Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/261,448

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING SCHEDULING INFORMATION BY A USER EQUIPMENT (UE) FOR ANOTHER UE

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Jul 13, 2023
Examiner
CASTANEYRA, RICARDO H
Art Unit
2473
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
2 (Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
98%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allow Rate
305 granted / 415 resolved
+15.5% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+24.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
444
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.8%
-36.2% vs TC avg
§103
57.6%
+17.6% vs TC avg
§102
16.7%
-23.3% vs TC avg
§112
11.1%
-28.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 415 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This office action is a response to an application filed on 12/22/2025 in which claims 1-30 are pending. Response to Amendments Applicant’s Arguments/Remarks filed on 12/22/2025 with respect to amended independent claim 1 have been fully considered but are not persuasive. Applicant’s arguments are addressed below. The claims have not overcome the claim rejections as shown below. Claims 1-30 are pending. Response to Arguments Regarding amended independent claim 1, Applicant argues that Gulati do not explicitly disclose the amended feature “transmitting, via a sidelink control channel, a sidelink control information (SCI) message to the second UE indicating the scheduling information for use in connection with the sidelink communication and further indicating a third UE associated with the sidelink communication” because Gulati do not explicitly disclose a first UE that transmits, to a second UE, an SCI message indicating a third UE for a sidelink communication. Examiner respectfully disagrees. Gulati recites in [0071] “The relay UE may then forward the resources to remote UE in a transparent manner. For example, the relay UE 464 may receive DCI for relaying UE resource…the relay UE 464 may receive DCI for remote UE resource”, in [0072], “The DCI may be scrambled with a remote-RNTI being monitored by the relay UE 464 for the purpose of relaying to either the remote UE 466, or a group of remote UEs associated with the relay UE 464”, in [0073] “The relay UE 464 may relay the DCI to the remote UE 466. In one instance, the DCI may be sent as sidelink control information (SCI), and in [0094], “In some aspects, the resource allocation information may include or correspond to a bulk allocation of resources for one or more remote UEs including the remote UE 466 and associated with a SPS configuration”. Gulati further discloses in [0080] that the allocation is for sidelink resources. See also Fig. 10, [0106], [0108]. Gulati discloses that the relay UE transmits a SCI scheduling sidelink resources to the remote UE, where the resource allocation information includes a bulk allocation of resources for one or more remote UEs including the remote UE. Thus, Gulati discloses ““transmitting, via a sidelink control channel, a sidelink control information (SCI) message to the second UE indicating the scheduling information for use in connection with the sidelink communication and further indicating a third UE associated with the sidelink communication”. Therefore, based on the response to argument presented above, the independent claim 1 is rendered unpatentable. Independent claims 10, 29 and 30 recite similar distinguishing features as claim 1 discussed above, thus are rendered unpatentable for the reasons discussed above. As a result the features of the claims are shown by the cited references as set forth below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 6-11, 17-20, 26-30 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Gulati et al. (US 2018/0324882) (provided in the IDS), hereinafter “Gulati”. As to claim 1, Gulati teaches a method of wireless communication performed by a first user equipment (UE) (Gulati, Fig. 4, [0054], [0064], Fig. 10, [0106], a relay UE scheduling resources to a remote UE), the method comprising: determining scheduling information that is associated with a sidelink communication associated with a second UE (Gulati, Fig. 4, [0080], the relay UE assigns sidelink resources to the remote UE. Fig. 10, [0106], the relay determines a resource grant that schedules resources to the remote UE); and transmitting, via a sidelink control channel, a sidelink control information (SCI) message to the second UE indicating the scheduling information for use in connection with the sidelink communication (Gulati, Fig. 4, Fig. 10, [0106], [0108], the relay UE transmits, on the sidelink channel, the scheduling indication including the resource grant to the remote UE. The transmission of the scheduling indication includes transmitting SCI including the resource grant and an indication of an upcoming scheduling indication transmission to the remote UE) and further indicating a third UE associated with the sidelink communication (Gulati, [0071]-[0073], [0080], [0094], the relay UE transmits to the remote UE the SCI with resource allocation information including bulk allocation of resources for one or more remote UEs including the remote UE. The allocation is for sidelink resources). As to claim 6, Gulati teaches wherein the first UE transmits the SCI message using resources included in a dedicated resource pool for SCI communication between the first UE and the second UE (Gulati, [0066], “the eNB may set aside resource pools to be used for sidelink communication and the UE may autonomously (e.g., randomly and/or based on distributed sensing based MAC) select the resources within the pool for transmissions”. [0068], a subset of 6 PRB sub-pool is used for the transmission of resource scheduled for sidelink. Fig. 4, Fig. 10, [0106], [0108], the SCI is transmitted in the resources of the sidelink channel, where the SCI includes the scheduling information to the remote UE). As to claim 7, Gulati teaches wherein the first UE is associated with a first supported communication bandwidth (Gulati, [0036], [0068], the relay UE uses a corresponding channel bandwidth), wherein the second UE is associated with a second supported communication bandwidth less than the first supported communication bandwidth (Gulati, [0068], the remote UE uses a limited bandwidth, such as 6 PRB sub-pool, within the channel bandwidth), and wherein frequency resources of the dedicated resource pool are based on the second supported communication bandwidth (Gulati, [0066], “the eNB may set aside resource pools to be used for sidelink communication and the UE may autonomously (e.g., randomly and/or based on distributed sensing based MAC) select the resources within the pool for transmissions”. [0068], the subset of 6 PRB sub-pool is used for the transmission of resource scheduling for sidelink. Fig. 4, Fig. 10, [0106], [0108], the SCI is transmitted in the resources of the sidelink channel, where the SCI includes the scheduling information to the remote UE). As to claim 8, Gulati teaches further comprising receiving, from a base station, one or more configuration messages indicating the dedicated resource pool (Gulati, [0066], “the eNB may set aside resource pools to be used for sidelink communication and the UE may autonomously (e.g., randomly and/or based on distributed sensing based MAC) select the resources within the pool for transmissions”. Fig. 7, [0091], “At block 702, the method may receive, on a downlink channel from a network entity, at least one indication including resource allocation information for at least one of the relay UE or a remote UE. For example, as described herein, the relay UE 464 and/or the relay component 410 may execute the resource allocation component 414 to receive, on a downlink channel from a network entity (e.g., base station 462), at least one indication including resource allocation information for at least one of the relay UE 464 or a remote UE 466”). As to claim 9, Gulati teaches further comprising determining, by the first UE, the dedicated resource pool based at least in part on one or more of a supported communication bandwidth associated with the second UE (Gulati, [0068], the subset of 6 PRB sub-pool is used for the transmission of resource scheduling for sidelink. The remote UE uses a limited bandwidth, such as 6 PRB sub-pool, within the channel bandwidth. The relay UE uses the limited bandwidth of the remote UE to transmit the SCI with scheduling information. Fig. 4, Fig. 10, [0106], [0108], the SCI is transmitted in the resources of the sidelink channel, where the SCI includes the scheduling information to the remote UE) or a common resource pool configuration message received from a base station (Gulati, [0066], “the eNB may set aside resource pools to be used for sidelink communication and the UE may autonomously (e.g., randomly and/or based on distributed sensing based MAC) select the resources within the pool for transmissions”. Fig. 7, [0091], “At block 702, the method may receive, on a downlink channel from a network entity, at least one indication including resource allocation information for at least one of the relay UE or a remote UE. For example, as described herein, the relay UE 464 and/or the relay component 410 may execute the resource allocation component 414 to receive, on a downlink channel from a network entity (e.g., base station 462), at least one indication including resource allocation information for at least one of the relay UE 464 or a remote UE 466”). As to claim 10, Gulati teaches an apparatus for wireless communication (Gulati, Fig. 4, [0054], [0064], Fig. 10, [0106], Fig. 12, a relay UE scheduling resources to a remote UE), the apparatus comprising: a memory (Gulati, Fig. 4, Fig. 12, [0111], the relay UE includes a memory); and a processor coupled to the memory and configured to (Gulati, Fig. 4, Fig. 12, [0111]-[0112], the relay UE includes a processor connected to the memory to perform the functions of the relay UE) determine, at a first user equipment (UE), scheduling information that is associated with a sidelink communication associated with a second UE (Gulati, Fig. 4, [0080], the relay UE assigns sidelink resources to the remote UE. Fig. 10, [0106], the relay determines a resource grant that schedules resources to the remote UE) and to initiate transmission, via a sidelink control channel, of a sidelink control information (SCI) message to the second UE indicating the scheduling information for use in connection with the sidelink communication (Gulati, Fig. 4, Fig. 10, [0106], [0108], the relay UE transmits, on the sidelink channel, the scheduling indication including the resource grant to the remote UE. The transmission of the scheduling indication includes transmitting SCI including the resource grant and an indication of an upcoming scheduling indication transmission to the remote UE) and further indicating a third UE associated with the sidelink communication (Gulati, [0071]-[0073], [0080], [0094], the relay UE transmits to the remote UE the SCI with resource allocation information including bulk allocation of resources for one or more remote UEs including the remote UE. The allocation is for sidelink resources). As to claim 11, Gulati teaches wherein the processor is configured to receive, from a base station, one or more configuration messages indicating that the first UE is associated with the second UE (Gulati, [0066], “the eNB may set aside resource pools to be used for sidelink communication and the UE may autonomously (e.g., randomly and/or based on distributed sensing based MAC) select the resources within the pool for transmissions”. Fig. 7, [0091], the relay UE receives from the eNB an indication of resource allocation information in order to communicate via sidelink with the remote UE. Fig. 4, Fig. 10, [0106], [0108], the SCI is transmitted in the resources of the sidelink channel, where the SCI includes the scheduling information to the remote UE), wherein the first UE transmits the SCI message based on receiving the one or more configuration messages (Gulati, [0066], “the eNB may set aside resource pools to be used for sidelink communication and the UE may autonomously (e.g., randomly and/or based on distributed sensing based MAC) select the resources within the pool for transmissions”. Fig. 7, [0091], the relay UE receives from the eNB an indication of resource allocation information in order to communicate via sidelink with the remote UE. Fig. 4, Fig. 10, [0106], [0108], the SCI is transmitted in the resources of the sidelink channel, where the SCI includes the scheduling information to the remote UE). As to claim 17, Gulati teaches wherein the scheduling information indicates one or more of a discontinuous reception (DRX) parameter associated with the second UE, a wakeup parameter associated with the second UE, a bandwidth part (BWP) switching parameter associated with the second UE, transmission scheduling information associated with the second UE, or reception scheduling information associated with the second UE (Gulati, Fig. 4, Fig. 10, [0106], [0108], the relay UE transmits, on the sidelink channel, the scheduling indication including the resource grant to the remote UE. The transmission of the scheduling indication includes transmitting SCI including an indication of an upcoming scheduling indication transmission to the remote UE. [0090], the grant provides resources for bi-directional communication (transmission and reception) on the sidelink channel. See also [0100] for transmission on the sidelink by the remote UE based on the resource allocated). As to claim 18, Gulati teaches further comprising a receiver configured to (Gulati, Fig. 12, [0112], the relay UE includes a transceiver and reception component to receive signals) receive, from the second UE, a scheduling request for resources associated with the sidelink communication, wherein the first UE transmits the SCI message based on receiving the scheduling request (Gulati, Fig. 4, Fig. 10, [0106], [0108], the relay UE transmits, on the sidelink channel, the scheduling indication including the resource grant to the remote UE (steps 1004-1006) based on receiving a scheduling request from the remote UE (step 1002). The transmission of the scheduling indication includes transmitting SCI including an indication of an upcoming scheduling indication transmission to the remote UE). As to claim 19, Gulati teaches wherein the processor is further configured to receive, from a base station in connection with a mode one sidelink resource allocation operation, one or more configuration messages indicating resources associated with the sidelink communication, wherein the scheduling information indicates the resources (Gulati, [0067], “the base station 462 may assign the resources for the remote UE 466 via the sidelink relay connection”, [0080], “For a mode 1 UE, the remote UE 466 may rely on the eNB to allocate PC5 sidelink resource dynamically”, [0071], Fig. 7, [0091], the relay UE receives from the base station an indication including resource allocation (sidelink resources) information for the remote UE). As to claim 20, Gulati teaches wherein the processor is further configured to perform a resource reservation operation that includes sensing one or more wireless communication channels in connection with a mode two sidelink resource allocation operation (Gulati, Fig. 4, [0066], in the UE autonomous mode of resource allocation for sidelink communication, the relay UE performs sensing to select resources within a resource pool. Fig. 10, [0106], the relay UE determines the resource grant for the remote UE. [0037], the sensing and CCA is performed to determine available resources in the channel) and to determine, based on a result the resource reservation operation, availability of resources for the sidelink communication, and wherein the scheduling information indicates the resources (Gulati, Fig. 4, [0066], in the UE autonomous mode of resource allocation for sidelink communication, the relay UE performs sensing to select resources within a resource pool. Fig. 10, [0106], the relay UE determines the resource grant for the remote UE. [0104], the resource grant includes the allocation of resources by the relay UE on the sidelink channel). As to claim 26, Gulati teaches wherein the SCI message indicates that the sidelink communication is to include transmitting data by one of the first UE and the second UE to the other of the first UE and the second UE (Gulati, Fig. 4, Fig. 10, [0106], [0108], the relay UE transmits, on the sidelink channel, the scheduling indication including the resource grant to the remote UE. The transmission of the scheduling indication includes transmitting SCI including an indication of an upcoming scheduling indication transmission to the remote UE from the relay UE). As to claim 27, Gulati teaches wherein the SCI message indicates that the sidelink communication is to include relaying downlink data from a base station to the second UE and by relaying uplink data from the second UE to the base station (Gulati, Fig. 4, [0056]-[0057], [0061], the RNTI is used for D2D relaying, which includes bi-directional relaying where both uplink traffic from and downlink traffic to the remote UE may be relayed by the relay UE to/from the base station. [0073], the DCI is sent as the SCI, Fig. 5, [0085], Fig. 6, [0089]-[0090], [0093], the RNTI is relayed by the relay UE to the remote UE via the SCI). As to claim 28, Gulati teaches wherein the SCI message indicates that the sidelink communication is to include relaying uplink data from the second UE to a base station, and wherein the second UE receives downlink data directly from the base station (Gulati, [0057], “D2D relaying may include uni-directional relaying and/or bi-directional relaying. Uni-directional relaying may be used to relay only uplink traffic from the remote UE 466 to the base station 462 via the relay UE 464, while downlink traffic to the remote UE 466 may be transmitted directly to the remote UE 466”. Fig. 8, [0099]-[0100], the transmission of sidelink by the remote UE to the relay UE (uplink) is based on the resource allocation previously received (i.e. SCI) in step 802). As to claim 29, Gulati teaches a non-transitory computer-readable medium storing instructions executable by a processor to initiate, perform, or control operations, the operations comprising (Gulati, Fig. 4, Fig. 10, [0111]-[0112], a memory in the relay UE which includes software executed by a processor to perform the functions of the relay UE): determining, by a first user equipment (UE), scheduling information that is associated with a sidelink communication associated with a second UE (Gulati, Fig. 4, [0080], the relay UE assigns sidelink resources to the remote UE. Fig. 10, [0106], the relay determines a resource grant that schedules resources to the remote UE); and transmitting, via a sidelink control channel, a sidelink control information (SCI) message to the second UE indicating the scheduling information for use in connection with the sidelink communication (Gulati, Fig. 4, Fig. 10, [0106], [0108], the relay UE transmits, on the sidelink channel, the scheduling indication including the resource grant to the remote UE. The transmission of the scheduling indication includes transmitting SCI including the resource grant and an indication of an upcoming scheduling indication transmission to the remote UE) and further indicating a third UE associated with the sidelink communication (Gulati, [0071]-[0073], [0080], [0094], the relay UE transmits to the remote UE the SCI with resource allocation information including bulk allocation of resources for one or more remote UEs including the remote UE. The allocation is for sidelink resources). As to claim 30, Gulati teaches an apparatus for wireless communication (Gulati, Fig. 4, [0054], [0064], Fig. 10, [0106], a relay UE scheduling resources to a remote UE), the apparatus comprising: means for (This element is interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) as processors, electronic devices, hardware device, etc. as indicated in Applicant’s PGPUB Figs. 2-3 and 10, and [0054], [0138]) (Gulati, Fig. 4, Fig. 10, [0111]-[0112], the relay UE includes a processor to perform the functions of the relay UE. The relay UE also includes hardware components, such as resource allocation component and scheduling determination component) determining, at a first user equipment (UE), scheduling information that is associated with a sidelink communication associated with a second UE (Gulati, Fig. 4, [0080], the relay UE assigns sidelink resources to the remote UE. Fig. 10, [0106], the relay determines a resource grant that schedules resources to the remote UE); and means for (This element is interpreted under 35 U.S.C. 112(f) as processors, electronic devices, hardware device, etc. as indicated in Applicant’s PGPUB Figs. 2-3 and 10, and [0054], [0138]) (Gulati, Fig. 4, Fig. 10, [0111]-[0112], the relay UE includes a transceiver to receive and transmit signals) transmitting, via a sidelink control channel, a sidelink control information (SCI) message to the second UE indicating the scheduling information for use in connection with the sidelink communication (Gulati, Fig. 4, Fig. 10, [0106], [0108], the relay UE transmits, on the sidelink channel, the scheduling indication including the resource grant to the remote UE. The transmission of the scheduling indication includes transmitting SCI including the resource grant and an indication of an upcoming scheduling indication transmission to the remote UE) and further indicating a third UE associated with the sidelink communication (Gulati, [0071]-[0073], [0080], [0094], the relay UE transmits to the remote UE the SCI with resource allocation information including bulk allocation of resources for one or more remote UEs including the remote UE. The allocation is for sidelink resources). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 2-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gulati et al. (US 2018/0324882) (provided in the IDS), hereinafter “Gulati” in view of Freda et al. (US 2023/0063472), hereinafter “Freda”. Gulati teaches the claimed limitations as stated above. Gulati does not explicitly teach the following features: regarding claim 2, further comprising transmitting a wakeup signal indicating that the second UE is to transition from a first mode of operation to a second mode of operation to monitor for the SCI message during an active portion of a SCI transmission schedule. As to claim 2, Freda teaches further comprising transmitting a wakeup signal indicating that the second UE is to transition from a first mode of operation to a second mode of operation to monitor for the SCI message during an active portion of a SCI transmission schedule (Freda, [0145], [0157], [0160], the WTRU modifies its activity behavior based on receiving a sidelink wake-up signal (S-WUS), where the WTRU monitors a PSCCH in a certain time window associated with the S-WUS. [0188], [0207]-[0208], the PSCCH includes the SCI within an active time. [0211], “the WTRU may monitor PSCCH in a slot which is active slot”. [0256], the TX WTRU transmits the SCI to the RX WTRU). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the invention of Gulati to have the features, as taught by Freda in order to save power in sidelink by performing discontinuous reception (Freda, [0122]). Gulati teaches the claimed limitations as stated above. Gulati does not explicitly teach the following features: regarding claim 3, wherein the first UE transmits the wakeup signal prior to the active portion to indicate whether the second UE is to monitor for the SCI message during the active portion. As to claim 3, Freda teaches wherein the first UE transmits the wakeup signal prior to the active portion to indicate whether the second UE is to monitor for the SCI message during the active portion (Freda, [0145], [0157], [0160], the WTRU modifies its activity behavior based on receiving a sidelink wake-up signal (S-WUS), where the WTRU monitors a PSCCH in a certain time window associated with the S-WUS. [0211], “the WTRU may monitor PSCCH in a slot which is active slot”. [0256], the TX WTRU transmits the SCI to the RX WTRU. Fig. 3, [0830], Fig. 4, [0832], the TX WTRU transmits the transmission 301 (SCI/S-WUS) before the period 1 where the RX WTRU performs monitoring). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the invention of Gulati to have the features, as taught by Freda in order to save power in sidelink by performing discontinuous reception (Freda, [0122]). Gulati teaches the claimed limitations as stated above. Gulati does not explicitly teach the following features: regarding claim 4, wherein the first UE transmits the wakeup signal during the active portion, and wherein the wakeup signal indicates whether the second UE is to monitor for the SCI message during one or more particular slots of the active portion. As to claim 4, Freda teaches wherein the first UE transmits the wakeup signal during the active portion, and wherein the wakeup signal indicates whether the second UE is to monitor for the SCI message during one or more particular slots of the active portion (Freda, [0145], [0157], [0160], the WTRU modifies its activity behavior based on receiving a sidelink wake-up signal (S-WUS), where the WTRU monitors a PSCCH in a certain time window associated with the S-WUS. [0211], “the WTRU may monitor PSCCH in a slot which is active slot”. [0256], the TX WTRU transmits the SCI to the RX WTRU. Fig. 3, [0830], Fig. 4, [0832], the TX WTRU transmits the transmission 303 (SCI/S-WUS) during the period 3 where the RX WTRU performs monitoring). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the invention of Gulati to have the features, as taught by Freda in order to save power in sidelink by performing discontinuous reception (Freda, [0122]). Claim 5 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gulati et al. (US 2018/0324882) (provided in the IDS), hereinafter “Gulati” in view of Chen et al. (US 2021/0168814), hereinafter “Chen”. Gulati teaches the claimed limitations as stated above. Gulati does not explicitly teach the following features: regarding claim 5, wherein the SCI message indicates whether the second UE is to perform a bandwidth part (BWP) switching operation from a first BWP to a second BWP for the sidelink communication. As to claim 5, Chen teaches wherein the SCI message indicates whether the second UE is to perform a bandwidth part (BWP) switching operation from a first BWP to a second BWP for the sidelink communication (Chen, [0080], “Switching of a Sidelink BWP”, [0082] “For activation and switching of an SL BWP, the switching manners described below may be considered”, [0087], “Over the PC5 interface, the UE may carry the index of the activated SL BWP in SCI. The peer UE is instructed to switch to a new SL reception BWP”, [0089], “During the switching of an SL BWP, for example, when the UE switches from SL BWP1 to SL BWP2”). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the invention of Gulati to have the features, as taught by Chen in order to perform the sidelink data transmission according to the configuration information about the sidelink BWP/resource pool, thus achieving the communication of Internet of vehicles based on a 5G sidelink (Chen, [0012]). Claim 12 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gulati et al. (US 2018/0324882) (provided in the IDS), hereinafter “Gulati” in view of Faurie et al. (US 2016/0338095), hereinafter “Faurie”. Gulati teaches the claimed limitations as stated above. Gulati does not explicitly teach the following features: regarding claim 12, wherein the processor is further configured to detect the second UE using a relay selection process or a relay reselection process and to initiate the transmission of the SCI message based on detecting the second UE using the relay selection process or the relay reselection process. As to claim 12, Faurie teaches wherein the processor is further configured to detect the second UE using a relay selection process or a relay reselection process and to initiate the transmission of the SCI message based on detecting the second UE using the relay selection process or the relay reselection process (Faurie, [0049], “the description of the pool of resources may be included in the resource allocation configuration at block 204. In one example, the description may be transmitted to the second UE as part of relay information or relay status over a Sidelink Discovery CHannel (SL-DCH), a Physical Sidelink Downlink Discovery CHannel (PSDCH) or another sidelink channel during a relay discovery or the relay selection procedure”. The resource allocation is transmitted during a relay discovery or relay selection procedure. Fig. 8, [0090], the first UE performs a relay discovery/selection for direct communication with the second UE, where the first UE detects signals from the second UE (i.e. step 3) and transmits a resource allocation grant to the second UE (step 3). [0024], [0127], the SCI is used to indicate the scheduling of sidelink resources (grant). See also, Fig. 15, [0136]-[0138]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the invention of Gulati to have the features, as taught by Faurie in order to schedule resources for a remote UE and select the resources that may minimize collisions with other resources (Faurie, [0031]). Claim 13 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gulati et al. (US 2018/0324882) (provided in the IDS), hereinafter “Gulati” in view of He et al. (US 2020/0336253), hereinafter “He”. Gulati teaches the claimed limitations as stated above. Gulati does not explicitly teach the following features: regarding claim 13, wherein the processor is further configured to broadcast the SCI message to indicate presence of the first UE to one or more UEs within communication range of the first UE. As to claim 13, He teaches wherein the processor is further configured to broadcast the SCI message to indicate presence of the first UE to one or more UEs within communication range of the first UE (He, [0220], the first stage SCI is broadcasted by the transmitter UE to the UEs within the range of the transmitter UE. The first stage SCI is used by the other UEs to determine whether or not to exclude from transmission resources that are reserved by the UE that transmits the PSCCH with the first stage SCI format). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the invention of Gulati to have the features, as taught by He in order to perform sensing and reservation of sidelink resources for subsequent PSCCH/PSSCH transmissions (He, [0235]). Claims 14-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gulati et al. (US 2018/0324882) (provided in the IDS), hereinafter “Gulati” in view of Li et al. (US 2021/0306824), hereinafter “Li”. Gulati teaches the claimed limitations as stated above. Gulati does not explicitly teach the following features: regarding claim 14, wherein the processor is further configured to initiate the transmission of the SCI message during an SCI monitoring occasion that is associated with the first UE and the second UE, and wherein the SCI monitoring occasion is associated with time resources and frequency resources that are dedicated to the first UE and the second UE. As to claim 14, Li teaches wherein the processor is further configured to initiate the transmission of the SCI message during an SCI monitoring occasion that is associated with the first UE and the second UE (Li, [0076]-[0077], the transmitting UE and receiving UE use a broadcast occasion (BO) with time, frequency and space resources. Fig. 2, [0055]-[0056], the BO2 in SF s1 includes symbols and BWP resources, where the SCI is transmitted by the transmitting UE and received by the receiver UE. Also, Fig. 8A-8B, [0154]-[0156], the transmitter UE transmits the SCI1 and the receiver UE receives the SCI1 during an occasion (UO1)), and wherein the SCI monitoring occasion is associated with time resources and frequency resources that are dedicated to the first UE and the second UE (Li, [0076]-[0077], the transmitting UE and receiving UE use a broadcast occasion (BO) with time, frequency and space resources. Fig. 2, [0055]-[0056], the BO2 in SF s1 includes symbols and BWP resources, where the SCI is transmitted by the transmitting UE and received by the receiver UE. Also, Fig. 8A-8B, [0154]-[0156], the UO1 is used by the transmitter UE and the receiver UE, the UO1 includes time resources. [0145], [0167], the UO includes time, frequency and space resources). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the invention of Gulati to have the features, as taught by Li in order to reduce the signaling overhead and reduce the latency on sidelink, such as transmitter initiated and controlled transmission (Li, [0152]). As to claim 15, Gulati teaches wherein the second UE is associated with a supported communication bandwidth (Gulati, [0068], the remote UE uses a limited bandwidth, such as 6 PRB sub-pool, within the channel bandwidth), and wherein a frequency hopping pattern associated with the frequency resources is associated with a frequency range (Gulati, [0068], [0075], the resource pool for the remote UE has a hop in frequency using a predetermined pattern). Gulati teaches the claimed limitations as stated above. Gulati does not explicitly teach the following underlined features: regarding claim 15, wherein a frequency hopping pattern associated with the frequency resources is associated with a frequency range that exceeds the supported communication bandwidth. However, Li teaches wherein a frequency hopping pattern associated with the frequency resources is associated with a frequency range that exceeds the supported communication bandwidth (Li, Fig. 2, [0063], [0135], [0145], the broadcast and unicast occasions have a frequency hopping pattern, where the sidelink operational band of the BOs and UOs exceeds the BWP of the SCI). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the invention of Gulati to have the features, as taught by Li in order to reduce the signaling overhead and reduce the latency on sidelink, such as transmitter initiated and controlled transmission (Li, [0152]). Gulati teaches the claimed limitations as stated above. Gulati does not explicitly teach the following features: regarding claim 16, wherein the time resources correspond to a subset of a dedicated resource pool for communication between the first UE and the second UE. As to claim 16, Li teaches wherein the time resources correspond to a subset of a dedicated resource pool for communication between the first UE and the second UE (Li, Fig. 14D, [0212]-[0213], the time resources used for the SCI is a subset of the dedicated resource pools. [0154]-[0156], the transmitter UE transmits the SCI and the receiver UE receives the SCI). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the invention of Gulati to have the features, as taught by Li in order to reduce the signaling overhead and reduce the latency on sidelink, such as transmitter initiated and controlled transmission (Li, [0152]). Claims 21-22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gulati et al. (US 2018/0324882) (provided in the IDS), hereinafter “Gulati” in view of Jeong et al. (US 2021/0400762), hereinafter “Jeong”. Gulati teaches the claimed limitations as stated above. Gulati does not explicitly teach the following features: regarding claim 21, wherein the processor is further configured to initiate the transmission of the SCI message via the sidelink control channel based on an SCI transmission schedule and to transmit an indication of the SCI transmission schedule to the second UE via a sidelink data channel. As to claim 21, Jeong teaches wherein the processor is further configured to initiate the transmission of the SCI message via the sidelink control channel based on an SCI transmission schedule (Jeong, Fig. 8, [0089]-[0090], SL DRX configuration is exchanged between the SL TX UE and the SL RX UE. The configuration includes timing information, SL DRX on-duration, DRX cycle length, retransmission timers, etc. [0093], the SL TX UE #1 transmits the SL control information (PSCCH) based on the timing information, such as offset, retransmission timer, DRX cycle length, etc.) and to transmit an indication of the SCI transmission schedule to the second UE via a sidelink data channel (Jeong, Fig. 8, [0104], “SL TX UE #1's next initial transmission timing can be included in the physical control information in PSCCH/PSSCH or MAC CE/HD (Header), this timing can be used to set SL DRX cycle length (e.g., time duration between the previous initial transmission and the next initial transmission)”. The transmission timing of the next transmission is indicated in the PSSCH). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the invention of Gulati to have the features, as taught by Jeong in order to provide an efficient UE power saving procedure and reduction of DL and SL collision/interference (Jeong, [0101]). Gulati teaches the claimed limitations as stated above. Gulati does not explicitly teach the following features: regarding claim 22, wherein the SCI transmission schedule indicates a first plurality of slots during which the second UE is to monitor the sidelink control channel for SCI messages including the SCI message, and wherein the SCI transmission schedule further indicates a second plurality of slots during which the second UE is to avoid monitoring the sidelink control channel for the SCI messages. As to claim 22, Jeong teaches wherein the SCI transmission schedule indicates a first plurality of slots during which the second UE is to monitor the sidelink control channel for SCI messages including the SCI message (Jeong, Fig. 8, [0089]-[0090], SL DRX configuration is exchanged between the SL TX UE and the SL RX UE. The configuration includes timing information, SL DRX on-duration, DRX cycle length, retransmission timers, etc. [0093], the SL RX UE #3 receives the SL control information (PSCCH) based on the timing information, such as offset (the first time slot that meets a defined equation using SL DRX start offset), retransmission timer, DRX cycle length, etc.), and wherein the SCI transmission schedule further indicates a second plurality of slots during which the second UE is to avoid monitoring the sidelink control channel for the SCI messages (Jeong, Fig. 8, Fig. 8, [0089]-[0090], the SL DRX inactivity timer, [0093], the SL DRX offset (e.g. the first incoming time slot that meets a defined equation using SL DRX start offset). This indicates that the offset provides for slots that not available for the PSCCH/PSSCH transmission). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the invention of Gulati to have the features, as taught by Jeong in order to provide an efficient UE power saving procedure and reduction of DL and SL collision/interference (Jeong, [0101]). Claims 23-25 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gulati et al. (US 2018/0324882) (provided in the IDS), hereinafter “Gulati” in view of Luo et al. (US 2022/0346081), hereinafter “Luo”. Gulati teaches the claimed limitations as stated above. Gulati does not explicitly teach the following features: regarding claim 23, wherein the SCI message indicates that the sidelink communication is to include transmitting data by one of the second UE and the third UE to the other of the second UE and the third UE. As to claim 23, Luo teaches wherein the SCI message indicates that the sidelink communication is to include transmitting data by one of the second UE and the third UE to the other of the second UE and the third UE (Luo, Figs. 5-6, [0074], the PS-SCI 611 is equivalent to the configuration 511 in Fig. 5. [0067]-[0068], Table 5, the wakeup control resource configuration (511) includes the ID of each of the group members for sidelink communication. [0064], wakeup signal and sidelink data are transmitted from the UE1 to the UE2 based on the wakeup control resource configuration). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the invention of Gulati to have the features, as taught by Luo in order to perform power-saving in sidelink communication between communication terminals (Luo, [0003]). Gulati teaches the claimed limitations as stated above. Gulati does not explicitly teach the following features: regarding claim 24, wherein the processor is further configured to initiate the transmission of the SCI message to the second UE and to the third UE, and wherein the SCI message identifies the second UE as a transmitter of the sidelink communication and further identifies the third UE as a receiver of the sidelink communication. As to claim 24, Luo teaches wherein the processor is further configured to initiate the transmission of the SCI message to the second UE and to the third UE (Luo, Figs. 5-6, [0064], [0067]-[0068], [0074], the UE3 (Head) transmits the PS-SCI resource configuration to the UE1 (step 611) and UE2 (step 610)), and wherein the SCI message identifies the second UE as a transmitter of the sidelink communication and further identifies the third UE as a receiver of the sidelink communication (Luo, Figs. 5-6, [0074], the PS-SCI 611 is equivalent to the configuration 511 in Fig. 5. [0067]-[0068], Table 5, the wakeup control resource configuration (511) includes the ID of each of the group members for sidelink communication. [0064], wakeup signal and sidelink data are transmitted from the UE1 (Transmitter) to the UE2 (Receiver) based on the wakeup control resource configuration). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the invention of Gulati to have the features, as taught by Luo in order to perform power-saving in sidelink communication between communication terminals (Luo, [0003]). Gulati teaches the claimed limitations as stated above. Gulati does not explicitly teach the following features: regarding claim 25, wherein the SCI message corresponds to a first SCI message that identifies the second UE as a transmitter of the sidelink communication, and wherein the processor is further configured to initiate transmission of a second SCI message that includes a wakeup signal to the third UE prior to performing the sidelink communication. As to claim 25, Luo teaches wherein the SCI message corresponds to a first SCI message that identifies the second UE as a transmitter of the sidelink communication (Luo, Figs. 5-6, [0074], the PS-SCI 611 is equivalent to the configuration 511 in Fig. 5. [0067]-[0068], Table 5, the wakeup control resource configuration (511) includes the ID of each of the group members for sidelink communication. [0064], wakeup signal and sidelink data are transmitted from the UE1 (Transmitter) to the UE2 (Receiver) based on the wakeup control resource configuration. [0063], “the wakeup control resource configuration may further include a source identity”. The UE3 (Head) transmits the PS-SCI resource configuration to the UE1 (step 611)), and wherein the processor is further configured to initiate transmission of a second SCI message that includes a wakeup signal to the third UE prior to performing the sidelink communication (Luo, Figs. 5-6, [0064], [0067]-[0068], [0074], the UE3 (Head) transmits the PS-SCI resource configuration/Wakeup control resource configuration to the UE2 (step 610) prior to the sidelink data transmitted). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the invention of Gulati to have the features, as taught by Luo in order to perform power-saving in sidelink communication between communication terminals (Luo, [0003]). Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to RICARDO H CASTANEYRA whose telephone number is (571)272-2486. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00am - 5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kwang bin Yao can be reached at 571-272-3182. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RICARDO H CASTANEYRA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2473
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 13, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 30, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Dec 22, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 20, 2026
Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604366
MULTICAST SERVICE DELIVERY FOR USE IN INACTIVE STATE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598646
FR2-2 ENERGY DETECTION THRESHOLD ADAPTATION WITH TARGET LISTEN BEFORE TALK SENSING BANDWIDTH
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593293
METHODS AND APPARATUSES FOR RECEIVER (Rx) - TRANSMITTER (Tx) ROUND TRIP TIME ESTIMATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12593355
SWITCHING BETWEEN CHANNEL ACCESS PROCEDURES THAT INCLUDE AND EXCLUDE RECEIVING BEFORE TRANSMITTING
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12574905
Channel Adjustment Method And Electronic Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
98%
With Interview (+24.1%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 415 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month