Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 18/248,318

AEROSOL PROVISION DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Apr 07, 2023
Priority
Oct 16, 2020 — GB 2016481.0 +1 more
Examiner
EFTA, ALEX B
Art Unit
1745
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Nicoventures Trading Limited
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allowance Rate
452 granted / 760 resolved
-5.5% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+25.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
809
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
57.5%
+17.5% vs TC avg
§102
9.3%
-30.7% vs TC avg
§112
26.3%
-13.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 760 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 6/25/2026 has been entered. Response to Amendment Amendment filed 6/25/2026 has been entered and fully considered. Claims 1-8, 10, 11, 14-16, 19-21, 23, 25, 26, 28, 29, 33 and 34 are pending. Claims 9, 12, 13, 17, 18, 22, 24, 27, 30 and 31 are cancelled. Claims 1 and 34 are amended. No new matter is added. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see REMARKS, filed 6/25/2026, with respect to claims 1 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The rejection of the claims have been withdrawn. Applicant argues that the cited art is designed to only have the receptacle removed upon disassembly of the device, and not while in use. Examiner agrees. The rejection over claim 1 is withdrawn. Applicant's arguments filed 6/25/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Examiner notes that claim 34 does not include all of the features recited in claim 1. Specifically, claim 34 does not require that the enclosed channels are at least partially received within the device chamber. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 34 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over PLOJOUX et al. (WO 2013/102609 A2) in view of MIRONOV et al. (US 2020/0236999). With respect to claim 34, PLOJOUX et al. discloses an aerosol generating device (Abstract) comprising a removable insert, 40, comprising a receptacle, 22, defining a heating chamber arrangement to removably receive an aerosol generating material, and is capable of being placed into and removed from a chamber of the device (Figures 3-5; Page 14, lines 1-37; Page 9, lines 1-30). While PLOJOUX et al. discloses that the insert, 40, may be removed after use, the insert does not appear to require disassembly of the device to be removed from the device chamber. Thus, removal “during use” appear to be a capability of the device. The insert comprises an opening at a proximal end (Figures 3 and 4) and a base (having 30 and 46) at a distal end (Figures 4 and 5) and a wall arrangement (having 42, 48 and 44) (Figure 5). Within the wall arrangement is an enclosed channel, 28b (Figures 4 and 5; Page 14, lines 15-25) defined within the wall arrangement to provide airflow along the wall arrangement (Figure 4). The aerosol generating device comprises a heater, 14 (Page 14, lines 10-20). PLOJOUX et al. does not explicitly disclose that the insert itself comprises the heating element. MIRONOV et al. discloses an aerosol generating device with a detachable heating compartment (Abstract; Title; Paragraph [0021] and [0022]). The removable heating compartment comprises the heater element, 14, as well (Paragraphs [0048]-[0049]; Figure 1), instead of having the heater attached to device (Paragraph [0055]). Having the heating element attached to the heating compartment allows for the heating element to be easily cleaned (Paragraph [0007]). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art, prior to the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to provide the heating element of PLOJOUX et al. attached to the insert of MIRONOV et al. so that the heating element can be easily cleaned. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-8, 10, 11, 14-16, 19-21, 23, 25, 26, 28, 29 and 33 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: COUNTS ‘978 discloses that the housing portions, 33 and 35, are removable (Column 4, lines 50-68; Column 5, lines 1-20) and thus, the heater element and its receptacle are removable as well. However, upon removing the two housing components from each other, it does not appear that the device could still be considered “during use” as claimed, per se. Having a removable receptacle that is capable of being removed during use is generally known. PLOJOUX et al. (WO 2013/102609 A2) and MAHLER et al. (US 2018/0049472) disclose such a feature. As seen in MAHLER et al., the aerosol generating device (Abstract) comprises an extractor, 130, (Paragraph [0071]; Figures 3 and 4) that is configured to be removed from the device (Paragraph [0074]). This extractor fits within a device chamber (Paragraph [0068]; Figure 1) and the extractor itself comprises a base, 137, and a wall, 131, arrangement extending from the base (Paragraph [0071]). The base and wall arrangement define a heating chamber, 35, (Paragraph [0073; Figures 5 and 6) and are arranged to removably receive at least a portion an article comprising aerosol generating material (Paragraph [0076]; Figures 7 and 8). The device further comprises a heating element, 110, for hearting the article (Paragraphs [0076], [0077]) when in the chamber and the removable receptacle has a closed channel, 171 (Paragraphs [0072] and [0073]). However, this closed channel is located entirely within the base of the removable receptacle, and not the wall arrangement, as claimed. While MAHLER et al. appears to show structures, 151 and 153, that could act as an air channel between the wall arrangement and device chamber (Figures 3-6) these channels are not closed channels, per se. PLOJOUX et al. discloses a similar device (Abstract; Summary) to that of MAHLER et al. in that a removable extractor is provided in a device chamber (Page 4, lines 30-36; Page 5, lines 1-5). The removable extractor comprises a base (at 30 and 46) and a wall arrangement (42 and 44) (Page 14, lines 7-35; Figure 5). The wall arrangement includes air channels, 26 and 28b, within the wall arrangement that appear to be enclosed (Figures 3-5). However, as seen in figure 4, the enclosed channels, 28b, are within the portion of the wall arrangement that is not received within the device chamber, as is required by the claims. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALEX B EFTA whose telephone number is (313)446-6548. The examiner can normally be reached 8AM-5PM EST M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Philip Tucker can be reached at 571-272-1095. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALEX B EFTA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1745
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 07, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 04, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Dec 04, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 25, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jun 25, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 27, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12686639
CERAMIC, VAPORIZATION CORE, AND VAPORIZER
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12677877
SMOKING SUBSTITUTE DEVICE
4y 2m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12642300
VAPORIZATION CORE, VAPORIZER, AND ELECTRONIC VAPORIZATION DEVICE
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12617195
METHOD AND INSTALLATION FOR MANUFACTURING A FLOOR COVERING PRODUCT AND FLOOR COVERING PRODUCT OBTAINED HEREBY
5y 3m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12616245
HEATING ELEMENT HAVING HEAT CONDUCTIVE AND WICKING FILAMENTS
3y 9m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+25.4%)
3y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 760 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month