Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/260,911

CONTROL PLANE ACTIVITY BETWEEN WIRELESS DEVICE AND WIRELESS NETWORK

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jul 10, 2023
Examiner
LINDENBAUM, ALAN LOUIS
Art Unit
2413
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Nokia Technologies Oy
OA Round
2 (Final)
48%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 7m
To Grant
64%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 48% of resolved cases
48%
Career Allow Rate
204 granted / 421 resolved
-9.5% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
69 currently pending
Career history
490
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.2%
-37.8% vs TC avg
§103
56.7%
+16.7% vs TC avg
§102
20.4%
-19.6% vs TC avg
§112
17.5%
-22.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 421 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claim(s) 15-18, 21-23 and 26-28 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Koc et al. (US 2013/0301500) in view of Yi et al. (US 2020/0359247). Regarding claim 15, Koc discloses a method comprising: receiving, by a wireless device, from a wireless network, a configuration for at least one control plane activity comprising a transmission activity towards the wireless network (Koc, Fig. 9, MAC-MAINConfig IE IE 910; paragraph [0059], eNodeB sending a list of available DRX sets to the UE); measuring, by the wireless device, one or more metrics including device mobility and data arrival rate (Koc, Fig. 9, UE-AssistanceInfo IE 912; paragraph [0020], UE communicates UE assistance information to an eNodeB; paragraph [0022], UE assistance information, including a packet inter-arrival time, a mobility state indicator and QoE metrics, for the eNodeB to adjust DRX parameters based on the UE indications; paragraph [0029], UE may perform IAT measurements; paragraph [0059], UE sending UE assistance information to the eNodeB); determining based on the measured device mobility or the measured data arrival rate changing the transmission activity (Koc, Fig. 9, UE-AssistanceInfo IE 912; paragraph [0020], UE communicates UE assistance information to an eNodeB; paragraph [0022], eNodeB adjust the DRX parameters based on UE assistance information, including a packet inter-arrival time, a mobility state indicator and QoE metrics, for the eNodeB to adjust DRX parameters based on the UE indications; paragraph [0029], UE may perform IAT measurements; paragraph [0059], UE sending UE assistance information to the eNodeB); transmitting, by the wireless device assistance information for the at least one control plane activity, wherein the assistance information comprises at least one of a periodicity, an offset, and a precoding matrix indicator, to the wireless network (Koc, Fig. 9, UE-AssistanceInfo IE 912; paragraph [0020], UE communicates UE assistance information to an eNodeB; paragraph [0022], UE assistance information, including a packet inter-arrival time, a mobility state indicator and QoE metrics, for the eNodeB to adjust DRX parameters based on the UE indications; paragraph [0034], granularity of the traffic type information; paragraph [0052], expected periodicity of the traffic type; paragraph [0059], UE sending UE assistance information to the eNodeB). Koc does not explicitly disclose determining, by the wireless device, based on the measured device mobility exceeding a predefined mobility threshold or the measured data arrival rate exceeding a predefined threshold that one or more conditions for changing the transmission activity are met Yi discloses receiving, by a wireless device, from a wireless network, a configuration for at least one control plane activity comprising a transmission activity towards the wireless network (Yi, paragraph [0326], base station configures conditions of a measurement object; paragraph [0329], base station configures conditions from UE assistance information); measuring, by the wireless device, one or more metrics including device mobility and data arrival rate (Yi, paragraph [0326], base station configures conditions of a measurement object, wireless device may determine whether conditions are met, the conditions include data rate requirements, including thresholds, and the wireless device performs RRM measurements in response to the determining; paragraph [0330]-[0331], conditions based on the wireless device changing geographical region or moving speed being within a range); determining, by the wireless device, based on the measured device mobility exceeding a predefined mobility threshold or the measured data arrival rate exceeding a predefined threshold that one or more conditions for changing the transmission activity are met (Yi, Fig. 26, step 2642, conditions met?; paragraph [0326], wireless device may determine whether conditions are met, the conditions include data rate requirements, including thresholds, and the wireless device performs RRM measurements in response to the determining; paragraph [0329], base station configures conditions from UE assistance information; paragraph [0330]-[0331], conditions based on the wireless device changing geographical region or moving speed being within a range); transmitting, by the wireless device assistance information for the at least one control plane activity, wherein the assistance information comprises at least one of a periodicity, an offset, and a precoding matrix indicator, to the wireless network (Yi, Fig. 26, step 2640, transmit the measurement report; paragraph [0326], wireless device may determine whether conditions are met, the conditions include data rate requirements, including thresholds, and the wireless device performs RRM measurements in response to the determining; paragraph [0329], base station configures conditions from UE assistance information; paragraph [0330]-[0331], conditions based on the wireless device changing geographical region or moving speed being within a range). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, for a wireless device to determine whether data rate or mobility conditions are met in the invention of Koc. The motivation to combine the references would have been to conserve power and resources by only adjusting transmission parameters when needed. Regarding claim 16, Koc in view of Yi discloses the method according to claim 15, wherein the one or more conditions comprise a change of a mobility of the wireless device, a change of an arrival rate of data for transmission towards the wireless network and a reception of a trigger message from the wireless network (Koc, Fig. 9, UE-AssistanceInfo IE 912; paragraph [0020], UE communicates UE assistance information to an eNodeB; paragraph [0022], UE assistance information, including a packet inter-arrival time, a mobility state indicator and QoE metrics, for the eNodeB to adjust DRX parameters based on the UE indications; paragraph [0059], UE sending UE assistance information to the eNodeB) (Yi, Fig. 26, step 2640, transmit the measurement report; paragraph [0326], wireless device may determine whether conditions are met, the conditions include data rate requirements, including thresholds, and the wireless device performs RRM measurements in response to the determining; paragraph [0329], base station configures conditions from UE assistance information; paragraph [0330]-[0331], conditions based on the wireless device changing geographical region or moving speed being within a range). Regarding claim 17, Koc in view of Yi discloses the method according to claim 15, comprising: receiving, by the wireless device, from the wireless network, a new configuration for the at least one control plane activity (Koc, Fig. 9, drxSet-Config IE 914; paragraph [0022], eNodeB to adjust DRX parameters based on the UE indications; paragraph [0059], eNodeB sending DRX set of index to the UE; paragraph [0068], eNodeB may send a drxSet-Config IE to the UE with a request to change the DRX setting) (Yi, paragraph [0326], base station configures conditions of a measurement object; paragraph [0329], base station configures conditions from UE assistance information); changing, by the wireless device, on the basis of the new configuration for the at least one control plane activity, the transmission activity of the at least one control plane activity (Koc, Fig. 10, step 1018; paragraph [0022], eNodeB to adjust DRX parameters based on the UE indications; paragraph [0059], eNodeB sending DRX set of index to the UE; paragraph [0068], eNodeB may send a drxSet-Config IE to the UE with a request to change the DRX setting; paragraph [0070], UE reads the drxset-index included in the drxSet-Config IE and configures the DRX set as the current DRX set). Regarding claim 18, Koc in view of Yi discloses the method according to claim 17, comprising: performing, by the wireless device, monitoring activity for the at least one control plane activity (Koc, paragraph [0022], UE assistance information, including a packet inter-arrival time, a mobility state indicator and QoE metrics, for the eNodeB to adjust DRX parameters based on the UE indications; paragraph [0029], UE may perform IAT measurements) (Yi, paragraph [0236], wireless device monitors PDCCHs; paragraph [0327], measurement objects monitored/measured); and maintaining, by the wireless device, the at least one of the measurement activity and the monitoring activity (Koc, paragraph [0022], UE assistance information, including a packet inter-arrival time, a mobility state indicator and QoE metrics, for the eNodeB to adjust DRX parameters based on the UE indications; paragraph [0029], UE may perform IAT measurements) (Yi, paragraph [0236], wireless device monitors PDCCHs; paragraph [0327], measurement objects monitored/measured), when the new configuration for the at least one control plane activity has been applied (Koc, Fig. 10, step 1018; paragraph [0022], eNodeB to adjust DRX parameters based on the UE indications; paragraph [0059], eNodeB sending DRX set of index to the UE; paragraph [0068], eNodeB may send a drxSet-Config IE to the UE with a request to change the DRX setting; paragraph [0070], UE reads the drxset-index included in the drxSet-Config IE and configures the DRX set as the current DRX set). Regarding claim 21, Koc in view of Yi discloses the method according to claim 15, wherein the at least one control plane activity comprises channel state information reporting, uplink sounding, power headroom reporting, reference signal received power reporting and buffer status reporting (Koc, Fig. 9, UE-AssistanceInfo IE 912; paragraph [0020], UE communicates UE assistance information to an eNodeB; paragraph [0022], UE assistance information, including a packet inter-arrival time, a mobility state indicator and QoE metrics, for the eNodeB to adjust DRX parameters based on the UE indications; paragraph [0042], IAT includes information about the status of the buffer; paragraph [0059], UE sending UE assistance information to the eNodeB). Regarding claim 22, Koc in view of Yi discloses the method according to claim 15, wherein the assistance information comprises a periodicity, an offset, a precoding matrix indicator (PMI) and a channel quality indicator (CQI) granularity (Koc, paragraph [0034], granularity of the traffic type information; paragraph [0052], expected periodicity of the traffic type). Claim 23 is rejected under substantially the same rationale as claim 15. Koc additionally discloses one or more processors, and memory storing instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors (Koc, paragraph [0075], memory, processor). Regarding claim 26, Koc in view of Yi discloses the method according to claim 17, wherein the new configuration increases a periodicity of transmissions from the wireless device towards the wireless network while the monitoring activity is maintained (Koc, Fig. 9, drxSet-Config IE 914; paragraph [0022], eNodeB to adjust DRX parameters based on the UE indications; paragraph [0052], adjust uplink allocations and DRX cycles based on the periodicity of the traffic type; paragraph [0059], eNodeB sending DRX set of index to the UE; paragraph [0068], eNodeB may send a drxSet-Config IE to the UE with a request to change the DRX setting). Regarding claim 27, Koc in view of Yi discloses the method according to claim 15, wherein the predefined mobility threshold corresponds to a speed range determined using a sensor comprising at least one of a gyroscope or an accelerometer (Yi, Fig. 26, step 2640, transmit the measurement report; paragraph [0207], accelerometer; paragraph [0326], wireless device may determine whether conditions are met, the conditions include data rate requirements, including thresholds, and the wireless device performs RRM measurements in response to the determining; paragraph [0329], base station configures conditions from UE assistance information; paragraph [0330]-[0331], conditions based on the wireless device changing geographical region or moving speed being within a range). Regarding claim 28, Koc in view of Yi discloses the method according to claim 15, wherein the data arrival rate is estimated over a time period and the predefined threshold corresponds to a boundary rate for transmitting buffer status reporting (Yi, Fig. 26, step 2640, transmit the measurement report; paragraph [0326], wireless device may determine whether conditions are met, the conditions include a range of data rate or buffer status requirements, including thresholds, and the wireless device performs RRM measurements in response to the determining). Claim(s) 19 and 25is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Koc et al. (US 2013/0301500) in view of Yi et al. (US 2020/0359247), and further in view of 3GPP TS 38.212 V16.3.0 (cited in Applicants IDS filed on July 18, 2023). Regarding claim 19, Koc in view of Yi discloses the method according to claim 15, comprising: receiving, by the wireless device, a downlink signaling indicating an uplink transmission allocation for the wireless device (Koc, paragraph [0052], eNodeB adjusts its UL allocations and/or DRX cycles based on UE assistance information) (Yi, paragraph [0220], DCI indicates uplink scheduling grants); determining, by the wireless device, that the downlink signaling comprises Downlink Control Information (DCI) that triggers a Physical Uplink Shared Channel (PUSCH) resources with an UL-SCH indicator indicating that a transport block shall not be transmitted (Koc, paragraph [0044], UL-SCH is used for the MAC CE that communicates the UE assistance information [UE assistance information is not data and may be transmitted without CSI]; paragraph [0052], eNodeB adjusts its UL allocations and/or DRX cycles based on UE assistance information [changing a DRX cycle means transmitting less transport blocks]) (Yi, paragraph [0219], UL-SCH may be mapped to PUSCH; paragraph [0220], DCI indicates uplink scheduling grants, may [or may not] support multiplexing UCI and PUSCH).; and omitting, by the wireless device, at least one uplink transmission in accordance with the control plane activity in response to the DCI (Koc, paragraph [0053], eNodeB may adjust the UEs DRX configuration to long DRX cycle; paragraph [0055], eNodeB releases the uplink control channels for that UE and the UE cannot provide UL transmissions). Koc does not explicitly disclose that the downlink signaling comprises Downlink Control Information (DCI) that triggers a Physical Uplink Shared Channel (PUSCH) resources with an UL-SCH indicator indicating that a transport block shall not be transmitted. 3GPP TS 38.212 V16.3.0 discloses determining, by the wireless device, that the downlink signaling comprises Downlink Control Information (DCI) that triggers a Physical Uplink Shared Channel (PUSCH) resources with an UL-SCH indicator indicating that a transport block shall not be transmitted (3GPP TS 38.212 V16.3.0, page 97 and page 117, - 1 bit otherwise. A value of" l" indicates UL-SCH shall be transmitted on the PUSCH and a value of "0" indicates UL-SCH shall not be transmitted on the PUSCH. Except for DCI format O _ l with CRC scrambled by SP-CSI-RNTI, a UE is not expected to receive a DCI format O _ l with UL-SCH indicator of "O" and CSI request of all zero(s)). It would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art, before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, to transmit Physical Uplink Shared Channel (PUSCH) resources with an UL-SCH indicator indicating that a transport block shall not be transmitted, in the invention of Koc. The motivation to combine the references would have been to conform to 3GPP standards. Regarding claim 25, Koc in view of Yi, and further in view of 3GPP TS 38.212 V16.3.0 discloses the method according to claim 19, wherein the UL-SCH indicator equals 0 (3GPP TS 38.212 V16.3.0, page 97 and page 117, - 1 bit otherwise. A value of" l" indicates UL-SCH shall be transmitted on the PUSCH and a value of "0" indicates UL-SCH shall not be transmitted on the PUSCH. Except for DCI format O _ l with CRC scrambled by SP-CSI-RNTI, a UE is not expected to receive a DCI format O _ l with UL-SCH indicator of "O" and CSI request of all zero(s)). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed October 30, 2025 have been fully considered but they are moot in view of the new grounds of rejection. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ALAN LOUIS LINDENBAUM whose telephone number is (571)270-3858. The examiner can normally be reached Monday through Friday 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Faruk Hamza can be reached at (571) 272-7969. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ALAN L LINDENBAUM/Examiner, Art Unit 2466 /FARUK HAMZA/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2466
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 10, 2023
Application Filed
Jul 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Oct 30, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 19, 2025
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603845
Device-Assisted Services for Protecting Network Capacity
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12557092
Data Scheduling in High Frequency
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12526661
Radio Link Monitoring for Sidelink Communications
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Patent 12483974
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR REDUCED CAPABILITY TERMINAL TO ACCESS A CELL IN MOBILE WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 25, 2025
Patent 12396051
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR FAILURE RECOVERY IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Aug 19, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
48%
Grant Probability
64%
With Interview (+15.8%)
3y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 421 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month