Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 24, 2026
Application No. 18/248,862

POLYMER-CONJUGATED MICROBUBBLES FOR HIGH DRUG/GENE LOADING

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Apr 12, 2023
Priority
Oct 13, 2020 — provisional 63/091,204 +1 more
Examiner
TIEN, LUCY MINYU
Art Unit
1612
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Board of Regents of the University of Texas System
OA Round
2 (Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allowance Rate
52 granted / 88 resolved
-0.9% vs TC avg
Strong +37% interview lift
Without
With
+36.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
140
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
47.3%
+7.3% vs TC avg
§102
6.2%
-33.8% vs TC avg
§112
25.7%
-14.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 88 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1, 15-22, 25-28, and 30-34 are examined; claims 40, 42, 43, 46, 65, 70, 72, 77, 82, 84, 85, 88, and 96 are withdrawn pursuant to Applicant’s election with traverse on 17 February 2026. Applicant’s arguments, filed 16 July 2026, have been fully considered. Rejections and/or objections not reiterated from previous office actions are hereby withdrawn. The following rejections and/or objections are either reiterated or newly applied. They constitute the complete set presently being applied to the instant application. Claim Objections Claim 1 is objected to because of the following informalities: “comprise” in line 3 should be recited as --- comprises ---. Appropriate correction is required. Response to Arguments The objection above is maintained since claim 1 still contains the grammatical inconsistent terminology. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 1, 15-22, 25-28, and 30-34 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Bettinger et al. (US 2009/0041833 A1) (hereinafter Bettinger). Regarding claims 1, 17-19, Bettinger discloses gas-filled microcapsules comprising a bioactive agent ([0001]) having a polymeric and/or lipid shell/envelope ([0007]), wherein the bioactive agent is incorporated in a carrier preferably comprising a positively charged (i.e. cationic) lipid or polymer ([0014]). The cationic lipids include ethyl-DSPC ([0066]) and dioctadecylamidoglycyl spermine (DOGS), 2-3-dioleyloxy-N-(2(sperminecarboxyamido)ethyl)-N,N-dimethyl-1-propanaminium trifluoroacetate (DOSPA), or dipalmitoyl phosphatidyl-ethanolamidospermine (DPPES) ([0067]). Together these would provide a microbubble composition as instantly claimed. The prior art is not anticipatory insofar as this combination must be selected from various lists/locations in the reference. It would have been obvious, however, to make the combination since all the claimed elements were known in the prior art and one skilled in the art could have combined the elements as claimed by known methods with no change in their respective functions, and the combination yielded nothing more than predictable results to one of ordinary skill in the art. See MPEP § 2143 (I)(A). Regarding claim 1 reciting wherein a plurality of spermine molecules are coupled to an external surface of the surfactant shell, as noted by p. 2, lines 12-18 of the instant Specification, the plurality of spermine molecules may be coupled, covalently or non-covalently, and directly or indirectly, to the external surface of each microbubble. Accordingly, the DOGS or DOSPA of Bettinger, being spermine-based cationic lipids, or lipospermines, comprising a spermine molecule, glycyl/amido or carboxamido group as the linker, respectively, and a hydrophobic tail as anchor, under the broadest reasonable interpretation, reasonably appear to meet the limitation of a plurality of spermine molecules “coupled” to an external surface of the surfactant shell as instantly claimed. Regarding claims 15 and 16, Bettinger further discloses wherein the gas may comprise fluorinated gases including perfluorocarbons such as perfluorobutane (i.e. decafluorobutane) ([0054]-[0056]). Regarding claim 20, Bettinger further discloses wherein the cationic lipids may also be formulated in combination with PEG-modified phosphatidylethanolamines ([0069]). Regarding claims 21-22, Bettinger further discloses wherein the carrier may further comprise a targeting ligand ([0015]). The targeting ligand can be linked to a molecule of the carrier through a reactive moiety including maleimides ([0088]). Thus, Bettinger reasonably appears to disclose a plurality of reactive groups, such as maleimides, linked to a molecule of the carrier, which is on the external surface of the shell. Regarding claims 25-28, Bettinger further discloses wherein the bioactive agent includes proteins ([0028]) and genetic materials such as DNA ([0061]). Regarding claims 30-31, Bettinger further discloses wherein suitable targeting ligands include antibodies ([0085]). Regarding claims 32-34, Bettinger further discloses wherein an exemplary average diameter suitable for microcapsules include about 3 µm ([0126]). Accordingly, the claimed ranges (i.e. about 1-10 µm, about 1-5 µm, and about 3 µm, respectively) would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art since they overlap with the ranges of the prior art (i.e. about 3 µm). In the case where the claimed ranges "overlap or lie inside ranges disclosed by the prior art" a prima facie case of obviousness exists. See MPEP § 2144.05(I). Response to Arguments Applicant mainly asserts in the Remarks filed 16 July 2026 that Bettinger does not disclose or suggest wherein DOGS is coupled to the external surface of the microcapsule shell, and it does not disclose that DOGS provides a plurality of spermine molecules coupled to the external surface of the surfactant shell of each gas-filled microcapsule. Applicant further asserts that the instant claims use spermine molecules coupled to the microbubble surface to provide a spermine-decorated microbubble capable of associating with payload molecules, and Bettinger emphasizes that a bioactive agent is preferably substantially unbound and thus one of ordinary skill in the art would not have modified the microcapsule shell to present a plurality of spermine molecules coupled to the external shell surface with a reasonable expectation of success. The Examiner does not find Applicant’s assertion to be persuasive. As noted by p. 2, lines 12-18 of the instant Specification, the plurality of spermine molecules may be coupled, covalently or non-covalently, and directly or indirectly, to the external surface of each microbubble. Therefore, the instant claims as amended do not limit a specific molecule to facilitate the coupling. As such, the DOGS or DOSPA of Bettinger, being spermine-based cationic lipids, or lipospermines, comprising a spermine molecule, glycyl/amido or carboxamido group as the linker, respectively, and a hydrophobic tail as anchor, under the broadest reasonable interpretation, reasonably appear to meet the limitation of a plurality of spermine molecules “coupled” to an external surface of the surfactant shell as instantly claimed. In response to applicant's argument regarding the association of payload molecules with the microbubbles, it is noted that Applicant agrees Bettinger defines “substantially unbound” as more than 50%. As such, Bettinger does not limit the bioactive agent to unbound molecules. Thus, it reasonably appears the microcapsules of Bettinger are capable of associating with the bioactive agent. Moreover, as noted by p. 11, lines 1-2 of the instant Specification, the payload molecule may be electrostatically bound. Accordingly, absent explicit recitation to the contrary, it reasonably appears the microcapsules of Bettinger reasonably appear to meet the limitation of associating with a plurality of payload molecules as instantly claimed. As such, Applicant’s assertion is unpersuasive. Response to Arguments of Non-Statutory Double Patenting Applicant mainly asserts in the copending Application No. 18/554,944 has a later effective filing date and that provisional nonstatutory double patenting rejection should be withdrawn if the present application is otherwise in condition for allowance, consistent with the procedure set forth in MPEP § 804(I)(B)(1). Although the Examiner does not find the allegation of patentability to be persuasive, nevertheless the nonstatutory double patenting rejection has been withdrawn upon consideration of the effective filing date of the copending Application. Citation of State of the Art and Pertinent Prior Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Unger (US 2002/0159952 A1, 10/31/2002), directed to targeted therapeutic delivery systems comprising a gas or gaseous precursor filled microsphere comprising an oil, a surfactant, and a therapeutic compound. Joyce (US 2004/0180094 A1, 09/16/2004), directed to compositions and method for therapeutic treatment comprising a gas-filled encapsulation vesicle, an activation agent, and an optional targeting ligand. Khorsandi et al. (“Development of novel polyplex-conjugated microbubbles as vectors for gene delivery”, Spring 2020, IDS reference 02/17/2026), directed to polyplex-conjugated microbubbles utilizing spermine-conjugated dextran as a non-toxic polymer to complex DNA. Zhou et al. (US 2019/0247515 A1, 08/15/2019, IDS reference of 04/12/2023), directed to DNA-targeted nanocarriers in the form of microbubbles. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LUCY TIEN whose telephone number is (571)272-8267. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday 8:30 AM - 6:30 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, SAHANA KAUP can be reached at (571) 272-6897. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LUCY M TIEN/Examiner, Art Unit 1612 /SAHANA S KAUP/Supervisory Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1612
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 12, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 16, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Jul 16, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 16, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12766098
A SOLID CO-AMORPHOUS DISPERSION OF VALSARTAN, A METHOD FOR SYNTHETIZING THE SAME AND A MEDICAL USE OF THE DISPERSION
3y 11m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12758494
ORAL POLYPEPTIDE FORMULATIONS
3y 3m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12758579
THERAPEUTIC METHOD OF USING A VETERINARY COMPOSITION TO PREVENT THE ONSET OF HORSE COLIC
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 13, 2026
Patent 12648914
INJECTABLE SUSTAINED RELEASE COMPOSITION AND METHOD OF USING THE SAME FOR TREATING INFLAMMATION IN JOINTS AND PAIN ASSOCIATED THEREWITH
4y 6m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12558321
Pharmaceutical Formulation
4y 10m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+36.8%)
2y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 88 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month