Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/251,919

COMPOSITION FOR DETECTING OR MEASURING ANALYTES

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
May 05, 2023
Priority
Oct 27, 2021 — RE 10-2021-0144315 +1 more
Examiner
BERKELEY, EMILY R
Art Unit
1796
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
BERTIS INC.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
314 granted / 413 resolved
+11.0% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+28.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
26 currently pending
Career history
437
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.0%
-38.0% vs TC avg
§103
68.4%
+28.4% vs TC avg
§102
12.2%
-27.8% vs TC avg
§112
12.7%
-27.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 413 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The applicant's election of Group I and species, claims 1-6 and 8, without traverse in their reply dated 5/11/2026 is acknowledged. Claims 7 and 9-22 were withdrawn. Claims 1-6 and 8 are considered on the merits below. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The Information Disclosure Statements filed on 5/5/2023 and 5/11/2026 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97 and has been considered. An initialed copy of the Form 1449 is enclosed herewith. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-6 and 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kung et al. (Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 6888). Regarding claim 1, Kung describes a composition for detecting or measuring analytes by mass spectrometry (Figure 4) comprising a complex compound represented by Formula 1: [Formula 1] [M]n-L1-N1 PNG media_image1.png 316 500 media_image1.png Greyscale wherein n is an integer ranging from 2 to 100000 (n is 10); M is a repeatable unit compound selected from the group consisting of amino acids, amino acid analogs, peptides, peptide analogs, monosaccharides, oligosaccharides and polysaccharides (M is amino acids); L1 is either a direct bond between M and N1 or a linker (L1 is a direct bond); N1 is a first binding moiety that binds to the analyte (N1 is shown in “6a” and can bind an analyte); and the bond between adjacent M and M is cleaved by a catalyst, so that the M is detected or measured when the analytes are detected or measured (Examiner’s note: A recitation directed to the manner in which a claimed composition is intended to be used does not distinguish the claimed composition from the prior art, if the prior art has the capability to so perform. In this case, the M-M bond is capable of being cleaved by a catalyst, so that the M is detected or measured when the analytes are detected or measured). Regarding claim 2, Kung describes The composition of claim 1, wherein M has a mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) of 30 to 3,000 (Figure 4: the amino acids in “6a” have a mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) of 30 to 3,000). Regarding claim 3, Kung describes The composition of claim 1, wherein M is represented by Formula 2: [Formula 2] (X1X2...Xm) wherein m is an integer ranging from 1 to 100000; and X1 to Xm are each independently selected from the group consisting of an amino acid, amino acid analog, peptide, peptide analog, monosaccharide, oligosaccharide and polysaccharide (Figure 4: m is 10; X are amino acids). Regarding claim 4, Kung describes the composition of claim 3, wherein X1 or Xm, is isoleucine, lysine, serine, arginine or threonine (Figure 4: Thr (T), Ser (S), Lys (K), Asn (N) and Arg (R)). Regarding claim 5, Kung describes the composition of claim 1, wherein the first binding moiety comprises at least one selected from the group consisting of a probe, an antisense nucleotide, an antibody, an oligopeptide, a ligand, PNA (peptide nucleic acid) and an aptamer, which bind to the analyte (page 6890 “incorporation of functionalized hydroxylamines such as dansyl (5a) (probe) and PEG (5b, av. MV = 500) groups into oxime-modified peptide 2 was demonstrated to give functionalized peptides 6a–b in 99% conversion (Fig. 4, Fig. S29 and S30, ESI†). Attachment of fluorophores onto peptides facilitates molecular imaging for biological studies while PEGylation of peptides allows alteration of their bioavailability and solubility.”). Regarding claim 6, Kung describes The composition of claim 1, wherein the first binding moiety comprises at least one selected from the group consisting of Chemical Formulas 1 to 5: [Chemical Formula 2] (Figure 4: dansyl) Regarding claim 8, Kung describes The composition of claim 1, comprising two or more different complex compounds represented by Formula 1 (Figure 4). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EMILY R BERKELEY whose telephone number is (571)272-9831. The examiner can normally be reached M-Th 9-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lyle Alexander can be reached at (571) 272-1254. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LYLE ALEXANDER/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1797 /EMILY R. BERKELEY/ Examiner Art Unit 1796
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 05, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12673324
SURFACTANT ADDITIVES FOR DIGITAL MICROFLUIDIC DEVICES FOR HIGH PROTEIN CONTENT DROPLETS TRANSPORT
4y 3m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12674801
BIOCHIP AND DETECTION METHOD
4y 2m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12663426
METHOD AND COMPOSITION FOR MEASUREMENT OF NITRIC OXIDE
4y 0m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12636651
CONTAINER FOR SELECTIVE TRANSFER OF SAMPLES OF BIOLOGICAL MATERIAL
4y 2m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12638394
SKIN SENSITIZATION MEASURING REAGENT, METHOD FOR MEASURING SKIN SENSITIZATION, AND COMPOUND
4y 2m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+28.0%)
3y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 413 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month