Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/248,279

AIR BLOWING DEVICE AND AIR-CONDITIONED CLOTHING

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Apr 07, 2023
Examiner
SANKS, SCHYLER S
Art Unit
2129
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Kabushiki Kaisha Acb
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allow Rate
362 granted / 501 resolved
+17.3% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
541
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.6%
-37.4% vs TC avg
§103
46.7%
+6.7% vs TC avg
§102
17.1%
-22.9% vs TC avg
§112
32.2%
-7.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 501 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election of Group 2, claims 2 and 5 in the reply filed on 12/23/2025 is acknowledged. Because applicant did not distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the restriction requirement, the election has been treated as an election without traverse (MPEP § 818.01(a)). Claims 1, 3, and 8-13 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 12/23/2025. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 2 and 5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Ichigaya (WO2017006481A1). Regarding claim 1, Ichigaya teaches an air blowing device that is attachable to air-conditioned clothing having an insertion hole(Figure 1B, 20, 40, 50 also see Figures 8A-C), comprising: an air blowing unit that can be disposed on an inner side of the air-conditioned clothing (Figure 8A-C: 22, 10 is the “inner garment”); a power supply unit that is configured integrally with the air blowing unit and can be disposed on the inner side of the air-conditioned clothing (Figure 1B: 40); a first fastening part that enables the air blowing unit to be fastened to the air-conditioned clothing, and can come into contact with a peripheral edge of the insertion hole from an outer side of the air-conditioned clothing (Figure 8C: part of 23 on 300); and a recess portion that is disposed on a downstream side of the first fastening part in a gas flow direction and can hold cloth at a peripheral edge of the insertion hole (Figure 8A, the shoulder of 23 on which 300 sits can be considered a “recess portion” because when constructed this portion is recessed towards 221. It is downstream from its opposite side), wherein the recess portion comes into contact with cloth at a lower end of the insertion hole when attached to the air-conditioned clothing, and a size in a width direction is set to be larger than a thickness of the cloth (Figure 8A: the diameter of 23, which can be considered a size in a width direction, is larger than 300 is thick in the axial direction of the fan). Regarding claim 5, Ichigaya teaches all of the limitations of claim 2, wherein the power supply unit is configured to be freely attachable to and detachable from the air blowing unit (“In addition, the power supply cable 50 that connects the power supply device 40 and the two fan main bodies 20 may be inserted with the terminal on the power supply device 40 side and the terminal on the fan main body 20 side misplaced, and a load is applied to the power supply cable 50. Can cause disconnection. Therefore, the positive electrode of the plug on the side connected to the power supply device 40 of the power cable 50 is connected to the negative electrode of the plug on the side connected to the fan body 20, and the plug on the side connected to the power supply device 40 is connected. The negative electrode is connected to the positive electrode of the plug on the side connected to the fan body 20. In the case of such a connection (so-called cross cable), when the plug on the side connected to the fan body 20 is mistakenly connected to the power supply device 40, one of the remaining two plugs has a reverse polarity. Thus, the fan main body 20 rotates in the reverse direction, and air is exhausted from the inside of the integrated air-conditioning garment, so that the user can notice an incorrect connection of the power cable 50.”). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SCHYLER S SANKS whose telephone number is (571)272-6125. The examiner can normally be reached 06:30 - 15:30 Central Time, M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Huntley can be reached at (303) 297-4307. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SCHYLER S SANKS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2129
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 07, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 23, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602588
NEURAL NETWORK MODEL OPTIMIZATION METHOD BASED ON ANNEALING PROCESS FOR STAINLESS STEEL ULTRA-THIN STRIP
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12578694
INTELLIGENT MONITORING METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ABNORMAL WORKING CONDITIONS IN HEAVY METAL WASTEWATER TREATMENT PROCESS BASED ON TRANSFER LEARNING AND STORAGE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12578103
HUMIDIFIER FOR PREVENTING POLLUTION OF HUMIDIFYING WATER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12571549
DESICCANT ENHANCED EVAPORATIVE COOLING SYSTEMS AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12553629
HEAT PUMP AND METHOD FOR INSTALLING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+15.9%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 501 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month