Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 15, 2026
Application No. 18/259,117

APPARATUS, SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING OF HARVESTED CANNABIS PLANT MATERIAL

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jun 23, 2023
Examiner
MATTHEWS, TERRELL HOWARD
Art Unit
3653
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Eqalis Group New Zealand Limited
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
865 granted / 1034 resolved
+31.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
28 currently pending
Career history
1062
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
63.9%
+23.9% vs TC avg
§102
17.3%
-22.7% vs TC avg
§112
12.6%
-27.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1034 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 73-109 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 73, the phrase “cooling agent” renders the claim indefinite because it is unclear whether the limitation encompasses any liquid, gas or solid cooling medium (e.g. slurry of ice and water, chilled water). The absence of clear boundaries renders the claim indefinite. Likewise in claim 73, the phrase “flow path” renders the claim indefinite because the recitation “first flow path” and “second flow path” lack clarity as to whether these are structural conduits, pipes, pipelines or merely conceptual movement of fluid. Because the term “flow path” does not connote a definite structure, the claim fails to particularly point out the invention. Additionally, in claim 73, the phrase “a laden quantity of cooling agent” is unclear and subjective. It is not apparats whether “laden” refers to concentration, volume, weight, or merely the presence of trichomes. The lack of subjective boundaries renders the limitation indefinite. Likewise, in claim 73, the phrase “at least some trichomes” is vague and essentially encompasses any non-zero amount including trivial or trace amounts. This introduces uncertainty into the scope of protection and renders the claim indefinite. Furthermore, in claim 73, the phrase “a first stream of material derived from the filtrate”, specifically the term “derived from” is indefinite as it fails to specify what processing, modification or separation occurs in deriving the first stream from the filtrate. It is unclear whether the material is a liquid portion, solid fraction, or some other constituent. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 73-109 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TERRELL HOWARD MATTHEWS whose telephone number is (571)272-5929. The examiner can normally be reached Monday thru Friday; 8:00 AM - 4:30 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael McCullough can be reached at (571)272-7805. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /TERRELL H MATTHEWS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3653
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 23, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Apr 04, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12595211
REFRACTORY LINING DESIGN AND SEPARATION VIA DESTRUCTIVE HYDRATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12595123
BLOCK STORAGE ARRANGEMENT AND METHOD FOR OPERATING A BLOCK STORAGE ARRANGEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590899
MEASURING DEVICE AND SELECTION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12570497
GUIDING CHAIN CARRIER SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12564845
PURIFICATION APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+11.1%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 1034 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month