Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/261,521

COLLABORATIVE INFORMATION SENDING METHOD, RESOURCE DETERMINATION METHOD, COMMUNICATION NODE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jul 14, 2023
Examiner
CATTUNGAL, AJAY P
Art Unit
2467
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
ZTE CORPORATION
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
89%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 89% — above average
89%
Career Allow Rate
795 granted / 895 resolved
+30.8% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+6.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
912
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.8%
-34.2% vs TC avg
§103
43.2%
+3.2% vs TC avg
§102
31.2%
-8.8% vs TC avg
§112
3.7%
-36.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 895 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Specification The lengthy specification has not been checked to the extent necessary to determine the presence of all possible minor errors. Applicant’s cooperation is requested in correcting any errors of which applicant may become aware in the specification. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1-7, 11, 14, 16-18, 20-23, and 25-26 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Ganesan et al. (US 2023/0189292 A1). Regarding claims 1, 26, Ganesan et al. discloses a collaborative information sending method, the method being applied to a first terminal and comprising: acquiring condition information (Para 52 and 77 teaches of based on the sensing results determining a resource ) ; and sending collaborative information in a case where a target parameter satisfies restriction of the condition information, wherein the collaborative information comprises a resource set (Para 77-82 teaches of based on the coordination information selecting a candidate resource set that satisfies one of the many conditions, and sending the resource set to the first UE). Regarding claim 2, Ganesan et al. discloses a method, wherein the condition information is pre-configured or pre-stored information, or information configured through Radio Resource Control (RRC) signaling, or information determined according to first sidelink control information (SCI) sent by a second terminal. (Para 51 teaches of sending sidelink control information). Regarding claims 3, 22, Ganesan et al. discloses a method, wherein the condition information comprises at least one of: a road direction indicated by a target terminal to the first terminal; a range of a road direction indicated by a target terminal to the first terminal; a road identifier indicated by a target terminal to the first terminal; a movement direction indicated by a target terminal to the first terminal; a range of a movement direction indicated by a target terminal to the first terminal; a threshold of an included angle between a movement direction of the first terminal and a movement direction of a target terminal; a value range of an included angle between a movement direction of the first terminal and a movement direction of a target terminal; a threshold of a remainder obtained from dividing an included angle between a movement direction of the first terminal and a movement direction of a target terminal by 90 or π/2; a value range of a remainder obtained from dividing an included angle between a movement direction of the first terminal and a movement direction of a target terminal by 90 or π/2; a threshold of an included angle between a road direction in which the first terminal is located and a road direction in which a target terminal is located; a value range of an included angle between a road direction in which the first terminal is located and a road direction in which a target terminal is located; a threshold of a remainder obtained from dividing an included angle between a road direction in which the first terminal is located and a road direction in which a target terminal is located by 90 or π/2; a value range of a remainder obtained from dividing an included angle between a road direction in which the first terminal is located and a road direction in which a target terminal is located by 90 or π/2; a threshold of a distance between the first terminal and a target terminal; a value range of a distance between the first terminal and a target terminal; a threshold of Reference Signal Received Power (RSRP); a value range of RSRP; or a number threshold of collaborative user equipments (UEs). (Para 65 teaches of “In a third option, instead of a candidate resource, a receiver UE may report an interference report (e.g., Rx_IR - may be a resource having RSSI and/or RSRP below a certain configured threshold) from all or a subset of sub channels and a TX UE may select a resource that is present in Tx_CRS, but not in the Rx_IR (e.g., removes resources from Tx_CRS set based on Rx_IR)”) Regarding claims 4, 20, Ganesan et al. discloses a method, wherein the condition information comprises first SCI sent by a second terminal, wherein the first SCI comprises request information that comprises at least one of: a user identifier of a collaborative UE; or a first bitmap configured to indicate a collaborative UE or request the first terminal to send the collaborative information (Para 48 and Para 50 teaches of the TX UE transmitting the source identifier to the RX UE). Regarding claims 5, 21, Ganesan et al. discloses a method, wherein the condition information comprises first SCI sent by a second terminal, wherein the first SCI comprises request information comprising: a user identifier of a collaborative UE, wherein the user identifier of the collaborative UE is a source identifier (ID) of the collaborative UE. (Para 48 and Para 50 teaches of the TX UE transmitting the source identifier to the RX UE). Regarding claim 6, Ganesan et al. discloses a method, wherein the target parameter comprises at least one of: a road direction in which the first terminal is located; a road identifier in which the first terminal is located; a movement direction of the first terminal; a distance between the first terminal and a target terminal; RSRP of a reference signal of a target terminal received by the first terminal; an included angle between a road direction in which the first terminal is located and a road direction in which a target terminal is located; a remainder obtained from dividing an included angle between a road direction in which the first terminal is located and a road direction in which a target terminal is located by 90 or π/2; an included angle between a movement direction of the first terminal and a movement direction of a target terminal; or a remainder obtained from dividing an included angle between a movement direction of the first terminal and a movement direction of a target terminal by 90 or π/2 (Para 65 teaches of “In a third option, instead of a candidate resource, a receiver UE may report an interference report (e.g., Rx_IR - may be a resource having RSSI and/or RSRP below a certain configured threshold) from all or a subset of sub channels and a TX UE may select a resource that is present in Tx_CRS, but not in the Rx_IR (e.g., removes resources from Tx_CRS set based on Rx_IR)”) Regarding claim 7, Ganesan et al. discloses a method, wherein the target parameter comprises at least one of: a user identifier of the first terminal; or a corresponding location of the first terminal in a bitmap (Para 48 and Para 50 teaches of the TX UE transmitting the source identifier to the RX UE). Regarding claim 11, Ganesan et al. discloses a method, wherein sending the collaborative information in the case where the target parameter satisfies the restriction of the condition information comprises: sending the collaborative information in a case where a number of at least one collaborative UE is less than a number threshold; or sending the collaborative information in a case where a user identifier of the first terminal belongs to a user identifier of a collaborative UE; or sending the collaborative information in a case where bit indication of a corresponding location of the first terminal in a bitmap is a set value (Para 48 and Para 50 teaches of the TX UE transmitting the source identifier to the RX UE). Regarding claims 14, 23, Ganesan et al. discloses a method, further comprising: sending second SCI, wherein the second SCI is configured to indicate that the first terminal supports for being a collaborative terminal; or sending second SCI, wherein the second SCI is configured to indicate a time limit for the first terminal to serve as a collaborative terminal. (Para 50 teaches “The first UE 602 may transmit a trigger for inter-UE coordination message 606 to the second UE 604”). Regarding claim 16, Ganesan et al. discloses a method, further comprising: detecting third SCI; and according to a detection result of the third SCI, sending the collaborative information or canceling sending the collaborative information. (Para 50 teaches “Moreover, the second UE 604 may transmit an inter-UE coordination message 608 (e.g., a set of resource) to the first UE 602. Further, the first UE 602 may transmit a transmission 610 to the second UE 604.”). Regarding claim 17, Ganesan et al. discloses a method, wherein the collaborative information comprises a second bitmap, wherein each bit in the second bitmap is configured to indicate that one sub-channel on one slot is a recommended resource or an un-recommended resource (Para 56 teaches “In some embodiments, an Rx_CRS report contains a bitmap of a subchannel in a resource pool where candidate resources are not sorted according to highest RSSI and/or RSRP values. In such embodiments, a size of the bitmap depends on a number of subchannels in a resource pool. In various embodiments, a least significant bit (“LSB”) of a bitmap contains a lowest subchannel index, and a bit next to the least significant bit of the bitmap contains a next to lowest subchannel index, and so forth. For example, for a bitmap 01000111101, subchannel 0, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 9 are selected as candidate resources. In certain embodiments, a most significant bit (“MSB”) of a bitmap contains a lowest subchannel index, and a bit next to the most significant bit of the bitmap contains a next to lowest subchannel index, and so forth.”). Regarding claim 18, Ganesan et al. discloses a resource determination method, the method being applied to a second terminal and comprising: receiving collaborative information from a first terminal in a case where a target parameter satisfies restriction of condition information, wherein the collaborative information comprises a resource set (Para 77-82 teaches of based on the coordination information selecting a candidate resource set that satisfies one of the many conditions); and determining, according to the collaborative information, a resource. (Para 77-82 teaches resource set to the first UE that is used for transmission.). Regarding claim 25 Ganesan et al. discloses a communication node, comprising a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored on the memory and running on the processor, wherein when executing the computer program, the processor performs the collaborative information sending method of claim 1 ( See Fig 3 items 304, 302). Allowable Subject Matter Claims 8, 19 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AJAY P CATTUNGAL whose telephone number is (571)270-7525. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00-5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Hassan Phillips can be reached at 5712723940. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AJAY CATTUNGAL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2467
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 14, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 14, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604232
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR REDUCING CONGESTION IN MESH NETWORK
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604336
DELEGATED PEER-TO-PEER SCHEDULING ON ALLOCATED CHANNELS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598627
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MANAGING CONFIGURATION AND CONTROL INFORMATION OF MBS SERVICES IN WIRELESS NETWORK
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12593308
COMMUNICATION METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588052
QoS SUPPORT FOR P2P COMMUNICATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
89%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+6.7%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 895 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month