Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/257,753

FILAMENT-BODY-INTEGRATED ACTUATOR, UNIT, AND ROBOT

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Jan 29, 2024
Examiner
BROWN, JOSEPH HENRY
Art Unit
3618
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Fanuc Corporation
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 10m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allow Rate
271 granted / 453 resolved
+7.8% vs TC avg
Strong +38% interview lift
Without
With
+38.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
495
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
45.5%
+5.5% vs TC avg
§102
23.9%
-16.1% vs TC avg
§112
28.0%
-12.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 453 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED CORRESPONDENCE Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 01/20/2026 has been entered. Response to Amendment The amendment filed 12/19/2025 has been entered. Claims 1-2 and 4-13 remain pending in the application. Applicant' s amendments to the claims have overcome each and every 112(b) rejection and objection previously set forth in the Final Office Action mailed 10/24/2025. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1, 6 and 8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Kono (JP 2005237168 A). Regarding claim 1, Kono discloses an actuator (see Fig. 8) comprising: a hollow part (3) extending and running through the actuator, at least one umbilical member (10) extending through the hollow part, at least one first junction part (left side 13 in the figure) positioned at one end side of the actuator (left side in the figure) and being connected to one end of the umbilical member (left side of 10 in the figure), at least one second junction part (right side 13 in the figure) positioned at another end side of the actuator (right side in the figure) and being connected to another end of the umbilical member (right side of 10 in the figure), a first fastening part (8) fastening the umbilical member to the actuator between the first junction part and the second junction part, and a second fastening part (9) fastening the umbilical member to the actuator, a line segment (see annotated Fig. 8 below; A) connecting the first fastening part and the second fastening part is parallel to a central axis of the actuator (see annotated Fig. 8 below; B), and a length of the umbilical member between the first fastening part and the second fastening part being made longer than a shortest distance between the first fastening part and the second fastening part (see Fig. 8). Regarding claim 6, Kono discloses the actuator includes a hollow motor (32) and a hollow speed reducer (31) coupled coaxially with the hollow motor (see Fig. 8). Regarding claim 8, Kono discloses the actuator further comprises a hollow brake (33) arranged coaxially with the hollow motor (32). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kono (JP 2005237168 A) in view of Miyazawa (US 20200235636 A1). Regarding claim 9, Kono fails to disclose a force detector detecting a force acting on an output shaft of the actuator. However, Miyazawa teaches a force detector (see Fig. 1, 60) detecting a force acting on an output shaft (12) of the actuator (2-1). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art as of the effective filing date to modify Kono with a force detector, as taught by Miyazawa, to measure the rotational torque transmitted from the reducer (see paragraph [0035]), such that the measurement result can be transmitted to a host via a cable, and the host may appropriately adjust (feedback) the value of the current supplied to the motor according to the received measurement results. As a result, the actuator may output target torque even in a case of receiving an external force (see paragraph [0107]). PNG media_image1.png 518 596 media_image1.png Greyscale 1 - Kono (JP 2005237168 A) Fig. 8 Annotated Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments have been considered but are moot in view of the new grounds of rejections that were necessitated by an amendment. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSEPH BROWN whose telephone number is (313)446-6568. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Thurs: 8:00am - 5:00pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Minnah Seoh can be reached at 571-357-2384. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOSEPH BROWN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3618
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jan 29, 2024
Application Filed
Jul 24, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Oct 06, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 22, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §103
Dec 19, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 20, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 04, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 02, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601397
ASYMMETRIC TORQUE BRACKETS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12589487
ROBOT ARM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12584541
VEHICLE TRANSMISSION AND VEHICLE HAVING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12576512
HORIZONTAL ARTICULATED ROBOT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12560221
SYMMETRIC 4 SPEED TRANSMISSION WITH COUNTERSHAFT POWER-SHIFT GEARBOX AND INPUT REDUCTION GEAR SET
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+38.3%)
2y 10m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 453 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month