Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 18/258,816

HIGH-DISINTEGRATION MULTILAYER BIODEGRADABLE FILM

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 22, 2023
Priority
Dec 29, 2020 — IT 102020000032663 +1 more
Examiner
ZHANG, MICHAEL N
Art Unit
1781
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Novamont S P A
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
54%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
78%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 54% of resolved cases
54%
Career Allowance Rate
219 granted / 406 resolved
-11.1% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
71 currently pending
Career history
470
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
59.3%
+19.3% vs TC avg
§102
8.3%
-31.7% vs TC avg
§112
27.9%
-12.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 406 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 04/23/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 Claims 1-25 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ponti et al. (US 2019/0160796 A1) in view of White et al. (US 5,480,962 A) Regarding Claim 1, Ponti teaches a multilayer film comprising a first layer A and at least one second layer B. (Claim 1 of Ponti). Ponti teaches layer B can 30-95% of an aliphatic-aromatic polyester comprising of the following components: a dicarboxylic component containing with respect to the total dicarboxylic component: e1) 35-70% by moles of units deriving from at least one aromatic dicarboxylic acid, e2) 65-30% by moles of units deriving from at least one saturated aliphatic dicarboxylic acid, and e3) 0-5% by moles of units deriving from at least one unsaturated aliphatic dicarboxylic acid; a diol component comprising with respect to the total diol component: f1) 95-100% by moles of units deriving from at least one saturated aliphatic diol, and f2) 0-5% by moles of units deriving from at least one unsaturated aliphatic diol; vii) 0.1-50% by weight, with respect to the sum of components vi.-x., of at least one polymer of natural origin; viii) 1-40% by weight, with respect to the sum of components vi.-x, of at least one polyhydroxyalkanoate; ix) 0-15% by weight, with respect to the sum of components vi.-x, of at least one inorganic filler; and x) 0-5% by weight, with respect to the sum of components vi.-x, of at least one cross-linking agent and/or chain extender comprising at least one compound having two and/or multiple functional groups including isocyanate, peroxide, carbodiimide, isocyanurate, oxazoline, epoxide, anhydride divinylether groups and mixtures thereof. (Claim 1 of Ponti). These ranges overlap the claimed ranges. In the case where the claimed ranges "overlap or lie inside ranges disclosed by the prior art" a prima facie case of obviousness exists. (MPEP §2144.05). Ponti teaches layer A can comprise i) 60-100% by weight of at least one aliphatic-aromatic polyester; ii) 0-20% by weight of at least one aliphatic polyester; iii) 0-40% by weight of at least one polyhydroxyalkanoate; v) 0-5% by weight, of at least one cross-linking agent and/or a chain extender comprising at least one compound having two and/or multiple functional groups including isocyanate, peroxide, carbodiimide, isocyanurate, oxazoline, epoxy, anhydride or divinyl ether groups and mixtures thereof; iv) 0-10% by weight of at least one filler. (Paragraph 0109). Ponti also teaches layer A can comprise i) 30-70% by weight of at least one aliphatic-aromatic polyester; ii) 20-60% by weight of at least one aliphatic polyester; iii) 1-20% by weight of at least one polyhydroxyalkanoate; v) 0-5% by weight of at least one cross-linking agent and/or a chain extender comprising at least one compound having two and/or multiple functional groups including isocyanate, peroxide, carbodiimide, isocyanurate, oxazoline, epoxy, anhydride or divinyl ether groups and mixtures thereof; iv) 0-10% by weight, of at least one filler. (Paragraph 0103). These ranges overlap the claimed ranges. In the case where the claimed ranges "overlap or lie inside ranges disclosed by the prior art" a prima facie case of obviousness exists. (MPEP §2144.05). Ponti teaches the aliphatic-aromatic polyester can comprise a dicarboxylic component comprising with respect to the total dicarboxylic component: a1) 35-70% by moles of units deriving from at least one aromatic dicarboxylic acid, a2) 65-30% by moles of units deriving from at least one saturated aliphatic dicarboxylic acid, and a3) 0-5% by moles of units deriving from at least one unsaturated aliphatic dicarboxylic acid; and d) a diol component comprising with respect to the total diol component: b1) 95-100% by moles of units deriving from at least one saturated aliphatic diol, and b2) 0-5% by moles of units deriving from at least one unsaturated aliphatic diol. (Claim 2 of Ponti). These ranges overlap the claimed ranges recited for the aliphatic-aromatic polyester composition of layer A. In the case where the claimed ranges "overlap or lie inside ranges disclosed by the prior art" a prima facie case of obviousness exists. (MPEP §2144.05). Ponti teaches the aliphatic polyester in layer A can comprise a dicarboxylic component comprising succinic acid (c1) and azelaic acid (c2). Ponti teaches a diol component comprising d1) 95-100% by moles of units deriving from at least one aliphatic dicarboxylic acid; d2) 0-5% by moles of units deriving from at least one unsaturated aliphatic dicarboxylic acid. (Paragraph 0037-0044). Ponti teaches the dicarboxylic component can comprise a mixture of multiple acids, including succinic acid and azelaic acid. (Paragraph 0044). Ponti does not teach the mole% of the succinic acid and the azelaic acid in the aliphatic polyester. White teaches an aliphatic polyester for use in packaging (Abstract; Column 9, Lines 1) comprising succinic acid and azelaic acid as the dicarboxylic component. (Abstract; Column 8, Lines 10-15). White teaches the molar amount of succinic acid can range from 65 to 95 mol% and azelaic acid can range from 5 to 35 %. (Column 3, Lines 50-67). White teaches this range ensure proper elongation and the proper crystallinity of the resulting aliphatic polyester, when the polyester is used in a film. (Column 3, Lines 50-67). These ranges overlap the claimed ranges. Thus, as it would have been obvious to one with ordinary skill in the art to use the claimed range of succinic acid to azelaic acid as taught by White to ensure a proper polyester is formed. Regarding Claim 2-3, Ponti teaches the a1 can be 1 to 99 mol% of terephthalic acid, its esters or salts and 99 to 1 mol% of 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid, its esters or salts. (Paragraph 0030). Regarding Claims 4-6, Ponti teaches the saturated aliphatic dicarboxylic acid comprises mixtures comprising at least 50% moles of succinic acid, adipic acid, azelaic acid, sebacic acid, brassylic acid, their C1-C24 esters, salts and mixtures thereof. (Paragraph 0033). Regarding Claim 7, Ponti teaches 0-20% or 20-60% by weight of at least one aliphatic polyester. (Paragraph 0103, 0109) This overlaps the claimed range. In the case where the claimed ranges "overlap or lie inside ranges disclosed by the prior art" a prima facie case of obviousness exists. (MPEP §2144.05). Ponti teaches the aliphatic polyester in layer A can comprise a dicarboxylic component comprising succinic acid (c1) and azelaic acid (c2). Ponti teaches a diol component comprising d1) 95-100% by moles of units deriving from at least one aliphatic dicarboxylic acid; d2) 0-5% by moles of units deriving from at least one unsaturated aliphatic dicarboxylic acid. (Paragraph 0037-0044). Ponti does not teach the mole% of the succinic acid and the azelaic acid in the aliphatic polyester. White teaches an aliphatic polyester for use in food packaging (Abstract; Column 9, Lines 1) comprising succinic acid and azelaic acid as the dicarboxylic component. (Abstract; Column 8, Lines 10-15). White teaches the molar amount of succinic acid can range from 65 to 95 mol% and azelaic acid can range from 5 to 35 %. (Column 3, Lines 50-67). White teaches this range ensure proper elongation and the proper crystallinity of the resulting aliphatic polyester, when the polyester is used in a film. (Column 3, Lines 50-67). These ranges overlap the claimed ranges. Thus, as it would have been obvious to one with ordinary skill in the art to use the claimed range as taught by White to ensure a polyester that can be used for films is formed. Regarding Claims 8-10, Ponti teaches one of the acids can be azelaic acid, as discussed above. White teaches the c2 is azelaic acid, as discussed above. White teaches an aliphatic polyester for use in food packaging (Abstract; Column 9, Lines 1) comprising succinic acid and azelaic acid as the dicarboxylic component. (Abstract; Column 8, Lines 10-15). White teaches the molar amount of succinic acid can range from 65 to 95 mol% and azelaic acid can range from 5 to 35 %. (Column 3, Lines 50-67). White teaches this range ensure proper elongation and the proper crystallinity of the resulting aliphatic polyester, when the polyester is used in a film. (Column 3, Lines 50-67). These ranges overlap the claimed ranges. Thus, as it would have been obvious to one with ordinary skill in the art to use the claimed range as taught by White to ensure a polyester that can be used for films is formed. Regarding Claim 11, Ponti teaches layer A can comprise iii) 0-40% or 1-20% by weight of at least one polyhydroxyalkanoate. (Paragraph 0103, 0109) This overlaps the claimed range. In the case where the claimed ranges "overlap or lie inside ranges disclosed by the prior art" a prima facie case of obviousness exists. (MPEP §2144.05). Regarding Claim 12, Ponti teaches iv) 0-10% by weight of at least one filler. (Paragraph 0103, 0109). This overlaps the claimed range. In the case where the claimed ranges "overlap or lie inside ranges disclosed by the prior art" a prima facie case of obviousness exists. (MPEP §2144.05). Regarding Claim 13, Ponti does not specifically teach the composition of the filler iv). However, Ponti teaches talc and calcium carbonate aid in the disintegrability of polyesters. (Paragraph 0163) Thus, it would have been obvious to one with ordinary skill in the art to use the fillers of talc and calcium carbonate as taught by Ponti as component iv) in polyester to further aid in disintegrability. Regarding Claim 14 Ponti teaches layer A can comprise v) 0-5% by weight, of at least one cross-linking agent and/or a chain extender. (Paragraph 0103, 0109) This overlaps the claimed range. In the case where the claimed ranges "overlap or lie inside ranges disclosed by the prior art" a prima facie case of obviousness exists. (MPEP §2144.05). Regarding Claim 15-16, Ponti teaches the aromatic dicarboxylic acids e1 can comprise Ponti teaches the a1 can be 1 to 99 mol% of terephthalic acid, its esters or salts and 99 to 1 mol% of 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid, its esters or salts. (Paragraph 0135). Regarding Claim 17-19, Ponti teaches e2, saturated aliphatic dicarboxylic acids, can be mixture of adipic acid and azelaic acid and have 5 to 40 mole% of azelaic acid with respect to adipic and azelaic acid. (Paragraph 0138). This overlaps the claimed range. In the case where the claimed ranges "overlap or lie inside ranges disclosed by the prior art" a prima facie case of obviousness exists. (MPEP §2144.05). Regarding Claim 20, Ponti teaches 0.1-50% by weight, with respect to the sum of components vi.-x., of at least one polymer of natural origin. (Claim 1 of Ponti). This overlaps the claimed range. In the case where the claimed ranges "overlap or lie inside ranges disclosed by the prior art" a prima facie case of obviousness exists. (MPEP §2144.05). Regarding Claim 21, Ponti teaches the arrangement of A/B/A or A/B. (Claim 1 of Ponti; Paragraph 0020). Regarding Claim 22, Ponti teaches the film should disintegrate under domestic composting conditions according to UNI 1135 in under 180 days. (Paragraph 0207-0209). Regarding Claim 23-24, Ponti teaches using the film for a food packaging. (Paragraph 0019). Regarding Claim 25, teaches a multilayer film comprising a first layer A and at least one second layer B. (Claim 1 of Ponti). Ponti teaches layer B can 30-95% of an aliphatic-aromatic polyester comprising of the following components: a dicarboxylic component containing with respect to the total dicarboxylic component: e1) 35-70% by moles of units deriving from at least one aromatic dicarboxylic acid, e2) 65-30% by moles of units deriving from at least one saturated aliphatic dicarboxylic acid, and e3) 0-5% by moles of units deriving from at least one unsaturated aliphatic dicarboxylic acid; a diol component comprising with respect to the total diol component: f1) 95-100% by moles of units deriving from at least one saturated aliphatic diol, and f2) 0-5% by moles of units deriving from at least one unsaturated aliphatic diol; vii) 0.1-50% by weight, with respect to the sum of components vi.-x., of at least one polymer of natural origin; viii) 1-40% by weight, with respect to the sum of components vi.-x, of at least one polyhydroxyalkanoate; ix) 0-15% by weight, with respect to the sum of components vi.-x, of at least one inorganic filler; and x) 0-5% by weight, with respect to the sum of components vi.-x, of at least one cross-linking agent and/or chain extender comprising at least one compound having two and/or multiple functional groups including isocyanate, peroxide, carbodiimide, isocyanurate, oxazoline, epoxide, anhydride divinylether groups and mixtures thereof. (Claim 1 of Ponti). These ranges overlap the claimed ranges. In the case where the claimed ranges "overlap or lie inside ranges disclosed by the prior art" a prima facie case of obviousness exists. (MPEP §2144.05). Ponti teaches layer A can comprise i) 60-100% by weight of at least one aliphatic-aromatic polyester; ii) 0-20% by weight of at least one aliphatic polyester; iii) 0-40% by weight of at least one polyhydroxyalkanoate; v) 0-5% by weight, of at least one cross-linking agent and/or a chain extender comprising at least one compound having two and/or multiple functional groups including isocyanate, peroxide, carbodiimide, isocyanurate, oxazoline, epoxy, anhydride or divinyl ether groups and mixtures thereof; iv) 0-10% by weight of at least one filler. (Paragraph 0109). These ranges overlap the claimed ranges. In the case where the claimed ranges "overlap or lie inside ranges disclosed by the prior art" a prima facie case of obviousness exists. (MPEP §2144.05). Ponti teaches the aliphatic-aromatic polyester can comprise a dicarboxylic component comprising with respect to the total dicarboxylic component: a1) 35-70% by moles of units deriving from at least one aromatic dicarboxylic acid, a2) 65-30% by moles of units deriving from at least one saturated aliphatic dicarboxylic acid, and a3) 0-5% by moles of units deriving from at least one unsaturated aliphatic dicarboxylic acid; and d) a diol component comprising with respect to the total diol component: b1) 95-100% by moles of units deriving from at least one saturated aliphatic diol, and b2) 0-5% by moles of units deriving from at least one unsaturated aliphatic diol. (Claim 2 of Ponti). These ranges overlap the claimed ranges recited for the aliphatic-aromatic polyester composition of layer A. In the case where the claimed ranges "overlap or lie inside ranges disclosed by the prior art" a prima facie case of obviousness exists. (MPEP §2144.05). Ponti teaches the aliphatic polyester in layer A can comprise a dicarboxylic component comprising succinic acid (c1) and azelaic acid (c2). Ponti teaches a diol component comprising d1) 95-100% by moles of units deriving from at least one aliphatic dicarboxylic acid; d2) 0-5% by moles of units deriving from at least one unsaturated aliphatic dicarboxylic acid. (Paragraph 0037-0044). Ponti teaches the dicarboxylic component can comprise a mixture of multiple acids, including succinic acid and azelaic acid. (Paragraph 0044). Ponti does not teach the mole% of the succinic acid and the azelaic acid in the aliphatic polyester. White teaches an aliphatic polyester for use in food packaging (Abstract; Column 9, Lines 1) comprising succinic acid and azelaic acid as the dicarboxylic component. (Abstract; Column 8, Lines 10-15). White teaches the molar amount of succinic acid can range from 65 to 95 mol% and azelaic acid can range from 5 to 35 %. (Column 3, Lines 50-67). White teaches this range ensure proper elongation and the proper crystallinity of the resulting aliphatic polyester, when the polyester is used in a film. (Column 3, Lines 50-67). These ranges overlap the claimed ranges. Thus, as it would have been obvious to one with ordinary skill in the art to use the claimed range as taught by White to ensure a polyester that can be used for films is formed. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments have been fully considered. A new grounds of rejection has been made in view of Applicant’s amendments. Correspondence Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MICHAEL ZHANG whose telephone number is (571)270-0358. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday: 9:30am-3:30pm, 8:30PM-10:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Frank Vineis can be reached at (571) 270-1547. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Michael Zhang/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1781
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 22, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 28, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Nov 21, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 23, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 23, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 25, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12696386
COPPER CLAD LAMINATE AND USES OF THE SAME
2y 6m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12661865
ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE ABSORBER AND ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE ABSORBER-ATTACHED MOLDED ARTICLE
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12661864
MULTILAYER LAMINATED FILM AND PROJECTED IMAGE DISPLAY MEMBER
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12654425
GLASS POLYMER LAMINATES WITH COMPRESSIVE TOP LAYER
3y 1m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12655677
VACUUM INSULATED GLASS
1y 7m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
54%
Grant Probability
78%
With Interview (+23.9%)
3y 2m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 406 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month