Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 18/255,030

PART MADE FROM CMC AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SUCH A PART

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
May 30, 2023
Priority
Nov 30, 2020 — FR 2012373 +1 more
Examiner
MELENDEZ, ARMAND
Art Unit
1759
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Irt Antoine De Saint Exupery
OA Round
2 (Final)
46%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 46% of resolved cases
46%
Career Allowance Rate
165 granted / 355 resolved
-18.5% vs TC avg
Strong +42% interview lift
Without
With
+42.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
53 currently pending
Career history
402
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
97.0%
+57.0% vs TC avg
§102
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§112
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 355 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of claims 9-12 in the reply filed on 2/5/26 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that Hall does not disclose the technical feature. This is not found persuasive because this is merely a conclusory statement and does not allege any specific limitations that are missing. Additionally, this feature would be anticipated as demonstrated by the rejection below. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claims 1-8, 13-14 are withdrawn from further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR 1.142(b), as being drawn to a nonelected invention, there being no allowable generic or linking claim. Applicant timely traversed the restriction (election) requirement in the reply filed on 2/5/26. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 9-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hall (US 2018/0362413). As to claim 9, Hall teaches a method for manufacturing a CMC composite part, comprising the steps of: - providing an intermediate part (14a) according to any one of an intermediate part made from CMC composite material, having at least one working area (the external surface) intended, once the part has been finalized, to be in contact with a working fluid of a turbomachine [0036] (however this merely describes an intended use and not an actual structural component of the intermediate part), comprising a reinforcement (12), a matrix (18), including a ceramic material [0037], and at least one insert (14a), which is made from a material different from that of the reinforcement (12) and the matrix and having a diameter comprised between 0.1 and 1 mm [0042] and which is designed to promote migration of liquid silicon within the intermediate part during a step of densifying the intermediate part, in which said at least one insert is provided in an area of the intermediate part that is not a working area [0056, 0042, 0052-0054] as explained above and densifying the intermediate part by penetration of liquid silicon into the intermediate part [0056]. As to claim 10, Hall teaches the step of providing the intermediate part comprises a step of weaving a preform, the weaving step comprising the simultaneous three- dimensional weaving of two types of fibers the materials of which are different, the first type of fiber forming the three-dimensional structure of the preform intended to form the reinforcement of the intermediate part and the second type of fiber forming at least one insert of the intermediate part [0039, Fig 3]. As to claim 11, Hall teaches comprising, during the densification step, a sub-step of controllably cooling the intermediate part, and a. in which a homogeneous temperature is imposed on the entire intermediate part during the cooling sub-step [0056, 0069]. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 12 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over by Hall (US 2018/0362413) in view of Corman (US 5952100). As to claim 12, Hall does not explicitly state the cooling sub-step comprises at least one cooling ramp of less than 50C/min. Corman teaches a fiber reinforced silicon-silicon carbide matrix composite wherein silicon melt infiltration includes a cooling period wherein the cooling occurs at 3 C/min and then at a rate of 5 C/min [col 8 line 9-36] as this avoids thermal cracking and provides protection in dry and wet environments at high temperatures [col 2 line 56-67, col 1 line 45-55]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have altered the invention of Hall and had a cooling ramp period of 3 C/min or 5 C/min, as suggested by Corman, in order to avoids thermal cracking and provides protection in dry and wet environments at high temperatures. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ARMAND MELENDEZ whose telephone number is (571)270-0342. The examiner can normally be reached 9 AM- 6 PM Monday-Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christina Johnson can be reached at 571-272-1176. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ARMAND MELENDEZ/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1759
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 30, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Jul 02, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 16, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12668011
ULTRASONICALLY ASSISTED POLYMER EXTRUSION
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12642950
HEMOSTASIS VALVE
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12636825
EXTRUDER VENT FLOW SENSOR
2y 6m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12636820
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING FOAM MOLDED BODY
1y 8m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12600067
INJECTION DEVICE
1y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
46%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+42.5%)
3y 6m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 355 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month