Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/259,929

METHOD FOR DETERMINING AT LEAST ONE COLOUR COMPATIBLE WITH AN OUTFIT OF A USER

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Jun 29, 2023
Examiner
TRAN, PHUOC
Art Unit
2668
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
L'Oréal
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
93%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allow Rate
606 granted / 713 resolved
+23.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
9 currently pending
Career history
722
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
11.2%
-28.8% vs TC avg
§103
26.8%
-13.2% vs TC avg
§102
31.0%
-9.0% vs TC avg
§112
9.4%
-30.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 713 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Interpretation Claims 13, 14 are interpreted as independent claims drafted with a short-hand format. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Claim(s) 13, 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to non-statutory subject matter. Claim 13 does not fall within at least one of the four categories of patent eligible subject matter because claim 13 is directed to a “computer program product” without being stored on a non-transitory computer-readable medium. The software computer program product per se does not fall within a statutory category. Claim 14 does not fall within at least one of the four categories of patent eligible subject matter because claim 14 is directed to a “computer-readable medium". However, the broadest reasonable interpretation of the "computer-readable medium" can encompass a transitory propagating signal which is non-statutory subject matter. See In re Nuijten, 500 F.3d 1346, 84 USPQ2d 1495 (Fed. Cir. 2007). The examiner suggests amending the claim(s) to recite a “non-transitory computer-readable medium” storing a computer program or equivalent. Any amendment to the claims should be commensurate with its corresponding disclosure. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-12 are allowed. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Shimozaki discloses determining the color of a portion of a wearable outfit. Natesh discloses searching for cosmetic products that match the target colors. SCHICKEL teaches users may get a better impression of whether the lipstick color they choose matches the rest of their outfit. However, none of the prior art whether taken singly or in combination discloses the combination of features “automatically determining, within a computational system, at least one colour of a cosmetic product compatible with an outfit of a user, comprising: a step (IMP) of importing at least one photographic image (IM) containing a representation of at least one portion of the outfit of the user; a step (SEG) of segmenting said at least one image (IM), to identify at least one region of interest (S1, S2, S3) in the outfit; a step (DET) of determining the colour of said at least one region of interest (S1, S2, S3); and a step (GEN) of generating said at least one colour compatible with the outfit of the user, on the basis of the determined colour of said region of interest (S1, S2, S3) depending on a database (PAL1-PAL4) of compatible colours or on a computational rule (RGL, 11-71) for obtaining compatible colours“ as required by independent claim 1. The remaining claims require similar combination of feature. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to PHUOC TRAN whose telephone number is (571)272-7399. The examiner can normally be reached 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Vu Le can be reached at 571-272-7332. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /PHUOC TRAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2668
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 29, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12602752
IMAGE PROCESSING METHOD AND IMAGE PROCESSING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12592071
METHOD, DEVICE, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR DETERMINING NODE OF DECISION TREE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12579692
Method and device for preparing data for identifying analytes
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12579618
IMAGING METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12573000
UPSAMPLING AN IMAGE USING ONE OR MORE NEURAL NETWORKS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
93%
With Interview (+8.1%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 713 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month