Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/256,423

SURFACE EMITTING LASER DEVICE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jun 07, 2023
Examiner
KOTTER, STEPHEN SUTTON
Art Unit
2828
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Sony Semiconductor Solutions Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 6m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allow Rate
68 granted / 102 resolved
-1.3% vs TC avg
Strong +40% interview lift
Without
With
+39.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
137
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
55.0%
+15.0% vs TC avg
§102
20.6%
-19.4% vs TC avg
§112
24.2%
-15.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 102 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Acknowledgment is made of applicant’s claim for domestic benefit under 35 U.S.C. 365(c) with PCT/JP2021/040954 which in turn claims foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 (a)-(d) with JP2020-207646. The certified copy of foreign priority has been filed with the Office on June 7, 2023. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on June 7, 2023 and June 12, 2024 were filed in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement has been considered by the examiner. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-6, 8-10 13-15, 18, 20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) & (a)(2) as being anticipated by Mathai et al. US 20200343695. Regarding Claim 1, Mathai teaches A surface emitting laser device (Fig. 1A) comprising: a first wiring group (Fig. 1A, 120, 114 Paragraph 0018 “The optical module 100 includes a plurality of electrical conductors 114 (e.g., identified individually as electrical conductors 114a-114d)”) including a plurality of first wiring lines (Fig. 1A, 120a-120d, 114a-114d) insulated from each other (The plurality of first wiring lines are insulated from each other by the 132 Paragraph 0025 “In some examples, an optical underfill layer 132”); a second wiring group (Fig. 1A, 120, 114 Paragraph 0022 “However, in other examples, the first pads 120 can include separate pads (e.g., two pads) configured to be coupled to the electrical conductors 114 and top-emitting VCSELS 108 respectively. The separate pads can be electrically coupled via conductive traces extending along or through the interposer 104.” The second wiring group are the conductive traces that extend along or through the interposer to the separate pads of 120) including a plurality of second wiring lines (As Paragraph 0022 above stated each of the separate pads has a conductive trace. Each one of these individual conductive traces are the plurality of second wiring lines) insulated from each other (The plurality of second wiring lines are insulated from each other due to the interposer 104); a first board provided (Fig. 1, 102) with a plurality of light emitting units (Fig. 1A, 108a-108d) electrically connected to any one of the plurality of first wiring lines (Paragraph 0023 “The substrate 102 can also include conductive traces 128. The second pads 122 can be electrically coupled to an ASIC 130 or other suitable chip via the traces 128 (identified individually as traces 128a-128d) such that the ASIC 130 or other suitable chip can send electrical signals to respective top-emitting VCSELs 108 via the electrical paths between the substrate 102 and interposer 104 formed by the electrical conductors 114, pads (e.g., first and second pads 120 and 122, traces, and contacts 116.”) and electrically connected to any one of the plurality of second wiring lines (Paragraph 0022 “The first pads 120 can be single pads (e.g., continuous pads) extending along the interposer 104 and attached to both the electrical conductors 114 and the top-emitting VCSELs 108. However, in other examples, the first pads 120 can include separate pads (e.g., two pads) configured to be coupled to the electrical conductors 114 and top-emitting VCSELS 108 respectively. The separate pads can be electrically coupled via conductive traces extending along or through the interposer 104”.); and a second board (Fig. 1A, 104) disposed to face the first board (Fig. 1A shows the second board facing the first board) and provided with the first wiring group and/or the second wiring group. (Fig. 1A shows the second board is provided with the first wiring group and the second wiring group) Regarding Claim 2, Mathai teaches each of a plurality of the light emitting units is joined to a corresponding wiring line (Fig. 1A, 124a-124d) of one wiring group provided on the second board (Fig. 1A shows 124a-124d is provided on the second board) among the first wiring group and the second wiring group. (Fig. 1A shows the corresponding wiring line is among the first and second wiring group) Regarding Claim 3, Mathai teaches both the first wiring group and the second wiring group are provided on the second board. (Fig. 1A shows that the first wiring group is on the second board, 120 is part of the first wiring group and is on 104. Paragraph 0022 “However, in other examples, the first pads 120 can include separate pads (e.g., two pads) configured to be coupled to the electrical conductors 114 and top-emitting VCSELS 108 respectively. The separate pads can be electrically coupled via conductive traces extending along or through the interposer 104.”) Regarding Claim 4, Mathai teaches each of the plurality of light emitting units has a mesa protruding on the second board side, (Fig. 1A shows each of the plurality of light emitting units has a mesa, 108, protruding on the second board side, ) a first electrode (Fig. 1A, 116a-116d) provided at a top portion of the mesa of each light emitting unit (Paragraph 0018 “Each of the electrical conductors 114 forms a respective electrical path between electrical contacts 116 (e.g., identified individually as electrical contacts 116a-116d) of respective top-emitting VCSELs 108 and the substrate 102.”) among the plurality of light emitting units is joined via a first bump (Fig. 1A, 126) to each of the first wiring lines corresponding to the each light emitting unit (Paragraph 0024 “As illustrated, the top-emitting VCSELs 108 (or top-entry photodetectors) can be mechanically coupled to respective first pads 120 via soldering (e.g., solder bumps 126 and corresponding solder reflow techniques).”), and a second electrode (Fig. 1A, 122a-d) provided in a peripheral portion of each light emitting unit among the plurality of light emitting units on the first board (Fig. 1A shows that 122 is provided in a peripheral portion of the light emitting units among the plurality of light emitting units on the first board) is joined via a second bump (Fig. 1A, 126 attached to 122) to each of the second wiring lines corresponding to each light emitting unit. (Fig. 1A shows that each of the second wiring lines corresponds to the light emitting unit is joined to the second electrode via a second bump.) Regarding Claim 5, Mathai teaches the first wiring group or the second wiring group is provided on the second board. (Fig. 1A shows that the first wiring group is on the second board, 120 is part of the first wiring group and is on 104. Paragraph 0022 “However, in other examples, the first pads 120 can include separate pads (e.g., two pads) configured to be coupled to the electrical conductors 114 and top-emitting VCSELS 108 respectively. The separate pads can be electrically coupled via conductive traces extending along or through the interposer 104.”) Regarding Claim 6, Mathai teaches each of the plurality of light emitting units has a mesa protruding on the second board side, (Fig. 1A shows each of the plurality of light emitting units has a mesa, 108, protruding on the second board side,) the first wiring group is provided on the second board, (Fig. 1A shows that 120 of the first wiring group is provided on the second board) and the second wiring group is provided on the first board (Fig. 1A shows that 114 of the second wiring group is provided on the first board), a first electrode (Fig. 1A, 116a-116d) provided at a top portion of the mesa of each light emitting unit (Paragraph 0018 “Each of the electrical conductors 114 forms a respective electrical path between electrical contacts 116 (e.g., identified individually as electrical contacts 116a-116d) of respective top-emitting VCSELs 108 and the substrate 102.”) among the plurality of light emitting units is joined via a first bump (Fig. 1A, 126) to each of the first wiring lines corresponding to the each light emitting unit (Paragraph 0024 “As illustrated, the top-emitting VCSELs 108 (or top-entry photodetectors) can be mechanically coupled to respective first pads 120 via soldering (e.g., solder bumps 126 and corresponding solder reflow techniques).”), and each second wiring line among the plurality of second wiring lines is joined via a second bump to a wiring line (Fig. 1A, 114) provided on the second board (Fig. 1A shows that 114 is on the second board) and corresponding to each second wiring line. (Paragraph 0022 “However, in other examples, the first pads 120 can include separate pads (e.g., two pads) configured to be coupled to the electrical conductors 114 and top-emitting VCSELS 108 respectively. The separate pads can be electrically coupled via conductive traces extending along or through the interposer 104.”) Regarding Claim 8, Mathai teaches a conductor (Fig. 1A, 116 Paragraph 0021 “are electrically coupled to one of the electrical contacts 116”) that is disposed along at least a part of the first wiring group and/or the second wiring group and insulated from both the first wiring group and the second wiring group. (Fig. 1A shows that 116a-116d are disposed along the first and second wiring group and are insulated from both groups.) Regarding Claim 9, Mathai teaches the conductor is provided on the first board and/or the second board. (Fig. 1A shows 116 is on the VCSEL which is provided on the first board) Regarding Claim 10, Mathai teaches the conductor is connected to a reference potential. (Paragraph 0021 “The pads as described herein (e.g., the first and second pads 120 and 122) can be, for example, solder attachment pads. Each of the first pads 120 are electrically coupled to one of the electrical contacts 116 (e.g., one of the anode or cathode contacts) of a respective top-emitting VCSEL 108 (e.g., via corresponding or matching pads or traces of the top-emitting VCSEL 108). The electrical metal pillars 118 thus form electrical paths between the respective electrical contacts 116 on top sides of the top-emitting VCSELs 108 and the substrate 102 thereunder. As discussed above, the optical module 100 includes other electrical contacts 116 (e.g., the other of the anode or cathode contacts) of the pair of electrical contacts (not shown in FIG. 1A-1C or 2A-2C). These electrical contacts 116 are also electrically coupled to the substrate 102 via separate electrical conductors 114 extending between the substrate 102 and interposer 104.” There are two 116 on the VCSEL one that is the cathode and one is the anode. The cathode is attached to the reference potential) Regarding Claim 13, Mathai teaches a third wiring line (Fig. 1A, 124) that is provided on the second board and insulated from both the first wiring group and the second wiring group, (Fig. 1A shows that 124 is insulated from both the first and second wiring group) wherein the conductor is provided on the first board, (Fig. 1A shows the conductor is on the first board through the VCSEL) and the conductor and the third wiring line are joined via a bump. (Fig. 1A shows that 124 connects to the VCSEL via a bump 126 and the VCSEL is connected to the conductor 116 so the conductor is connected to the third wiring line via a bump) Regarding Claim 14, Mathai teaches the third wiring line is provided along at least a part of the first wiring group and/or the second wiring group. (Fig. 1A shows that the third wiring line is provided along part of the first and/or second wiring group.) Regarding Claim 15, Mathai teaches a third wiring line (Fig. 1A 128 Paragraph 0023 “The substrate 102 can also include conductive traces 128.”) that is provided on the first board and/or the second board (Fig. 1A shows 128 is provided on the first board) and insulated from both the first wiring group and the second wiring group, (Fig. 1A shows that 128 is insulated from the first and second wiring group) wherein the third wiring line is provided along at least a part of the first wiring group and/or the second wiring group. (Fig. 1A shows the third wiring line is provided along the first and second wiring group) Regarding Claim 18, Mathai teaches both the first wiring group and the second wiring group are connected to an electronic circuit. (Paragraph 0023 “The substrate 102 can also include conductive traces 128. The second pads 122 can be electrically coupled to an ASIC 130 or other suitable chip via the traces 128 (identified individually as traces 128a-128d) such that the ASIC 130 or other suitable chip can send electrical signals to respective top-emitting VCSELs 108 via the electrical paths between the substrate 102 and interposer 104 formed by the electrical conductors 114, pads (e.g., first and second pads 120 and 122, traces, and contacts 116. When the optical module 100 includes top-entry photodetectors, electrical signals converted from optical signals by the top-entry photodetectors can be sent to the ASIC 130 or other suitable chip via the electrical paths between the substrate 102 and interposer 104 for further processing.”) Regarding Claim 20, Mathai teaches a conductor that is disposed along at least a part of the first wiring group and/or the second wiring group and insulated from both the first wiring group and the second wiring group. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 11, 17 are rejected as being unpatentable over 35 U.S.C. 103 over Mathai in view of US 20150340841. Regarding Claim 11, Mathai does not teach the conductor is metal or an alloy. However, Joseph teaches the conductor is metal or an alloy (Paragraph 0058 “The p-metal contact layer 120 ”) It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the conductor as taught by Mathai by having it be made of a metal or an alloy as disclosed by Han. The selection of a known material based on its suitability for its intended use supported a prima facie obviousness determination in Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp., 325 U.S. 327, 65 USPQ 297 (1945) MPEP 2144.07. The reference has demonstrated a metal is suitable to be a contact layer on a VCSEL. Regarding Claim 17, Mathai teaches each of the light emitting units includes a layered structure in which a first reflector, an active layer, and a film reflector are layered in this order on the first board. (Paragraph 0018 “Typically, top-emitting VCSELs include one or more active layers sandwiched between upper and lower mirror layers built or otherwise formed on the support substrate.”) Mathai does not teach that the reflectors are made of a multilayer film. However, Joseph teaches the reflectors are made of a multilayer film (Paragraph 0032 “As is understood by those skilled in the art, the wavelength of emission is substantially determined according to the choice of materials used to create lower DBR 104 and upper DBR 108,”) It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the reflectors as taught by Mathai by having the reflectors be made of a multilayer film as disclosed by Joseph. The selection of a known material based on its suitability for its intended use supported a prima facie obviousness determination in Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp., 325 U.S. 327, 65 USPQ 297 (1945) MPEP 2144.07. The reference has demonstrated a multilayer reflector is suitable to be a reflector in a VCSEL. Claims 12, 16 are rejected as being unpatentable over 35 U.S.C. 103 over Mathai in view of Han et al. US 20200067278. Regarding Claim 12, Mathai does not teach the conductor is a semiconductor containing impurities. However, Han teaches the conductor is a semiconductor containing impurities. (Paragraph 0073 “or example, the first contact layer 25 may be an n contact layer”) It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the conductor as taught by Mathai by having it be made of a semiconductor containing impurities as disclosed by Han. The selection of a known material based on its suitability for its intended use supported a prima facie obviousness determination in Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp., 325 U.S. 327, 65 USPQ 297 (1945) MPEP 2144.07. The reference has demonstrated a semiconductor containing impurities is suitable to be a contact layer on a VCSEL. Regarding Claim 16, Mathai does not teach a total of a number of the plurality of first wiring lines and a number of the plurality of second wiring lines is less than twice a number of the light emitting units. However, Han teaches a total of a number of the plurality of first wiring lines and a number of the plurality of second wiring lines is less than twice a number of the light emitting units (Fig. 13 shows 20 first and second wires and 100 light emitting units. 20 is less than 200) It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the surface emitting laser device as taught by Mathai by having the number of the first and second wiring lines total be less than twice the number of light emitting units as disclosed by Han. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification in order to give control of which light emitting units to illuminate. (Han Paragraph 0103 “When a voltage is applied to any one of the first wires W10 by the first driving unit D10 and a voltage is applied to any one of the second wires W20 by the second driving unit D20, light may be emitted by a VCSEL at a point where a first wire W10 and a second wire W20 to which voltages are applied.”) Claims 12, 16 are rejected as being unpatentable over 35 U.S.C. 103 over Mathai in view of another embodiment of Mathai. Regarding Claim 19, Mathai teaches the second board contains an insulating material, (Paragraph 0014 “The interposer 104 can be formed out of glass or other suitable material(s) with a relatively high-index of refraction.”) Mathai does not teach an electronic circuit is disposed on the second board or in the second board, and the first wiring group and the second wiring group are connected to the electronic circuit. However, Another embodiment of Mathai teaches an electronic circuit is disposed on the second board or in the second board, and the first wiring group and the second wiring group are connected to the electronic circuit. (Paragraph 0035 “The separate pads can be electrically coupled via conductive traces extending along or through the interposer 204.”) It would have been obvious for one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified the second board as taught by Mathai by adding the electronic circuit disposed on or in the second board as disclosed by another embodiment of Mathai. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification in order to provide additional locations where the light emitting units can connect to power. Mathai teaches a conductor (Fig. 1A, 116 Paragraph 0021 “are electrically coupled to one of the electrical contacts 116”) that is disposed along at least a part of the first wiring group and/or the second wiring group and insulated from both the first wiring group and the second wiring group. (Fig. 1A shows that 116a-116d are disposed along the first and second wiring group and are insulated from both groups.) Allowable Subject Matter Claim 7 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Mathai does not teach each of the plurality of second wiring lines includes: a first portion provided along the first board; and a second portion provided along a pedestal portion provided on the first board, and the second portion of each of the second wiring lines is joined via the second bump to the wiring line that is corresponding. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Yu et al. US 20200014169 teaches many features found in Claim 1. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEPHEN SUTTON KOTTER whose telephone number is (571)270-1859. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 8:00-5:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, MinSun Harvey can be reached at 571-272-1835. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /STEPHEN SUTTON KOTTER/ Examiner, Art Unit 2828 /MINSUN O HARVEY/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2828
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 07, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 25, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12592547
PHOSPHOR STRUCTURES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12562552
INDEPENDENTLY-ADDRESSABLE HIGH POWER SURFACE-EMITTING LASER ARRAY WITH TIGHT-PITCH PACKING
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12548981
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR LASER DEVICE, AND SEMICONDUCTOR LASER DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12525770
METHOD, SYSTEM AND APPARATUS FOR DIFFERENTIAL CURRENT INJECTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Patent 12527029
TRENCH POWER SEMICONDUCTOR COMPONENT AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+39.6%)
3y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 102 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month