DETAILED ACTION
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status
The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .
Status of the Claims
Claims 1 and 6-9 are amended. Claims 2-3 and 10-11 are as previously presented. Claims 4-5 are cancelled. Therefore, claims 1-3 and 6-11 are currently pending and have been considered below.
Response to Amendment
The amendment filed on June 05, 2026 has been entered.
Response to Arguments
Applicant’s arguments, see Pages 6-8, filed on 06/05/2026, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1-11 under U.S.C. 103 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of applicant’s amendment regarding the carbon sheath and wire content ratio and Titanium values and newly found prior art regarding these feature.
It is the Examiner’s position that even with the typo, the carbon steel values can range from 0.02% to 2.14% and with the carbon wire percentages of Keito being between 0.03% and 0.07%, the carbon ratio would still be satisfied by Hashiba.
Applicant’s argument against Nako is persuasive and newly found prior is used for the titanium limitation. It is suggested that additional arguments be presented against newly found prior art reference Xie regarding the titanium values.
Claim Objections
Claims 8 and 9 are objected to because of the following informalities: claims 8 and 9 depend upon canceled claims 4 and 5. For the purposes of substantive examination, claims 8 and 9 are viewed as though they depend upon claim 1.
Appropriate correction is required.
Priority
Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d). The certified copy has been filed in parent Application No. JP2020-210727, filed on 12/18/2020.
Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows:
1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art.
2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue.
3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art.
4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness.
Claims 1-3 and 10-11 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Keito et al. (JP 4776508 B2, hereinafter Keito) in view of Nako et al. (EP 3511111 A1, hereinafter Nako) and Hashiba et al. (WO 2019186811 A1, hereinafter Hashiba) and Xie et al. (CN 102689106 A, hereinafter Xie).
Regarding claim 1, Keito discloses a flux-cored wire with a steel sheath filled with flux (Page 2, Para. 6 from end, “The flux cored wire for electrogas arc welding according to the present invention is a flux cored wire for electrogas arc welding formed by filling a steel outer shell with flux”), comprising: based on a total mass of the wire,
C: 0.026% by mass or more and 0.060% by mass or less (Page 2, Para. 5 from end, “C: 0.03 to 0.07 mass%”),
Si: more than 0% by mass and 0.50 by mass or less (Page 2, Para. 4 from end, “Si: 0.3 to 0.8 mass%”),
Mn: 1.3% by mass or more and 2.8% by mass or less (Page 2, Para. 3 from end, “Mn: 1.5 to 2.2% by mass”),
max Cu value within the weld: 0.20% by mass or more and 1.50% by mass or less (Page 9, Para. 4 from end, “In this case, if Cu exceeds 0.5% by mass, the strength increases too much, the toughness deteriorates, and the elongation also decreases.”),
Ni: 0.45% by mass or more and 1.00% by mass or less (Page 2, Para. 2 from end, “Ni: 0.4 to 1.5 mass%”),
Mo: 0.15% by mass or more and 0.65% by mass or less (Page 2, last Para., “At least one selected from the group consisting of Cr and Mo: 0.05 to 0.60 mass% in total”),
Mg: 0.30% by mass or more and 0.65% by mass or less (Page 3, Para. 3, “Mg: 0.20 to 0.50 mass%”), and
B: 0.001% by mass or more and 0.010% by mass or less (Page 3, Para. 2, “B: 0.005 to 0.020 mass%”),
provided that Cr: 0.10% by mass or less (Page 2, last Para., “At least one selected from the group consisting of Cr and Mo: 0.05 to 0.60 mass% in total”) and
Al: 0.10% by mass or less (Page 3, Para. 5, “Al: ≦ 0.10% by mass”),
wherein a Nb content [Nb] of the wire expressed in % by mass based on the total mass of the wire (Page 9, Para. 8, ““Nb ≦ 0.1 mass%”) and
a V content [V] of the wire expressed in % by mass based on the total mass of the wire (Page 9, Para. 4 from end, “V is also contained as an impurity in the filling flux of the flux-cored wire and in the steel outer shell, or V contained in the base metal is contained in the weld metal by dilution, but the amount is allowed to 0.5 mass%.”) satisfy [Nb] + [V] = 0.015 or less (Page 9, Nb is less than or equal to 0.1 and V is less than or equal to 0.5; where a combination of the Nb and V values can be 0.015 or less); and
a C content [C]b of the wire expressed in % by mass based on the total mass of the wire (Page 2, Para. 5 from end, “C: 0.03 to 0.07 mass%”).
Keito does not disclose:
the Cu value within the wire: 0.20% by mass or more and 1.50% by mass or less;
wherein a Ti content being 3.3% by mass or more and 6.0% by mass or less;
a C content [C]o of the steel sheath expressed in % by mass based on a total mass of the steel sheath and
satisfy [C]o / [C]b = 0.37 or less.
However, Nako discloses, in the similar field of flux-cored wires (Abstract, “a flux cored wire for gas shield arc welding”), where a Cu value within the wire can be between 0.20-1.50% by mass or less (Para .0052, “(Cu: 0.40 mass% or less)”, and Para. 0054, “In addition, the Cu amount in the wire is preferably 0.40% or less, more preferably 0.30% or less, still more preferably 0.25% or less.”). It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to have modified the wire from Keito to include the elements and values as taught by Nako.
One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification in order to gain the advantage of being able to ensure the strength of the weld metal and to prevent deterioration of weld toughness, as stated by Nako, Para. 0053, “Cu is an element effective in ensuring the strength of the weld metal. However, if the amount of Cu is excessive, the strength may increase excessively, causing deterioration of the toughness.”.
Hashiba discloses, in the similar field of flux-cored wires (Abstract, “This method for manufacturing flux-cored wire”), where a C content of the steel sheath has a mass percentage (Page 14, Para. 4 from end, “the material of the steel material to which the manufacturing method of the flux cored wire 10 and the welded joint according to the present embodiment is not particularly limited, and may be a normal steel material such as carbon steel or low alloy steel.”, where carbon steel has carbon mass percentage values of 0.02-2.14%, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steel, Definitions and related materials, second paragraph, “The carbon content of steel is between 0.02% and 2.14% by weight for plain carbon steel (iron-carbon alloys).”), where [C]o / [C]b = 0.37 or less (Keito, [C]b=0.07; Hashiba, [C]o=0.02; where the equation is satisfied, 0.02/0.07 = 0.2857). It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to have modified the steel sheath in modified Keito to be carbon steel as taught by Hashiba.
One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification in order to gain the advantage of being able to use steel that is weather resistant to be used in buildings, as stated by Hashiba, Page 14, Para. 4 from end, “structural steel materials that require corrosion resistance of the weld metal, in particular, harbor facilities, bridges, building / civil engineering structures and tanks, It is particularly suitable to be applied to the manufacture of steel structures such as ships / marine structures, railways and containers…a normal steel material such as carbon steel or low alloy steel. Weather resistant steel or low alloy steel containing Ni, Sn and the like is more advantageous from the viewpoint of weather resistance and paint corrosion resistance.”.
Xie discloses, in the similar field of flux cored wires (Abstract “a vertical gas electric metal core and flux core welding wire”), where the titanium mass percentage values for the wire are between 3.3% and 6.0% (Abstract, “total weight of the flux core as follows:…titanium iron of 2 to 8 percent”). It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to have modified the flux core wire in modified Keito to include the titanium values as taught by Xie; where from Keito a higher titanium value can reduce toughness, but Xie teaches that higher titanium values can have a deoxidizing effect and improve the stability of the electric arc, where one of ordinary skill in the art would be able decide on which benefits and drawbacks they need as a design choice and could choose the advantage of improved stability of the electric arc over toughness.
One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification in order to gain the advantage of being able to improve the stability of the electric arc, where the toughness can be improved for the welding seam metal, as stated by Xie, Para. 0022, “titanium iron with a deoxidizing effect, and can improve the stability of electric arc, the amount of Ti and B cause welding seam separating the acicular ferrite upon solidification, so as to improve the toughness of the welding seam metal, Ti in the invention is in the form of titanium iron is added, the dosage range is 2 to the total weight of welding wire core 8%, when Ti content is small than 2 or larger than 8, the welding seam metal strength and toughness is reduced.”.
Regarding claim 2, modified Keito teaches the apparatus according to claim 1, as set forth above, discloses wherein a Cu content [Cu] of the wire expressed in % by mass based on the total mass of the wire (Keito, Page 9, Para. 4 from end, “In this case, if Cu exceeds 0.5% by mass, the strength increases too much, the toughness deteriorates, and the elongation also decreases.”, and teaching from Nako, Para .0052, “(Cu: 0.40 mass% or less)”),
a Ni content [Ni] of the wire expressed in % by mass based on the total mass of the wire (Keito, Page 2, Para. 2 from end, “Ni: 0.4 to 1.5 mass%”),
a Mo content [Mo] of the wire expressed in % by mass based on the total mass of the wire (Keito, Page 2, last Para., “At least one selected from the group consisting of Cr and Mo: 0.05 to 0.60 mass% in total”),
a Mn content [Mn] of the wire expressed in % by mass based on the total mass of the wire (Keito, Page 2, Para. 3 from end, “Mn: 1.5 to 2.2% by mass”),
a Si content [Si] of the wire expressed in % by mass based on the total mass of the wire (Keito, Page 2, Para. 4 from end, “Si: 0.3 to 0.8 mass%”),
a Cr content [Cr] of the wire expressed in % by mass based on the total mass of the wire (Keito, Page 2, last Para., “At least one selected from the group consisting of Cr and Mo: 0.05 to 0.60 mass% in total”),
satisfy ([Cu] + [Ni] + [Mo]) / ([Mn] + [Si] + [Cr] + 10 ([Nb] + [V])) = 0.55 or more and 0.90 or less (Keito, values for the elements can be as follows, Cu=0.4, Ni=0.6, Mo=0.5, Mn=1.7, Si=0.4, Cr=0.05, Nb=0.0001, V=0.001; (0.4+0.6+0.5)/(1.7+0.4+0.05+10(0.0001+0.001)) = 0.694, which satisfies the equation disclosed above).
Regarding claim 3, modified Keito teaches the apparatus according to claim 1, as set forth above, discloses wherein a Cu content [Cu] of the wire expressed in % by mass based on the total mass of the wire (Keito, Page 9, Para. 4 from end, “In this case, if Cu exceeds 0.5% by mass, the strength increases too much, the toughness deteriorates, and the elongation also decreases.”, and teaching from Nako, Para .0052, “(Cu: 0.40 mass% or less)”),
a Mo content [Mo] of the wire expressed in % by mass based on the total mass of the wire (Keito, Page 2, last Para., “At least one selected from the group consisting of Cr and Mo: 0.05 to 0.60 mass% in total”),
satisfy [Cu] / [Mo] = 0.5 or more and 5.0 or less (Keito, values for the elements can be as follows, Cu= 0.2 and Mo=0.05, where 0.2/0.05 = 4, which satisfies the equation disclosed above).
Regarding claim 10, modified Keito teaches the apparatus according to claim 1, as set forth above, discloses a gas-shielded arc welding method, comprising gas-shielded arc welding using the flux-cored wire from claim 1 (Keito, Abstract, “a flux cored wire for one-electrode electrogas arc welding”; teaching from Nako, Abstract, “a flux cored wire for gas shield arc welding”).
Regarding claim 11, modified Keito teaches the apparatus according to claim 3, as set forth above, discloses a gas-shielded arc welding method, comprising gas shielded arc welding using the flux-cored wire from claim 3 (Keito, Abstract, “a flux cored wire for one-electrode electrogas arc welding”; teaching from Nako, Abstract, “a flux cored wire for gas shield arc welding”).
Claims 6-9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Keito et al. (JP 4776508 B2, hereinafter Keito) in view of Nako et al. (EP 3511111 A1, hereinafter Nako) and Hashiba et al. (WO 2019186811 A1, hereinafter Hashiba) and Xie et al. (CN 102689106 A, hereinafter Xie) in further view of Zhang et al. (CN 110480207 A, hereinafter Zhang).
Regarding claim 6, modified Keito teaches the apparatus according to claim 1, as set forth above.
Modified Keito does not disclose:
further comprising at least one selected from the group consisting of Zr, F, Na, and K,
a Zr content being 0.25% mass or less,
a F content being 0.05% by mass or more and 0.30% by mass or less, and
a Na and K content being 0.10% by mass or more and 0.30% by mass or less, based on the total mass of the wire.
However, Nako discloses where a Ti content is between 3.3-6% by mass (Claim 1, “based on total mass of the wire… Ti in terms of Ti in Ti alloy and Ti compound: from 2.4 to 4.5 mass%”), where a F content is between 0.05-0.30% by mass (Claim 6, “mass of the wire: F: 1.0 mass% or less.”), a Na and K content between 0.10-0.30% by mass (Para. 0016, “The flux-cored wire for gas-shielded arc welding above may further contain at least one member selected from the group consisting of, based on the total mass of the wire: a total of Li, Na and K: 1.0 mass%”, where the combination of Na and K could be between 0.1-0.3% with Li making up for the rest of the mass percentage). It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to have modified the wire in modified Keito to include the elements and values as taught by Nako.
One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification in order to gain the advantage of being able to use Ti as a deoxidizer, as stated by Nako, Para. 0035, “Ti is an element acting as a deoxidizer, and an oxide-based inclusion thereof acts as a nucleus of acicular ferrite.”, use F to adjust the arc spraying force and reduce the amount of hydrogen diffused into the deposited metal, as stated by Nako, Para. 0070, “F may be incorporated into the wire so as to adjust the arc spraying force (concentration) and reduce the amount of hydrogen diffused in the deposited metal.”, and use Na and K to enhance arc stability and reduce spatter generation, as stated by Nako, Para. 0063, “Li, Na and K are elements having an effect of enhancing the arc stability and reducing spatter generation.”.
Further, Zhang discloses, in the similar field of flux-cored wires (Abstract, “ultra-high-strength steel welding with composite rare earth element flux-cored wire”), where a Zr content being 0.25% mass or less (Page 2, Para. 4 from end, “weight percentage are as follows…Zr: 0.05% to 0.25%”). It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to have modified the flux-cored wire in modified Keito to include the Zr values as taught by Zhang.
One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification in order to gain the advantage of using Zr to enhance impact toughness, as stated by Zhang, Page 3, Para. 6, “proportion of zirconium (Zr): spheroidizing added promoting inclusion of zirconium, providing large amount of nucleation core, zirconium oxide is titanium oxide and sulphide of large and fine distribution of the inclusions, by improving the nucleation rate, good for acicular ferrite transition, reducing and other phase of bainite formation, enhanced impact toughness.”.
Regarding claim 7, modified Keito teaches the apparatus according to claim 3, as set forth above.
Modified Keito does not disclose:
further comprising at least one selected from the group consisting of Zr, F, Na, and K,
a Zr content being 0.25% mass or less,
a F content being 0.05% by mass or more and 0.30% by mass or less, and
a Na and K content being 0.10% by mass or more and 0.30% by mass or less, based on the total mass of the wire.
However, Nako discloses where a Ti content is between 3.3-6% by mass (Claim 1, “based on total mass of the wire… Ti in terms of Ti in Ti alloy and Ti compound: from 2.4 to 4.5 mass%”), where a F content is between 0.05-0.30% by mass (Claim 6, “mass of the wire: F: 1.0 mass% or less.”), a Na and K content between 0.10-0.30% by mass (Para. 0016, “The flux-cored wire for gas-shielded arc welding above may further contain at least one member selected from the group consisting of, based on the total mass of the wire: a total of Li, Na and K: 1.0 mass%”, where the combination of Na and K could be between 0.1-0.3% with Li making up for the rest of the mass percentage). It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to have modified the wire in modified Keito to include the elements and values as taught by Nako.
One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification in order to gain the advantage of being able to use Ti as a deoxidizer, as stated by Nako, Para. 0035, “Ti is an element acting as a deoxidizer, and an oxide-based inclusion thereof acts as a nucleus of acicular ferrite.”, use F to adjust the arc spraying force and reduce the amount of hydrogen diffused into the deposited metal, as stated by Nako, Para. 0070, “F may be incorporated into the wire so as to adjust the arc spraying force (concentration) and reduce the amount of hydrogen diffused in the deposited metal.”, and use Na and K to enhance arc stability and reduce spatter generation, as stated by Nako, Para. 0063, “Li, Na and K are elements having an effect of enhancing the arc stability and reducing spatter generation.”.
Further, Zhang discloses, in the similar field of flux-cored wires (Abstract, “ultra-high-strength steel welding with composite rare earth element flux-cored wire”), where a Zr content being 0.25% mass or less (Page 2, Para. 4 from end, “weight percentage are as follows…Zr: 0.05% to 0.25%”). It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to have modified the flux-cored wire in modified Keito to include the Zr values as taught by Zhang.
One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification in order to gain the advantage of using Zr to enhance impact toughness, as stated by Zhang, Page 3, Para. 6, “proportion of zirconium (Zr): spheroidizing added promoting inclusion of zirconium, providing large amount of nucleation core, zirconium oxide is titanium oxide and sulphide of large and fine distribution of the inclusions, by improving the nucleation rate, good for acicular ferrite transition, reducing and other phase of bainite formation, enhanced impact toughness.”.
Regarding claim 8, modified Keito teaches the apparatus according to claim 4, as set forth above.
Modified Keito does not disclose:
further comprising at least one selected from the group consisting of Zr, F, Na, and K,
a Zr content being 0.25% mass or less,
a F content being 0.05% by mass or more and 0.30% by mass or less, and
a Na and K content being 0.10% by mass or more and 0.30% by mass or less, based on the total mass of the wire.
However, Nako discloses where a Ti content is between 3.3-6% by mass (Claim 1, “based on total mass of the wire… Ti in terms of Ti in Ti alloy and Ti compound: from 2.4 to 4.5 mass%”), where a F content is between 0.05-0.30% by mass (Claim 6, “mass of the wire: F: 1.0 mass% or less.”), a Na and K content between 0.10-0.30% by mass (Para. 0016, “The flux-cored wire for gas-shielded arc welding above may further contain at least one member selected from the group consisting of, based on the total mass of the wire: a total of Li, Na and K: 1.0 mass%”, where the combination of Na and K could be between 0.1-0.3% with Li making up for the rest of the mass percentage). It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to have modified the wire in modified Keito to include the elements and values as taught by Nako.
One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification in order to gain the advantage of being able to use Ti as a deoxidizer, as stated by Nako, Para. 0035, “Ti is an element acting as a deoxidizer, and an oxide-based inclusion thereof acts as a nucleus of acicular ferrite.”, use F to adjust the arc spraying force and reduce the amount of hydrogen diffused into the deposited metal, as stated by Nako, Para. 0070, “F may be incorporated into the wire so as to adjust the arc spraying force (concentration) and reduce the amount of hydrogen diffused in the deposited metal.”, and use Na and K to enhance arc stability and reduce spatter generation, as stated by Nako, Para. 0063, “Li, Na and K are elements having an effect of enhancing the arc stability and reducing spatter generation.”.
Further, Zhang discloses, in the similar field of flux-cored wires (Abstract, “ultra-high-strength steel welding with composite rare earth element flux-cored wire”), where a Zr content being 0.25% mass or less (Page 2, Para. 4 from end, “weight percentage are as follows…Zr: 0.05% to 0.25%”). It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to have modified the flux-cored wire in modified Keito to include the Zr values as taught by Zhang.
One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification in order to gain the advantage of using Zr to enhance impact toughness, as stated by Zhang, Page 3, Para. 6, “proportion of zirconium (Zr): spheroidizing added promoting inclusion of zirconium, providing large amount of nucleation core, zirconium oxide is titanium oxide and sulphide of large and fine distribution of the inclusions, by improving the nucleation rate, good for acicular ferrite transition, reducing and other phase of bainite formation, enhanced impact toughness.”.
Regarding claim 9, modified Keito teaches the apparatus according to claim 5, as set forth above.
Modified Keito does not disclose:
further comprising at least one selected from the group consisting of Zr, F, Na, and K,
a Zr content being 0.25% mass or less,
a F content being 0.05% by mass or more and 0.30% by mass or less, and
a Na and K content being 0.10% by mass or more and 0.30% by mass or less, based on the total mass of the wire.
However, Nako discloses where a Ti content is between 3.3-6% by mass (Claim 1, “based on total mass of the wire… Ti in terms of Ti in Ti alloy and Ti compound: from 2.4 to 4.5 mass%”), where a F content is between 0.05-0.30% by mass (Claim 6, “mass of the wire: F: 1.0 mass% or less.”), a Na and K content between 0.10-0.30% by mass (Para. 0016, “The flux-cored wire for gas-shielded arc welding above may further contain at least one member selected from the group consisting of, based on the total mass of the wire: a total of Li, Na and K: 1.0 mass%”, where the combination of Na and K could be between 0.1-0.3% with Li making up for the rest of the mass percentage). It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to have modified the wire in modified Keito to include the elements and values as taught by Nako.
One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification in order to gain the advantage of being able to use Ti as a deoxidizer, as stated by Nako, Para. 0035, “Ti is an element acting as a deoxidizer, and an oxide-based inclusion thereof acts as a nucleus of acicular ferrite.”, use F to adjust the arc spraying force and reduce the amount of hydrogen diffused into the deposited metal, as stated by Nako, Para. 0070, “F may be incorporated into the wire so as to adjust the arc spraying force (concentration) and reduce the amount of hydrogen diffused in the deposited metal.”, and use Na and K to enhance arc stability and reduce spatter generation, as stated by Nako, Para. 0063, “Li, Na and K are elements having an effect of enhancing the arc stability and reducing spatter generation.”.
Further, Zhang discloses, in the similar field of flux-cored wires (Abstract, “ultra-high-strength steel welding with composite rare earth element flux-cored wire”), where a Zr content being 0.25% mass or less (Page 2, Para. 4 from end, “weight percentage are as follows…Zr: 0.05% to 0.25%”). It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filling date of the claimed invention to have modified the flux-cored wire in modified Keito to include the Zr values as taught by Zhang.
One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification in order to gain the advantage of using Zr to enhance impact toughness, as stated by Zhang, Page 3, Para. 6, “proportion of zirconium (Zr): spheroidizing added promoting inclusion of zirconium, providing large amount of nucleation core, zirconium oxide is titanium oxide and sulphide of large and fine distribution of the inclusions, by improving the nucleation rate, good for acicular ferrite transition, reducing and other phase of bainite formation, enhanced impact toughness.”.
Conclusion
Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action.
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KEVIN GUANHUA WEN whose telephone number is (571)272-9940 and whose email is kevin.wen@uspto.gov. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 10:00 am - 6:00 pm.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ibrahime Abraham can be reached on 571-270-5569. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/KEVIN GUANHUA WEN/Examiner, Art Unit 3761
08/20/2026
Prosecution Insights