Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 18/256,304

METHOD OF TREATING HEREDITARY HEMORRHAGIC TELANGIECTASIA USING PAZOPANIB

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 07, 2023
Priority
Dec 07, 2020 — provisional 63/199,116 +1 more
Examiner
WORSHAM, JESSICA N
Art Unit
1615
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Hht Foundation International Inc.
OA Round
4 (Non-Final)
56%
Grant Probability
Moderate
4-5
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 56% of resolved cases
56%
Career Allowance Rate
423 granted / 751 resolved
-3.7% vs TC avg
Strong +56% interview lift
Without
With
+56.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
796
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.1%
-38.9% vs TC avg
§103
41.7%
+1.7% vs TC avg
§102
13.6%
-26.4% vs TC avg
§112
25.4%
-14.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 751 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Detailed Action Status of Application 1. Receipt of the Request for Continued Examination (RCE) under 37 C.F.R. 1.114 and Applicants’ Arguments/Remarks, all filed 17 August 2026 are acknowledged. Claims 1-2, 5-6, 27-28, 33-34, 37, 39-41, and 55-57 are currently pending. Claims 3-4, 7-26, 29-32, 35-36, 38, and 42-54 are cancelled. Claims 55-57 are newly added. Claims 1, 27, and 33 are amended. Claims 1-2, 5-6, 27-28, 33-34, 37, 39-41, and 55-57 are examined on the merits within. Continued Examination Under 37 C.F.R. 1.114 2. A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 17 August 2026 has been entered. Withdrawn Rejections 3. Applicant’s arguments, filed 17 August 2026, with respect to the 35 U.S.C. 103 Rejections of Devries et al. in view of Marambaud have been fully considered and are persuasive. The 35 U.S.C. 103 Rejections of claims 1-2, 6, 27-28, 33-34 and 37-41 have been withdrawn in view of the claim amendments. New Rejections Claim Rejections – 35 U.S.C. 103 4. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 5. Claim(s) 1-2, 6, 27-28, 33-34, 37, 39-41, and 55-57 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Parambil et al. (Laryngoscope, 2018) in view of Marambaud (WO2020/068719). Parambil et al. teach a patient with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia dependent on iron infusion and packed red blood cell transfusions. The patient is administered 100 mg of pazopanib with dramatic improvements in epistaxis and normalization of hemoglobin and iron levels without replenishment needs for 12 months. See abstract. The initial dose of pazopanib was 50 mg daily which was increased to 100 mg daily and continued with this dose through 6 months and 1 year. See page 2235. Side effects are observed in approximately 30% of patients when prescribed pazopanib at a standard dose of 800 mg daily. At a low dose of 100 mg, pazopanib is well tolerated without side effects. See page 2236 Parambil et al. do not teach hemorrhagic locus, vascular density, or cardiac failure. Marambaud teaches compositions for treating vascular lesions and hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia. See abstract. Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT), also known as Osler-Weber-Rendu disease or syndrome, is a hemorrhagic genetic disorder that leads to abnormal blood vessel formations (or vascular lesions), including prominently telangiectasis and arteriovenous malformations, in the skin, mucous membranes and organs, such as the liver, lung, gastrointestinal system, and brain of an afflicted subject. In its most severe manifestations, HHT can lead to highly debilitating and life-threatening events, such as severe epistaxis and internal bleeding. HHT is also associated with secondary complications, which include anemia, cerebral abscess and embolism following pulmonary AVMs, as well as high-output cardiac failure consecutive to liver AVMs. See paragraph [0004]. Active ingredients include pazopanib. See paragraph [0015]. Receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) inhibitors treat a vascular lesion and/or bleeding and/or anemia in a subject. See paragraph [0006]. Figures 1A-1B show the effects of different treatments on number and diameter of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs), diameter of veins, and vascular density, including statistical comparisons. See paragraph [0008]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art as of the effective filing date of the invention to identify a hemorrhagic locus prior to administering pazopanib in an effective amount because Parambil et al. teach treatment of hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia with pazopanib and Marambaud teaches that receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors treat vascular lesions and/or bleeding in subjects with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art as of the effective filing date of the invention to determine a first vascular density of a subject with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia and administer pazopanib and then identify a second vascular density and modify the amount of pazopanib based on the results because Marambaud teaches the correlation between vascular density and hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia. It is well within the purview of the skilled artisan to modify dosing regimen by increasing or decreasing therapeutic amounts based on routine testing to determine the efficacy of the therapeutic agent, especially since it is known to give up to 800 mg pazopanib daily. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art as of the effective filing date of the invention to determine a cardiac failure in a subject prior to administering pazopanib in an effective amount because Marambaud teaches the correlation between hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia and cardiac failure including anemia, lung lesions and liver lesions. 6. Claim(s) 5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Parambil et al. (Laryngoscope, 2018) in view of Marambaud (WO2020/068719) as applied to claims 1-2, 6, 27-28, 33-34, 37, 39-41, and 55-57 above and further in view of Beckman et al. (Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 2020). Parambil et al. and Marambaud do not teach severity indicators. Beckman et al. teach Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia (HHT) is a rare inherited disorder characterized by development of mucocutaneous telangiectasis and visceral organ arteriovenous malformations, which can lead to recurrent, spontaneous bleeding and development of iron deficiency anemia. The primary objective of this study was to ascertain the relationship between epistaxis severity scores (ESS), laboratory values, genotype, and phenotype in HHT. Our secondary objective was to assess efficacy of systemic antifibrinolytic therapy in reducing ESS in HHT. See abstract. We demonstrate that the ESS predicts markers of iron deficiency anemia and that it can be used to both guide and monitor response to therapeutic interventions in patients with HHT. See Conclusion. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art as of the effective filing date of the invention to determine the effective amount of pazopanib to administer based on severity scores because Beckman et al. teach using the knowledge learned from severity scores to guide and monitor therapeutic interventions. Correspondence 7. No claims are allowed at this time. 8. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JESSICA WORSHAM whose telephone number is (571)270-7434. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday (8-5). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Robert Wax can be reached at 571-272-0623. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JESSICA WORSHAM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1615
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Oct 15, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 02, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 04, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 05, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
May 19, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Aug 17, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 19, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12746207
LIPID AND COMPOSITION
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12714663
COMPOSITION FOR SKIN EXTERNAL APPLICATION
4y 2m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12714653
Saponin-Containing Compositions for Use in Textile Wipes and Methods of Use and Preparation
2y 6m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12708674
METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR DELIVERY OF A THERAPEUTIC AGENT
5y 9m to grant Granted Aug 18, 2026
Patent 12691069
SYNTHETIC GLYCOLIPIDS AND GLYCOLIPOSOME COMPOSITIONS : SUITABLE FOR CARGO DELIVERY TO THE CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM
2y 0m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
56%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+56.3%)
2y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 751 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month