Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/252,220

IMAGE PROCESSING DEVICE, MOUNTING DEVICE, MOUNTING SYSTEM, IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD, AND MOUNTING METHOD

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
May 09, 2023
Examiner
KIM, PAUL D
Art Unit
3729
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Fuji Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
88%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 88% — above average
88%
Career Allow Rate
1346 granted / 1537 resolved
+17.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
52 currently pending
Career history
1589
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
35.2%
-4.8% vs TC avg
§102
29.4%
-10.6% vs TC avg
§112
30.9%
-9.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1537 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Objections Claims 1-10 are objected to because of the following informalities: Re. claim 1: The phrase “the protruding sections formed” as recited in line 3 appears to be --the one or more protruding sections formed--. The phrase “by side lighting and/or vertical lighting” as recited in lines 7-8 appears to be --by a side lighting and/or a vertical lighting--. The phrase “with light from side” as recited in line 10 appears to be --with a light from a side--. The phrase “with light from below” as recited in lines 10-11 appears to be --with a light from a below--. The phrase “the component from below” as recited in line 12 appears to be --the component from the below--. The phrase “positions of the protruding sections, the number of the protruding sections” as recited in lines 13-14 appears to be --positions of the one or more protruding sections, the number of the one or more protruding sections--. The phrase “including the shape” as recited in line 18 appears to be --including the contour shape--. Re. claim 2: The phrase “generates a component model” as recited in line 2 appears to be --generates the component model--. The phrase “from information of the insertion sections” as recited in line 3 appears to be --from the information of the insertion sections--. Re. claim 3: The phrase “the protruding sections formed” as recited in line 3 appears to be --the one or more protruding sections formed--. The phrase “to turn on side lighting” as recited in line 6 appears to be --to turn on a side lighting--. The phrase “The phrase “with light from side” as recited in line 7 appears to be --with a light from a side--. The phrase “the component from below” as recited in line 9 appears to be --the component from the below--. The phrase “the positions of the protruding sections, the number of the protruding sections” as recited in line 12 appears to be --the positions of the one or more protruding sections, the number of the one or more protruding sections--. Re. claim 6: The phrase “executes parallax correction” as recited in line 3 appears to be --executes a parallax correction--. The phrase “detects the positions of the protruding sections” as recited in line 4 appears to be --detects the positions of the one or more protruding sections--. Re. claim 9: The phrase “the protruding sections formed on the main body” as recited in lines 3-4 appears to be --the one or more protruding sections formed on the main body--. The phrase “by side lighting and/or vertical lighting” as recited in lines 6-7 appears to be --by a side lighting and/or a vertical lighting--. The phrase “with light from side” as recited in line 9 appears to be --with a light from a side--. The phrase “with light from side” as recited in line 10 appears to be --with a light from a side--. The phrase “positions of the protruding sections, the number of the protruding sections” as recited in lines 13-14 appears to be --positions of the one or more protruding sections, the number of the one or more protruding sections--. The phrase “including the shape” as recited in lines 19-20 appears to be --including the contour shape--. The phrase “the number of the protruding sections” as recited in line 21 appears to be --the number of the one or more protruding sections--. Re. claim 10: The phrase “the protruding sections formed on the main body” as recited in line 3 appears to be --the one or more protruding sections formed on the main body--. The phrase “to turn on side lighting” as recited in line 5 appears to be --to turn on a side lighting--. The phrase “with light from side and vertical lighting” as recited in line 6 appears to be --with a light from a side and a vertical lighting--. The phrase “with light from below” as recited in lines 6-7 appears to be --with a light from a below--. The phrase “image the component from below” as recited in line 8 appears to be --image the component from the below--. The phrase “the positions of the protruding sections, the number of the protruding sections” as recited in lines 13-14 appears to be --the positions of the one or more protruding sections, the number of the one or more protruding sections--. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Re. claim 1: The phrase “the protruding section” as recited in line 12 lacks antecedent basis. The phrase “the number of the protruding sections” as recited in lines 13 and 14 renders the claim vague and indefinite. It is noted that the protruding sections should be the one or more protruding sections. Since the one or more protruding sections can be only one protruding section, there could be no plurality of protruding sections. It is unclear as to what the number of the one protruding section is meant. Re. claim 3: The phrase “the protruding section” as recited in line 9 lacks antecedent basis. The phrase “the number of the protruding sections” as recited in line 12 renders the claim vague and indefinite. It is noted that the protruding sections should be the one or more protruding sections. Since the one or more protruding sections can be only one protruding section, there could be no plurality of protruding sections. It is unclear as to what the number of the one protruding section is meant. Re. claim 5: The phrase “the insertion section” as recited in line 4 lacks antecedent basis. Re. claim 9: The phrase “the protruding section” as recited in line 11 lacks antecedent basis. The phrase “the number of the protruding sections” as recited in line 14 renders the claim vague and indefinite. It is noted that the protruding sections should be the one or more protruding sections. Since the one or more protruding sections can be only one protruding section, there could be no plurality of protruding sections. It is unclear as to what the number of the one protruding section is meant. Re. claim 10: The phrase “the protruding section” as recited in line 8 lacks antecedent basis. The phrase “the number of the protruding sections” as recited in line 14 renders the claim vague and indefinite. It is noted that the protruding sections should be the one or more protruding sections. Since the one or more protruding sections can be only one protruding section, there could be no plurality of protruding sections. It is unclear as to what the number of the one protruding section is meant. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-10 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. The Prior Art The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Inagaki et al. (US PAT. 12,051,188) and Akiyama (US PAT. 7,002,676) are cited to further show the state of the art with respect to an image processing device for use in a mounting device. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PAUL D KIM whose telephone number is (571)272-4565. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday: 6:00 AM-2:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Aneeta Yodichkas can be reached at 571-272-9773. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PAUL D KIM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3729
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 09, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 31, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603212
METHOD OF MAKING A SHIELDED INDUCTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597553
MANUFACTURING METHOD OF SURFACE-MOUNT INDUCTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597550
Optimized Electromagnetic Inductor Component Design and Methods Including Improved Conductivity Composite Conductor Material
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588944
METHOD OF MANUFACTURING A TIP ELECTRODE OF AN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY CATHETER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588178
PRODUCTION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
88%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+6.6%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1537 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month