Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/259,676

TERMINAL AND COMMUNICATION METHOD

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Jun 28, 2023
Examiner
ZHAO, WEI
Art Unit
2479
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
NTT Docomo Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allow Rate
953 granted / 1067 resolved
+31.3% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
1092
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.4%
-34.6% vs TC avg
§103
42.4%
+2.4% vs TC avg
§102
21.5%
-18.5% vs TC avg
§112
18.3%
-21.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1067 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment Acknowledgment is made of Applicant’s submission of amendment with remarks/arguments, dated October 27, 2025. Claims 1-6 have been canceled and claims 7-12 are new. Upon entering the amendment, claims 7-12 are pending. This communication is considered fully responsive and sets forth below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 3. The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office Action. 4. Claims 7-12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Bala et al. (US 2023/0180249). Regarding claim 7, Bala et al. teach the terminal (paragraphs [0017] lines 1-15 & [0029] lines 1-11; Examiner’s Notes: UE/WTRU, e.g., 102a depicted in FIG. 1A and 102 depicted in FIG. 1B in the prior art teaches the limitation of “terminal” in the instant application) comprising: a receiver (paragraph [0029] lines 1-11; Examiner’s Notes: receiving element 122 in UE/WTRU 102 depicted in FIG. 1B in the prior art teaches the limitation of “a receiver” in the instant application) that receives, from a base station, downlink control information that indicates both switching of a search space set or a search space set group and skipping of PDCCH (Physical Downlink Control Channel) monitoring for a predetermined period (paragraph [0069] lines 1-12; Examiner’s Notes: base station 114a depicted in FIG. 1A in the prior art teaches the limitation of “a base station;” the Search Spaces (SS) switching in the prior art teaches the limitation of “switching of a search space set;” the PDCCH monitoring reduction/skipping in the prior art teaches the limitation of “skipping of PDCCH (Physical Downlink Control Channel) monitoring;” in fact, receiving, from base station 114a, a DCI indicating both SS switching and the PDCCH monitoring reduction/skipping for a scheduled period, as illustrated in FIG. 1A, in the prior art teaches the limitation of “receives, from a base station, downlink control information that indicates both switching of a search space set or a search space set group and skipping of PDCCH (Physical Downlink Control Channel) monitoring for a predetermined period” in the instant application); and a processor (paragraph [0029] lines 1-11; Examiner’s Notes: processor 118 in UE/WTRU 102 depicted in FIG. 1B in the prior art teaches the limitation of “a processor” in the instant application) that performs, based on the downlink control information, at least one of the switching of the search space set or the search space set group, or the skipping of PDCCH monitoring for the predetermined period (paragraph [0069] lines 9-12; Examiner’s Notes: performing the SS switching and the PDCCH monitoring reduction/skipping for the scheduled period based on the DCI, as illustrated in FIG. 1A, in the prior art teaches the limitation of “performs, based on the downlink control information, at least one of the switching of the search space set or the search space set group, or the skipping of PDCCH monitoring for the predetermined period” in the instant application). Regarding claim 8, Bala et al. further teach the terminal, wherein the receiver further receives, from the base station, delay information indicating a time to delay a start of the switching of the search space set or the search space set group (paragraph [0146] lines 1-16; Examiner’s Notes: the specific time delay in the prior art teaches the limitation of “delay information indicating a time to delay;” in fact, receiving, from base station 114a, the information, e.g., a specific time delay, to start the Search Spaces (SS) switching, as illustrated in FIG. 1A, in the prior art teaches the limitation of “receives, from the base station, delay information indicating a time to delay a start of the switching of the search space set or the search space set group” in the instant application), and the processor performs the switching of the search space set or the search space set group after the time indicated by the delay information has elapsed from reception of the downlink control information (paragraph [0146] lines 16-29; Examiner’s Notes: performing the SS switching after the specific time delay indicated in the DCI in the prior art teaches the limitation of “performs the switching of the search space set or the search space set group after the time indicated by the delay information has elapsed from reception of the downlink control information” in the instant application). Regarding claim 9, Bala et al. further teach the terminal, wherein a time from reception of the downlink control information to a start of the skipping of the PDCCH monitoring is different from a time from the reception of the downlink control information to a start of the switching of the search space set or the search space set group (paragraph [0146] lines 1-16; Examiner’s Notes: the specific time delay between the time from reception of the DCI to a start of the PDCCH skipping and the time from the reception of the DCI to a start of the Search Spaces (SS) switching in the prior art teaches the limitation of “wherein a time from reception of the downlink control information to a start of the skipping of the PDCCH monitoring is different from a time from the reception of the downlink control information to a start of the switching of the search space set or the search space set group” in the instant application). Regarding claim 10, Bala et al. further teach the terminal, wherein the downlink control information includes a parameter that indicates the switching of the search space set or the search space set group and the skipping of the PDCCH monitoring for the predetermined period (paragraph [0146] lines 1-16; Examiner’s Notes: the 1-bit indication in the prior art teaches the limitation of “a parameter;” in fact, the DCI including the 1-bit indication indicating the Search Spaces (SS) switching and the PDCCH monitoring skipping for the scheduled period in the prior art teaches the limitation of “wherein the downlink control information includes a parameter that indicates the switching of the search space set or the search space set group and the skipping of the PDCCH monitoring for the predetermined period” in the instant application), and the predetermined period is different depending on a value of the parameter (paragraph [0146] lines 6-16; Examiner’s Notes: the bit value of the 1-bit indication, e.g., 0 or 1, in the prior art teaches the limitation of “a value of the parameter;” in fact, the scheduled period is different depending on the bit value of the 1-bit indication, e.g., 0 or 1, in the prior art teaches the limitation of “the predetermined period is different depending on a value of the parameter” in the instant application). Regarding claim 11, Bala et al. further teach the terminal, wherein: the receiver further receives, from the base station, information indicating a duration for which the PDCCH monitoring is skipped (paragraph [0069] lines 1-12; Examiner’s Notes: receiving, from base station 114a, information indicating the scheduled period/time regards to the PDCCH monitoring reduction/skipping, as illustrated in FIG. 1A, in the prior art teaches the limitation of “receives, from the base station, information indicating a duration for which the PDCCH monitoring is skipped” in the instant application), and the processor determines the predetermined period based on the duration indicated by the information and a value of a parameter included in the downlink control information (paragraph [0146] lines 6-16; Examiner’s Notes: the bit value of the 1-bit indication, e.g., 0 or 1, in the prior art teaches the limitation of “a value of the parameter;” in fact, determining the time based on the scheduled period and the bit value of the 1-bit indication, e.g., 0 or 1, included in the DCI in the prior art teaches the limitation of “the processor determines the predetermined period based on the duration indicated by the information and a value of a parameter included in the downlink control information” in the instant application). Regarding claim 12, Bala et al. teach the communication method performed by a terminal (paragraphs [0017] lines 1-15 & [0029] lines 1-11; Examiner’s Notes: UE/WTRU, e.g., 102a depicted in FIG. 1A and 102 depicted in FIG. 1B in the prior art teaches the limitation of “terminal” in the instant application), the communication method comprising: receiving, from a base station, downlink control information that indicates both switching of a search space set or a search space set group and skipping of PDCCH (Physical Downlink Control Channel) monitoring for a predetermined period (paragraph [0069] lines 1-12; Examiner’s Notes: base station 114a depicted in FIG. 1A in the prior art teaches the limitation of “a base station;” the Search Spaces (SS) switching in the prior art teaches the limitation of “switching of a search space set;” the PDCCH monitoring reduction/skipping in the prior art teaches the limitation of “skipping of PDCCH (Physical Downlink Control Channel) monitoring;” in fact, receiving, from base station 114a, a DCI indicating both SS switching and the PDCCH monitoring reduction/skipping for a scheduled period, as illustrated in FIG. 1A, in the prior art teaches the limitation of “receiving, from a base station, downlink control information that indicates both switching of a search space set or a search space set group and skipping of PDCCH (Physical Downlink Control Channel) monitoring for a predetermined period” in the instant application); and performing, based on the downlink control information, at least one of switching of the search space set or the search space set group, or skipping of PDCCH monitoring for the predetermined period (paragraph [0069] lines 9-12; Examiner’s Notes: performing the SS switching and the PDCCH monitoring reduction/skipping for the scheduled period based on the DCI, as illustrated in FIG. 1A, in the prior art teaches the limitation of “performing, based on the downlink control information, at least one of the switching of the search space set or the search space set group, or the skipping of PDCCH monitoring for the predetermined period” in the instant application). Response to Remarks/Arguments 5. Objection to Specification: in the Response, filed October 27, 2025, Applicants amended the specification to render the objection to the specification moot. The previous objection to the specification is withdrawn. 6. Claims Art Rejections: Applicants’ amendment with arguments filed October 27, 2025 have been fully considered but they are moot in view of the new ground(s) of rejection. Conclusion 7. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to WEI ZHAO whose telephone number is (571)270-5672. The examiner can normally be reached from 8:00AM to 5:00PM Monday through Friday. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor JAE Y. LEE can be reached on 571-270-3936. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /WEI ZHAO/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2473
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 28, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Oct 27, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 25, 2026
Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12598619
PAUSING AND RESUMING SKIPPING OF CONTROL CHANNEL MONITORING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12581483
TERMINAL APPARATUS, BASE STATION APPARATUS, AND COMMUNICATION METHOD FOR FLEXIBLE PHYSICAL DOWNLINK CONTROL CHANNEL (PDCCH) REPETITIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12581475
HYBRID AUTOMATIC REPEAT REQUEST CODEBOOK INTERACTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12574950
METHOD FOR CONFIGURING RESOURCES FOR PHYSICAL DOWNLINK CONTROL CHANNEL TRANSMISSION, TERMINAL DEVICE AND NETWORK DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12563427
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ENHANCED PHYSICAL DOWNLINK CONTROL CHANNEL (PDCCH) MONITORING ON OVERLAPPING PDCCH MONITORING OCCASIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+15.4%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1067 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month