Office Action Predictor
Application No. 18/255,862

Smoke-Producing Compositions

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jun 02, 2023
Examiner
FELTON, AILEEN BAKER
Art Unit
1734
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Etienne Lacroix Tous Artifices S.A.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
51%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
4y 6m
To Grant
77%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

51%
Career Allow Rate
223 granted / 435 resolved
Without
With
+25.7%
Interview Lift
avg trend
4y 6m
Avg Prosecution
49 pending
484
Total Applications
career history

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
64.0%
+24.0% vs TC avg
§102
16.4%
-23.6% vs TC avg
§112
17.1%
-22.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 4-6 and 8-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Bardisa (ES2302620). Regarding claims 1, 4-6 and 9-12, Bardisa discloses a smoke producing composition for signaling smoke that can be used for military use (0005) that includes an oxidizing agent such as potassium nitrate (0028) from 25-38 %, lactose from 0-25 %, binder from 5-25%, flame suppressor (inhibitor) from 0-30 % (0017), and talc (0018) (meets phlegmatizer as shown by Applicant’s specification). The dye can include Solvent yellow 93 (0019) which meets that claimed sublimation and decomposition dye properties since it is one of the dyes used by Applicant. Thus, these properties are inherent to the dye disclosed by Bardisa. Regarding claim 8, the decomposition temperature is inherent to the composition of Bardisa. As to limitations which are considered to be inherent in a reference, note the case law of In re Ludke, 169 USPQ 563; In re Swinehart, 169 USPQ 226, In re Fitzgerald, 205 USPQ 594; In re Best et al, 195 USPQ 430; and In re Brown, 173 USPQ 685, 688. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 7 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Couture (4225368). Regarding claim 7, Couture discloses that it is known to use dye of size 100-1000 micron with a smoke producing composition (col. 1, lines 10-25). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made and/or filed to use the particle sizes disclosed by Couture since both compositions relate to smoke production and since Couture suggests that these particle sizes of dye material are useful in a smoke producing composition. Claims 2 and 3 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wang (CN 110627597). Regarding claims 2 and 3, Wang discloses a smoke producing composition that utilizes Solvent Yellow 98 as the dye. It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made and/or filed to use the dye as disclosed by Wang since Wang teaches that it is a known dye for use in a smoke producing composition and since Bardisa is a smoke producing composition that also uses dye. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AILEEN BAKER FELTON whose telephone number is (571)272-6875. The examiner can normally be reached Monday 9-5:30, Thursday 11-3, Friday 9-5:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jonathan Johnson can be reached at 571-272-1177. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AILEEN B FELTON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1734
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 02, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 06, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Apr 02, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology. Study what changed to get past this examiner.

Patent 12595217
THERMITE BLOCK FOR STORED-DATA DESTRUCTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595174
METHOD FOR PRODUCING THE PENTAZOLATE ANION USING A HYPERVALENT IODINE OXIDANT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12559443
ENERGY-RELEASING COMPOSITE MATERIAL AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12552729
MECHANICALLY-GASSED EMULSION EXPLOSIVES AND METHODS RELATED THERETO
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12545632
METHOD FOR MAKING PYROTECHNIC MATERIAL AND RELATED TECHNOLOGY
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026

AI Strategy Recommendation

Click below to generate an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
51%
Grant Probability
77%
With Interview (+25.7%)
4y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 435 resolved cases by this examiner