Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/259,349

RUBBER COMPOSITION

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Jun 26, 2023
Priority
Dec 28, 2020 — nonprovisional of PCTUS2020067100 +1 more
Examiner
JOHNSTON, BRIEANN R
Art Unit
1766
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE DES ÉTABLISSEMENTS MICHELIN
OA Round
2 (Final)
49%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
82%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 49% of resolved cases
49%
Career Allowance Rate
493 granted / 1008 resolved
-16.1% vs TC avg
Strong +33% interview lift
Without
With
+32.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 10m
Avg Prosecution
50 currently pending
Career history
1067
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
88.2%
+48.2% vs TC avg
§102
9.6%
-30.4% vs TC avg
§112
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1008 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION This office action follows a reply filed on April 23, 2026. Claims 1, 2, 4-5, 10-11, and 15-16 have been amended. Claims 1-2 and 4-21 are currently pending and under examination. The texts of those sections of Title 35 U.S. Code are not included in this section and can be found in a prior Office action. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Double Patenting Claims 1-2 and 4-21 are provisionally rejected on the ground of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1-21 of copending Application No. 18/259,366 (reference application). Although the claims at issue are not identical, they are not patentably distinct from each other because the claimed invention claims the product claimed by the method claims of App. No. ‘366. This is a provisional nonstatutory double patenting rejection because the patentably indistinct claims have not in fact been patented. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102/103 Claims 1-2, 4 and 6-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as anticipated by or, in the alternative, under 35 U.S.C. 103 as obvious over Cain (US 3,882,186), as evidenced by Nakamura (US 2008/10110544). Cain exemplifies a composition comprising the following: PNG media_image1.png 131 364 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 105 573 media_image2.png Greyscale N-phenyl-4-aminophenol is the same as 4-hydroxydiphenylamine. The minimum viscosity is the lowest Mooney viscosity recorded before vulcanization begins. While the viscosity is measured at 130°C instead of 100°C, one of ordinary skill in the art would expect the same composition to have a reduced viscosity when N-phenyl-4-aminophenol is present compared to when it is not present even if the Mooney viscosity was measured at 100°C. Cain anticipates or is prima facie obvious over instant claims 1-2 and 6-10. As to claim 4, HAF carbon black is known as having a surface area between about 25-100 m2/g (p. 2, [0025]); therefore, the HAF carbon black inherently possesses a surface area within the claimed range of 20-400 m2/g. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to the claimed invention have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BRIEANN R JOHNSTON whose telephone number is (571)270-7344. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8:00 AM - 4:00 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Randy Gulakowski can be reached at (571)272-1302. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /Brieann R Johnston/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1766
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 26, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 23, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103
Apr 23, 2026
Response Filed
May 18, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12630706
MEMBRANE COMPRISING A BLEND OF POLYARYLETHERSULFONE AND POLYARYLETHERKETONE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THEREOF
4y 4m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12624176
RESIN COMPOSITION, PREPREG, FILM WITH RESIN, METAL FOIL WITH RESIN, METAL-CLAD LAMINATE, AND WIRING BOARD
4y 4m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12612530
HYDROPHOBIC FLUID AND USE THEREOF
4y 4m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12599545
DENTAL ADHESIVE COMPOSITION, DENTAL ADHESIVE MATERIAL, AND DENTAL ADHESIVE MATERIAL PACKAGE
3y 10m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595385
INKJET INKS
3y 9m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
49%
Grant Probability
82%
With Interview (+32.9%)
2y 10m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1008 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month