Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/249,453

Nozzle for Spraying Substances and Method for the Open-Loop or Closed-Loop Control of the Nozzle

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Apr 18, 2023
Examiner
KIM, CHRISTOPHER S
Art Unit
3752
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Glatt Gesellschaft Mit Beschränkter Haftung
OA Round
2 (Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 4m
To Grant
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allow Rate
705 granted / 1118 resolved
-6.9% vs TC avg
Strong +21% interview lift
Without
With
+21.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
1164
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
22.6%
-17.4% vs TC avg
§102
33.8%
-6.2% vs TC avg
§112
38.3%
-1.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1118 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. The response filed on November 26, 2025 is acknowledged. Election/Restrictions Applicant elected without traverse Group I in the reply filed on August 21, 2025. Applicant elected with traverse Species B (figure 3) in the reply filed on August 21, 2025. The requirement was still deemed proper and was therefore made FINAL in the Office action mailed on August 28, 2025. Claims 4, 8 and 14 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected species, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on August 21, 2025. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 Claim(s) 1-3, 5-7, 11, 13 and 15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Toda et al. (4,638,945). Toda et al. disclose a nozzle comprising: a nozzle body 1, 2, 4, 9 having a longitudinal axis, wherein the nozzle body has an inner tube 1, 9 connected to a feed for a substance to be sprayed and equipped with an inner tube channel (channel of inlet 9 and tube 1) comprising an inner tube channel inner wall (wall of inlet 9 and tube 1) and an inner tube channel cross-section having an inner tube channel cross-sectional area, and with an inner tube discharge opening (outlet opening of tube 1) having an inner tube discharge opening area, and an outer tube 2 surrounding the inner tube and connected to a feed 4a for a gas, comprising an outer tube discharge opening (downstream outlet of tube 2) having an outer tube discharge opening area, wherein an annular gap (conical annular gap between tubes 1 and 2 at the flange portion 2a and the current passage/gap between tubes 1 and 2 when tube 2 is press widened and tube 1 is press contracted, col. 2, ll. 54-58) exists between the inner tube and the outer tube, wherein the gas flows through the annular gap to the outer tube discharge opening, and wherein the inner tube discharge opening and the outer tube discharge opening together form a nozzle tip (downstream end/tip of tubes 1 and 2), wherein a constriction (contraction of tube 1, col. 2, ll. 53-57, or ring-like grooves, col. 3, ll. 2-4) is provided in the inner tube channel carrying the substance to be sprayed at a distance from the inner tube discharge opening, and wherein the inner tube channel cross-sectional area is smaller in the constriction than the inner tube channel cross-section area between the constriction and the inner tube discharge opening; wherein the constriction is a section of the inner tube channel having a constriction length (length of the constriction); wherein the inner tube channel cross-sectional area (cross sectional area of each constriction or each ring-like groove) is constant along the constriction length; wherein the constriction has a constriction discharge opening (opening at the downstream end of the contraction), wherein the inner tube channel cross-section area widens in a flow direction of the substance to be sprayed along a constriction flowing-out length; wherein the inner tube and the outer tube are arranged coaxially around the longitudinal axis; wherein the inner tube and the outer tube are arranged relative to one another in such a way that the inner tube discharge opening is concentric with the outer tube discharge opening; wherein the constriction is formed from a flexible material; wherein a fluid chamber 11 for receiving and discharging fluid and having a chamber volume is provided in and/or at the flexible material, so that the inner tube channel cross-sectional area can be adjusted in the constriction; wherein the inner tube is of multi-part (parts 1 and 9) design. Claim(s) 1-3, 5-7 and 15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Tanaka et al. (5,447,567). Although not required by the claim, even if an annular gap is required at all times along the entire length, Tanaka et al. disclose a nozzle comprising: a nozzle body (body of nozzle 2) having a longitudinal axis, wherein the nozzle body has an inner tube 3 connected to a feed for a substance to be sprayed and equipped with an inner tube channel 4 comprising an inner tube channel inner wall 4a, 4b, 4c and an inner tube channel cross-section having an inner tube channel cross-sectional area, and with an inner tube discharge opening (outlet opening of path 4) having an inner tube discharge opening area, and an outer tube (outer tube of path 6) surrounding the inner tube and connected to a feed for a gas, comprising an outer tube discharge opening (downstream outlet of path 6) having an outer tube discharge opening area, wherein an annular gap 6, 6a exists between the inner tube and the outer tube, wherein the gas flows through the annular gap to the outer tube discharge opening, and wherein the inner tube discharge opening and the outer tube discharge opening together form a nozzle tip (downstream end/tip of nozzle 2), wherein a constriction 4b is provided in the inner tube channel carrying the substance to be sprayed at a distance from the inner tube discharge opening, and wherein the inner tube channel cross-sectional area is smaller in the constriction than the inner tube channel cross-section area between the constriction and the inner tube discharge opening; wherein the constriction is a section of the inner tube channel having a constriction length (length of portion 4b); wherein the inner tube channel cross-sectional area (cross sectional area of portion 4b) is constant along the constriction length; wherein the constriction has a constriction discharge opening (opening at the downstream end of portion 4b), wherein the inner tube channel cross-section area widens in a flow direction of the substance to be sprayed along a constriction flowing-out length; wherein the inner tube and the outer tube are arranged coaxially around the longitudinal axis; wherein the inner tube and the outer tube are arranged relative to one another in such a way that the inner tube discharge opening is concentric with the outer tube discharge opening; wherein the inner tube is of multi-part (parts 4a, 4b, 4c) design. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed November 26, 2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues that Toda does not teach a constriction. Toda discloses that tube 1 is press contracted. The contraction that produces the vibration is inherently smaller in cross section than when the tube is relaxed. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTOPHER S KIM whose telephone number is (571)272-4905. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30-3:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Arthur O Hall can be reached at (571) 270-1814. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTOPHER S KIM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3752 CHRISTOPHER S. KIM Examiner Art Unit 3752 CK
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 18, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 26, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Nov 26, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 15, 2026
Final Rejection — §102
Apr 08, 2026
Interview Requested
Apr 15, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 15, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599730
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR A FLUID DISPERSAL CARTRIDGE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594565
SPRAY GUN WITH ADJUSTABLE ATOMIZER AND REMOVABLE NOZZLE BODY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589399
WATER DISCHARGE DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12551741
RIDGE SEAL FOR FIRE SPRINKLER
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12544785
APPARATUS FOR PRODUCING RECONFIGURABLE WALLS OF WATER
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+21.2%)
3y 4m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1118 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month