Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/248,112

STRUCTURE, SLIDING MEMBER, CONNECTOR, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING STRUCTURE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 06, 2023
Examiner
MILLER, DANIEL H
Art Unit
1783
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
NEC Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
53%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
4y 2m
To Grant
73%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 53% of resolved cases
53%
Career Allow Rate
367 granted / 687 resolved
-11.6% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+19.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 2m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
717
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
66.2%
+26.2% vs TC avg
§102
14.7%
-25.3% vs TC avg
§112
11.6%
-28.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 687 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 1/20/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-3, 5-16, 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being obvious over Tour (US 2005/0233158) in view of Sui (US 2016/0010022). The art is considered to teach all the elements of newly amended claim 1. Tour teaches a metal surface coated with molecules having linking groups comprising thiols amides and other claimed groups attaching carbon nanotubes to the surface and a second metal surface that can form a sliding member (See [0046], Abstract, figures and claims, [0059-0060] ). Regarding claim 8, the claimed molecules are met Tour (See figures and claims). The metal surface can be gold, silver and other alloys thereof (See claim 34). Regarding claims to 3 or more connective functional groups the art teaches multiple thiol or other connective groups to a CNT (See figures), meeting the claim limitations. To the extent to which one of ordinary skill has to pick between embodiments it would have been obvious to provide an embodiment within the claimed ranges of molecules and functional groups that overlap with the claimed art. The art is considered to encompass new claim 19. See figures, including those included in claims (particularly claim 5) depicting molecules attached to functional groups that would meet and /pr render obvious the claimed molecular structure. [0045] Once the interconnects are treated with the above oligomers and polymers, they also have the advantage of presenting a contact surface with a lubricity higher than present in untreated contacts, thereby reducing the rate of physical wear of the contact surfaces subject to repeated connection/disconnection cycles or long-term vibrations. It is expected that all or nearly all of the above-noted oligomers and polymers exhibit this lubricity property since the pendant moieties are hydrophobic and there is no H-bonding mechanism from which they can adhere to each other. These hydrophobic (lipophilic) interactions are very weak relative to dipolar and H-bonding interactions, and therefore the coatings do not "stick" to other surfaces [0045]. Contacts in which lubricity is important include sliding contacts in motors which are typically subject to substantial friction and wear that produces undesirable electrical noise. Lubricants often used on such contacts to reduce the wear (such as graphite and molybdenum disulfide) may have deleterious effects on conductivity because, inter alia, their surface coatings are much thicker than the coatings disclosed here, therefore they are not readily shifted away from the desired metal-to-metal mating contact areas. Other examples of contacts in which lubricity is important are make/break contacts such as are found in electrical relays. These are particularly subject to electrical and material breakdown [0046-0047] Tour. Claims 1-3, 5-16, 19 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being obvious over Tour (US 2005/0233158), as above, in view of Sui. The art may not teach the nanohorns as claimed. Sui (US 2016/0010022) teaches Carbon nanotube or graphene nanoribbons or carbon nanohorns (and/or combinations thereof) can be added to a lubricant and put between two sliding or motor surfaces (see [0021-0022, and claims). The material with a polymer or organic molecule with functional groups and the nanohorn(s) are good in high temperatures (see claims and abstract). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing the invention to provide nanohorns in order to provide a high temperature lubricant between two surfaces at an interface as Tour teaches the connective material can have usefulness of providing lubricating effects. The art is considered to encompass new claim 19. See figures, including those included in claims (particularly claim 5) depicting molecules attached to functional groups that would meet and /pr render obvious the claimed molecular structure. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 1/20/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The 112 has been overcome by Examiner amendment. [0045] Once the interconnects are treated with the above oligomers and polymers, they also have the advantage of presenting a contact surface with a lubricity higher than present in untreated contacts, thereby reducing the rate of physical wear of the contact surfaces subject to repeated connection/disconnection cycles or long-term vibrations. It is expected that all or nearly all of the above-noted oligomers and polymers exhibit this lubricity property since the pendant moieties are hydrophobic and there is no H-bonding mechanism from which they can adhere to each other. These hydrophobic (lipophilic) interactions are very weak relative to dipolar and H-bonding interactions, and therefore the coatings do not "stick" to other surfaces [0045]. Contacts in which lubricity is important include sliding contacts in motors which are typically subject to substantial friction and wear that produces undesirable electrical noise. Lubricants often used on such contacts to reduce the wear (such as graphite and molybdenum disulfide) may have deleterious effects on conductivity because, inter alia, their surface coatings are much thicker than the coatings disclosed here, therefore they are not readily shifted away from the desired metal-to-metal mating contact areas. Other examples of contacts in which lubricity is important are make/break contacts such as are found in electrical relays. These are particularly subject to electrical and material breakdown [0046-0047] Tour. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of filing the invention to provide nanohorns in order to provide a high temperature lubricant between two surfaces at an interface as Tour teaches the connective material can have usefulness of providing lubricating effects. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DANIEL H MILLER whose telephone number is (571)272-1534. The examiner can normally be reached M-TH 9-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Veronica Ewald can be reached at 571-272-8519. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DANIEL H MILLER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1783
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 06, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 06, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jun 20, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 20, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Jan 07, 2026
Interview Requested
Jan 14, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jan 14, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 20, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 27, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 17, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594579
ENVIRONMENTAL BARRIER COATING AND METHOD OF REPAIRING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12577023
Recyclable paper packaging with high barrier to water vapor and oxygen
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12571129
TWO-DIMENSIONAL VERTICAL COMPOSITE LAMINATE INCLUDING GRAPHENE AND HEXAGONAL BORON NITRIDE AND METHOD OF FABRICATING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12540105
HIGH TEMPERATURE COATINGS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12534639
MICHAEL ADDITION CURABLE COMPOSITION, COATING COMPOSITION CONTAINING THE SAME, AND COATED ARTICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
53%
Grant Probability
73%
With Interview (+19.3%)
4y 2m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 687 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month