Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/258,519

TUBELESS TYRE INSERT

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 20, 2023
Examiner
JOHNSTONE, ADRIENNE C
Art Unit
1749
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Alex Trimnell
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 11m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allow Rate
285 granted / 450 resolved
-1.7% vs TC avg
Strong +35% interview lift
Without
With
+34.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 11m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
473
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
32.7%
-7.3% vs TC avg
§102
21.0%
-19.0% vs TC avg
§112
35.5%
-4.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 450 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of species a (run-flat insert for a bicycle wheel) in the reply filed on August 1, 2025 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that the added statement of intended use on a two-wheeled vehicle renders moot the species election requirement. This is not found persuasive because mere statement of intended use does not further limit the structure of the claimed invention in claims 1-14 and even in claim 15 merely reciting a two-wheeled vehicle does not place any limitation on the structure of the wheel, and the functional capability of the insert as a run-flat insert, bead spreader, or noise damper that does further limit structure depending upon the the particular wheel was clearly demonstrated to require different searches in the species election requirement contrary to applicant’s arguments. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Specification The amendment filed June 20, 2023 is objected to under 35 U.S.C. 132(a) because it introduces new matter into the disclosure. 35 U.S.C. 132(a) states that no amendment shall introduce new matter into the disclosure of the invention. The added material which is not supported by the original disclosure is as follows: the added benefit statement including incorporations by reference and claiming benefit to itself (this application is the national stage of the international application) constitutes new matter because it was filed subsequent to the filing date of this application which is the international filing date (MPEP 608.01(p)(I)(B) last paragraph). Applicant is required to cancel the new matter in the reply to this Office Action. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1-15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US Patent Application Publication 2018/0244106 A1 cited by applicant and/or European Patent Application 0 441 552 A2 cited by applicant and/or Published PCT Application WO 00/43224 A1 cited by applicant. See the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority filed in this application June 20, 2023. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Adrienne C. Johnstone whose telephone number is (571)272-1218. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 1PM-5PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Katelyn Smith can be reached at 571-270-5545. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. ADRIENNE C. JOHNSTONE Primary Examiner Art Unit 1749 Adrienne Johnstone /ADRIENNE C. JOHNSTONE/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1749 September 30, 2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 20, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 30, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12589617
RUN FLAT TIRE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583260
PNEUMATIC TIRE WITH OPTIMIZED CROWN AND BEAD ARCHITECTURES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12576673
TIRE COMPRISING REINFORCING ELEMENTS IN THE FORM OF LAMINATED STRIPS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12565064
VEHICLE PNEUMATIC TYRE COMPRISING A SEALANT LAYER, AND METHOD FOR DETECTING A VEHICLE PNEUMATIC TYRE COMPRISING A SEALANT LAYER AND FOR RECYCLING A VEHICLE PNEUMATIC TYRE COMPRISING A SEALANT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12552200
TIRE WITH SPECIFIED PROFILE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+34.7%)
3y 11m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 450 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month