an image processing unit that synthesizes images obtained from the image capturing units (Images from the camera is processed. Para [0013]; Images from the camera are integrated. Para [0018]). Regarding claim 8, Charles discloses a display (display system 374; para [0289]) unit that displays an image processed by the image processing unit. Regarding claim 9, Charles discloses a program used for the surgery support system (Images from the camera is processed. Para [0013]; Images from the camera are integrated. Para [0018]). Claim(s) 5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Charles (US 20150272694) in view of Austin (US 20180368656) and further in view of Connor (US 20200348627). Regarding claim 5, Charles does not expressly disclose wherein the base member is formed of a flexible material. Connor is directed to an endoscope for minimally invasive surgery (abstract) and teaches wherein the base member is formed of a flexible material (The camera remains connected to the housing by a flexible component (such as a wire, cord, or strap) even when the camera is removed from the housing, wherein the camera is in electronic (wired or wireless) communication with the housing even when it is removed from the housing so that the camera can be used to record images even when the camera is removed from the housing. Para [0238]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Charles to include the base member made of a flexible material so that use of the surgical assistance device could be made more convenient as the device is passed through the body by way of having flexible base member. Claim(s) 10 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Charles (US 20150272694) in view of Austin (US 20180368656) and further in view of Connor (US 20200348627) and Ano (US 20180061372). Regarding claim 10, Charles discloses wherein when any of the image capturing units captures a surgical instrument during a surgery (sensor and refractor; laser 200; Composite image is generated by FIGS. 13B, 14; Para [0269]). Charles does not expressly disclose wherein the program performs image processing so that the surgical instrument is not displayed on the display unit based on an image captured by another of the image capturing units. Ano teaches wherein the program performs image processing so that the surgical instrument is not displayed on the display unit based on an image captured by another of the image capturing units (Surgical tool image is hidden when the image is displayed in the display so that the problem of image of the surgical area being hidden by the image of the surgical tool is avoided. Para [0123]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Charles system so that the tool image is hidden when the image of the surgical area is displayed in a display so that the surgical image area is displayed without being obscured by the surgical tool image. Claim(s) 11-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Charles (US 20150272694) in view of Austin (US 20180368656) and further in view of Von (US 20140180001). Regarding claim 11, Charles does not expressly disclose wherein the plurality of holding parts are formed as through holes penetrating the base member. Von is directed to endoscope for minimally invasive surgery and teaches wherein the holding parts are formed as through holes penetrating the base member (FIG. 3; Rotationally symmetric main support device 4 are two camera modules or two imaging devices 12a, 13a, 14a, 12b, 13b, 14b consisting in particular of imaging optics 14a and 14b, respectively, mounted on two camera brackets 12a and 12b. FIG. 3; Para [0041]; As seen from FIG. 3, the camera bracket provide holes where the imaging devices 12a-14b are positioned.). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Charles system to include brackets and holes in the base member of Charles in accordance with the teaching of Von so that the mounting of camera could be made convenient and secured. Regarding claim 12, Charles as modified teaches wherein the plurality of holding parts are formed as cutouts in an outer circumferential face of the base member (Von: FIG. 3). Regarding claim 13, Charles discloses wherein the N image capturing units are arranged at substantially equal intervals in the base member (FIGS. 4A-4D). Regarding claim 14, Charles discloses wherein the base member is formed in a substantially elliptical shape (FIGS. 4A-4D). Regarding claim 15, Charles discloses wherein the N image capturing units are arranged at substantially equal intervals in the base member (FIGS. 4A-4D). Regarding claim 16, Charles discloses wherein the base member is formed in a substantially elliptical shape (FIGS. 4A-4D). Regarding claim 17, Charles discloses wherein the base member is formed in a substantially elliptical shape (FIGS. 4A-4D). Regarding claim 18, Charles discloses wherein at least one of the N image capturing units has a variable angle of the center line with respect to the reference line (The cameras may be configured to have tip and/or tilt adjustment such that the attitude or orientation of the camera may be adjusted. Para [0204]). Regarding claim 19, Charles discloses wherein at least one of the N image capturing units has a variable angle of the center line with respect to the reference line (The cameras may be configured to have tip and/or tilt adjustment such that the attitude or orientation of the camera may be adjusted. Para [0204]). Regarding claim 20, Charles discloses wherein at least one of the N image capturing units has a variable angle of the center line with respect to the reference line (The cameras may be configured to have tip and/or tilt adjustment such that the attitude or orientation of the camera may be adjusted. Para [0204]). Response to Arguments Applicant' s arguments submitted on 05/26/2026 with respect to the claims have been fully considered. Therefore, the rejection dated 01/26/2026 has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration a new rejection has been made. Newly cited art Austin (US 20180368656 ) teaches four cameras 520a are mounted on a frame 510a (FIGS. 14A1-a ) and directed to the same direction. The cameras 8015 (FIG. 4C) of Charles (US 20150272694) could be modified to provide camera in multiple positions and directed to downward in the frame/base 8005 in accordance with the teaching of Austin to achieve the features of claim 1. See rejection set forth above. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHANKAR R GHIMIRE whose telephone number is (571)272-0515. The examiner can normally be reached 8 AM - 5 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anhtuan Nguyen can be reached at 571-272-4963. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHANKAR RAJ GHIMIRE/Examiner, Art Unit 3795 /ANH TUAN T NGUYEN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3795 6/3/26
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 5 earlier events
Apr 07, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 13, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 21, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 22, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 27, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 26, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 28, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 08, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12667239
Endoscopic Vessel Harvesting With Thermal Management and Augmented Reality Display
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12660984
SURGICAL METHODS USING MULTI-SOURCE IMAGING
4y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12653379
Endoscopic System With Attached Instruments
2y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12635862
ENDOSCOPE WITH OPTICAL FILTER ARRANGEMENT AND USE
2y 1m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12629013
ARTHROSCOPIC PROBE DEVICE, SYSTEM AND METHOD
3y 2m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+18.7%)
3y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 289 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month