Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 17, 2026
Application No. 18/258,368

COMMON TX BEAM INDICATION AND APPLICATION FOR UL

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 20, 2023
Priority
Dec 29, 2020 — nonprovisional of PCTCN2020140478
Examiner
ZUNIGA ABAD, JACKIE
Art Unit
2469
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Lenovo (United States) Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
1m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
568 granted / 743 resolved
+18.4% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
774
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.4%
-34.6% vs TC avg
§103
55.1%
+15.1% vs TC avg
§102
22.8%
-17.2% vs TC avg
§112
9.0%
-31.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 743 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-4, 9-14, 16-24, and 26 are presented for examination. Claims 1, 3, 4, 9, 13, 14, 18, 20-23, and 26 are amended. Claims 5-8, 15, and 25 are canceled. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 06/10/2026 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1, 13, and 14 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-4, 13, 14, 16-20, and 26 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhang et al., (hereinafter Zhang), U.S. Publication No. 2022/0150945 (Provisional Support 63/198753, fig. 4-6, paragraphs 0058, 0060-0065, 0070, 0084, 0085), in view of Grossmann et al., (hereinafter Grossmann), U.S. Publication No. 2022/0271890. As per claim 1, Zhang discloses a method, comprising: receiving a higher layer parameter to enable a common uplink (UL) beam for UL transmission for a serving cell [fig. 4-6, paragraphs 0061, 0063-0065, 0069, 0073, 0087, receiving a higher layer parameter to enable a common uplink (UL) beam for UL transmission for a serving cell (the base station 110 may transmit, and the UE 120 may receive, DCI that indicates a TCI state associated with a common beam; uplink beam activation commands are communicated using higher-layer signaling, such as an RRC message or a MAC-CE; the UE 120 may activate the common beam indicated by the TCI state for use in a particular serving cell)]; receiving a downlink control information (DCI) of a DCI format 1_1 or a DCI format 1_2 including a transmission configuration indication (TCI) field indicating a TCI state based on the higher layer parameter [paragraphs 0060, 0061, 0067, 0068, receiving a downlink control information (DCI) of a DCI format 1_1 or a DCI format 1_2 including a transmission configuration indication (TCI) field indicating a TCI state based on the higher layer parameter (the DCI that indicates the TCI state may be associated with a DCI format; DCI formats 1_0, 1_1, or 1_2; uplink beam activation commands are communicated using higher-layer signaling, such as an RRC message)]; and determining the common UL beam and power control parameters for the UL transmission according to the TCI state [fig. 4-6, paragraphs 0044, 0064-0068, determining the common UL beam for the UL transmission and power control parameters for the UL transmission according to the TCI state (DCI format to indicate transmit power control commands; the DCI that indicates the TCI state may be associated with a DCI format that is associated with indicating the TCI state; uplink TCI state may be associated with a common beam to be used to communicate any suitable combination of downlink signals and/or uplink signals)]. Zhang does not explicitly disclose wherein the power control parameters comprise a first set of the power control parameters for a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) transmission and a second set of the power control parameters for a physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) transmission. However, Grossmann teaches wherein the power control parameters comprise a first set of the power control parameters for a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) transmission and a second set of the power control parameters for a physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) transmission [fig. 16, 17, 20, paragraphs 0055, 0173, 0174, 0176-0179, 0200, 0201, 0243, 0244-0247, 0261, wherein the power control parameters comprise a first set of the power control parameters for a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) transmission and a second set of the power control parameters for a physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) transmission (power control settings for the PUSCH are differently configured/indicated from that of the PUCCH; the UE is configured to receive, from the gNB or any other network entity, a higher layer configuration; configure the power control settings for PUCCH and, either SRS or PUSCH or both)]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to improve upon the method described in Zhang by including wherein the TCI state indicated in the TCI field of the DCI is associated with a control resource set as taught by Grossmann because it would provide the Zhang’s method with the enhanced capability of reducing redundant higher layer configurations [Grossmann, paragraphs 0078, 0175]. As per claim 2, Zhang discloses the method of claim 1, wherein, the common UL beam for the UL transmission is determined by a quasi co-location(QCL)-TypeD reference signal (RS) configured in the TCI state indicated in the TCI field in the DCI with a physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) assignment for the UE with joint DL/UL beam indication capability [paragraphs 0054, 0058, 0067, 0068, 0072, 0073, 0095, wherein, the common UL beam for the UL transmission is determined by a quasi co-location(QCL)-TypeD reference signal (RS) configured in the TCI state indicated in the TCI field in the DCI with a physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) assignment for the UE with joint DL/UL beam indication capability (the TCI state may be associated with a QCL source reference signal per QCL type; TCI state may be associated with one downlink reference signal set for different QCL types (e.g., QCL types for different combinations of Doppler shift, Doppler spread, average delay, delay spread, or spatial receive parameters, among other examples); the TCI state may be indicated in a DCI associated with DCI formats 1_0, 1_1, or 1_2 for PDSCH scheduling; apply the joint downlink and uplink TCI state)]. As per claim 3, Zhang discloses the method of claim 1, wherein, the common UL beam for the UL transmission is determined by spatialRelationlnfo configured in an UL TCI state indicated in the TCI field in the DCI without a physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) assignment for the UE with separate downlink (DL)/UL beam indication capability [paragraphs 0057, 0060, 0061, 0067, 0068, 0073, wherein, the common UL beam for the UL transmission is determined by spatialRelationlnfo configured in an UL TCI state indicated in the TCI field in the DCI without a physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) assignment for the UE with separate downlink (DL)/UL beam indication capability (uplink beam, such as a UE transmit beam 315 or a BS receive beam 320, may be associated with a spatial relation; spatial relation may indicate a directionality or a characteristic of the uplink beam, similar to one or more QCL properties; applying separate downlink and uplink beam activation commands)]. As per claim 4, Zhang discloses the method of claim 1, wherein the TCI state is associated with a third set of power control parameters for both the PUCCH transmission and the PUSCH transmission [paragraphs 0058, 0066-0068, 0070, 0071, wherein the TCI state is associated with a third set of power control parameters for both the PUCCH transmission and the PUSCH transmission (DCI formats 0_0, 0_1, or 0_2 for PUSCH scheduling; uplink signal(s) associated with the TCI state may include, for example, a PUCCH, a PUSCH; the DCI may signal one TCI state to indicate a common beam to be used for different signals communicated using the common beam, which may include any suitable combination of downlink signals and/or uplink signals)]. Zhang does not explicitly discloses wherein each set of the power control parameters at least includes a pathloss reference signal (PL-RS). However, Grossmann teaches wherein each set of the power control parameters at least includes a pathloss reference signal (PL-RS) [paragraphs 0060, 0077, 0080, 0173, 0201, wherein each set of the power control parameters at least includes a pathloss reference signal (pathloss reference RSs used in the derivation of the pathloss factor in the UL Tx power expressions change with respect to UE mobility; a PUCCH/SRS resource or PUSCH is configured/indicated with a pathloss reference RS IE/parameter)]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to improve upon the method described in Zhang by including a pathloss reference signal (PL-RS) as taught by Grossmann because it would provide the Zhang’s method with the enhanced capability of reducing redundant higher layer configurations [Grossmann, paragraphs 0078, 0175]. As per claim 13, Zhang discloses a base unit for wireless communication, comprising, comprising: at least one memory; and at least one processor coupled with the at least one memory [fig. 2, paragraphs 0034, 0041, 0045, 0046, at least one memory; and at least one processor coupled with the at least one memory (a processor (e.g., controller/processor 240) and memory 242)] and configured to cause the base unit to: transmit a higher layer parameter to enable a common uplink(UL) beam for UL transmission for a serving cell [fig. 4-6, paragraphs 0061, 0063-0065, 0069, 0073, 0087, transmit a higher layer parameter to enable a common uplink(UL) beam for UL transmission for a serving cell (the base station 110 may transmit, and the UE 120 may receive, DCI that indicates a TCI state associated with a common beam; uplink beam activation commands are communicated using higher-layer signaling, such as an RRC message or a MAC-CE; the UE 120 may activate the common beam indicated by the TCI state for use in a particular serving cell)]; transmit a downlink control information (DCI) of a DCI format 1_1 or a DCI format 1_2 including a transmission configuration indication (TCI) field indicating a TCI state based on the higher layer parameter [paragraphs 0060, 0061, 0067, 0068, transmit a downlink control information (DCI) of a DCI format 1_1 or a DCI format 1_2 including a transmission configuration indication (TCI) field indicating a TCI state based on the higher layer parameter (the DCI that indicates the TCI state may be associated with a DCI format; DCI formats 1_0, 1_1, or 1_2; uplink beam activation commands are communicated using higher-layer signaling, such as an RRC message)]; and determine the common UL beam and power control parameters for the UL transmission according to the TCI state [fig. 4-6, paragraphs 0044, 0064-0068, determine the common UL beam for the UL transmission and power control parameters for the UL transmission according to the TCI state (DCI format to indicate transmit power control commands; the DCI that indicates the TCI state may be associated with a DCI format that is associated with indicating the TCI state; uplink TCI state may be associated with a common beam to be used to communicate any suitable combination of downlink signals and/or uplink signals)]. Zhang does not explicitly disclose wherein the power control parameters comprise a first set of the power control parameters for a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) transmission and a second set of the power control parameters for a physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) transmission. However, Grossmann teaches wherein the power control parameters comprise a first set of the power control parameters for a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) transmission and a second set of the power control parameters for a physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) transmission [fig. 16, 17, 20, paragraphs 0055, 0173, 0174, 0176-0179, 0200, 0201, 0243, 0244-0247, 0261, wherein the power control parameters comprise a first set of the power control parameters for a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) transmission and a second set of the power control parameters for a physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) transmission (power control settings for the PUSCH are differently configured/indicated from that of the PUCCH; the UE is configured to receive, from the gNB or any other network entity, a higher layer configuration; configure the power control settings for PUCCH and, either SRS or PUSCH or both)]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to improve upon the unit described in Zhang by including wherein the TCI state indicated in the TCI field of the DCI is associated with a control resource set as taught by Grossmann because it would provide the Zhang’s unit with the enhanced capability of reducing redundant higher layer configurations [Grossmann, paragraphs 0078, 0175]. As per claim 14, Zhang discloses a user equipment (UE) for wireless communication, comprising: at least one memory; and at least one processor coupled with the at least one memory [fig. 2, paragraphs 0034, 0041, 0044, 0047, at least one memory; and at least one processor coupled with the at least one memory (a processor (e.g., controller/processor 280) and memory 282)], the processor configured to cause the apparatus to: receive a higher layer parameter to enable a common uplink (UL) beam for UL transmission for a serving cell [fig. 4-6, paragraphs 0061, 0063-0065, 0069, 0073, 0087, receiving a higher layer parameter to enable a common uplink (UL) beam for UL transmission for a serving cell (the base station 110 may transmit, and the UE 120 may receive, DCI that indicates a TCI state associated with a common beam; uplink beam activation commands are communicated using higher-layer signaling, such as an RRC message or a MAC-CE; the UE 120 may activate the common beam indicated by the TCI state for use in a particular serving cell)]; receive a downlink control information (DCI) of a DCI format 1_1 or a DCI format 1_2 including a transmission configuration indication (TCI) field indicating a TCI state based on the higher layer parameter [paragraphs 0060, 0061, 0067, 0068, receive a downlink control information (DCI) of a DCI format 1_1 or a DCI format 1_2 including a transmission configuration indication (TCI) field indicating a TCI state based on the higher layer parameter (the DCI that indicates the TCI state may be associated with a DCI format; DCI formats 1_0, 1_1, or 1_2; uplink beam activation commands are communicated using higher-layer signaling, such as an RRC message)]; and determine the common UL beam and power control parameters for the UL transmission according to the TCI state [fig. 4-6, paragraphs 0044, 0064-0068, determine the common UL beam for the UL transmission and power control parameters for the UL transmission according to the TCI state (DCI format to indicate transmit power control commands; the DCI that indicates the TCI state may be associated with a DCI format that is associated with indicating the TCI state; uplink TCI state may be associated with a common beam to be used to communicate any suitable combination of downlink signals and/or uplink signals)]. Zhang does not explicitly disclose wherein the power control parameters comprise a first set of the power control parameters for a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) transmission and a second set of the power control parameters for a physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) transmission. However, Grossmann teaches wherein the power control parameters comprise a first set of the power control parameters for a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) transmission and a second set of the power control parameters for a physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) transmission [fig. 16, 17, 20, paragraphs 0055, 0173, 0174, 0176-0179, 0200, 0201, 0243, 0244-0247, 0261, wherein the power control parameters comprise a first set of the power control parameters for a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) transmission and a second set of the power control parameters for a physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) transmission (power control settings for the PUSCH are differently configured/indicated from that of the PUCCH; the UE is configured to receive, from the gNB or any other network entity, a higher layer configuration; configure the power control settings for PUCCH and, either SRS or PUSCH or both)]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to improve upon the UE described in Zhang by including wherein the TCI state indicated in the TCI field of the DCI is associated with a control resource set as taught by Grossmann because it would provide the Zhang’s UE with the enhanced capability of reducing redundant higher layer configurations [Grossmann, paragraphs 0078, 0175]. As per claim 16, Zhang discloses the UE of claim 14, wherein the common UL beam for the UL transmission is determined by a quasi co-location (QCL)-TypeD reference signal (RS) configured in the TCI state indicated in the TCI field in the DCI with a physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) assignment for the UE with joint DL/UL beam indication capability [paragraphs 0054, 0058, 0067, 0068, 0072, 0073, 0095, wherein the common UL beam for the UL transmission is determined by a quasi co-location (QCL)-TypeD reference signal (RS) configured in the TCI state indicated in the TCI field in the DCI with a physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) assignment for the UE with joint DL/UL beam indication capability (the TCI state may be associated with a QCL source reference signal per QCL type; TCI state may be associated with one downlink reference signal set for different QCL types (e.g., QCL types for different combinations of Doppler shift, Doppler spread, average delay, delay spread, or spatial receive parameters, among other examples); the TCI state may be indicated in a DCI associated with DCI formats 1_0, 1_1, or 1_2 for PDSCH scheduling; apply the joint downlink and uplink TCI state)]. As per claim 17, Zhang discloses the UE of claim 16, Zhang does not explicitly discloses wherein if no pathloss reference signal (PL-RS) is associated with a DL TCI state indicated in the TCI field in the DCI, a periodic DL RS with a same identifier (ID) as the QCL-TypeD RS contained in the indicated DL TCI state is determined as the PL-RS. However, Grossmann teaches wherein if no pathloss reference signal (PL-RS) is associated with a DL TCI state indicated in the TCI field in the DCI, a periodic DL RS with a same identifier (ID) as the QCL-TypeD RS contained in the indicated DL TCI state is determined as the PL-RS [paragraphs 0200, 0204, 0204, 0223-0226, 0271, 0283, wherein if no pathloss reference signal (PL-RS) is associated with a DL TCI state indicated in the TCI field in the DCI, a periodic DL RS with a same identifier (ID) as the QCL-TypeD RS contained in the indicated DL TCI state is determined as the PL-RS (If PUCCH resources are grouped via a higher layer configuration using CORESET ID values, the UE uses a DL RS configured with ‘qcl-TypeD’ in a TCI-state of a CORESET to derive a pathloss factor]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to improve upon the UE described in Zhang by including wherein if no pathloss reference signal (PL-RS) is associated with the indicated DL TCI state as taught by Grossmann because it would provide the Zhang’s UE with the enhanced capability of reducing redundant higher layer configurations [Grossmann, paragraphs 0078, 0175]. As per claim 18, Zhang discloses the UE of claim 14, wherein, the common UL beam for the UL transmission is determined by spatialRelationlnfo configured in an UL TCI state indicated in the TCI field in the DCI without a physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) assignment for the UE with separate downlink(DL)/UL beam indication capability [paragraphs 0057, 0060, 0061, 0067, 0068, 0073, wherein, the common UL beam for the UL transmission is determined by spatialRelationlnfo configured in an UL TCI state indicated in the TCI field in the DCI without a physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) assignment for the UE with separate downlink(DL)/UL beam indication capability (uplink beam, such as a UE transmit beam 315 or a BS receive beam 320, may be associated with a spatial relation; spatial relation may indicate a directionality or a characteristic of the uplink beam, similar to one or more QCL properties; applying separate downlink and uplink beam activation commands)]. As per claim 19, Zhang discloses the UE of claim 18, Zhang does not explicitly discloses wherein if no pathloss reference signal (PL-RS) is associated with the indicated UL TCI state, a periodic DL RS with a same identifier (ID) as the spatialRelationlnfo configured in the indicated UL TCI state is determined as the PL-RS. However, Grossmann teaches wherein if no pathloss reference signal (PL-RS) is associated with the indicated UL TCI state, a periodic DL RS with a same identifier (ID) as the spatialRelationlnfo configured in the indicated UL TCI state is determined as the PL-RS [paragraphs 0033, 0217, 0223-0226, 0233-0236, 0300, wherein if no pathloss reference signal (PL-RS) is associated with the indicated UL TCI state, a periodic DL RS with a same identifier (ID) as the spatialRelationlnfo configured in the indicated UL TCI state is determined as the PL-RS (UE may be indicated explicitly with a pathloss reference RS for PUCCH via a PUCCH-SpatialRelationInfo)]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to improve upon the UE described in Zhang by including wherein if no pathloss reference signal (PL-RS) is associated with the indicated DL TCI state as taught by Grossmann because it would provide the Zhang’s UE with the enhanced capability of reducing redundant higher layer configurations [Grossmann, paragraphs 0078, 0175]. As per claim 20, Zhang discloses the UE of claim 14, wherein the TCI state is associated with a third set of power control parameters for both the PUCCH transmission and the PUSCH transmission [paragraphs 0058, 0066-0068, 0070, 0071, wherein the TCI state is associated with a third set of power control parameters for both the PUCCH transmission and the PUSCH transmission (DCI formats 0_0, 0_1, or 0_2 for PUSCH scheduling; uplink signal(s) associated with the TCI state may include, for example, a PUCCH, a PUSCH; the DCI may signal one TCI state to indicate a common beam to be used for different signals communicated using the common beam, which may include any suitable combination of downlink signals and/or uplink signals)]. Zhang does not explicitly discloses wherein each set of the power control parameters at least includes a pathloss reference signal (PL-RS). However, Grossmann teaches wherein each set of the power control parameters at least includes a pathloss reference signal (PL-RS) [paragraphs 0060, 0077, 0080, 0173, 0201, wherein each set of the power control parameters at least includes a pathloss reference signal (pathloss reference RSs used in the derivation of the pathloss factor in the UL Tx power expressions change with respect to UE mobility; a PUCCH/SRS resource or PUSCH is configured/indicated with a pathloss reference RS IE/parameter)]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to improve upon the UE described in Zhang by including a pathloss reference signal (PL-RS) as taught by Grossmann because it would provide the Zhang’s UE with the enhanced capability of reducing redundant higher layer configurations [Grossmann, paragraphs 0078, 0175]. As per claim 26, Zhang discloses a method performed by a base unit, the method comprising: transmit a higher layer parameter to enable a common uplink(UL) beam for UL transmission for a serving cell [fig. 4-6, paragraphs 0061, 0063-0065, 0069, 0073, 0087, transmit a higher layer parameter to enable a common uplink(UL) beam for UL transmission for a serving cell (the base station 110 may transmit, and the UE 120 may receive, DCI that indicates a TCI state associated with a common beam; uplink beam activation commands are communicated using higher-layer signaling, such as an RRC message or a MAC-CE; the UE 120 may activate the common beam indicated by the TCI state for use in a particular serving cell)]; transmit a downlink control information (DCI) of a DCI format 1_1 or a DCI format 1_2 including a transmission configuration indication (TCI) field indicating a TCI state based on the higher layer parameter [paragraphs 0060, 0061, 0067, 0068, transmit a downlink control information (DCI) of a DCI format 1_1 or a DCI format 1_2 including a transmission configuration indication (TCI) field indicating a TCI state based on the higher layer parameter (the DCI that indicates the TCI state may be associated with a DCI format; DCI formats 1_0, 1_1, or 1_2; uplink beam activation commands are communicated using higher-layer signaling, such as an RRC message)]; and determine the common UL beam and power control parameters for the UL transmission according to the TCI state [fig. 4-6, paragraphs 0044, 0064-0068, determine the common UL beam for the UL transmission and power control parameters for the UL transmission according to the TCI state (DCI format to indicate transmit power control commands; the DCI that indicates the TCI state may be associated with a DCI format that is associated with indicating the TCI state; uplink TCI state may be associated with a common beam to be used to communicate any suitable combination of downlink signals and/or uplink signals)]. Zhang does not explicitly disclose wherein the power control parameters comprise a first set of the power control parameters for a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) transmission and a second set of the power control parameters for a physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) transmission. However, Grossmann teaches wherein the power control parameters comprise a first set of the power control parameters for a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) transmission and a second set of the power control parameters for a physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) transmission [fig. 16, 17, 20, paragraphs 0055, 0173, 0174, 0176-0179, 0200, 0201, 0243, 0244-0247, 0261, wherein the power control parameters comprise a first set of the power control parameters for a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) transmission and a second set of the power control parameters for a physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) transmission (power control settings for the PUSCH are differently configured/indicated from that of the PUCCH; the UE is configured to receive, from the gNB or any other network entity, a higher layer configuration; configure the power control settings for PUCCH and, either SRS or PUSCH or both)]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to improve upon the method described in Zhang by including wherein the TCI state indicated in the TCI field of the DCI is associated with a control resource set as taught by Grossmann because it would provide the Zhang’s method with the enhanced capability of reducing redundant higher layer configurations [Grossmann, paragraphs 0078, 0175]. Claim(s) 9, 10, 23, and 24 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhang, in view of Grossmann, and in further view of Svedman et al., (hereinafter Svedman), U.S. Publication No. 2024/0014880, (Provisional Support 63/104179, paragraphs 0052, 0064-0069, 0087, 0105, 0106, 0208-0211). As per claim 9, the modified Zhang discloses the method of claim 1, wherein, if a higher layer parameter CORESETPoolIndex is configured for each control resource set(CORESET), the TCI state indicated in the TCI field of the DCI only applies to: PUSCH transmission scheduled by a UL DCI transmitted from the CORESET configured with a same value as that configured for the CORESET transmitting the DCI; a configured grant (CG)-PUSCH associated with the same value as that configured for the CORESET transmitting the DCI; and PUCCH resources associated with the same value as that configured for the CORESET transmitting the DCI [paragraphs 0055, 0070, 0092, 0114, PUSCH transmission scheduled by a UL DCI transmitted from the CORESET configured with a same value as that configured for the CORESET transmitting the DCI; a configured grant (CG)-PUSCH associated with the same value as that configured for the CORESET transmitting the DCI; and PUCCH resources associated with the same value as that configured for the CORESET transmitting the DCI (the TCI state may be applicable to downlink and uplink control and data channels (e.g., a joint PDCCH/PDSCH/PUCCH/PUSCH TCI state), in which case the DCI contents may include a CORESET identifier, a PDSCH resource identifier, a PUCCH resource identifier, and/or a PUSCH resource identifier)]. The modified Zhang does not explicitly discloses the CORESET configured with a same CORESETPoolIndex value. However, Svedman teaches the CORESET configured with a same CORESETPoolIndex value [paragraphs 0068-0072, the CORESET configured with a same CORESETPoolIndex value (a TCI state indication/activation/update in a DCI or a MAC CE may apply to a subset of CORESETs associated with a certain CORESET pool index value (e.g., 0 or 1), e.g., through parameter coresetPoolIndex-r16)]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to improve upon the method described in Zhang by including wherein the CORESET configured with a same CORESETPoolIndex value as taught by Svedman because it would provide the Zhang’s method with the enhanced capability of proving overhead reduction by common beam operation [Svedman, paragraphs 0006, 0065, 0194]. As per claim 10, the modified Zhang discloses the method of claim 1, The modified Zhang does not explicitly discloses further comprising: receiving a configuration of one or more cell lists each of which is composed of one or multiple serving cells, wherein the common UL beam for the UL transmission is enabled for all serving cells in a cell list containing the serving cell. However, Svedman teaches receiving a configuration of one or more cell lists each of which is composed of one or multiple serving cells, wherein the common UL beam for the UL transmission is enabled for all serving cells in a cell list containing the serving cell [paragraphs 0067, 0068, 0199, receiving a configuration of one or more cell lists each of which is composed of one or multiple serving cells, wherein the common UL beam for the UL transmission is enabled for all serving cells in a cell list containing the serving cell (TCI state(s) may be applied to one or more serving cells, e.g., cells in a band or cells in a configured list of serving cells; common beam operation, source reference signal(s) in M (e.g., M=1 or M≥1) TCIs (e.g., TCI states or TCI codepoints) provide common QCL information)]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to improve upon the method described in Zhang by receiving a configuration of one or more cell lists as taught by Svedman because it would provide the Zhang’s method with the enhanced capability of proving overhead reduction by common beam operation [Svedman, paragraphs 0006, 0065, 0194]. As per claim 23, the modified Zhang discloses the UE of claim 14, wherein, if a higher layer parameter CORESETPoolIndex is configured for each control resource set (CORESET), the TCI state indicated in the TCI field of the DCI only applies to: a physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) transmission scheduled by a UL DCI transmitted from the CORESET configured with a same value as that configured for the CORESET transmitting the DCI; a configured grant (CG)-PUSCHassociated with the same value as that configured for the CORESET transmitting the DCI; and physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) resources associated with the same value as that configured for the CORESET transmitting the DCI [paragraphs 0055, 0070, 0092, 0114, a physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) transmission scheduled by a UL DCI transmitted from the CORESET configured with a same value as that configured for the CORESET transmitting the DCI; a configured grant (CG)-PUSCHassociated with the same value as that configured for the CORESET transmitting the DCI; and physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) resources associated with the same value as that configured for the CORESET transmitting the DCI (the TCI state may be applicable to downlink and uplink control and data channels (e.g., a joint PDCCH/PDSCH/PUCCH/PUSCH TCI state), in which case the DCI contents may include a CORESET identifier, a PDSCH resource identifier, a PUCCH resource identifier, and/or a PUSCH resource identifier)]. The modified Zhang does not explicitly discloses the CORESET configured with a same CORESETPoolIndex value. However, Svedman teaches the CORESET configured with a same CORESETPoolIndex value [paragraphs 0068-0072, the CORESET configured with a same CORESETPoolIndex value (a TCI state indication/activation/update in a DCI or a MAC CE may apply to a subset of CORESETs associated with a certain CORESET pool index value (e.g., 0 or 1), e.g., through parameter coresetPoolIndex-r16)]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to improve upon the UE described in Zhang by including wherein the CORESET configured with a same CORESETPoolIndex value as taught by Svedman because it would provide the Zhang’s UE with the enhanced capability of proving overhead reduction by common beam operation [Svedman, paragraphs 0006, 0065, 0194]. As per claim 24, The modified Zhang discloses the UE of claim 14, The modified Zhang does not explicitly discloses wherein the processor is configured to cause the apparatus to receive a configuration of one or more cell lists each of which is composed of one or multiple serving cells, wherein the common UL beam for the UL transmission is enabled for all serving cells in a cell list containing the serving cell. However, Svedman teaches receive a configuration of one or more cell lists each of which is composed of one or multiple serving cells, wherein the common UL beam for the UL transmission is enabled for all serving cells in a cell list containing the serving cell [paragraphs 0067, 0068, 0199, receive a configuration of one or more cell lists each of which is composed of one or multiple serving cells, wherein the common UL beam for the UL transmission is enabled for all serving cells in a cell list containing the serving cell (TCI state(s) may be applied to one or more serving cells, e.g., cells in a band or cells in a configured list of serving cells; common beam operation, source reference signal(s) in M (e.g., M=1 or M≥1) TCIs (e.g., TCI states or TCI codepoints) provide common QCL information)]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to improve upon the UE described in Zhang by receiving a configuration of one or more cell lists as taught by Svedman because it would provide the Zhang’s UE with the enhanced capability of proving overhead reduction by common beam operation [Svedman, paragraphs 0006, 0065, 0194]. Claim(s) 21 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhang, in view of Grossmann, and in further view of Matsumura et al., (hereinafter Matsumura), U.S. Publication No. 2023/0413283. As per claim 21, Zhang discloses the UE of claim 20, Zhang does not explicitly discloses wherein the determined common UL beam for the UL transmission and a determined pathloss reference signal (PL-RS) apply to all PUSCH transmissions and PUCCH transmissions for the serving cell. However, Grossmann teaches wherein the determined common UL beam for the UL transmission and a determined pathloss reference signal (PL-RS) apply to all PUSCH transmissions and PUCCH transmissions for the serving cell [paragraphs 0068, 0069, 0173, 0175, 0176, 0181, 0200-0202, wherein the determined common UL beam for the UL transmission and a determined pathloss reference signal (PL-RS) apply to all PUSCH transmissions and PUCCH transmissions for the serving cell, starting from a first slot that is a predetermined number of symbols after acknowledgment of the DCI (common configuration of the pathloss reference RSs for PUCCH, and either SRS or PUSCH or both)]. The modified Zhang does not explicitly disclose starting from a first slot that is a predetermined number of symbols after acknowledgment of the DCI. However, Matsumura teaches starting from a first slot that is a predetermined number of symbols after acknowledgment of the DCI [fig. 6A, paragraphs 0047, 0058, 0082, 0103, 0108, 0121, 0131, starting from a first slot that is a predetermined number of symbols after acknowledgment of the DCI (Pathloss in transmit power control for each of the PUSCH, PUCCH, and SRS is calculated by the UE; common beam may be updated after specific time from transmission of HARQ-ACK information associated with the DCI)]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to improve upon the UE described in the modified Zhang by including wherein the determined common UL beam for the UL transmission as taught by Matsumura because it would provide the modified Zhang’s UE with the enhanced capability of improving communication quality [Matsumura, paragraphs 0105, 0114]. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 11, 12, and 22 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Matsumura et al., U.S. Publication No. 2023/0171045 discloses a spatial relation of each transmission occasion for a PUCCH/PUSCH that transmits a HARQ-ACK. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JACKIE ZUNIGA ABAD whose telephone number is (571)270-7194. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 8:00am - 4:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, IAN MOORE can be reached at 571-272-3085. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JACKIE ZUNIGA ABAD/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2469
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 5 earlier events
Jan 26, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 15, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 24, 2026
Interview Requested
May 05, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
May 05, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jun 10, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 17, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 01, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12696174
COMMUNICATION RELATED TO NETWORK SLICE
3y 10m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12689561
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING CAPACITY OF A TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK
1y 9m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12683747
RULES FOR INTERFERENCE MITIGATION COORDINATION
4y 5m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12684381
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR BEAM INDICATION IN MULTI-BEAM CELL
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12672195
KNOWN TRANSMISSION CONTROL INDICATOR DURATION
2y 10m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+23.1%)
3y 3m (~1m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 743 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month