Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/248,108

COMBINATION THERAPY FOR TREATING CANCER

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Apr 06, 2023
Priority
Oct 08, 2020 — provisional 63/089,195 +1 more
Examiner
SANCHEZ, JUSTIN CHRISTOPHER
Art Unit
1622
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Astrazeneca AB
OA Round
2 (Final)
87%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 87% — above average
87%
Career Allowance Rate
33 granted / 38 resolved
+26.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+11.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
72
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
32.1%
-7.9% vs TC avg
§102
21.4%
-18.6% vs TC avg
§112
30.5%
-9.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 38 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-3, 5-7, and 14-24, submitted 18 March 2026, are pending in the application and subject to examination in the instant Office Action. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Objections/Restrictions – Withdrawn and Maintained The status of the previous objection and rejected claims in the Office Action mailed 18 December 2025 are set out below. Objection to Specification The amendment to the specification is sufficient to overcome the previous objection. Rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 112(a) The Applicant has amended claim 1 to add a wherein clause to specify that the cancer is homologous recombination deficient (HRD) cancer. However, this amendment is not sufficient to overcome the previous rejection. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 18 March 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The Applicant argues that the instant specification provides adequate support for the treatment of HRD cancer. In the previous Office Action, the Examiner acknowledged that the instant specification provided support for the treatment of breast cancer wherein the cancer has the mutated BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene through administration of a combination with AZD5305 and carboplatin. However, there is no support in the specification that would lead one skilled in the art to conclude that all cancers comprising an HRR mutation can be treated with the above-mentioned combination of pharmaceuticals as the Applicant is asserting. To rebut the Applicant’s argument that the mechanism-based rationale applies across all cancers with HRD, the Examiner would like to cite a new reference, explicitly to address this argument. Specifically, the Examiner cites Hurley et al. ("53BP1 as a potential predictor of response in PARP inhibitor-treated homologous recombination-deficient ovarian cancer." Gynecologic oncology 153.1 (2019): 127-134.), which states “Not all cancers with defects in homologous recombination (HR) demonstrate clinical responses to PARP inhibitors.” (pg. 127, Section “Highlights”, 1st Bullet Point). Hurley also states that “Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have shown substantial activity in homologous recombination- (HR-) deficient ovarian cancer and are undergoing testing in other HR-deficient tumors. For reasons that are incompletely understood, not all patients with HR-deficient cancers respond to these agents.”. Thus, there remains unpredictability in the treatment of all claimed HRD cancers to be treated with the same pharmaceutical combination. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JUSTIN CHRISTOPHER SANCHEZ whose telephone number is (703)756-5336. The examiner can normally be reached Monday -Friday (0730-1700). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, James H Alstrum-Acevedo can be reached at 571-272-5548. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JUSTIN CHRISTOPHER SANCHEZ Examiner Art Unit 1622 /J.C.S./Examiner, Art Unit 1622 /JAMES H ALSTRUM-ACEVEDO/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1622
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 06, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 18, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Mar 18, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 09, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12643882
INHIBITORS OF HUMAN RESPIRATORY SYNCYTIAL VIRUS AND METAPNEUMO VIRUS
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12624039
BTK INHIBITORS
3y 10m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12624043
COMPOSITIONS USEFUL FOR TREATING DISORDERS RELATED TO KIT
2y 6m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12616651
Topical Lipolysis Composition and Methods
4y 7m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12612408
Pyrazolone-Fused Pyrimidine Compound, Preparation Method for Same and Applications Thereof
4y 4m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
87%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+11.9%)
3y 3m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 38 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month