Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/254,699

IN VITRO METHOD FOR FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF HAEMATOPOIETIC PROGENITORS

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
May 26, 2023
Priority
Dec 18, 2020 — CO NC2020/0015994 +1 more
Examiner
MACFARLANE, STACEY NEE
Art Unit
1675
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Instituto Distrital De Ciencia Biotecnologia E Innovacion En Salud - Idcbis
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
53%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
4m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 53% of resolved cases
53%
Career Allowance Rate
439 granted / 824 resolved
-6.7% vs TC avg
Strong +39% interview lift
Without
With
+39.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
866
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.7%
-36.3% vs TC avg
§103
38.6%
-1.4% vs TC avg
§102
16.6%
-23.4% vs TC avg
§112
20.1%
-19.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 824 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election of the species VCAM-1 and mesenchymal stromal cell conditioned medium, without traverse, in the reply filed on is acknowledged. Applicant has cancelled all claims to non-elected inventions/species. Claims 1, 3 and 8 are pending and examined upon their merits. Priority Applicant’s claim for the benefit of a prior-filed application under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) or under 35 U.S.C. 120, 121, 365(c), or 386(c) is acknowledged. This application is the national stage entry of PCT/IB2021/061953 filed on 17 December 2021, and claiming the benefit of Republic of Colombia Application No. CONC2020/0015994, filed 18 December 2020. Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 6 July 2023 is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Claim Objections Claim 3 is objected to because of the following informalities: the unit of measure should be corrected from “Mg/mL” to “mg/mL”. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 3 and 8 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hildago et al. Experimental Hematology, 29: 345-355, 2001. Regarding Claim 1, the Hildago et al. prior art teaches an in vitro Transwell migration assay comprising incubating an adhesion solution on a surface or adhesion compartment, wherein the adhesion solution comprises adhesion molecules, and wherein the adhesion molecules is vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), wherein it states, “For adhesion to VCAM-1, we used the soluble seven-extracellular domain recombinant human VCAM-1 (R&D Systems)” (pg. 346, Cell adhesion assays). adding a migration buffer to a chemotactic compartment which comprises a chemotactic agent, wherein the chemotactic agent is mesenchymal stromal cell conditioned medium, wherein it states: “Before the adhesion assays, the cell lines were starved for 7 hours by incubation in adhesion medium (DMEM/BSA 0.5%)” (pg.346, Cell adhesion assays). suspending a cellular phase of a source of HPC in a migration buffer and incubation thereof in a cellular compartment, wherein it states: CD34hi BM cells resuspended in adhesion medium …labeled for 20 minutes with the fluorescent dye BCECF-AM (pg.346, Cell adhesion assays) and “BM cells were placed in the upper chamber of Transwells (pg. 347, Chemotactic assays). The prior art teaches these cells are “hematopoietic progenitor cells” (see for example, Figure 1 legend). And, recovering the content of the chemotactic compartment and count the cells which migrated; wherein the cellular compartment is separated from the chemotactic compartment by an adhesion surface or adhesion compartment; and wherein the cellular compartment and the chemotactic compartment are in mutual communication via a continuous solution which comprises a chemotactic gradient. Hildago and colleagues state: “600 mL of adhesion medium with or without 100 ng/mL of SDF-1 alpha was added to the lower chamber and transwells were incubated at 37 C for 3 hours. Viable migrated cells were counted in the flow cytometer by analyzing each sample in the same predetermined time and flow conditions” (pg. 347, Chemotactic assays). Regarding Claim 3, Hildago et al. teach 1 µg/mL of sVCAM-1 is used (pg. 346, Cell adhesion assay). Thus, the prior art teaches the method wherein the concentration of the adhesion molecule (namely, VCAM-1) is of the order of pg/mL to mg/mL. Regarding Claim 8, the methods of Hildago et al. prior art teach, in both the cell adhesion assays and the Chemotactic assays,wherein the HPC are incubated at 37oC for 3 hours (pg. 347, Chemotactic assays) and cells were maintained “in a humidified atmosphere at 37 8 C and 5% CO2” (pg. 347, lines 4-5). Therefore, the prior art teaches HPCs are incubated for 2 - 5 hours at 37°C with an atmosphere of between 3 and 5% of CO2. Therefore, the method of the invention fails to distinguish over the methods disclosed in the prior art of record, and claims 1, 3 and 8 are rejected. Conclusion No claim is allowed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STACEY NEE MACFARLANE whose telephone number is (571)270-3057. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30-5 (EST) & Sat. A.M.. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jeffrey Stucker can be reached at 571-272-0911. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /STACEY N MACFARLANE/Examiner, Art Unit 1675
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 26, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 30, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601749
BIOMARKER DETECTION PROCESS AND ASSAY OF NEUROLOGICAL CONDITION
1y 12m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594320
METHOD FOR TREATING CHECKPOINT INHIBITORS INDUCED ADVERSE EVENTS
4y 8m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12594330
ANTI-OPIOID COMPOUNDS AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USING SAME
4y 4m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590963
ANTI-CANCER TREATMENT OF PRESELECTED SUBJECTS AND SCREENING METHODS TO IDENTIFY SUSCEPTIBLE SUBJECTS
5y 3m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589138
MARKER FOR ACID SPHINGOMYELINASE DISORDERS AND USES THEREOF
1y 11m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
53%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+39.2%)
3y 4m (~4m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 824 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month