Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/246,371

IMPROVEMENTS IN LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY SUBSTRATES

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 23, 2023
Priority
Sep 25, 2020 — AU 2020903467 +1 more
Examiner
FIGUEROA, JOHN J
Art Unit
1763
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allowance Rate
919 granted / 1104 resolved
+18.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
1124
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
58.7%
+18.7% vs TC avg
§102
27.4%
-12.6% vs TC avg
§112
5.8%
-34.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1104 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restriction Applicant’s election, without traverse, of Group I (claims 1-17 and 21) in the reply filed on Feb. 8, 2026, to the restriction requirement dated Dec. 9, 2025, is hereby acknowledged. The election of the species aryl monovinyl monomer for the mono-ethylenically unsaturated aryl monomer; aryl polyvinyl monomer for the poly-ethylenically aryl monomer; and CPDTC for the reversible-addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) agent, are also acknowledged. Accordingly, claims 1-17 and 21 have been examined in the instant Office action whereas claims 43 and 45 have been withdrawn from consideration as drawn to a non-elected invention but remain pending in the present application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 5-11, 13-17 and 21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. §102(a)(1) as anticipated by Barlow ["Porous, functional, poly(styrene-co-divinyIbenzene) monoliths by RAFT polymerization", Kristine J Barlow et al., Polymer Chemistry, Vol. 5, pages 722-732, published Sept. 2, 2013]. This document was cited in the prior restriction requirement. Barlow discloses a method for the preparation of porous functional poly(styrene- co-divinylbenzene) monoliths by use of reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization, wherein, for example, styrene-divinylbenzene copolymerization in the presence of 2-cyano-2-propyl dodecyl trithiocarbonate (CPDTC), provides control over polymerization kinetics, monolith morphology and surface functionality, wherein the time to onset of rapid polymerization (gelation) and the monolith morphology depend strongly on the RAFT agent concentration and wherein RAFT-synthesized monoliths show a modified morphology with smaller pores and polymer globules when compared to non-RAFT monoliths but retain good flow properties, wherein the monoliths have potential applications in chromatography and flow chemistry (abstract). Barlow therefore discloses a method for producing a porous copolymer monolith substrate for use in flow through liquid chromatography applications, the method comprising: forming a reaction composition comprising at least one monoethylenically unsaturated aryl monomer (styrene), at least one polyethylenically unsaturated aryl monomer (divinylbenzene), a RAFT agent (2-cyano-2-propyl dodecyl trithiocarbonate (CPDTC)), at least one liquid porogen (e.g., dodecanol), and a radical initiator (azobisisobutyronitrile; AIBN); introducing the reaction composition to a mold (column) having a shape and dimensions suitable for forming a liquid chromatography substrate; co-polymerizing the mixture in the mold (NMR tubes and columns) under conditions (60°C for 21 h) to form a solid copolymer network that is phase separated from the reaction composition and/or any liquid components; separating the solid copolymer network from the reaction composition and/or any liquid components to provide the porous copolymer monolith substrate with various BET surface areas (1.13, 1.87, 32.4 or 90 m²/g) (see page 725, column 1, para 4-page 730, column 2, first paragraph; Schemes 1-2; Figures 1-6). Barlow discloses the functionalizing porous copolymer monoliths with various functional groups (surface-grafting) that are suitable for covalently attaching the monoliths on any surface of column materials/walls (see page 727, column 2, para 3-page 728, column 2, para 3; page 730, column 1, last para-column 2, first paragraph). Thus, the instant claims are anticipated by Barlow. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4 and 12 are objected to as dependent upon rejected base claim 1 but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Barlow does not teach or suggest the RAFT agent as 2-[[(butylsulfanyl)-carbonothioyl]sulfanyl] propanoic acid (PABTC), or 4-cyano-4-[(dodecylsulfanyl-thiocarbonyl)sulfanyl]-pentanoic acid (CDSTS), as recited in present dependent claim 4. Nor does Barlow suggest the porogenic solvent as toluene, THF or dioxane, in accordance with present dependent claim 12 Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOHN J FIGUEROA whose telephone number is (571)272-8916. The examiner can normally be reached on 8:30 am -6:00 pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, JOSEPH DEL SOLE can be reached on 571-272-1130. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOHN J FIGUEROA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1763 May 30, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 23, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12673352
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR LOW-TEMPERATURE TREATMENT OF HEAVY METALS AND DIOXINS IN FLY ASH
3y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12667835
SYSTEMS FOR CATALYTICALLY REMOVING OXIDIZED CONTAMINANTS FROM A FLUID AND RELATED METHODS
3y 6m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12668486
CONTAMINATED HYDROGEN GAS COMPOSITION AND ITS USE AS A REFERENCE FOR HYDROGEN FUELS
3y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12644038
Surfactant and Preparation Method Therefor
4y 0m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12633533
METHOD FOR PRODUCING LITHIUM TRANSITION METAL COMPLEX OXIDE
3y 10m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+8.6%)
2y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1104 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month