Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/258,958

HEAT RAY SHIELDING RESIN SHEET MATERIAL

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 22, 2023
Examiner
WILSON, PAISLEY L
Art Unit
2871
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
58%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 58% of resolved cases
58%
Career Allow Rate
389 granted / 671 resolved
-10.0% vs TC avg
Strong +35% interview lift
Without
With
+35.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
23 currently pending
Career history
694
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
54.2%
+14.2% vs TC avg
§102
23.2%
-16.8% vs TC avg
§112
20.1%
-19.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 671 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant’s submission filed on February 20, 2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Mapro Co Ltd et al. (KR 101182194) in view of Nakayama et al. (US 2019/0077676), each of record. Regarding claim 1, Mapro discloses a heat ray shielding resin sheet material (Abstract) comprising: near infrared absorbing material particles (p. 9); and a resin (para. [0058]), wherein the near infrared absorbing material particles contain particles of a complex tungsten oxide (pp. 3-4; Examples) represented by General Formula: MxWyOz (where an element M is one or more elements selected from H, He, alkali metals, alkaline-earth metals, rare-earth elements, Mg, Zr, Cr, Mn, Fe, Ru, Co, Rh, Ir, Ni, Pd, Pt, Cu, Ag, Au, Zn, Cd, Al, Ga, In, Tl, Si, Ge, Sn, Pb, Sb, B, F, P, S, Se, Br, Te, Ti, Nb, V, Mo, Ta, Re, Be, Hf, Os, Bi, and I, W represents tungsten, O represents oxygen (p. 4), 0.001≤x/y≤0.5 (p. 4), and 3.0<z/y<3.4 (p. 4)). Mapro fails to explicitly disclose wherein a crystallite size of the particles of the complex tungsten oxide is 16.9 nm or more and 21.1 nm or less. However, Nakayama discloses a heat ray shielding resin sheet material (paras. [0156-0157]), wherein a crystallite size of the particles of the complex tungsten oxide (para. [0054]) is 16.9 nm or more and 21.1 nm or less (para. [0088]). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate wherein a crystallite size of the particles of the complex tungsten oxide is 16.9 nm or more and 21.1 nm or less, as in Nakayama, into the heat ray shielding resin sheet material of Mapro for excellent infrared shielding properties (Nakayama, para. [0088]). Regarding claim 2, Mapro discloses wherein the element M includes one or more elements selected from Cs, Rb, K, Tl, In, Ba, Li, Ca, Sr, Fe, and Sn (p. 4). Regarding claim 3, Mapro discloses wherein the particles of the complex tungsten oxide contain a crystal having one or more crystal structures selected from a hexagonal crystal, a tetragonal crystal, and a cubic crystal (paras. [0054, 0088]). Regarding claim 4, Mapro fails to explicitly disclose wherein a particle diameter of the near infrared absorbing material particles is 54 nm or more and 100 nm or less. However, Nakayama discloses wherein a particle diameter of the near infrared absorbing material particles is 54 nm or more and 100 nm or less (para. [0083]). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate wherein a particle diameter of the near infrared absorbing material particles is 54 nm or more and 100 nm or less, as in Nakayama, into the heat ray shielding resin sheet material of Mapro for excellent infrared shielding properties (Nakayama, para. [0083]). Regarding claim 5, Mapro discloses wherein the resin is a polycarbonate resin or an acrylic resin (para. [0058]). Claims 6-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Mapro Co Ltd et al. (KR 101182194) in view of Nakayama et al. (US 2019/0077676), as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Sumitomo Metal Mining Co Ltd (JP 2006-219662), hereinafter “Sumitomo,” of record. Regarding claim 6, Mapro in view of Nakayama discloses the limitations of claim 1 above, but fails to explicitly disclose wherein the heat ray shielding resin sheet material includes a plurality of sheet layers containing at least the resin, one or more of the sheet layers contain the near infrared absorbing material particles, the sheet layers include a first surface sheet layer, a second surface sheet layer, an intermediate sheet layer, and a connecting sheet layer, the first surface sheet layer, the intermediate sheet layer, and the second surface sheet layer are laminated in this order, and the connecting sheet layer connects between the first surface sheet layer, the intermediate sheet layer, and the second surface sheet layer, the first surface sheet layer includes a first surface, which is an outer surface of the heat ray shielding resin sheet material, the second surface sheet layer includes a second surface, which is an outer surface of the heat ray shielding resin sheet material located on an opposite side of the first surface, and the heat ray shielding resin sheet material includes a void between the first surface sheet layer and the second surface sheet layer, and has a hollow multilayer structure. However, Sumitomo discloses a heat ray shielding resin sheet material (Figs. 1-2), wherein the heat ray shielding resin sheet material includes a plurality of sheet layers containing at least the resin (paras. [0046-0047]), one or more of the sheet layers contain the near infrared absorbing material particles (para. [0046]), the sheet layers include a first surface sheet layer (11), a second surface sheet layer (12), an intermediate sheet layer (13), and a connecting sheet layer (14) (Fig. 1), the first surface sheet layer (11), the intermediate sheet layer (13), and the second surface sheet layer (12) are laminated in this order (Fig. 1; para. [0053]), and the connecting sheet layer (14) connects between the first surface sheet layer (11), the intermediate sheet layer (13), and the second surface sheet layer (12) (Fig. 1), the first surface sheet layer (11) includes a first surface, which is an outer surface of the heat ray shielding resin sheet material (Fig. 1), the second surface sheet layer (12) includes a second surface, which is an outer surface of the heat ray shielding resin sheet material located on an opposite side of the first surface (Fig. 1), and the heat ray shielding resin sheet material includes a void (15) between the first surface sheet layer (11) and the second surface sheet layer (12), and has a hollow multilayer structure (Fig. 1; para. [0048]). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate wherein the heat ray shielding resin sheet material includes a plurality of sheet layers containing at least the resin, one or more of the sheet layers contain the near infrared absorbing material particles, the sheet layers include a first surface sheet layer, a second surface sheet layer, an intermediate sheet layer, and a connecting sheet layer, the first surface sheet layer, the intermediate sheet layer, and the second surface sheet layer are laminated in this order, and the connecting sheet layer connects between the first surface sheet layer, the intermediate sheet layer, and the second surface sheet layer, the first surface sheet layer includes a first surface, which is an outer surface of the heat ray shielding resin sheet material, the second surface sheet layer includes a second surface, which is an outer surface of the heat ray shielding resin sheet material located on an opposite side of the first surface, and the heat ray shielding resin sheet material includes a void between the first surface sheet layer and the second surface sheet layer, and has a hollow multilayer structure, as in Sumitomo, into the heat ray shielding resin sheet material of Mapro and Nakayama to improve a heat insulating effect (Sumitomo, para. [0052]). Regarding claims 7-9, Mapro in view of Nakayama fails to explicitly disclose wherein all the sheet layers contain the near infrared absorbing material particles, wherein only one of the first surface sheet layer and the second surface sheet layer contains the near infrared absorbing material particles, and wherein only the first surface sheet layer and the second surface sheet layer contain the near infrared absorbing material particles. However, Sumitomo discloses wherein all the sheet layers contain the near infrared absorbing material particles, wherein only one of the first surface sheet layer and the second surface sheet layer contains the near infrared absorbing material particles, and wherein only the first surface sheet layer and the second surface sheet layer contain the near infrared absorbing material particles (paras. [0050-0051]). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate wherein all the sheet layers contain the near infrared absorbing material particles, wherein only one of the first surface sheet layer and the second surface sheet layer contains the near infrared absorbing material particles, and wherein only the first surface sheet layer and the second surface sheet layer contain the near infrared absorbing material particles, as in Sumitomo, into the heat ray shielding resin sheet material of Mapro and Nakayama to configure the particles on outer surfaces only, for example, depending on application for versatility (Sumitomo, para. [0052]). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim 1 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not solely rely on the primary reference applied in the prior rejection of record for the teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Therefore, the new ground of rejection over Mapro in view of Nakayama is considered appropriate in accordance with the amendment to the claim. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PAISLEY L WILSON whose telephone number is (571)270-5023. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 9:00am-5:00pm ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, MICHAEL CALEY can be reached at 571-272-2286. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PAISLEY L WILSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2871
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 22, 2023
Application Filed
Aug 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Oct 21, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Oct 21, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Nov 05, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 03, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Feb 20, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 27, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598960
DISPLAY PANEL, PREPARATION METHOD FOR DISPLAY PANEL, AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12599001
DISPLAY DEVICE INCLUDING DISPLAY PANEL AND INFORMATION CODE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12585052
Dispersive Optical Elements, Devices, Systems and Methods Using the Same
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12566349
PIXEL UNIT, DISPLAY SUBSTRATE, DISPLAY PANEL, AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12560753
LIGHTING UNIT HAVING A CENTERING DEVICE FOR A LIGHT GUIDE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
58%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+35.3%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 671 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month