Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 23, 2026
Application No. 18/254,381

INKJET RECORDING DEVICE AND INKJET RECORDING METHOD

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 25, 2023
Priority
Nov 30, 2020 — JP 2020-198122 +1 more
Examiner
VALENCIA, ALEJANDRO
Art Unit
2853
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Kyocera Corporation
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
43%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
49%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 43% of resolved cases
43%
Career Allowance Rate
594 granted / 1391 resolved
-25.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
151 currently pending
Career history
1528
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
55.0%
+15.0% vs TC avg
§102
24.6%
-15.4% vs TC avg
§112
19.2%
-20.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1391 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 21 and 22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Okuda et al. (2019/0264056) in view of Matsushima (2005/0179725) and Ohnishi (2019/0283458). Regarding claim 1, Okuda teaches an inkjet recording device, comprising: a conveyance unit (fig. 1, item 7) configured to convey a recording medium in a conveyance direction (fig. 1, note arrow); a carriage (fig. 1, item 2) configured to reciprocate in a main scanning direction (fig. 1, into page) intersecting the conveyance direction, a plurality of heads (fig. 3C, items R, C1-C4 and CL), wherein the plurality of heads comprises a preprocessing head (fig. 3C, item R) configured to eject a non-coloring preprocessing solution ([0123]), a postprocessing head (fig. 3C, item CL) configured to eject a non-coloring postprocessing solution ([0123]), and a plurality of ink heads (fig. 3C, items C1-C4), each ink head among the plurality of ink heads configured to eject ink for image formation ([0123]), an ink head line (fig. 3C, line running through heads C1-C4) located on the carriage comprising respective ink heads among the plurality of ink heads aligned in the main scanning direction (see fig. 3C), wherein at least a portion of the preprocessing head is arranged upstream of the ink head line in the conveyance direction (see fig. 3C), at least a portion of the postprocessing head is arranged downstream of the ink head line in the conveyance direction (see fig. 3C), the preprocessing head and the postprocessing head are arranged to satisfy a relationship of Formula 1, 1/2 ≤ (B1 + B2)/LC ≤ 3/2…(Formula 1) in a case where a distance between a leftmost head and a rightmost head is defined as LC (see fig. 3C), a distance from the leftmost head to the preprocessing head in the main scanning direction is defined as B1 (see fig. 3C), and a distance from the leftmost head to the postprocessing head in the main scanning direction is defined as B2 (see fig. 3C). Okuda does not teach wherein the ink head line is an even-numbered quantity of ink head lines located on the carriage and aligned in the conveyance direction or wherein the postprocessing head is arranged between a leftmost head in the main scanning direction among the plurality of heads and a rightmost head in the main scanning direction among the plurality of heads. Matsushima teaches this (Matsushima, see fig. 3, Note even numbered rows, and note that specialty/processing ink heads W and CL are arranged between the leftmost and rightmost heads on the carriage 5). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of invention to arrange the heads disclosed by Okuda in an even number of lines instead of one and arrange the processing heads between the rightmost and leftmost heads as disclosed by Matsushima, because doing so would amount to a simple substitution of one known head arrangement for another to obtain predictable results. Okuda does not teach wherein the preprocessing head for non-ink, transparent solution is arranged between a leftmost head in the main scanning direction among the plurality of heads and a rightmost head in the main scanning direction among the plurality of heads. Ohnishi teaches this (Ohnishi, see fig. 3, Note preprocessing head 104 located between leftmost 102c and rightmost 102k heads in main canning direction. Further, note that this arrangement is an obvious variant of that shown in Figure 1, where the preprocessing head is an end head in the main scan direction as also disclosed by Okuda). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to use the preprocessing head/color head arrangement disclosed by Ohnishi instead of that disclosed by Okuda because doing so would amount to the simple substitution of one known head variant for another to yield predictable results. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1 have been considered but are moot in light of the new ground(s) of rejection. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALEJANDRO VALENCIA whose telephone number is (571)270-5473. The examiner can normally be reached M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, RICARDO MAGALLANES can be reached at 571-202-5960. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALEJANDRO VALENCIA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2853
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 5 earlier events
Aug 04, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 02, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Nov 11, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 15, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Mar 15, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 13, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 19, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12752537
LIQUID EJECTION DEVICE CONTROL METHOD AND LIQUID EJECTION DEVICE
3y 6m to grant Granted Oct 06, 2026
Patent 12741466
WIPER UNIT
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 22, 2026
Patent 12734799
SUBSTRATE TREATING CONTROL METHOD, SUBSTRATE TREATING APPARATUS, SUBSTRATE TREATING METHOD AND COMPUTER PROGRAM STORED IN COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM FOR TREATING SUBSTRATE
4y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12734815
CARTRIDGE AND PRINTING APPARATUS
3y 6m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12734830
LIQUID EJECTION DEVICE AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING LIQUID EJECTION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
43%
Grant Probability
49%
With Interview (+6.2%)
3y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1391 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month