Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/252,101

COMPONENT MOUNTER AND CLAMP CONTROL METHOD

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 08, 2023
Priority
Dec 14, 2020 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2020046506
Examiner
KIM, PAUL D
Art Unit
3729
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Fuji Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allowance Rate
1357 granted / 1548 resolved
+17.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
1598
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
52.7%
+12.7% vs TC avg
§102
18.1%
-21.9% vs TC avg
§112
26.4%
-13.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1548 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ishitani et al. (US PAT. 6,206,352) in view of Fukao et al. (JP 2003289199 A). Ishitani et al. teach a component mounter for mounting a component on a board, the component mounter comprising: a conveyance device (not shown) configured to convey the board (col. 4, lines 37-39); a clamp device including a fixed side clamp member (13), a movable side clamp member (14), and a moving device (15) configured to move up and down the movable side clamp member by driving of a motor as shown in Fig. 2 (col. 4, lines 37-47), the clamp device being configured to sandwich and clamp the board (2) from both sides by moving the movable side clamp member with the moving device and bringing the board conveyed by the conveyance device into contact with the fixed side clamp member as shown in Figs. 3-4 (col. 4, line 37 to col. 5, line 30); and a control device configured to set a target position of the movable side clamp member configured to move a contacting surface of the board to a contacted surface of the fixed side clamp member based on a detected value of the sensor, the control device being configured to drive and control the motor by position control such that a position of the movable side clamp member coincides with the target position as shown in Fig. 5 (col. 6, lines 1-42). However, Ishitani et al. silent a sensor configured to measure a thickness of the board conveyed by the conveyance device. Fukao et al. teach a distance sensor (252), which acquires the distance of the upper and lower surface of a printed wiring board (80) with respect to a supporting structure (18) as shown in Fig. 4, in order to determine the board thickness (see abstract). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, at the time of the effective filing date of the claimed invention was made, to a person having ordinary skill in the art to modify a component mounter of Ishitani et al. by a sensor configured to measure a thickness of the board as taught by Fukao et al. in order to determine the board thickness. Re. claim 2: Ishitani et al. also teach that a mounting head (3, Fig. 1) including a holding member (a suction nozzle) that is capable of holding the component, wherein the control device controls the mounting head by the position control in a state where the position of the movable side clamp member is caused to coincide with the target position such that the component held by the holding member is mounted on the board (see also col. 1, lines 18-51 and col. 6, lines 142). Re. claim 3: Ishitani et al. teach all limitations as set forth above in claim 1 including the motor by torque control (such as controlling a force) instead of the position control such that the board comes into contact with the fixed side clamp member with a constant torque as shown in Figs. 3-5 (see also col. 4, line 37 to col. 5, line 30). Re. claim 4: Ishitani et al., modified by Fukao et al., also teach a clamp control method for use in a clamp device that includes a fixed side clamp member, a movable side clamp member, and a moving device configured to move up and down the movable side clamp member by driving of a motor, the clamp device being configured to sandwich and clamp the board from both sides by moving the movable side clamp member with the moving device and bringing the board conveyed by a conveyance device into contact with the fixed side clamp member, comprising steps of: measuring a thickness of the board; and setting a target position of the movable side clamp member configured to move a contacting surface of the board to a contacted surface of the fixed side clamp member based on the measured thickness of the board, and driving and controlling the motor by position control such that a position of the movable side clamp member coincides with the target position (see also a rejection of claim 1 as set forth above). Re. claim 5: Ishitani et al., modified by Fukao et al., also teach all limitations as set forth above in claim 4, including the motor by torque control (such as controlling a force) instead of the position control such that the board comes into contact with the fixed side clamp member with a constant torque as shown in Figs. 3-5 (see also col. 4, line 37 to col. 5, line 30). The Prior Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Sakurayama et al. (US PAT. 10,966,361), Shimizu (US PAT. 10,462,948), and Nozawa (US PAT. 10,925,199) are cited to further show the state of the art with respect to a component mounter for mounting a component on a board. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PAUL D KIM whose telephone number is (571)272-4565. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday: 6:00 AM-2:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Thomas Hong can be reached at 571-272-0993. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PAUL D KIM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3729
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 08, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12640294
METHOD FOR PRODUCING LAMINATES SUITABLE FOR MAGNETIC CORES
4y 1m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12640632
CLAMPING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING STATOR
3y 2m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12633809
METHOD FOR PRODUCING AN ACTIVE PART FOR A ROTATING ELECTRIC MACHINE, ACTIVE PART FOR A ROTATING ELECTRIC MACHINE AND ROTATING ELECTRIC MACHINE
3y 7m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12628325
MANUFACTURING SYSTEM, MANUFACTURING METHOD, CONTROL SYSTEM, AND CONTROL METHOD
3y 3m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12626866
MULTILAYER CERAMIC CAPACITOR AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 6m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+6.6%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1548 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month