Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/251,572

SELECTIVE RAPID DISCONNECTION OF A CHARGING DEVICE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 03, 2023
Examiner
FANTU, YALKEW
Art Unit
2859
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Siemens Aktiengesellschaft
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
862 granted / 1075 resolved
+12.2% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
1105
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
47.7%
+7.7% vs TC avg
§102
26.3%
-13.7% vs TC avg
§112
7.8%
-32.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1075 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The instant application with Application Number 18/251,572 filed on 05/03/2023 is presented for examination. As per the remarks of 05/03/2023, claims 1-10 have been cancelled, and new claims 11-21 are added. Information Disclosure Statment The Information Disclosure Statement dated 05/03/2023 is acknowledged and the cited references have been considered in this examination. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers submitted under 35 U.S.C. 119(a)-(d), which papers have been placed of record in the file. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries set forth in Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 148 USPQ 459 (1966), that are applied for establishing a background for determining obviousness under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 11-21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zheng et al. (US 2021/0237610) (Hereinafter, Zheng) in view of Bouman (US 2018/0212438). With respect to claims 11, 16 and 21, Zheng discloses a charging device/method (see Fids. 1-4), comprising: charging ports including at least a first and a second charging port (Fig. 1, 1-1…10-6), each of said charging ports being configured to establish a detachable connection to a respective electric vehicle (Para. #0042-0043: a protective ground wire between the charger and the vehicle; or disconnecting a connection confirmation signal between the charger and the vehicle); a plurality of power converters (Fig. 1, power conversion unit 1, 2 and 10; Para. #. each power conversion unit is connected to six charging terminals); a controller having control outputs (Fig. 2, Power controller; Para. # 0012); a primary switch configuration connected between said charging ports and said power converters and having control inputs connected to said control outputs of said controller (Fig. 2, switch mat is between charging port 1, and 6; and power conversion unit), said primary switch configuration being configured to connect, depending on control signals from said controller received at said control inputs (Para. #$ 0013 and 0015: The switch matrix switches the output of each group of modules in six direct-current output circuits according to the control instruction of the power controller), PNG media_image1.png 676 811 media_image1.png Greyscale a first group of said power converters with a variably selectable first number of said power converters to said first charging port and a second group of said power converters with a variably selectable second number of said power converters to said second charging port (see para. # 0017, 0018 and 0019: full power charging, average power charging and free dynamic charging; each power conversion unit is configured to output constant power to each charging terminal. Each charging terminal corresponds to one vehicle); PNG media_image2.png 589 822 media_image2.png Greyscale said controller configured to provide the control signals according to a respective performance requirement for said charging ports, said controller further configured to check a rapid disconnection condition for each of said charging ports, to identify a causative charging port from among said first and second charging port in a case of a positive test result in relation to the rapid disconnection condition (Para. # 0042: The charging controller controls a charger to stop charging and controls the low-voltage auxiliary power supply relay and the high-voltage direct-current contactor on the direct-current output circuit bus to be disconnected within 100 ms when one of the following cases occurs during charging: a failure that the charger is incapable of continuing charging; triggering an emergency stop switch action; disconnecting a protective ground wire between the charger and), and to disconnect said first group of said power converters and use said second group of said power converters (Para. # 0048: monitoring module is configured to determine whether each closing and disconnection action state of the high-voltage direct-current contactor of the switch matrix is consistent with a control command of the charging controller and terminate charging in a case where each closing and disconnection action state of the high-voltage direct-current contactor of the switch matrix is inconsistent with the control command of the charging controller). Zheng, does not expressly disclose disconnecting said first group power converters from charging port with issues and leave said second group (or other groups) switched on. Bouman, on the other hand, discloses disconnecting said first group power converters from charging port with issues (such as malfunction) and leave said second group (or other groups) switched on. PNG media_image3.png 510 764 media_image3.png Greyscale (See Para. # 0071: charging system wherein a plurality of power converters are connected with charge ports by a switched connection matrix. By using a switched connection matrix multiple electric vehicles can be charged simultaneously, without the need of extra converters, and the controller can decide to switch off each of the converter modules or charging ports in case of malfunctions as also shown in Fig. 7 above). ZHENG and Bouman are analogous art because they are from the same field of endeavor namely Intelligent electric vehicle charging system and charging system for electric vehicle. At the time of the invention, it would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person of ordinary skill in the art to have added a controller for power converter charging electric vehicle with full control capability to switch off each of the converter module or charging ports in case found defective in order to efficiently use battery charging capacity for optimal use and operates the recharge process of the power converters and charging ports who are in good stand excluding the defective part of the multiple power converter system to the intelligent electric vehicle charging station of Zhen in view of Bouman. With respect to claim 12, the combined references of Zheng and Bouman disclose the charging device as described above, further Zhen discloses wherein said controller is configured to check for a presence of a state or state change that is impermissible according to a charging protocol, an overshoot of a threshold temperature, or an unexpected state change of a charging plug locking mechanism for each of said charging port as the rapid disconnection condition (Para. # 0026, 0041 and 0042: disconnected within 100 ms when one of the following cases occurs during charging: a failure that the charger is incapable of continuing charging; triggering an emergency stop switch action; disconnecting a protective ground wire between the charger and the vehicle; or disconnecting a connection confirmation signal between the charger and the vehicle). With respect to claim 13, the combined references of Zheng and Bouman disclose the charging device as described above, further Zhen discloses wherein said power converters have supply inputs; further comprising a power supply connection of the charging device; further comprising main switches connected between said power supply connection of said charging device and said supply inputs of said power converters; and wherein said controller is configured to keep said main switches closed in a case of the positive test result in relation to the rapid disconnection condition (Para. # 0048: the switch matrix is consistent with a control command of the charging controller and terminate charging in a case where each closing and disconnection action state of the high-voltage direct-current contactor of the switch matrix is inconsistent with the control command of the charging controller). With respect to claims 14 and 15, the combined references of Zheng and Bouman disclose the charging device as described above, further Zhen discloses wherein: said charging ports having output switches; and said controller is configured to check for an emergency disconnection condition, and to disconnect all of said power converters in a case of a positive test result in relation to the emergency disconnection condition and to isolate said charging ports by opening said output switches after a waiting time has elapsed (Para. 0042: a failure that the charger is incapable of continuing charging; triggering an emergency stop switch action; disconnecting a protective ground wire between the charger and the vehicle). With respect to claim 17, the combined references of Zheng and Bouman disclose the charging device as described above, further Bouman discloses wherein said controller is configured to output the rapid disconnection signal to all of said inputs of said secondary switch configuration in a case of a positive test result in relation to an emergency disconnection condition (Para. 0071: a switched connection matrix multiple electric vehicles can be charged simultaneously, without the need of extra converters, and the controller can decide to switch off each of the converter modules or charging ports in case of malfunctions). With respect to claim 18, the combined references of Zheng and Bouman disclose the charging device as described above, further Zhen discloses the charging device is configured to output a direct current at said charging ports (Para. # 0041). With respect to claim 19, the combined references of Zheng and Bouman disclose the charging device as described above, further Zhen discloses wherein said power converters are configured to convert an alternating current into a direct current (Para. # 00011: Referring to FIG. 2, the charger includes one power conversion unit and six charging terminals, where the power conversion unit includes an alternating-current power distribution module, 12 rectification modules, a switch matrix and a power controller). With respect to claim 20, the combined references of Zheng and Bouman disclose the charging device as described above, further Zhen discloses further comprising a door; further comprising an emergency disconnection button; and wherein the emergency disconnection condition is an opening of said door of the charging device or an activation of said emergency disconnection button of the charging device (Para. # 0010 and 0042: The station-level monitoring system includes a charging monitoring cabinet and a charging monitoring operator station. The charging monitoring cabinet is disposed in the charging box; and during charging: a failure that the charger is incapable of continuing charging; triggering an emergency stop switch action; disconnecting a protective ground wire between the charger and the vehicle). Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to YALKEW FANTU whose telephone number is (571)272-8928. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7:00AM-4:00PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, DREW A DUNN can be reached at 571-272-2312. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /YALKEW FANTU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2859
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 03, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597868
THREE-PHASE SYNCHRONOUS RECTIFIER FOR CHARGING A BATTERY ON BOARD THE VEHICLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597793
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROLONGING THE LIFE OF A BATTERY THAT IS ELECTRICALLY COUPLED TO A LOAD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597790
WIRELESS CHARING SYSTEM FOR WEARABLE RING WITH LED ACTIVITY INDICATORS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589707
VEHICLE CONTROL UNIT AND VEHICLE CONTROL SYSTEM WITH CONTROL UNIT CONFIGURED TO SELECTIVELY SUPPLY POWER TO A LOAD
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582173
AEROSOL GENERATING DEVICE INCLUDING A HARVEST DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+15.9%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1075 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month