Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/253,719

CONNECTING-FINGER CONNECTOR, AND POWER CONNECTION MODULE AND POWER SUPPLY CABINET THEREOF

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
May 19, 2023
Examiner
CHAMBERS, TRAVIS SLOAN
Art Unit
2831
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Zte Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
1y 10m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
1001 granted / 1161 resolved
+18.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
1y 10m
Avg Prosecution
14 currently pending
Career history
1175
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
42.7%
+2.7% vs TC avg
§102
41.2%
+1.2% vs TC avg
§112
9.3%
-30.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1161 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-3, 6, 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kunkle et al. 3639893. In reference to claim 1, Kunkle teaches a connecting-finger connector (shown in figure 1), comprising: a first contact module (34) , comprising a first main body portion (near lead line 42) and a first contact portion (38) configured to be electrically connected to a connecting finger (64), the first contact portion being electrically connected to the first main body portion; and a connecting member (i.e. the housing of 10), provided with a mounting structure (i.e. the rear portion of 10; fig. 2) configured to connect an external terminal (70; fig. 1) to the first main body portion. In reference to claim 2, Kunkle teaches wherein the first contact module is integrally formed, and the first main body portion and the first contact portion are connected by a bend (see fig. 3). In reference to claim 3, Kunkle teaches wherein the first main body portion is arranged on an outer side of the connecting member (the housing of 10. See fig. 2, 3) and is provided with a first via hole (42; fig. 1) , the mounting structure is a connecting hole (62) provided with internal threads (pertaining to threads of the nut 50 mounted into 62), and the first via hole (42) is communicated with the connecting hole (62). In reference to claim 6, Kunkle teaches wherein the first contact module comprises an abutting portion (32; fig. 2),the connecting member comprises a limiting portion (46; fig. 2), and the abutting portion abuts against the limiting portion to limit a displacement of the first contact module in an insertion direction of inserting the connecting finger into the connecting- finger connector. In reference to claim 11, Kunkle teaches a power connection module (shown in figure 1), comprising a connecting-finger connector (10), wherein the connecting-finger connector comprises: a first contact module (34), comprising a first main body portion (near lead line 42) and a first contact portion (36) configured to be electrically connected to a connecting finger (64), the first contact portion (36) being electrically connected to the first main body portion; and a connecting member(i.e. the housing of 10), provided with a mounting structure (i.e. the rear portion of 10; fig. 2) configured to connect an external terminal (70) to the first main body portion. Claims 1, 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by JP H08264242A (herein JP242). In reference to claim 1, JP242 teaches a connecting-finger connector (shown in figure 2), comprising: a first contact module, comprising a first main body portion (8) and a first contact portion (15) configured to be electrically connected to a connecting finger (8a), the first contact portion being electrically connected to the first main body portion; and a connecting member (11; fig. 2), provided with a mounting structure (body of 11; fig. 2,3 ) configured to connect an external terminal to the first main body portion. In reference to claim 12, JP242 teaches a power supply cabinet (not shown, but houses the modular controller shown in figure 1), comprising a power connection module (shown in figure 1), wherein the power connection module comprises a connecting-finger connector (shown in figure 2) comprising: a first contact module, comprising a first main body portion (8) and a first contact portion (15) configured to be electrically connected to a connecting finger (8a), the first contact portion being electrically connected to the first main body portion; and a connecting member (11; fig. 2), provided with a mounting structure (body of 11; fig. 2, 3) configured to connect an external terminal to the first main body portion. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim 7 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over JP242 in view of DE 202020106219 (herein DE219). In reference to claim 7, JP242 teaches wherein the first main body portion is a printed circuit board (see fig. 2, 3), and the first contact portion comprises a first signal contact region (front portion of 15) configured to be electrically connected to the connecting finger (see fig. 4) and a second signal contact region (rear portion of 15) configured to be electrically connected to the first main body portion (see fig. 3), the connecting member is a connector electrically connected to the first main body portion. However JP242 does not teach the mounting structure is a socket arranged in the connecting member. DE219 teaches the mounting structure is a socket (near lead line 416; fig. 9) arranged in the connecting member (400; fig. 9, 10). Using the teachings of DE219 to modify JP242 to arrive at the results of claim 7 is seen as an obvious modification. Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use the teachings DE219 to modify JP242 to arrive at the results of claim 7. The connecting member still connects to an external terminal, therefore new results are not produced. Claims 8-10, 15, 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over JP242 and DE 202020106219 (herein DE219), further in view of WO 2013136751 A1 (herein WO751). In reference to claim 8, JP242 substantially teaches the claimed invention. However JP242 does not teach wherein the first main body portion is provided with a voltage dividing element configured to provide a voltage value for determining whether the first signal contact region is electrically connected to the connecting finger. WO751 teaches of using a voltage dividing element (C2a; fig. 7B). Using the teaching of WO751 to modify JP242 to arrive at the results of claim 8 is seen as an obvious modification. Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use the teachings of WO751 to modify JP242 in order to arrive at the results of claim 8. With a reasonable expectation of success, the voltage dividing element of WO751 to modify JP242 would yield the claimed “voltage value for determining whether the first signal contact region is electrically connected to the connecting finger”. In reference to claim 9, JP242 teaches wherein the first main body portion is further provided with a signal connection terminal (pertaining to 10; fig. 2, 3) configured for cascade connection. Regarding the limitation configured for cascade connection, it has been held that a recitation with respect to the manner in which a claimed apparatus is intended to be employed does not differentiate the claimed apparatus from a prior art apparatus satisfying the claimed structural limitations. In reference to claim 10, JP242 teaches wherein the first contact module further comprises a third contact portion (15 of the adjacent contacts housed in 9; fig. 2, 3), the third contact portion comprises a third signal contact region and a fourth signal contact region (similar to the top and bottom 15 shown in figure 4), the first signal contact region and the third signal contact region form a slot for holding the connecting finger (8a), and the second signal contact region and the fourth signal contact region form a slot for holding the first main body portion (8). In reference to claim 15, JP242 teaches wherein the first contact module further comprises a third contact portion (15 of the adjacent contacts housed in 9; fig. 2, 3), the third contact portion comprises a third signal contact region and a fourth signal contact region (similar to the top and bottom 15 shown in figure 4), the first signal contact region and the third signal contact region form a slot for holding the connecting finger (8a), and the second signal contact region and the fourth signal contact region form a slot for holding the first main body portion (8). In reference to claim 16, JP242 teaches wherein the first contact module further comprises a third contact portion (15 of the adjacent contacts housed in 9; fig. 2, 3), the third contact portion comprises a third signal contact region and a fourth signal contact region (similar to the top and bottom 15 shown in figure 4), the first signal contact region and the third signal contact region form a slot for holding the connecting finger (8a), and the second signal contact region and the fourth signal contact region form a slot for holding the first main body portion (8). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 4, 5, 13, 14 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TRAVIS SLOAN CHAMBERS whose telephone number is (571)272-6813. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:30a.m.-5:00p.m.. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Abdullah A Riyami can be reached at 571-270-3119. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TRAVIS S CHAMBERS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2831 09/25/2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 19, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Apr 03, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597555
EDGE-FIT PINS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592528
DC POWER CONNECTOR PLUG WITH IMPROVED POWER AND RIGIDITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586949
CASE FORMING MEMBER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12586941
FIELD INSTALLABLE CARD EDGE CONNECTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12586940
ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR AND POWER TERMINAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+11.4%)
1y 10m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1161 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month