Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/254,792

NEGATIVE THERMAL EXPANSION MATERIAL, COMPOSITE MATERIAL, METHOD OF MANUFACTURING NEGATIVE THERMAL EXPANSION MATERIAL, AND COMPONENT MADE OF NEGATIVE THERMAL EXPANSION MATERIAL

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
May 26, 2023
Priority
Nov 30, 2020 — JP 2020-198758 +2 more
Examiner
NGUYEN, CAM N
Art Unit
1736
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
National University Corporation Tokai National Higher Education and Research System
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
1079 granted / 1273 resolved
+19.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +12% lift
Without
With
+12.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
36 currently pending
Career history
1318
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
52.7%
+12.7% vs TC avg
§102
26.4%
-13.6% vs TC avg
§112
13.9%
-26.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1273 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Response to Election/Restrictions 1. Applicant’s election of Group I, claims 1-4, 6, 8-15, & 24, in the reply filed on 04/03/2026 is acknowledged. Because applicant did not distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the restriction requirement, the election has been treated as an election without traverse (MPEP § 818.01(a)). 2. Claims 19, 22, & 25-30 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention(s), there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Election was made without traverse in the reply filed on 04/03/2026. Status of Application 3. This application is a 371 of PCT/JP2021/042997, which was filed on 11/24/2021. Claims 1, 3-4, 6, 8-9, 12-15, 19, & 22 were originally amended. Claims 5, 7, 16-18, 20-21, & 23 were originally canceled. Claims 24-30 were originally added. Claims 1-4, 6, 8-15, & 24-30 are currently pending in this application. Information Disclosure Statement 4. The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 02/10/2026 & 03/11/2026 have been made of record and entered. The submissions are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statements have been considered by the examiner. An initialed copy accompanies this office action. Specification 5. The examiner has not checked the specification to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors (grammatical, typographical, and idiomatic). Cooperation of the applicant(s) is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant(s) may become aware of in the specification, in the claims and in any further amendment(s) that applicant(s) may file. Applicant(s) is also requested to complete the status of the copending applications referred to in the specification by their Attorney Docket Number or Application Serial Number, if any. The status of the parent application(s) and/or any other application(s) cross-referenced to this application, if any, should be updated in a timely manner. Claim Objections 6. Claims 1, 8-10, 15, & 24 are objected to because of the following informalities: A. In claim 1, line 1, “that includes” should change to --comprising-. B. In claim 1, line 2, “Cu2-xRxV2-yPyO7” should change to --Cu2-xRxV2-yPyO7--. C. In claim 1, last line, “0≤x≤2, 0<y<2” should change to --0≤x≤2 and 0<y<2--. D. In claim 8, line 3, --of the oxide-- should be inserted after “coefficient”. E. In claim 9, line 3, --of the oxide-- should be inserted after “coefficient”. F. In claim 10, line 1, “that includes” should change to --comprising-. G. In claim 10, line 2, “Zn2-xTxP2-yAyO7” should change to --Zn2-xTxP2-yAyO7--. H. In claim 10, line 4, “0≤x<2, 0≤y≤2” should change to --0≤x<2 and 0≤y≤2--. I. In claim 15, line 1, “that includes” should change to --comprising-. J. In claim 15, line 2, --:-- should be inserted after “general formula”. K. In claim 15, line 3, “Cu2-x1Rx1V2-y1Py1O7” should change to --Cu2-x1Rx1V2-y1Py1O7--. L. In claim 15, formula (1), “0≤x≤2, 0<y1<2” should change to --0≤x≤2 and 0<y1<2--. M. In claim 15, line 5, “Zn2-x2Tx2P2-y2Ay2O7” should change to --Zn2-x2Tx2P2-y2Ay2O7--. N. In claim 15, formula (2), 0≤x2<2, 0≤y2≤2” should change to --0≤x2<2 and 0≤y2≤2--. O. In claim 15, line 9, “Ti2-x3Mx3O3” should change to --Ti2-x3Mx3O3--. P. In claim 24, line 1, “that includes” should change to --comprising-. Q. In claim 24, line 2, “Cu2-xRxV2-yPyO7” should change to --Cu2-xRxV2-yPyO7--. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112(b) (Second Paragraph) 7. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 6 & 10-15 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. A. Regarding claim 6, the claim limitation on “at least one of an oxide having a monoclinic crystal system or an oxide having an orthorhombic crystal system is included” appears unclear as to what it is being referred to. Is this limitation referring to the physical property feature of the oxide of the negative thermal expansion material recited in claim 1? Or Is this an additional claim feature of the oxide of the negative thermal expansion material recited in claim 1? B. Regarding claim 10, the claim recites “wherein 0≤x≤2, 0≤y≤2” and the claim also recites “except that (x,y)=(0,0) and (0,2) are excluded”. This is unclear and improper since the claim uses “≤” defining x and y to include 0 for x and 2 for y. C. Regarding claim 15, formula (2), the claim recites “wherein 0≤x2≤2, 0≤y2≤2” and the claim also recites “except that (x2,y2)=(0,0) and (0,2) are excluded”. This is unclear and improper since the claim uses “≤” defining x and y to include 0 for x2 and 2 for y2. *Claims 11-14 are rejected because they are based on rejected claims 10 & 15 and they do not appear to cure the indefiniteness. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102(a)(1) 8. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4, 6, 8-15, & 24 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by CN110229001, hereinafter “CN ‘001”. The claimed invention relates to a negative thermal expansion material comprising an oxide represented by a general formula (1) Cu2-xRxV2-yPyO7 (R includes at least one element selected from Mg, Al, Si, Ti, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Zn, and Sn, wherein 0≤x≤2 and 0<y<2 are met (as recited in the instant claim 1). CN ‘001 broadly discloses a negative thermal expansion material having a formula Cu2-x AxP2yByO7. The copper pyrophosphate has a strong negative thermal expansion property at -150oC to 100oC and a volumetric thermal expansion coefficient (CTE) of -21.33 x 10-6 and negative thermal expansion abruptly becomes positive expansion, and the volumetric thermal expansion coefficient at 100oC to 500oC is +17.13 x 10-6. See Abstract. Regarding claims 1, 15, & 24, the claimed negative thermal expansion material is met by reference. When x = 0 in the claimed formula (1) Cu2-xRxV2-yPyO7, formula (1) will become Cu2V2-yPyO7, and with the proviso that 0<y<2 when y=0.6, the claimed formula (1) will become Cu2V1.4P0.6O7. When y=1.4, the claimed formula (1) will become Cu2V0.6P1.4O7, which appears to be the same formulas as disclosed in CN ‘001. The reference specifically discloses Cu2P2-yVyO7 (0.5<y<1.5) (See Example 3). When y=0.6, the formula disclosed will become Cu2P1.4V0.6O7. When y=1.4, the disclosed formula will become Cu2P0.6V1.4O7. Regarding claims 2, 6, 8-9, 13-14, & 24, it is considered the property features of the negative thermal expansion material as further defined in these claims are inherent characteristics of the disclosed negative thermal expansion materials in view of the same oxide material disclosed and claimed. The reference specifically discloses that the disclosed copper pyrophosphate has a strong negative thermal expansion property at -150oC to 100oC, and the volumetric thermal expansion coefficient (CTE) is -21.33 x 10-6. After 100oC, it mutates to positive thermal expansion, and the thermal expansion coefficient of 100oC to 500oC is +17.13 x 10-6 (see page 2, last paragraph). Thus, the linear thermal expansion coefficient associated with the temperature of the negative thermal expansion material as claimed are inherently met by the reference. Regarding claims 10-12, the claimed thermal expansion material comprising an oxide having a formula (2) Zn2-xTxP2-yAyO7 is met by the reference. With the proviso 0≤x<2 and 0≤y≤2, when x=1.5 and y=0, the claimed formula (2) will become Zn0.5Cu1.5P2O7 with “T” being Cu. Example 2 in CN ‘001 teaches Cu2-xZnxP2O7 (0<x<1), when x=0.5, the disclosed formula will become Cu1.5 Zn0.5 P2O7. The same chemical formula is disclosed and claimed. Claims 1-4, 6, 8-15, & 24 are unpatentable as being anticipated or not inventive over CN ‘001. Conclusion 9. Claims 1-4, 6, 8-15, & 24-30 are pending. Claims 1-4, 6, 8-15, & 24 are rejected. Claims 19, 22, & 25-30 are withdrawn. No claims are allowed. Contacts 10. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Primary Examiner CAM N. NGUYEN whose telephone number is (571)272-1357. The examiner can normally be reached on M-F (8:30 am – 5:00 pm) at alternative worksite or at cam.nguyen@uspto.gov. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Anthony Zimmer, can be reached at 571-270-3591. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Cam N. Nguyen/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1736 /CNN/ June 21, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 26, 2023
Application Filed
Jun 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12679731
USE OF AN ADDITIVE IN THE PRODUCTION OF COPPER(II) HYDROXIDE PHOSPHATE
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12678773
SUPPORTED TRANSITION METAL NANOPARTICLE CATALYST AND USE THEREOF AS A HYDROGENATION CATALYST
3y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12679931
Method for Preparing Polyether Amine Catalyst, and Polyether Amine
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12662389
METHOD FOR PRODUCING LITHIUM-CONTAINING SOLUTION
3y 7m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12665233
METHOD FOR RECYCLING POSITIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL
3y 6m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+12.2%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1273 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month