Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/247,982

METHOD AND COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR CREATING MANUFACTURING DATA, AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING AN ORTHOPEDIC DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Oct 10, 2023
Examiner
KARIM, ZIAUL
Art Unit
2119
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Ottobock SE & Co. Kgaa
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allow Rate
601 granted / 736 resolved
+26.7% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+21.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
766
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
17.4%
-22.6% vs TC avg
§103
39.0%
-1.0% vs TC avg
§102
19.7%
-20.3% vs TC avg
§112
18.4%
-21.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 736 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-18 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-18 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Shin et al. USPGPUB 20170360578 A1(hereinafter “Shin”). As to claim 1, Shin teaches a method for creating manufacturing data for manufacturing an orthopedic device producible using the created manufacturing data in an automated manufacturing method (paragraph 0005-0006 “method for producing a prosthetic device”), comprising: providing a digital three dimensional (3D) body part model of a body part in a data processing facility (paragraph 0084-0085 “a prosthesis model can be generated based on an object model using some of the above described model”), providing at least one digital functional component model of an orthopedic functional component in the data processing facility, wherein the orthopedic functional component (paragraph 0085-0086 “a prosthesis model is generated, the process 100 continues by generating a set of instructions based on the prosthesis model (step 140)” and FIG. 1), wherein the at least one functional digital functional component model contains corresponding component properties of the respective orthopedic functional component (paragraph 0123-0124 and claim 2 “identifying supplemental data based on the received imaging data and/or the object model, wherein supplemental data comprises supplemental imaging data corresponding to body parts of one or more other patients; and updating the object model based on the imaging data and the supplemental data”),generating at least one digital component interface in the data processing facility in dependence on at least one component property of at least one selected digital functional component model of at least one selected an orthopedic functional component which is to be integrated into the orthopedic device, wherein the at least one digital component interface includes a receptacle for arranging the at least one selected orthopedic functional component (paragraph 0124-0128 “object model is generated, the process 200 continues by generating a prosthesis model based on the object model (step 240), generating a set of instructions based on the prosthesis model (step 250), and the set of instructions is executed using a 3D printer, causing the 3D printer to produce a prosthetic device for the patient (step 260). Steps 240, 250, and 260 can be similar to steps 130,140, and 150, respectively, as described above”), automatically creating a digital orthopedic model of the orthopedic device to be manufactured based on the 3D body part model and the at least one digital component interface for integration of the orthopedic functional component by the data processing facility (paragraph 085-0110 “continues by generating a set of instructions based on the prosthesis model (step 140). In an example implementation using 3D printing for fabrication, a prosthesis model can be converted into a set of printing instructions by using software specific to a destination printer and its materials” and FIG. 1-2), and generating digital manufacturing data from the created digital orthopedic model automatically created by the data processing facility (paragraph 0124-0128 and FIG. 2 “produce a prosthetic device for the patient (step 260). Steps 240, 250, and 260 can be similar to steps 130,140, and 150, respectively”). As to claim 2, Shin teaches wherein the 3D body part model is a digital representation of the body part for which the orthopedic device is intended and which was converted into an orthopedic intended shape (paragraph 0032-0033 “geometric shape of the body part”). As to claim 3, Shin teaches wherein a digital orthopedic model is created in a form of a volume model (paragraph 0033-0034 “cause the three-dimensional printer to produce a physical model of the body part”). As to claim 4, Shin teaches further comprising selecting a digital mechanical interface from a plurality of provided digital mechanical interfaces in dependence on component properties of the at least one selected digital functional component model of the orthopedic device, wherein a receptacle of the selected digital mechanical interface corresponds to the at least one selected orthopedic functional component (paragraph 0124-0130 “model can be generated from an intact contralateral limb in the setting of unilateral amputation, it may be preferable to discard such a model if volumetric data of the previously intact limb is available, such as a pre-operative CT of the relevant limb”). As to claim 5, Shin teaches wherein the generated at least one digital component interface is also generated in dependence on the 3D body part model and/or on a digital model, created from the 3D body part model, of the orthopedic device to be manufactured (paragraph 0022-0027 “generating an object model corresponding to the body part based on the first set of imaging data and the second set of imaging data”). As to claim 6, Shin teaches further comprising, using the data processing facility, automatically a first digital orthopedic partial model of the orthopedic device to be manufactured is created based on the 3D body part model, and a second digital orthopedic partial model of the orthopedic device to be manufactured is created based on the generated digital component interface, wherein the digital orthopedic model of the orthopedic device to be manufactured is created in dependence on the first digital orthopedic model and the second digital orthopedic model (paragraph 0112-0127 “Supplemental data can then be used to update the object model or generate a new object model. An example implementation of a process 300 is shown in FIG. 3” and FIG. 1-3). As to claim 7, Shin teaches wherein the second digital orthopedic model of the orthopedic device to be manufactured is created in dependence on the previously created first digital orthopedic model (paragraph 0104 “a digital camera to capture photographs from different perspectives relative to the arm). As another example, the patient's arm can be imaged using X-ray imaging. The acquired images are then used to create an object model of the patient's forearm” and 0173-0174). As to claim 8, Shin teaches wherein, for each digital functional component model of an orthopedic functional component, at least one of dimensions of the component, an installation space of the component, a movement space of the component, stability properties, accesses for the installation and/or removal, tool attachments, supply lines, disposal lines, tolerable torques, occurring torques, possible functional component combinations, and thermal properties, are stored as a component property (paragraph 0097-0109 “Adjustable and/or modular components can further improve ease of and control over the degree of manipulation and frequency of adjustment, and removable components can enable more frequent and facile evaluation of the progress of correction). As to claim 9, Shin teaches further comprising providing for visualizing one or more component properties on a playback unit of the data processing facility with or without the digital orthopedic model or a partial model thereof (paragraph 0075-0080 “identifying image segments based partially on user direction), or automatically (e.g., by a computer identifying image segments without user direction). Knowledge of the image acquisition parameters” and FIG. 1-4). As to claim 10, Shin teaches further comprising, in dependence on at least one component property of at least one selected functional component, checking with the data processing facility whether a combination of the selected functional component and the provided 3D body part model, an orthopedic intended shape derived therefrom, and/or digital orthopedic model or partial model is producible and/or functional (paragraph 0130-0135 “object model can include re-generating the object model based on the both the imaging data and the supplemental data (e.g., as described in reference to step 230 above). In some implementations, updating the object model can include transforming the object model based on the supplemental data. For example, inclusion of radiographic data into an object model acquired by photogrammetry may reveal exaggerated bony protuberances that are partially” and Fig. 1-4). As to claim 11, Shin teaches further comprising simulating by the data processing facility, in dependence on at least one component property of at least one selected functional component, at least one movement and/or load of the orthopedic device to be produced and/or the selected functional component (paragraph 0104-0109 and paragraph 0083-0086 “cable-pulley system or force-generating component at the joint itself, thus recreating anatomic motion”). As to claim 12, Shin teaches further comprising creating a digital surface model of the orthopedic device to be manufactured based on the 3D body part model and a border of the orthopedic device specified on the 3D body part model by means-of the data processing facility, wherein the digital surface model forms an inside of the orthopedic device and wherein the digital orthopedic model of the orthopedic device to be manufactured is automatically created based on the digital surface model and a specified material thickness of the orthopedic device to be manufactured by the data processing facility (paragraph 0087-0092 “mechanical properties (e.g., direct fabrication of a spiral geometry of varying thickness that is more uniform and mechanically robust than an identical geometry fabricated in layers with a single extrusion rate”). As to claim 13, Shin teaches wherein the orthopedic device producible using the created manufacturing data is an orthosis a prosthesis, or an exoskeleton (paragraph 0077 “prosthetic device (e.g., an orthosis or brace) can be modeled”). As to claim 14, is related to claim 1 with similar limitations also rejected by same rational. As to claim 15, Shin teaches supplying the manufacturing data to an automated manufacturing facility, wherein the automated manufacturing facility produces the orthopedic device using the created manufacturing data in an automated manufacturing method (paragraph 0160-0162 “portion of the object model that will be excised can be isolated and subsequently used to create a second prosthesis model”). As to claim 16, Shin teaches wherein the orthopedic device produced by the automated manufacturing method of the automated manufacturing facility, is produced in dependence on the supplied manufacturing data (paragraph 0088-90 and FIG. 1-2 “produce a prosthetic device for the patient (step 150)”). As to claim 17, Shin teaches further comprising fastening at least one functional component on a receptacle of a component interface of the orthopedic device (paragraph 0064-0066 and Fig. 1-4). As to claim 18, Shin teaches wherein the orthosis is selected from the group consisting of a foot orthosis, a hand orthosis, a knee orthosis, a torso orthosis, and a head orthosis (paragraph 0077-0083 “manufactured (e.g., Jaipur knee/foot)”). It is noted that any citations to specific, pages, columns, lines, or figures in the prior art references and any interpretation of the reference should not be considered to be limiting in any way. A reference is relevant for all it contains and may be relied upon for all that it would have reasonably suggested to one having ordinary skill in the art. See MPEP 2123. Conclusion The prior art made of record and listed on the attached PTO Form 892 but not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Fink et al. USP 53, 70692 teaches Prosthetic bone implants are fabricated to approximately replicate a patient's original bone. Medical computer aided imaging techniques are applied to generate a data base representing the size and shape of the original bone in a three dimensional coordinate system. The implantable replica is fabricated using the data base and free form manufacturing to sequentially solidify adjoining, cross-sectional intervals of a fluid material. Appropriate fluid materials include ceramic particles which may be selectively bonded by sintering or bonding with a polymer, and a monomer which is polymerized at selected regions by an incident laser beam. Grbic et al. USP 10710354 B2 teaches a method for generating a personalized scaffold for an individual includes acquiring images of an anatomy of interest corresponding to an intended scaffold location and acquiring test results related to the anatomy of interest. One or more functional specifications are generated based on the images and test results and one or more scaffold parameters are selected based on the functional specifications. A final scaffold may then be generated using the one or more scaffold parameters. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ZIAUL KARIM whose telephone number is (571)270-3279. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Thursday 8:00-4:00 PM EST. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Mohammad Ali can be reached on 571 272 4105. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ZIAUL KARIM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2119
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 10, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594896
POWER SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12585294
RE-EVALUATING VALVE FIT AND FUNCTION ON A PROCESS LINE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587014
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ENABLING ENERGY TRANSFER FROM A VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12585299
System, method, and apparatus for electric power grid and network management of grid elements
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12562588
METHOD FOR SETTING A POWER CLASS OF AN INVERTER, AND INVERTER
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+21.9%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 736 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month