Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/257,551

TECHNIQUES FOR RESOURCE RESERVATION IN SIDELINK COMMUNICATIONS

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jun 14, 2023
Priority
Feb 12, 2021 — nonprovisional of PCTCN2021076631
Examiner
CHOWDHURY, HARUN UR R
Art Unit
2473
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
2 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
2-3
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
446 granted / 589 resolved
+17.7% vs TC avg
Strong +26% interview lift
Without
With
+26.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
637
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
83.2%
+43.2% vs TC avg
§102
9.4%
-30.6% vs TC avg
§112
5.4%
-34.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 589 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status 1. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims 2. Claims 1, 4-5, 12, 15-16, 23, 26-27, and 29 are pending wherein claims 1, 12, 23, and 29 are in independent form. 3. Claims 1, 12, 23, and 29 have been amended. Response to Arguments 4. Applicant's arguments filed on 12/18/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The reasons set forth below. 5. On page 11 of the remarks, applicant argues, “However, the packet header described by Kenney is not the same as, and does not disclose, teach, or suggest, "parameters indicative of a second set of time and frequency resources," as recited in amended independent claim 1. Instead, the packet header of Kenney indicates whether the sending device has a full-duplex capability. See Kenney | [0069]. That is, whether a device is generally capable of full duplex communications, as in Kenney, is not the same as "a second set of time and frequency resources," as claimed. Thus, a packet header indicating whether a device has a capability, as in Kenney, is not the same as, and does not disclose, teach, or suggest, "parameters indicative of a second set of time and frequency resources," much less "parameters indicative of a second set of time and frequency resources for performing a full-duplex communication with the first UE, wherein the second set of time and frequency resources comprises one or more resources of the first set of time and frequency resources," as recited in amended independent claim 1.” In response, examiner respectfully disagrees because: The common radio frequency channel/wireless channel when accessed by a first communication device is considered as the claimed first set of time frequency resources. By transmitting the first portion/header of a first packet after gaining access, the first device reserves the radio frequency channel/wireless channel until all the packets available at the first device are transmitted (Par 0038—" Upon completion of the packet transmission, the first communication device 103a may release the wireless channel so that the other communication devices 103 may compete for access to the wireless channel again”.) (Fig. 4, Fig. 6A-C, Par 0037-0039, Par 0089-0090, Par 0094-0098). When first portion/header portion of the first packet includes a full duplex capability information, it (full duplex capability information) indicates to utilize the reserved radio frequency channel/wireless channel for performing a full duplex communication (Fig. 4-6, Par 0057-0059, Par 0075, Par 0080-0083, Par 0085-0087, Par 0089-0090, Par 0094-0098). Therefore, the reserved radio frequency channel/wireless channel is the radio frequency resources used for full duplex communication based on the full duplex capability information included in the first portion/header portion of the first packet. When the reserved radio frequency channel/wireless channel is indicated to be used for full duplex communication, it is considered as the claimed second set of time and frequency resources. Claim recites that the first set of time and frequency resources and the second set of time and frequency resources can be same (“the second set of time and frequency resources comprises one or more resources of the first set of time and frequency resources”), and Kenny discloses that feature when the reserved wireless channel (first set of time and frequency resources) and the wireless channel used for full duplex communication (second set of time and frequency resources) are same. Claim Rejections – 35 USC § 102 6. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. 7. Claims 1, 12, 23, and 29 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kenney et al (US 20160065355 A1, hereinafter referred to as Kenny). Re claim 1, Kenney teaches a method for wireless communication at a first user equipment (UE) (first communication device) (Fig. 3A-B, Fig. 4, Fig. 6A-C), comprising: (i) transmitting control signaling (first portion/header portion of the first packet) to reserve a first set of time and frequency resources for a sidelink transmission (transmission of the first portion/header portion of the first packet reserves the wireless channel for continuous D2D transmission to the second communication device), the control signaling indicating one or more parameters (header portion indicating full duplex capability) indicative of a second set of time and frequency resources (based on full duplex capability indication, the reserved wireless channel is determined to be used for simultaneous transmission and reception) for performing a full- duplex communication with the first UE (simultaneous transmission and reception with the first communication device), wherein the second set of time and frequency resources comprises one or more resources of the first set of time and frequency resources (According to claim limitation, the first set of time and frequency resources and the second set of time and frequency resources can be same. In view of that, the reserved wireless channel (first set of time and frequency resources) and the wireless channel used for full duplex communication (second set of time and frequency resources) are same) (Fig. 3A-B, Fig. 4, Fig. 6A-C, Par 0037-0040, Par 0058, Par 0061, Par 0069, Par 0071, Par 0077, Par 0085-0087, Par 0089-0090, Par 0094-0098); and (ii) communicating (remaining portion of the first packet) with a second UE (second communication device) based at least in part on the reserved first set of time and frequency resources (reserved wireless channel for D2D transmission) and the indicated one or more parameters associated with the second set of time and frequency resources (full duplex capability indicating simultaneous transmission and reception over the wireless channel) (Fig. 3A-B, Fig. 4, Fig. 6A-C, Par 0058, Par 0061, Par 0069, Par 0071, Par 0077, Par 0085-0087, Par 0089-0090, Par 0094-0098). Claim 23 recites an apparatus performing the steps recited in claim 1 and thereby, is rejected for the reasons discussed above with respect to claim 1. Kenney further teaches that the apparatus comprises one or memories (memory, 227), and one or more processors (processor 225) coupled with the one or more memories (Fig. 2, Par 0043-0046). Re claim 12, Kenney teaches a method for wireless communication (Fig. 3A-B, Fig. 4, Fig. 6A-C), comprising: (i) Receiving, from a user equipment (UE) (first communication device), control signaling (first portion/header portion of the first packet) to reserve a first set of time and frequency resources for a sidelink transmission (transmission of the first portion/header portion of the first packet reserves the wireless channel for continuous D2D transmission from the first communication device), the control signaling indicating one or more parameters (header portion indicating full duplex capability) indicative of a second set of time and frequency resources (based on full duplex capability indication, the reserved wireless channel is determined to be used for simultaneous transmission and reception) for performing a full- duplex communication with the UE (simultaneous transmission and reception with the first communication device), wherein the second set of time and frequency resources comprises one or more resources of the first set of time and frequency resources (According to claim limitation, the first set of time and frequency resources and the second set of time and frequency resources can be same. In view of that, the reserved wireless channel (first set of time and frequency resources) and the wireless channel used for full duplex communication (second set of time and frequency resources) are same) (Fig. 3A-B, Fig. 4, Fig. 6A-C, Par 0037-0040, Par 0058, Par 0061, Par 0069, Par 0071, Par 0077, Par 0085-0087, Par 0089-0090, Par 0094-0098); and (ii) communicating (transmitting second packet) with the UE (first communication device) based at least in part on the indicated one or more parameters associated with the second set of time and frequency resources (based on the full duplex capability indication, second packet is simultaneously transmitted while receiving the remaining portion of the first packet over the wireless channel) (Fig. 3A-B, Fig. 4, Fig. 6A-C, Par 0058, Par 0061, Par 0069, Par 0071, Par 0077, Par 0085-0087, Par 0089-0090, Par 0094-0098). Claim 29 recites an apparatus performing the steps recited in claim 12 and thereby, is rejected for the reasons discussed above with respect to claim 12. Kenney further teaches that the apparatus comprises one or memories (memory, 227), and one or more processors (processor 225) coupled with the one or more memories (Fig. 2, Par 0043-0046). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 8. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 9. Claims 4-5, 15-16, and 26-27 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kenney as applied to claims 1, 12, 23, and 29 above and further in view of Yi et al (US 20190089502 A1, hereinafter referred to as Yi). Re claims 4, 15, 26, Kenney does not explicitly disclose to determine the second set of time and frequency resources based at least in part on applying a threshold resource separation after each time and frequency resource of the first set of time and frequency resources, wherein the one or more parameters comprise the threshold resource separation. Yi teaches to determine the second set of time and frequency resources based at least in part on applying a threshold resource separation after each time and frequency resource of the first set of time and frequency resources (duplex gap between two frequency subbands in subframe 1 (i.e., UE1 SL TX and UE2 SL TX, Fig. 12-13)), wherein the one or more parameters comprise the threshold resource separation (two frequency subbands in subframe 1 for sidelink communication (UE1 SL TX resource and UE2 SL TX resource) include the duplex gap) (Fig. 12-13, Par 0084, Par 0106, Par 0118-0120, Par 0130-0131). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the invention to modify Kenney by including the step to determine the second set of time and frequency resources based at least in part on applying a threshold resource separation after each time and frequency resource of the first set of time and frequency resources, wherein the one or more parameters comprise the threshold resource separation, as taught by Yi for the purpose of minimizing interference while performing simultaneous transmission and reception, as taught by Yi (Par 0084-0087, Par 0090, Par 0097, Par 0125). Re claims 5, 16, 27, Kenney does not explicitly disclose that the threshold resource separation comprises a threshold number of physical resource blocks or a threshold number of subbands or both. Yi teaches that the threshold resource separation comprises a threshold number of physical resource blocks or a threshold number of subbands or both (subband/RB corresponding to the duplex gap between the two SL frequency subbands in subframe 1 (i.e., UE1 SL TX and UE2 SL TX, Fig. 12-13)) (Fig. 5, Fig. 12-13, Par 0084, Par 0106, Par 0118-0120, Par 0130-0131) It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the filing date of the invention to modify Kenney by including the step that the threshold resource separation comprises a threshold number of physical resource blocks or a threshold number of subbands or both, as taught by Yi for the purpose of minimizing interference while performing simultaneous transmission and reception, as taught by Yi (Par 0084-0087, Par 0090, Par 0097, Par 0125). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HARUN UR R CHOWDHURY whose telephone number is (571)270-3895. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9AM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kwang B Yao can be reached at 5712723182. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HARUN CHOWDHURY/Examiner, Art Unit 2473
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 14, 2023
Application Filed
Oct 01, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Dec 18, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 13, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Apr 13, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12634991
Anti-Motion And Anti-Interference Frame Exchange Sequences In Wireless Communications
2y 7m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12635011
METHOD OF QUICK PAIRING BETWEEN SECURITY CAMERA AND SECURITY PANEL
2y 9m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12628215
MULTI-LINK OPERATION MODE
4y 4m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12628221
COMMUNICATION APPARATUS, COMMUNICATION METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
3y 8m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12621084
SL HARQ BUFFER MANAGEMENT FOR NR VEHICULAR COMMUNICATION
2y 9m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

2-3
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+26.0%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 589 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month