Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 18/250,022

MEETING AN ERROR VECTOR MAGNITUDE REQUIREMENT

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Apr 21, 2023
Priority
Oct 23, 2020 — provisional 63/105,012 +1 more
Examiner
STEINER, STEPHEN NICHOLAS
Art Unit
2464
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Lenovo (United States) Inc.
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
237 granted / 322 resolved
+15.6% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
10 currently pending
Career history
333
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.2%
-34.8% vs TC avg
§103
50.7%
+10.7% vs TC avg
§102
17.4%
-22.6% vs TC avg
§112
24.5%
-15.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 322 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority The present application is a national stage entry of PCT/IB2021/059788 filed 10/23/2021. Response to Arguments/Amendments Regarding the Applicant’s statements about the support for the newly amended claims, the Applicant’s citations do not appear to show the newly amended claim limitations, and are therefore unpersuasive. See section 4 below for further details. EXAMINER’S NOTE The previous claim set in this case was allowed. However, the current claim set has been amended to introduce new matter. The claims are rejected for that reason (see section 4 below), but are not otherwise rejected under the prior art. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. 4. Claims 1 – 2, 4 – 7, 9 – 12, 14 - 19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. The independent claims contain an equation that has been amended from: a = 2 / ( 1   +   ρ ω c ) E V M R e q (m) to: a = 2 / ( 1   +   ρ ω c ) The Examiner notes that these are two different equations, and produce two different values. Using the latter equation would produce a meaningfully different invention than the former. The relevant paragraphs in the original disclosure, paragraphs [0145 – 0152], seem to disclose only the former value for a. It is not clear to the Examiner that the inventor had possession of an invention using the latter value for a at the time of invention. The claims are therefore rejected. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 20170288838 A1 - Cariou - EVM Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEPHEN STEINER whose telephone number is (571)272-9825. The examiner can normally be reached M - R 08:00 - 16:00; F 08:00 - 12:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ricky Ngo can be reached at 5712723139. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /S.S./Examiner, Art Unit 2464 /RICKY Q NGO/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2464
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Sep 09, 2025
Interview Requested
Sep 24, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 25, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Oct 30, 2025
Response Filed
Apr 23, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 14, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 21, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 11, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707239
ONE-SHOT TRANSMISSION FOR V2X MESSAGING
3y 12m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12696311
Flexible Resource Partitioning for Multi-Hop IAB on Unlicensed Spectrum Band
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12689421
REDUCED COMPLEXITY IN UPLINK RECEIVE BEAMFORMER CALCULATIONS
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12684370
MANAGING BEAM COVERAGE AREA REPRESENTATIONS IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12665640
CHANNEL STATE INFORMATION REPORTING FOR PARTIAL BANDS
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+15.7%)
2y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 322 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month