Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/256,821

CLOSING SYSTEM OF A SHOE OR CLOTHING ITEM OR ACCESSORY

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jun 09, 2023
Examiner
KANE, KATHARINE GRACZ
Art Unit
3732
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Geox S P A
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
47%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
3y 8m
To Grant
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 47% of resolved cases
47%
Career Allow Rate
296 granted / 631 resolved
-23.1% vs TC avg
Strong +45% interview lift
Without
With
+45.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
61 currently pending
Career history
692
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
48.6%
+8.6% vs TC avg
§102
26.9%
-13.1% vs TC avg
§112
18.1%
-21.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 631 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 3/5/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-6, 8-11 & 14-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Berger (USPN 5,177,882). Regarding Claim 1, Berger discloses a shoe (Figure 1) having a closing system (Figures 1 & 2), comprising: a sole (S), an upper (1); a lace (39), a substrate (15/19/18) secured to the upper, the substrate having an inner face and an exposed face opposite said inner face (Figures 1 & 2), a lace-locking element (24, 33 & 44) for adjusting the tension of said lace (Col. 4, lines 46-58), arranged at said exposed face of said substrate and wherein said lace crosses (via 50 & 51) said lace-locking element thus defining a lace portion downstream of said lace-locking element (Figures 1 & 2) comprising two lace segments coming out of said lace-locking element (Figure 2), an orienting element (9/10) secured to said substrate, the orienting element and the substrate define a second passage (12 on 9) and a third passage (12 on 10) and the lace is configured to extend through each of the second passage and third passage (Figure 2), the second passage and the third passage are configured to guide the lace for entering the lace-locking element upstream of said lace- locking element (Figure 2); one or more first passages (51/50) integral with said substrate, wherein said lace portion downstream of said lace-locking element crosses said one or more first passages (Figure 2) thus defining, on the side of said exposed face, an end portion (60/61) of lace extended beyond said one or more first passages, comprising one lace segment or two lace segments not contiguous to each other (Figure 2). Regarding Claim 2, Berger discloses a second passage (40 on one side) and a third passage (40 on another side) integral with said substrate (Figure 2) and which are arranged on the opposite part of said one or more first passages (Figures 1 & 2) with respect to said lace-locking element (Figures 1 & 2), wherein said lace crosses said second passage and said third passage (Figures 1 & 2). Regarding Claim 3, Berger discloses at least one attachment (62) combined with said end portion of lace (Figure 2),wherein said at least one attachment (62) preferably has dimensions such as not to be able to cross said one or more first passages (Figure 2). Regarding Claim 4, Berger discloses fastening means (Col. 5, lines 34-38) for fastening said end portion of lace to said substrate (Figure 2), wherein said fastening means are selected from the group comprising: a hook combined with said substrate, a bit combined with said substrate, a buckle combined with said substrate, a ring and a hook combined respectively with said end portion of lace and with said substrate or vice-versa, a couple of so-named hook and loop elements or elements with magnetic interaction, one combined with said substrate and the other combined with said end portion of lace (Col. 5, lines 34-38). Regarding Claim 5, Berger discloses signaling means (Col. 4, line 46 - Col. 5, line 38) for indicating the tension of said lace, wherein said signaling means are selected from the group comprising: notches arranged on said lace, markings drawn, colored or applied on said lace, lace portions having different colors from each other, and combinations thereof (Figures 1 & 2). Regarding Claim 6, Berger discloses said lace-locking element (39) is selected from the group comprising: a lace-locking element provided with a button for locking/releasing the lace, an elastic-ring-like lace-locking element, a lace-locking element provided with two passages in which said two passages preferably have an inner surface of a material with high coefficient of friction in contact with the lace (Col. 4, lines 46-58). Regarding Claim 8, Berger discloses at least one restraining element (9.1/ 10.1/44) constrained to said substrate (Figures 1 & 2) and having at least one visible portion (Figures 1 & 2) arranged on said exposed face defining, with said substrate, said at least one or more first passages (Figures 1 & 2). Regarding Claim 9, Berger discloses at least one restraining element (9.1/ 10.1/44) constrained to said substrate (Figures 1 & 2) and having at least one visible portion (Figures 1 & 2) arranged on said exposed face which is provided with at least one opening defining said one or more first passages (Figures 1 & 2). Regarding Claim 10, Berger discloses at least one restraining element (9.1/ 10.1/44) constrained to said substrate (Figures 1 & 2) and having at least one visible portion (Figures 1 & 2) arranged on said exposed face and folded, possibly on itself, thus defining said one or more first passages (Figure 5). Regarding Claim 11, Berger discloses at least one restraining element(9.1/ 10.1/44) constrained to said substrate (Figures 1 & 2) and having at least one visible portion (Figures 1 & 2)arranged on said exposed face and a pierced element (Figures 1, 2 & 5) combined with said at least one visible portion, wherein said at least one pierced element defines said one or more first passages (Figures 1, 2 & 5). Regarding Claim 14, Berger discloses at least one orienting element (40) for directing said lace, wherein said at least one orienting element is constrained to said substrate (Figure 2) and has at least one visible portion arranged on said exposed face (Figure 2), wherein said at least one visible portion defines, with said substrate, said second passage and/or said third passage (Figure 2), or wherein said at least one visible portion is provided with at least one opening defining said second passage or said third passage (Figures 1 & 2), or wherein said at least one visible portion is folded, possibly on itself, thus defining said second passage or said third passage (Figures 1 & 2), or wherein said at least one orienting element comprises a pierced element combined with said at least one visible portion, which pierced element defines said second passage or said third passage (Figures 1 & 2) Regarding Claim 15, Berger discloses said lace is elastic and/or like a closed ring (Figures 1 & 2). Regarding Claim 16, Berger discloses a shoe (Figure 1) having closing system (Figures 1 & 2), comprising: a sole (S), an upper (1), a lace (39), a substrate (15) secured to the upper, the substrate having an inner face and an exposed face opposite said inner face (Figures 1 & 2), a lace-locking element (24, 33 & 44) for adjusting the tension of said lace (Col. 4, lines 46-58), arranged at said exposed face of said substrate and wherein said lace crosses (via 50 & 51) said lace-locking element thus defining a lace portion downstream of said lace-locking element (Figures 1 & 2) comprising two lace segments coming out of said lace-locking element (Figure 2), an orienting element (9/10) secured to said substrate, the orienting element and the substrate define a second passage (12 on 9) and a third passage (12 on 10) and the lace is configured to extend through each of the second passage and third passage (Figure 2), the second passage and the third passage are configured to guide the lace for entering the lace-locking element upstream of said lace- locking element (Figure 2); one or more first passages (50/51) integral with said substrate, wherein said lace portion downstream of said lace-locking element crosses said one or more first passages (Figure 2) thus defining, on the side of said exposed face, an end portion (60/61) of lace extended beyond said one or more first passages, comprising one lace segment or two lace segments not contiguous to each other (Figure 2) and wherein the portion of the tightening element which extends entirely through the lace-locking element and is downstream of the lace-locking element is free to float (the lace is free since it is exposed and moves through passages, Figure 2). Regarding Claim 17, Berger discloses the end portion of the lace is free to move on the side of the exposed face of the substrate (the lace is free since it is exposed and moves through passages, Figure 2). Regarding Claim 18, Berger discloses the one or more first passages are fixed at a first distance from the substrate (Figures 1 & 2). Regarding Claim 19, Berger discloses tension is adjusted by pulling the lace portion downstream of said lace-locking element (Figures 1 & 2, a user is capable of pulling the lace at 62 or where the lace is free downstream of said lace-locking element). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to the amended claims have been fully considered but are moot in view of the new grounds of rejection as discussed supra. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KATHARINE KANE whose telephone number is (571)272-3398. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 9am-6pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, KHOA HUYNH can be reached at 571-272-4888. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KATHARINE G KANE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3732
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 09, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 29, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Oct 31, 2024
Response Filed
Feb 19, 2025
Final Rejection — §102
Apr 29, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 29, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
May 22, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
May 28, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
May 29, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Aug 05, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Aug 05, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Sep 02, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 04, 2025
Final Rejection — §102
Feb 06, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 05, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 10, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599185
PROTECTIVE KNEE PAD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12564247
ARTICLE OF FOOTWEAR WITH REEL CLOSURE AND SLIDABLE EYELET
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12538960
FOOT SUPPORT SYSTEMS INCLUDING FLUID MOVEMENT CONTROLLERS AND ADJUSTABLE FOOT SUPPORT PRESSURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12478118
Adapter System For Vest Closure Mechanisms
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 25, 2025
Patent 12471670
SOLE STRUCTURE HAVING A FLUID-FILLED CHAMBER FOR AN ARTICLE OF FOOTWEAR
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 18, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
47%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+45.4%)
3y 8m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 631 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month