DETAILED ACTION
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
Claim(s) 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Okuda et al. (2019/0264056) in view of Matsushima (2005/0179725).
Regarding claim 1, Okuda teaches an inkjet recording device, comprising:
a conveyance unit (fig. 1, item 7) configured to convey a recording medium in a conveyance direction (fig. 1, note arrow);
a carriage (fig. 1, item 2) configured to reciprocate in a main scanning direction (fig. 1, into page) intersecting the conveyance direction,
a plurality of heads (fig. 3C, items R, C1-C4 and CL), wherein the plurality of heads comprises
a preprocessing head (fig. 3C, item R) configured to eject a non-coloring preprocessing solution ([0123]),
a postprocessing head (fig. 3C, item CL) configured to eject a non-coloring postprocessing solution ([0123]), and
a plurality of ink heads (fig. 3C, items C1-C4), each ink head among the plurality of ink heads configured to eject ink for image formation ([0123]),
an ink head line (fig. 3C, line running through heads C1-C4) located on the carriage comprising respective ink heads among the plurality of ink heads aligned in the main scanning direction (see fig. 3C), wherein
at least a portion of the preprocessing head is arranged upstream of the ink head line in the conveyance direction (see fig. 3C),
at least a portion of the postprocessing head is arranged downstream of the ink head line in the conveyance direction (see fig. 3C),
the preprocessing head and the postprocessing head are arranged to satisfy a relationship of Formula 1,
1/2 ≤ (B1 + B2)/LC ≤ 3/2…(Formula 1)
in a case where
a distance between a leftmost head
a distance from the leftmost head to the preprocessing head in the main scanning direction is defined as B1 (see fig. 3C), and
a distance from the leftmost head to the postprocessing head in the main scanning direction is defined as B2 (see fig. 3C).
Okuda does not teach wherein the ink head line is an even-numbered quantity of ink head lines located on the carriage and aligned in the conveyance direction or wherein the preprocessing head and the postprocessing head are arranged between a leftmost head in the main scanning direction among the plurality of heads and a rightmost head in the main scanning direction among the plurality of heads.
Matsushima teaches this (Matsushima, see fig. 3, Note even numbered rows, and note that specialty/processing ink heads W and CL are arranged between the leftmost and rightmost heads on the carriage 5). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of invention to arrange the heads disclosed by Okuda in an even number of lines instead of one and arrange the processing heads between the rightmost and leftmost heads as disclosed by Matsushima, because doing so would amount to a simple substitution of one known head arrangement for another to obtain predictable results.
Response to Arguments
Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1 have been considered but are moot in light of the new ground(s) of rejection.
Conclusion
Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).
A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action.
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALEJANDRO VALENCIA whose telephone number is (571)270-5473. The examiner can normally be reached M-F.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, DOUGLAS X. RODRIGUEZ can be reached at 571-431-0716. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/ALEJANDRO VALENCIA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2853
Prosecution Insights