Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 18/260,536

WIRELESS POWER RECEPTION MODULE

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 06, 2023
Priority
Jan 08, 2021 — RE 10-2021-0002612 +2 more
Examiner
HOSSAIN, KAZI S
Art Unit
2837
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Amosense Co., Ltd.
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allowance Rate
506 granted / 633 resolved
+11.9% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
662
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
67.2%
+27.2% vs TC avg
§102
22.9%
-17.1% vs TC avg
§112
7.7%
-32.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 633 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Elections/Restrictions Applicant’s election of Species 1 (Claims 1-9) in the reply filed on 06/23/2026 without traverse is acknowledged. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Lim (US 20130257362 A1) in view of Woo (KR20180036350A). Regarding Claim 1: Lim teaches that a wireless power reception module comprising: an antenna unit (100, Fig. 3; para 0063-0075) which includes a circuit board (112) including a first surface (i.e. upper surface of 112 in Fig. 3) and a second surface (i.e. bottom surface of 112 in Fig. 3) which are opposite to each other, a wireless power reception antenna (113) formed as an antenna pattern on the first surface of the circuit board, a terminal pattern (117d) extending to a predetermined length (119, see Fig. 5) from the wireless power reception antenna on the first surface of the circuit board, a shielding unit (see para 0062) which includes a magnetic sheet (120) formed of a magnetic material to shield a magnetic field and having a side surface exposed to an outside (construed from Fig. 3) and is disposed on one surface of the antenna unit to be positioned at a position corresponding to the wireless power reception antenna, Lim does not teach that a first coverlay attached to the first surface of the circuit board; wherein the first coverlay is attached to the first surface to cover both the wireless power reception antenna and a part of a total length of the terminal pattern formed on the first surface. However, Woo teaches that a first coverlay (240, Fig. 5; para 0028) attached to the first surface of the circuit board (not shown; see para 0055); wherein the first coverlay is attached to the first surface to cover both the wireless power reception antenna (120) and a part of a total length of the terminal pattern (121, Fig. 4) formed on the first surface. It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to have a first coverlay attached to the first surface of the circuit board; wherein the first coverlay is attached to the first surface to cover both the wireless power reception antenna and a part of a total length of the terminal pattern formed on the first surface to provide a low-frequency antenna module capable of improving assembly and productivity (see para 0013). Regarding Claim 2: As applied to claim 1, the modified Lim teaches that wherein the magnetic sheet is a ribbon sheet formed of an amorphous alloy (see Woo’s para 0045) {or a ribbon sheet formed of a nano-crystalline alloy}. Regarding Claim 3: As applied to claim 1, the modified Lim teaches that the first coverlay is formed of an insulating material (see Woo’s para 0057). Regarding Claim 4: As applied to claim 1, the modified Lim teaches that the shielding unit (120, Lim’s Fig. 3) is disposed to be positioned on one surface of the first coverlay (Woo’s Fig. 5). Regarding Claim 5: As applied to claim 1, the modified Lim teaches that the shielding unit includes: a magnetic sheet having a plate shape and a predetermined area (See Lim’s Fig. 3); and a pair of protective films attached to both surfaces of the magnetic sheet so that a side surface of the magnetic sheet is exposed to the outside (construed from Lim. Fig. 4). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 6-9 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Claim 6 recites, comprising an empty space portion having a predetermined area and formed to pass through the wireless power reception module to be positioned at a central portion of the wireless power reception antenna, wherein the empty space portion includes a first empty space portion having a predetermined area and formed to pass through a central portion of the antenna unit and a second empty space portion having a predetermined area and formed to pass through a central portion of the shielding unit. The references of record do not teach or suggest the aforementioned limitations, nor would it be obvious to modify those references to include such limitations. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” , Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. A list of pertinent prior art is attached in form 892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Kazi Hossain whose telephone number is 571-272-8182. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Thursday from Monday to Thursday 8:00 AM to 4:30 PM (EST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at https:/www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Shawki Ismail can be reached on 571-272-3985. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https:/www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent- center for more information about Patent Center and https:/www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KAZI HOSSAIN/ Examiner, Art Unit 2837 /MALCOLM BARNES/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2837
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 06, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12688966
COIL MODULE AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING A COIL ASSEMBLY
4y 0m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12683057
COIL COMPONENT, CIRCUIT BOARD ARRANGEMENT AND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12683059
COIL DEVICE
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676262
COIL DEVICE
3y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12671023
REACTOR, CONVERTER, AND POWER CONVERSION DEVICE
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+16.0%)
2y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 633 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month