Office Action Predictor
Application No. 18/254,838

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SOUND-ENHANCED MEETING PLATFORMS

Final Rejection §102
Filed
May 26, 2023
Examiner
KURR, JASON R
Art Unit
2695
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
The Regents Of The University Of California
OA Round
2 (Final)
75%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

75%
Career Allow Rate
520 granted / 693 resolved
Without
With
+19.1%
Interview Lift
avg trend
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
27 pending
720
Total Applications
career history

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.7%
-35.3% vs TC avg
§103
42.9%
+2.9% vs TC avg
§102
31.2%
-8.8% vs TC avg
§112
15.4%
-24.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-8 and 10-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Nguyen et al (US 20200099792 A1). With respect to claim 1, Nguyen discloses a communications system, comprising: a plurality of electronic devices (fig.2 #210A-H “Client Device”), each corresponding to a participant in a gathering of multiple participants, wherein one or more of the plurality of electronic devices is located in a physical meeting space (Par.[0047] Client Devices #210 may be collocated within a Room #240A-C or remote from one another); and machine executable instructions, that when executed cause the communications system to: connect each of the plurality of electronic devices to a meeting platform (fig.2 #230) corresponding to the physical meeting space (Par.[0048] each Client Device #210 is connected to a meeting platform such as a Network #230); determine relative positions of the plurality of electronic devices (Par.[0075] localization may be performed to determine relative positions of talkers using the Client Devices #120); select an audio stream to transmit to the plurality of electronic devices based on sound feeds received by microphones in the plurality of electronic devices (Par.[0049] each Client Device #120 may generate a first audio stream by capturing speech of a user; wherein a representative audio stream is selected and transmitted to respective client devices); and adjust the audio stream to each of the plurality of electronic devices based on the relative positions of the plurality of electronic devices (Par.[0049][0075] the representative audio stream is spatially adjusted based on a relative position between user’s of the client devices #120). With respect to claim 2, Nguyen discloses the communications system of claim 1, wherein the communications system adjusts the audio stream to each of the plurality of electronic devices by independently setting a volume and delay for one or more speakers of each electronic device of the plurality of electronic devices (Par.[0104] delays may be set for each client device to time synchronize spatial rendering of the audio stream; Par.[0113] gain levels may be set for each client device by a host device). With respect to claim 3, Nguyen discloses the communications system of claim 1, wherein the communications system determines the relative positions of the plurality of electronic devices by: determining relative positions of one or more electronic devices in the physical meeting space based on one or more of sound feeds (Par.[0077] “TDOA” of recorded audio streams), video feeds, and user input, received by the one or more electronic devices. With respect to claim 4, Nguyen discloses the communications system of claim 1, wherein the communications system determines the relative positions of the plurality of electronic devices by: setting a position of a remote device of the plurality of electronic devices to a selected location in the physical meeting space, wherein the remote device is not located in the physical meeting space (Par.[0049] “A representative audio stream is an audio stream that, when played back using an audio play back device in a room (e.g., 240 A), either (1) approximates a user(s) at their location(s) within the room in which they were recorded (e.g., 240B), or (2) approximates a user(s) at a virtual location while respecting their relative position between one another. In other examples, the representative audio stream spatially renders users from other rooms (e.g., 240B) in the room (e.g., 240A) of the audio play back device(s)”). With respect to claim 5, Nguyen discloses the communications system of claim 1, wherein the communications system selects the audio stream to transmit to the plurality of electronic devices by: isolating a first sound feed corresponding to a primary person speaking; and setting the first sound feed as the audio stream (Par.[0112] inputs from client devices may be ranked based on importance, such that a leader’s input may be set as a first sound feed streamed to all client devices). With respect to claim 6, Nguyen discloses the communications system of claim 5, wherein the communications system further selects the audio stream to transmit to the plurality of electronic devices by: isolating a second sound feed corresponding to a secondary person speaking; adding the second sound feed to the first sound feed to produce a mixed sound feed; and setting the mixed sound feed as the audio stream (Par.[0107] “recorded audio streams from multiple users played back on a single client device 210 in another room”). With respect to claim 7, Nguyen discloses a method for enhancing sound in a meeting, the method comprising: connecting a plurality of electronic devices to a meeting platform, wherein the plurality of electronic devices are located in a physical meeting space (Par.[0047-0048] Client Devices #210 may be collocated within a Room #240A-C or remote from one another, wherein each Client Device #210 is connected to a meeting platform such as a Network #230)); gathering a plurality of sound feeds from microphones of the plurality of electronic devices (Par.[0049] each Client Device #120 may generate a first audio stream by capturing speech of a user; wherein a representative audio stream is selected and transmitted to respective client devices); identifying a primary person speaking based on the plurality of sound feeds (Par.[0112] primary person or leader may be identified based on a ranking system); and transmitting in real time an audio stream of the primary person speaking to the plurality of electronic devices (Par.[0112] inputs from client devices may be ranked based on importance, such that a leader’s input may be set as a first sound feed streamed to all client devices). With respect to claim 8, Nguyen discloses the method of claim 7, the method further comprising: for an electronic device of the plurality of electronic devices: adjusting a delay of the audio stream output by the electronic device based on a sound feed recorded by a microphone of the electronic device (Par.[0104] delays may be set for each client device to time synchronize spatial rendering of the audio stream). With respect to claim 10, Nguyen discloses the method of claim 7, the method further comprising: for an electronic device of the plurality of electronic devices: adjusting a volume of the audio stream output by the electronic device based on a sound feed recorded by a microphone of the electronic device (Par.[0113] gain levels may be set for each client device by a host device). With respect to claim 11, Nguyen discloses the method of claim 10, wherein the volume is adjusted based on a difference between a volume threshold of the device and a volume measured by the microphone of the device (Par.[0113] volume gains may be adjusted based on a test signal played by each client device and captured via corresponding microphones). With respect to claim 12, Nguyen discloses the method of claim 7, the method further comprising: for an electronic device of the plurality of electronic devices: adjusting a delay of the audio stream output by the electronic device based on a distance between the device and the primary person speaking (Par.[0104] delays may be introduced to account for transmission latencies between host and client devices, wherein transmission latencies are related to a distance between communicating devices). With respect to claim 13, Nguyen discloses the method of claim 7, the method further comprising: for an electronic device of the plurality of electronic devices: adjusting a volume of the audio stream output by the electronic device based on a distance between the electronic device and the primary person speaking (Par.[0113]) With respect to claim 14, Nguyen discloses the method of claim 7, wherein transmitting in real time the audio stream of the primary person speaking to the plurality of electronic devices comprises: determining an electronic device of the plurality of electronic devices closest to the primary person speaking; and setting the audio stream to a sound feed recorded by one or more microphones of the electronic device closest to the primary person speaking (Par.[0112] inputs from client devices may be ranked based on importance, such that client device associated with a leader (i.e. closest client device) may be set as a first sound feed streamed to all client devices). With respect to claim 15, Nguyen discloses the method of claim 7, wherein connecting the plurality of electronic devices to the meeting platform comprises: correlating a connection of one or more of the plurality of electronic devices to a meeting ID; and automatically connecting the plurality of electronic devices to the meeting platform using the meeting ID (Par.[0095]). With respect to claim 16, Nguyen discloses a method for a hybrid meeting, the method comprising: connecting a plurality of electronic devices to a meeting platform, wherein a first electronic device of the plurality of electronic devices is located in a physical meeting space, and wherein a second electronic device of the plurality of electronic devices is remote from the physical meeting space (Par.[0047] Client Devices #210 may be collocated within a Room #240A-C or remote from one another); determining a first location of the first electronic device within the physical meeting space (Par.[0075] localization may be performed to determine relative positions of talkers using the Client Devices #120); setting a second location of the second electronic device in the physical meeting space based on a user selection of the second location (Par.[0013][0118-0119] a user may set virtual locations of virtual users of remote client devices); recording a sound feed from one or more microphones of the first electronic device; determining an audio stream based on the sound feed; transmitting the audio stream to the second electronic device; and adjusting playback of the audio stream at the second electronic device based on a relative position of the first location with respect to the second location (Par.[0049] “A representative audio stream is an audio stream that, when played back using an audio play back device in a room (e.g., 240 A), either (1) approximates a user(s) at their location(s) within the room in which they were recorded (e.g., 240B), or (2) approximates a user(s) at a virtual location while respecting their relative position between one another. In other examples, the representative audio stream spatially renders users from other rooms (e.g., 240B) in the room (e.g., 240A) of the audio play back device(s)”. Sound feeds captured by microphones of a first client device may be transmitted to and reproduced by a second client device in a separate meeting space, wherein the sound feed is adjusted with respect to a relative spatial location of the client devices). With respect to claim 17, Nguyen discloses the method of claim 16, wherein adjusting playback of the audio stream at the second electronic device based on the relative position of the first location with respect to the second location comprises: simulating sound propagation from the first location to the second location using two or more speakers of the second electronic device (Par.[0043-0045] as shown in figures 1A,B at least two speakers are used to reproduce spatialized audio to a user of the client devices). With respect to claim 18, Nguyen discloses the method of claim 16, the method further comprising: recording a sound feed from one or more microphones of the second electronic device; determining an audio stream based on the sound feed; transmitting the audio stream to the first electronic device; and adjusting playback of the audio stream at the second electronic device based on the relative position of the first location with respect to the second location (Par.[0049][0075] the representative audio stream is spatially adjusted based on a relative position between users’ of the client devices #120). With respect to claim 19, Nguyen discloses the method of claim 18, wherein adjusting playback of the audio stream at the second electronic device based on the relative position of the first location with respect to the second location comprises: simulating sound propagation from the second location to the first location using two or more speakers of the first electronic device (Par.[0043-0045] as shown in figures 1A,B at least two speakers are used to reproduce spatialized audio to a user of the client devices). With respect to claim 20, Nguyen discloses the method of claim 16, the method further comprising: updating the first location to a third location based on input received by a user input device of the first electronic device (Par.[0013][0118-0119] a user may set virtual locations of virtual users of remote client devices). Allowable Subject Matter Claim 9 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed December 15, 2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Regarding independent claims 1 and 7, the Applicant remarks that the Nguyen reference (US 20200099792 A1) does not teach selecting an audio stream to transmit to the plurality of electronic devices based on an analysis of the sound feeds. The Examiner would like to note that the present claim language does not disclose an “analysis” step of the sound feeds. Claim 1 provides: “select an audio stream to transmit to the plurality of electronic devices based on sound feeds received by microphones in the plurality of electronic devices”. The term “based on” is not the same as an “analysis” of the sound feeds. Nguyen provides a selection of audio streams to transmit between client devices, wherein the audio streams are “based on” the sound feeds picked up by microphones of each client device. Claim 7 provides: “identifying a primary person speaking based on the plurality of sound feeds”. As per paragraph [0112] of Nguyen, the audio processing module #320 of the client devices #210 may use ranked metadata to assign outputs to the client devices. Such a ranking of outputs is an identification of a primary person that is speaking in order to output an audio stream “based on” the sound feed received by a microphones of client device associated with the primary person. Regarding independent claim 16, the Applicant remarks that Nguyen does not teach; “setting a second location of the second electronic device in the physical meeting space based on a user selection of the second location”. The Applicant continues that the claim limitation requires that the remote participant themselves select their own virtual position within the physical meeting space. The Examiner disagrees, and would like to note that at no point within the claim language does it state that the remote participant selects their own virtual position within the physical meeting space. The claim merely states that the second location is set based on a user selection of the second location, therefor any user may set the second location. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JASON R KURR whose telephone number is (571)270-5981. The examiner can normally be reached M-F: 9-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Vivian Chin can be reached at (571-272-7848. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JASON R. KURR Primary Examiner Art Unit 2695 /JASON R KURR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2695
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 26, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 11, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Dec 15, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 27, 2026
Final Rejection — §102
Mar 30, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology. Study what changed to get past this examiner.

Patent 12598439
POWER FAULT RECOVERY MECHANISM FOR AN AUDIO SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598424
Zoned Audio Duck For In Car Conversation
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12598414
System And Method For Generating An Audio Signal
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597411
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VIRTUAL MICROPHONES IN ACTIVE NOISE CANCELLATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12587773
CONFIGURATION SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AIRCRAFT EQUIPMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026

AI Strategy Recommendation

Click below to generate an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
75%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+19.1%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 693 resolved cases by this examiner