Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/262,060

WIRELESS SPEAKER, WIRELESS AUDIO SYSTEM, PROGRAM, AND METHOD OF STATE CONTROL FOR WIRELESS SPEAKER

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jul 19, 2023
Examiner
LIEBGOTT, TYLER MICHAEL
Art Unit
2694
Tech Center
2600 — Communications
Assignee
D&M Holdings Inc.
OA Round
2 (Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
58%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% of resolved cases
65%
Career Allow Rate
11 granted / 17 resolved
+2.7% vs TC avg
Minimal -7% lift
Without
With
+-6.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
46
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.7%
-39.3% vs TC avg
§103
44.9%
+4.9% vs TC avg
§102
29.1%
-10.9% vs TC avg
§112
21.2%
-18.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 17 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment In response to the non-final action dated 05/06/2025, applicant has amended claims 1, 3, 5 and 7-10. Claims 1-10 are currently pending in the application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 1-4 and 7-10, is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cook et al (U.S. Pub No. 20180350363, hereinafter Cook) as applied to claims above, and further in view of Hammer et al (US Patent No. 10158946, hereinafter Hammer). Regarding claim 1, Cook teaches a wireless speaker (See Cook Fig 1, Sound device 10) having a group reproduction function for synchronously reproducing an audio data by a plurality of wireless speakers (See Cook Fig 2 & ¶ [0085] lines 9-11, playback within established group), shift-to-on-state control means for shifting the own wireless speaker to an on state when the own wireless speaker is instructed to shift to the on state by a power button provided to the own wireless speaker (See Cook Fig 3 & ¶ [0115] lines 1-5, switch 80); shift-to-off-state control means for shifting the own wireless speaker to an off state when the own wireless speaker is instructed to shift to the off state by the power button (See Cook Fig 3 & ¶ [0115] lines 1-5, switch 80); shift-to-on-state command transmission means for transmitting (See Cook Fig 3 & ¶ [0115] lines 1-5, wireless transmitters/receivers switch 80), when the own wireless speaker is instructed to shift to the on state by the power button (See Cook Fig 3 & ¶ [0115] lines 1-5, switch 80), the command to shift to the on state to each of the other ones of the plurality of wireless speakers being members of the group to which the own wireless speaker currently belongs (See Cook ¶ [0120] lines 1-4, change of state events are communicated to all required devices depending on configuration), which are identified by the member information stored in the affiliated group information storage means (See Cook ¶ [0120] lines 1-4, change of state events are communicated to all required devices depending on configuration); and shift-to-off-state command transmission means for transmitting, when the own wireless speaker is instructed to shift to the off state by the power button (See Cook Fig 3 & ¶ [0115] lines 1-5, switch 80), the command to shift to the off state to each of the other ones of the plurality of wireless speakers being the members of the group to which the own wireless speaker currently belongs (See Cook ¶ [0120] lines 1-4, change of state events are communicated to all required devices depending on configuration), which are identified by the member information stored in the affiliated group information storage means (See Cook ¶ [0120] lines 1-4, change of state events are communicated to all required devices depending on configuration). Cook does not explicitly teach the wireless speaker comprising: affiliated group information storage means for storing member information on a group to which an own wireless speaker currently belongs; or group history information storage means for storing member information on a group to which the own wireless speaker belonged immediately before. Hammer teaches a wireless speaker comprising: affiliated group information storage means for storing member information on a group to which an own wireless speaker currently belongs (See Hammer Fig 15 & ¶ [0095 & 0103], Information and parameters may be stored within storage of the processing unit 112 or speaker 504, fourth data structure 1556 mapping of a speaker group 1560A-B of the devices, group information stored on speaker); group history information storage means for storing member information on a group to which the own wireless speaker belonged immediately before (Fig 15 & ¶ [0103], field 1560C indication whether or not a speaker assigned to a group is available, this indicates the wireless speaker information is still stored even when unavailable/disconnected). It would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have incorporated the local storage taught by Hammer with the wireless speaker taught by Cook. Local storage is well known in the art and provides several key benefits including faster performance and increased security of wireless devices. Regarding claim 2, Cook in view of Hammer teaches The wireless speaker according to claim 1, further comprising: connection means for establishing connection to a server for managing a group to which each of the plurality of wireless speakers belongs (See Cook Fig 2 & ¶ [0090], established device networks with room coordination and server access); and update means for updating (See Cook ¶ [0095], “home profile’ used to control and update devices within the coordinated system), when the own wireless speaker is instructed to shift to the on state or the off state by the power button (See Cook Fig 3 & ¶ [0115] lines 1-5, switch 80), the member information stored in the affiliated group information storage means by acquiring the member information on the group to which the own wireless speaker currently belongs from the server through the connection means (See Cook ¶ [0095], “home profile’ used to control and update devices within the coordinated system). Regarding claim 3, Cook in view of Hammer teaches the wireless speaker according to claim 1, wherein the shift-to-off-state control means is configured to shift the own wireless speaker to the off state when the command to shift to the off state is received from another one of the plurality of wireless speakers only in a case in which the another one of the plurality of wireless speakers is a member of the group to which the own wireless speaker currently belongs (See Cook ¶ [0120] lines 1-4, change of state events are communicated to all required devices depending on configuration), which is identified by the member information stored in the affiliated group information storage means (See Cook ¶ [0145] lines 1-5, “home profile’ is a database of all devices within the system). Regarding claim 4, Cook in view of Hammer teaches The wireless speaker according to claim 3, further comprising: connection means for establishing connection to a server for managing a group to which each of the plurality of wireless speakers belongs (See Cook Fig 2 & ¶ [0090], established device networks with room coordination and server access); and update means for updating (See Cook ¶ [0095], “home profile’ used to control and update devices within the coordinated system), when the own wireless speaker is instructed to shift to the on state or the off state by the power button (See Cook Fig 3 & ¶ [0115] lines 1-5, switch 80), the member information stored in the group history information storage means to the member information stored in the affiliated group information storage means (See Cook ¶ [0145] lines 1-5, “home profile’ is a database of all devices within the system), and updating the member information stored in the affiliated group information storage means by acquiring the member information on the group to which the own wireless speaker currently belongs from the server through the connection means (See Cook ¶ [0095] lines 1-7, all devices within a network check and update the “home profile”). Regarding claim 7/4/3/1, Cook in view of Hammer teaches A wireless audio system (See Cook Fig 2, wireless audio network), comprising: the plurality of wireless speakers of any one of claims 1 to 6; and a controller configured to remotely operate the plurality of wireless speakers (See Cook ¶ [0094], house coordinator unit), wherein the plurality of wireless speakers are wirelessly connected to an access point (See Cook Fig 2, speaker devices of a room all connected to same room coordinator unit), and wherein the controller is configured to instruct, when the controller is wirelessly connected to the access point, a predetermined wireless speaker of the plurality of wireless speakers to shift to an on state (See Cook ¶ [0094], house coordinator unit manages states of all devices in the network). Regarding claim 8, Cook in view of Hammer teaches A wireless audio system (See Cook Fig 2, wireless audio network), comprising: the plurality of wireless speakers of claim 1; and a controller configured to remotely operate the plurality of wireless speaker (See Cook ¶ [0094], house coordinator unit), wherein the plurality of wireless speakers are wirelessly connected to an access point (See Cook Fig 2, speaker devices of a room all connected to same room coordinator unit), wherein the controller includes group reproduction history information storage means for storing member information on a group instructed to perform group reproduction most recently (See Cook ¶ [0145] lines 1-5, “home profile’ is a database of all devices within the system), and wherein the controller is configured to instruct, when the controller is wirelessly connected to the access point, any one of the plurality of wireless speakers identified by the member information stored in the group reproduction history information storage means to shift to an on state (See Cook ¶ [0094], house coordinator unit manages states of all devices in the network). Regarding claim 9, Cook teaches a program stored in a non-transitory computer readable medium for causing a computer to function as a wireless speaker (See Cook ¶ [0140], each wireless speaker contains a chip that runs processing needs of the device. As is obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art, a processor requires program instructions to operate) having a group reproduction function for synchronously reproducing an audio data by a plurality of wireless speakers (See Cook Fig 2 & ¶ [0085] lines 9-11, playback within established group), the program causing the computer to function as: shift-to-on-state control means for shifting the own wireless speaker to an on state when the own wireless speaker is instructed to shift to the on state by a power button provided to the own wireless speaker (See Cook Fig 3 & ¶ [0115] lines 1-5, switch 80); shift-to-off-state control means for shifting the own wireless speaker to an off state when the own wireless speaker is instructed to shift to the off state by the power button (See Cook Fig 3 & ¶ [0115] lines 1-5, switch 80); shift-to-on-state command transmission means for transmitting (See Cook Fig 3 & ¶ [0115] lines 1-5, wireless transmitters/receivers switch 80), when the own wireless speaker is instructed to shift to the on state by the power button (See Cook Fig 3 & ¶ [0115] lines 1-5, switch 80), the command to shift to the on state to each of the other ones of the plurality of wireless speakers being members of the group to which the own wireless speaker currently belongs (See Cook ¶ [0120] lines 1-4, change of state events are communicated to all required devices depending on configuration), which are identified by the member information stored in the affiliated group information storage means (See Cook ¶ [0120] lines 1-4, change of state events are communicated to all required devices depending on configuration); and shift-to-off-state command transmission means for transmitting, when the own wireless speaker is instructed to shift to the off state by the power button (See Cook Fig 3 & ¶ [0115] lines 1-5, switch 80), the command to shift to the off state to each of the other ones of the plurality of wireless speakers being the members of the group to which the own wireless speaker currently belongs (See Cook ¶ [0120] lines 1-4, change of state events are communicated to all required devices depending on configuration), which are identified by the member information stored in the affiliated group information storage means (See Cook ¶ [0120] lines 1-4, change of state events are communicated to all required devices depending on configuration). Cook does not explicitly teach the wireless speaker comprising: affiliated group information storage means for storing member information on a group to which an own wireless speaker currently belongs; or group history information storage means for storing member information on a group to which the own wireless speaker belonged immediately before. Hammer teaches a wireless speaker comprising: affiliated group information storage means for storing member information on a group to which an own wireless speaker currently belongs (See Hammer Fig 15 & ¶ [0095 & 0103], Information and parameters may be stored within storage of the processing unit 112 or speaker 504, fourth data structure 1556 mapping of a speaker group 1560A-B of the devices, group information stored on speaker); group history information storage means for storing member information on a group to which the own wireless speaker belonged immediately before (Fig 15 & ¶ [0103], field 1560C indication whether or not a speaker assigned to a group is available, this indicates the wireless speaker information is still stored even when unavailable/disconnected). It would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have incorporated the local storage taught by Hammer with the program stored in a non-transitory computer readable medium taught by Cook. Local storage is well known in the art and provides several key benefits including faster performance and increased security of wireless devices. Regarding claim 10, Cook teaches a method of state control for a wireless speaker (See Cook Abstract lines 1-3, method for sound system control) having a group reproduction function for synchronously reproducing an audio data by a plurality of wireless speakers (See Cook Fig 2 & ¶ [0085] lines 9-11, playback within established group), the method comprising: shifting, by the wireless speaker, the own wireless speaker to an on state when the own wireless speaker is instructed to shift to the on state by a power button provided to the own wireless speaker (See Cook Fig 3 & ¶ [0115] lines 1-5, switch 80), and transmitting, when the own wireless speaker is instructed to shift to the on state by the power button (See Cook Fig 3 & ¶ [0115] lines 1-5, switch 80), the command to shift to the on state to each of the other ones of the plurality of wireless speakers being members of the group to which the own wireless speaker currently belongs (See Cook ¶ [0120] lines 1-4, change of state events are communicated to all required devices depending on configuration), which are identified by the member information (See Cook ¶ [0120] lines 1-4, change of state events are communicated to all required devices depending on configuration); and shifting, by the wireless speaker, the own wireless speaker to an off state when the own wireless speaker is instructed to shift to the off state by the power button (See Cook Fig 3 & ¶ [0115] lines 1-5, switch 80), and transmitting, when the own wireless speaker is instructed to shift to the off state by the power button (See Cook Fig 3 & ¶ [0115] lines 1-5, switch 80), the command to shift to the off state to each of the other ones of the plurality of wireless speakers being the members of the group to which the own wireless speaker currently belongs (See Cook ¶ [0120] lines 1-4, change of state events are communicated to all required devices depending on configuration), which are identified by the member information prior to the shifting of the own wireless speaker to the off state (See Cook ¶ [0120] lines 1-4, change of state events are communicated to all required devices depending on configuration). Cook does not explicitly teach the wireless speaker comprising: affiliated group information storage means for storing member information on a group to which an own wireless speaker currently belongs; or group history information storage means for storing member information on a group to which the own wireless speaker belonged immediately before. Hammer teaches a wireless speaker comprising: affiliated group information storage means for storing member information on a group to which an own wireless speaker currently belongs (See Hammer Fig 15 & ¶ [0095 & 0103], Information and parameters may be stored within storage of the processing unit 112 or speaker 504, fourth data structure 1556 mapping of a speaker group 1560A-B of the devices, group information stored on speaker); group history information storage means for storing member information on a group to which the own wireless speaker belonged immediately before (Fig 15 & ¶ [0103], field 1560C indication whether or not a speaker assigned to a group is available, this indicates the wireless speaker information is still stored even when unavailable/disconnected). It would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have incorporated the local storage taught by Hammer with the method taught by Cook. Local storage is well known in the art and provides several key benefits including faster performance and increased security of wireless devices. Claim(s) 5-6 and 7/6/5/1, is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cook et al (U.S. Pub No. 20180350363, hereinafter Cook) in view of Hammer et al (US Patent No. 10158946, hereinafter Hammer) as applied to claims above, and further in view of Spitznagle et al (U.S. Put No. 20170099558, hereinafter Spitznagle). Regarding claim 5, Cook in view of Hammer teaches The wireless speaker according to claim 1, further comprising controller monitoring means for monitoring a connection state of the controller wirelessly connected to an access point, the access point further connected to the own wireless speaker when the shift-to-on-state command transmission means has transmitted the command to shift to the on state to each of the other ones of the plurality of wireless speakers being members of the group to which the own wireless speaker currently belongs (See Cook ¶ [0095] lines 1-7, all devices within a network check and update the “home profile” providing updates to the controllers), and wherein the shift-to-off-state command transmission means is configured to transmit, also when the controller monitoring means detects that the wireless connection to the controller has been disconnected (See Cook ¶ [0095] lines 1-7, status updates are sent to the home profile regardless of speaker connection status), the command to shift to the off state to each of the other ones of the plurality of wireless speakers being the members of the group to which the own wireless speaker currently belongs (See Cook ¶ [0120] lines 1-4, change of state events are communicated to all required devices depending on configuration), which are identified by the member information stored in the affiliated group information storage means (See Cook ¶ [0120] lines 1-4, change of state events are communicated to all required devices depending on configuration). Cook does not explicitly teach a shift to off state when a wireless connection becomes disconnected. Spitznagle teaches a shift to off state when a wireless connection becomes disconnected (See Spitznagle ¶ [0099] lines 1-5, when signal between speaker and hub is disconnected the speaker will power down into a standby state). It would have been prima facie obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have incorporated power status change when disconnected from the network with the speaker system taught by Cook. Doing so allows for a power saving mode by transitioning the speaker to an off state when disconnected from the network or not in use. Regarding claim 6 Cook in view of Hammer and Spitznagle teaches The wireless speaker according to claim 5, further comprising shift-to-off-state notification means for notifying, when the controller monitoring means detects that the wireless connection to the controller has been disconnected, the controller through Internet that each of the members of the group to which the own wireless speaker currently belongs, which are identified by the member information stored in the affiliated group information storage means, has shifted to the off state (See Cook ¶ [0095] lines 1-7, status updates are sent to the home profile either by the speaker, room coordinator, or house coordinator). Regarding claim 7/6/5/1, Cook in view of Hammer and Spitznagle teaches A wireless audio system (See Cook Fig 2, wireless audio network), comprising: the plurality of wireless speakers of any one of claims 1 to 6; and a controller configured to remotely operate the plurality of wireless speakers (See Cook ¶ [0094], house coordinator unit), wherein the plurality of wireless speakers are wirelessly connected to an access point (See Cook Fig 2, speaker devices of a room all connected to same room coordinator unit), and wherein the controller is configured to instruct, when the controller is wirelessly connected to the access point, a predetermined wireless speaker of the plurality of wireless speakers to shift to an on state (See Cook ¶ [0094], house coordinator unit manages states of all devices in the network). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see page 1 Claim Rejection - 112, filed 10/06/2025, with respect to claims 1-10 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The 112 rejection of 05/06/2025 has been withdrawn. Applicant’s arguments, see page 1 Claim Rejection - 101, filed 10/06/2025, with respect to claim 9 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The 101 rejection of 05/06/2025 has been withdrawn. Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-10 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TYLER LIEBGOTT whose telephone number is (703)756-1818. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 10-6:30 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Fan Tsang can be reached at (571)272-7547. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /T.M.L./Examiner, Art Unit 2694 /FAN S TSANG/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2694
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 19, 2023
Application Filed
May 01, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Oct 06, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 15, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604143
SOUND DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12563336
RESONATOR DEVICES AND ASSEMBLIES THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12513468
MEMS microphone chip
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 30, 2025
Patent 12498897
DASHBOARD USER INTERFACE
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 16, 2025
Patent 12493445
LISTENING ASSISTANCE BY VIRTUAL CONFERENCE APPLICATIONS FOR HYBRID EVENTS
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 09, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
58%
With Interview (-6.7%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 17 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month