Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/255,657

IRIDIUM-CONTAINING OXIDE, METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME AND CATALYST CONTAINING IRIDIUM-CONTAINING OXIDE

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 02, 2023
Priority
Dec 24, 2020 — JP 2020-215039 +1 more
Examiner
FIORITO, JAMES A
Art Unit
1731
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Furuya Metal Co. Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
71%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 71% — above average
71%
Career Allowance Rate
521 granted / 731 resolved
+6.3% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+28.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
767
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
49.3%
+9.3% vs TC avg
§102
21.0%
-19.0% vs TC avg
§112
27.7%
-12.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 731 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of 1-4, and 10-13 in the reply filed on 6/22/2026 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that the prior art cited in the restriction does not teach the special technical feature of claim 1. This is not found persuasive because the special technical feature of claim 1 is at least taught in the prior art cited in the prior art rejections below. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-4, and 10-13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by TW 201407794. Regarding claim 1, TW ’794 teaches: “A porous metal oxide semiconductor film is formed on the electrode layer (1) or on the titanium oxide film (1) provided as necessary. Porous The average pore diameter of the metal oxide semiconductor film (1) is in the range of 10 to 40 nm, and the pore volume is in the range of 0.25 to 0.8 ml/g. The porous metal oxide semiconductor is not particularly limited, and is preferably one or more metals selected from the group consisting of titanium oxide, cerium oxide, zirconium oxide, cerium oxide, tungsten oxide, cerium oxide, zinc oxide, tin oxide, and indium oxide. Made up of oxides. Among them, crystalline titanium oxide such as anatase type titanium oxide, brookite type titanium oxide, and rutile type titanium oxide can be preferably used. Further, the film thickness of the porous metal oxide semiconductor film (1) is preferably in the range of 0.1 to 50 μm.” (Description). The film may include iridium oxide to provide reduction catalytic energy (Description). Regarding claims 2-3, and 10, TW ‘794 does not expressly state that the composition has the claimed hysteresis of claim 2 and the claimed surface area of claim 3. However, “[T]he discovery of a previously unappreciated property of a prior art composition, or of a scientific explanation for the prior art’s functioning, does not render the old composition patentably new to the discoverer.” Atlas Powder Co. v. Ireco Inc., 190 F.3d 1342, 1347, 51 USPQ2d 1943, 1947 (Fed. Cir. 1999). Thus the claiming of a new use, new function or unknown property which is inherently present in the prior art does not necessarily make the claim patentable. In re Best, 562 F.2d 1252, 1254, 195 USPQ 430, 433 (CCPA 1977). In re Crish, 393 F.3d 1253, 1258, 73 USPQ2d 1364, 1368 (Fed. Cir. 2004). See MPEP 2112. The product of TW ’794 is substantially similar because it has the same pore volume and pore size. Regarding claims 4, 11-13, the material may include rutile titanium oxide (Description). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAMES A FIORITO whose telephone number is (571)272-9921. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Amber Orlando can be reached at (571) 270-3149. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JAMES A FIORITO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1731
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 02, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12668495
METAL BORIDES AND USES THEREOF
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12668501
METAL OXIDE PARTICLE HAVING CORE-SHELL STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME
1y 5m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12643796
MOLECULAR SIEVE SSZ-113 WITH HIGH ACIDITY, ITS SYNTHESIS AND USE
3y 0m to grant Granted Jun 02, 2026
Patent 12623909
MOLECULAR SIEVE SSZ-121 WITH HIGH ACIDITY, ITS SYNTHESIS AND USE
2y 11m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12616963
CHROME-FREE COPPER CATALYSTS FOR FATTY ESTER HYDROGENOLYSIS/HYDROGENATION
3y 4m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
71%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+28.4%)
2y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 731 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month