Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/257,550

POLARIZATION-BASED LIGHT EMISSION AND DETECTION IN A LIDAR SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 14, 2023
Examiner
RAHMAN, MOHAMMAD J
Art Unit
2487
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Osram GmbH
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
90%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allow Rate
685 granted / 868 resolved
+20.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+10.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
909
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.3%
-33.7% vs TC avg
§103
56.0%
+16.0% vs TC avg
§102
3.0%
-37.0% vs TC avg
§112
10.4%
-29.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 868 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Detailed Action This office Action is in response to an application filed on 06/14/2023 is a 371 of PCT/EP2021/086401 12/17/2021, in which claims 16-30 are pending and are being examined. Priority Acknowledgement is made of applicant’s claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C § 119(a)-(d). Claimed foreign priority date for application GERMANY 10 2020 134 194.6 12/18/2020. The certified copy has been filed on 06/14/2023. Information Disclosure Statement This information disclosure statement (IDS) submitted on 06/14/2023. The submission is in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97 and 37 CFR 1.98. Accordingly, the information disclosure statement is being considered by the examiner. Examiner’s Note Claims 16-20 refer to "A LIDAR System”, Claims 21-29 refer to " A LIDAR System”, and Claim 30 refers to " A LIDAR System”. Claims 16-20 and 30 are similarly rejected in light of rejection of claims 21-29, any obvious combination of the rejection of claims 21-29, or the differences are obvious to the ordinary skill in the art. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 21-27 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Philipp (US 20200072950 A1 A1) in view of Amor et al. (US 20200003879 A1), hereinafter Amor. Regarding claim 21, Philipp discloses a LIDAR system comprising: a light detection system comprising (Abstract): a first optical component configured to: receive polarized light from a field of view of the LIDAR system, and convert a polarization of the received light (Fig. 2, [0031]); and a light deflection device configured to deflect light output by the first optical component in accordance with a polarization of light output by the first optical component (Fig. 2, [0031]). Philipp discloses all the elements of claim 1 but Philipp does not appear to explicitly disclose in the cited section type of polarization. However, Amor from the same or similar endeavor teaches type of polarization ([0009]-[0011]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Philipp to incorporate the teachings of Amor to improve signal to noise ratio (Amor, [0001]). Similar reasoning/motivation of modification can be applied/extended to the other related/dependent claims. Regarding claim 22, Philipp in view of Amor discloses the LIDAR system according to claim 21, wherein the polarized light received from the field of view of the LIDAR system comprises a first portion having a first polarization of a second type and a second portion having a second polarization of the second type (Philipp, Fig. 2, Amor, [0009]-[0011]). Regarding claim 23, Philipp in view of Amor discloses the LIDAR system according to The LIDAR system according to wherein the first polarization of the second type is a first linear polarization aligned along a first direction and the second polarization of the second type is a second linear polarization aligned along a second direction, perpendicular to the first direction, and wherein the first optical component is configured to convert the first linear polarization to a first circular polarization with a first handedness, and the second linear polarization to a second circular polarization with a second handedness opposite the first handedness (Philipp, Fig. 2, Amor, [0009]-[0011]). Regarding claim 24, Philipp in view of Amor discloses the LIDAR system according to claim 21, wherein the first optical component comprises a quarter-wave plate (Philipp, Fig. 2, [0031], Amor, [0009]-[0011]). Regarding claim 25, Philipp in view of Amor discloses the LIDAR system according to claim 21, wherein the light deflection device comprises a liquid crystal polarization grating (Philipp, Fig. 2, [0031], Amor, [0009]-[0011]). Regarding claim 26, Philipp in view of Amor discloses the LIDAR system according to The LIDAR system according to wherein the light detection system further comprises an optical arrangement configured to receive the light deflected by the light deflection device, and wherein the optical arrangement comprises: a second optical component configured to convert a type of the polarization of the deflected light from the first type to the second type, and a third optical component configured to absorb or reflect a second portion of the deflected light having a second polarization of the second type (Philipp, Fig. 2, [0031], Amor, [0009]-[0011]). Regarding claim 27, Philipp in view of Amor discloses the LIDAR system according to claim 21, wherein the light detection system further comprises a fourth optical component arranged optically upstream of the first optical component, the fourth optical component being configured to absorb or reflect a second portion of the received light having a second polarization of a second type (Philipp, Fig. 2, [0031], Amor, [0009]-[0011], Fig. 1). Claims 28-29 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Philipp in view of Amor further in view of Thayer et al. (US 20190018143 A1), hereinafter Thayer. Regarding claim 28, Philipp in view of Amor disclose in the cited section the LIDAR system according to claim 21, wherein the light detection system further comprises an optical component configured to: receive the light from the field of view, change a first direction into which a first linear polarization of a first portion of the received light is aligned to a second direction, and change a second direction into which a second linear polarization of a second portion of the received light is aligned to the first direction (Philipp, Fig. 2, [0031], Amor, [0009]-[0011], Fig. 1). Philipp in view of Amor discloses all the elements of claim 28 but they do not appear to explicitly disclose in the cited section a switchable optical component. However, Thayer from the same or similar endeavor teaches a switchable optical component ([0248]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Philipp in view of Amor to incorporate the teachings of Thayer to improve resolution of pulses (Thayer, Abstract). Similar reasoning/motivation of modification can be applied/extended to the other related/dependent claims. Regarding claim 29, Philipp in view of Amor discloses the LIDAR system according to claim 28, wherein the switchable optical component comprises a switchable half-wave plate (Philipp, Fig. 2, [0031], Amor, [0009]-[0011], Fig. 1, Thayer, [0248]). Regarding claim 16-20, 30, See Examiner’s Note. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MOHAMMAD J RAHMAN whose telephone number is (571)270-7190. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, David Czekaj can be reached at (571) 272-7327. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Mohammad J Rahman/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2487
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 14, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604001
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR BLOCK PARTITIONING AND INTERLEAVED CODING ORDER FOR MULTIVIEW VIDEO CODING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12593050
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MULTIPLE BIT RATE CONTENT ENCODING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12593028
ENCODER WHICH GENERATES PREDICTION IMAGE TO BE USED TO ENCODE CURRENT BLOCK
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12587656
INTRA PREDICTION MODE DERIVATION-BASED INTRA PREDICTION METHOD AND DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587647
IMAGE DATA ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
90%
With Interview (+10.7%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 868 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month