Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 15, 2026
Application No. 18/250,798

ARYL DERIVATIVES FOR TREATING TRPM3 MEDIATED DISORDERS

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Apr 27, 2023
Priority
Nov 24, 2020 — EU 20209570.9 +1 more
Examiner
SHIM, DAVID M.
Art Unit
1626
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven
OA Round
2 (Final)
58%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 58% of resolved cases
58%
Career Allowance Rate
51 granted / 88 resolved
-2.0% vs TC avg
Strong +56% interview lift
Without
With
+55.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
62 currently pending
Career history
126
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
59.1%
+19.1% vs TC avg
§102
13.1%
-26.9% vs TC avg
§112
19.7%
-20.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 88 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Claims 1, 3-6, 8 and 10-17 are pending in the application. Claims 1, 5, 6, 8 and 10-14 are rejected. Claims 3, 4 and 15-17 are withdrawn. Restriction/Election As per MPEP § 803.02(III), the examiner will determine whether the entire scope of the claims is patentable. As indicated in the Nonfinal Rejection mailed on December 16, 2025, Applicant’s elected species (reproduced below) appears to be free of the prior art. PNG media_image1.png 146 260 media_image1.png Greyscale Since the elected species was found allowable over the prior art, the examination of the Markush claim was previously extended to cover the following non-elected species or group of species that falls within the scope of a proper Markush grouping which includes the elected species: PNG media_image2.png 379 722 media_image2.png Greyscale . In view of Applicant’s amendments to the claims filed on March 16, 2026, the prior art search has been further extended to include the following non-elected species which is encompassed by variable definitions of the instantly claimed compound of formula (I) as discussed below in the newly applied rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 102: PNG media_image3.png 221 457 media_image3.png Greyscale . The prior art search will not be extended unnecessarily to cover all nonelected species, and need not be extended beyond a proper Markush grouping. See MPEP § 803.02(III). Response to Amendments Objections and rejections made in the Office Action mailed December 16, 2025 that do not appear below have been overcome by Applicant’s amendments to the claims and have been withdrawn. Response to Arguments - 35 USC § 112(b) In reply, Applicant traverses the claim rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 112(b) as presented in the Nonfinal Rejection mailed December 16, 2025. The rejections are rendered moot by Applicant’s amendment, filed on March 16, 2026, and the rejections are hereby withdrawn. Response to Arguments - 35 USC § 112(d) In reply, Applicant traverses the claim rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 112(d) as presented in the Nonfinal Rejection mailed December 16, 2025. The rejection is rendered moot by Applicant’s amendment, filed on March 16, 2026, and the rejection is hereby withdrawn. Response to Arguments - 35 USC § 102 In reply, Applicant traverses the claim rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as presented in the Nonfinal Rejection mailed December 16, 2025. The rejections are rendered moot by Applicant’s amendment, filed on March 16, 2026, and the rejections are hereby withdrawn. The newly applied 35 U.S.C. § 102 rejection of claims 1, 5, 6, 8 and 10-14 has been necessitated by Applicant’s amendment filed on March 16, 2026. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. § 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 5, 6, 8 and 10-14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by CAS Registry No. 1329890-48-3 (entered STN on September 8, 2011). CAS Registry No. 1329890-48-3 corresponds to the following chemical structure: PNG media_image3.png 221 457 media_image3.png Greyscale . Regarding instant claims 1, 5, 6, 8 and 10-12, the above prior art compound is encompassed by the instantly claimed compound of formula (I), wherein T is O; U is -CR5R5’-, further wherein R5 and R5’ each represent -RY and RY is H; R1 is -RW further wherein RW is -C1-alkyl, saturated, unsubstituted; Q is -NR3R4; R3 is H; R4 is -C1-alkylene-(5-14-membered heteroaryl), further wherein the 5-14-membered heteroaryl is 3-pyridine; R6, R7 and R8 are independently -RW, further wherein RW is H in each case; and R9, R10, R11, R12 and R13 are each -RY, further wherein RY is H in each case. Regarding instant claim 13, the above prior art compound reads on “Cpd 100” (reproduced below) as recited in the claim. PNG media_image4.png 27 726 media_image4.png Greyscale Regarding instant claim 14, CAS Registry No. 1329890-48-3 teaches the above prior art compound in unbuffered water which meets the requirements of a “pharmaceutical composition” as recited in the claim. See e.g., page 2. Conclusion No claims are allowed. Applicant’s amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DAVID SHIM whose telephone number is (571)270-1205. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 9 AM - 5 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, RENEE CLAYTOR can be reached at (571)272-8394. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /D.M.S./Examiner, Art Unit 1626 /REBECCA L ANDERSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1626
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 27, 2023
Application Filed
Dec 16, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Mar 16, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 01, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jul 13, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12673056
ORAL FORMULATION COMPRISING A CRYSTALLINE FORM OF RABEXIMOD
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12643904
RIPK1 INHIBITORS AND METHODS OF USE
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12642800
NITRIC OXIDE RELEASING PHOSPHODIESTERASE TYPE 5 INHIBITOR
2y 2m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12617807
Long lasting Opioid Reversal Using Hydrogen Peroxide-Induced Release in Blood
2y 7m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12617766
CRYSTAL FORM OF THIOPHENE DERIVATIVE AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR
2y 6m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
58%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+55.9%)
2y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 88 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month