Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/262,221

MODULATORS OF FPR1 AND METHODS OF USING THE SAME

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jul 20, 2023
Examiner
SEITZ, ANTHONY JOSEPH
Art Unit
1629
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
BIOFRONT LTD
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
1-2
OA Rounds
3y 8m
To Grant
96%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allow Rate
108 granted / 158 resolved
+8.4% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+27.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
74 currently pending
Career history
232
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.5%
-36.5% vs TC avg
§103
25.8%
-14.2% vs TC avg
§102
18.7%
-21.3% vs TC avg
§112
23.2%
-16.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 158 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Election of Species and Status of the Claims Applicant’s election of PNG media_image1.png 126 134 media_image1.png Greyscale , as the single specific compound as well as ‘hemorrhagic stroke,’ as the single disease/disorder/condition in the response filed on December 1st 2025 is acknowledged. Claims 1-42 are pending. Claims 9 and 39-42 are withdrawn from further consideration as being directed towards nonelected species until a generic claim has been found allowable. Claims 1-8 and 10-38 are examined on their merits. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Information Disclosure Statement The Information Disclosure Statements filed on August 15th 2025, March 5th 2025, October 10th 2024, and October 7th 2023 are in compliance with the provisions of 37 CFR 1.97 and have been considered in full. A signed copy of references cited from the IDS is included with this Office Action. Claim Objections The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(d): (d) REFERENCE IN DEPENDENT FORMS.—Subject to subsection (e), a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, fourth paragraph: Subject to the following paragraph [i.e., the fifth paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112], a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. Claims 4-8, 10-33 and 35-38 are objected to under 37 CFR 1.75(c) as being in improper form because a multiple dependent claim may not depend on another multiply dependent claim. See MPEP § 608.01(n). For the purpose of examination, each of the claims will be treated as if they depend on the first claim listed (Ex: claim 4 reads “The compound according to any one of claims 1 to 3” and will be treated as “The compound according to claim 1”). Examiner notes that this deficiency is also present in claims 9 and 39-42, currently not examined on their merits. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112(a) The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claim 1-2, 5-7, 11-14, 16-33, and 35-38 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claim 1 is directed to a compound of Formula I: PNG media_image2.png 283 447 media_image2.png Greyscale , wherein PNG media_image3.png 60 574 media_image3.png Greyscale . Applicant provides no embodies species wherein said bond is absent (i.e. wherein ring A is spiro-condensed with the core structure). As applicant has not demonstrated possession of the compounds of Formula I wherein said bond is absent, applicant’s written description is considered inadequate to support claims 1-2, 5-7, 11-14, 16-33, and 35-42 as written. Applicant will only be considered to have possession of compounds of Formula I wherein said bond is a single bond. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-6, 8, 11-17, 19-27, and 29-33 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by CAS Registry No. 1051894-75-7 (Entered STN September 23rd 2008): PNG media_image4.png 424 500 media_image4.png Greyscale . CAS Registry No. 1051894-75-7 is equivalent to applicant’s generic compound, PNG media_image2.png 283 447 media_image2.png Greyscale , wherein: Ra is H Ring A is phenyl Ring B is phenyl Ring C is C6-cycloalkyl R1 is C1-alkyl k is 1 R2 is F m is 1 n is 0 and is anticipatory of claims 1-6, 8, 11-17, 19-27, and 29-33. Claims 1-6, 8, 11-17, and 19-33 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by CAS Registry No. 1051883-28-3 (Entered STN September 23rd 2008): PNG media_image5.png 479 500 media_image5.png Greyscale . CAS Registry No. 1051883-28-3 is anticipatory of claims 1-6, 8, 11-17, and 19-33. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 7, 10, 18, and 34-38 are free of the prior art. Applicant has developed inhibitors of formyl peptide receptor 1 (FPR1) of general Formula I: PNG media_image2.png 283 447 media_image2.png Greyscale . Compounds anticipatory of applicant’s genus are found in the CAS Registry (see above and see search documents). However, Applicant’s particular compounds, as well as compounds wherein ring A is pyridine or pyrimidine are not found in the art. Conclusion Claims 1-8, 11-33, and 35-38 are rejected Claims 4-38 are objected to. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Anthony Seitz whose telephone number is (703)756-4657. The examiner can normally be reached 7:30 AM ET - 5:00 PM ET M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jeffrey Lundgren can be reached at (571)272-5541. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /A.J.S./Examiner, Art Unit 1629 /JEFFREY S LUNDGREN/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1629
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 20, 2023
Application Filed
Jan 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599583
SMALL MOLECULE GRB2 STABILIZERS FOR RAS MAP KINASE INHIBITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595263
PYRAZOLOPYRIMIDINE COMPOUND USED AS ATR KINASE INHIBITOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590087
INHIBITING USP36
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590080
NOVEL COMPOUNDS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12583861
DERIVATIVES OF IMIDAZO[4,5-d]PYRIDAZINE, THEIR PREPARATION AND THEIR THERAPEUTIC APPLICATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
96%
With Interview (+27.5%)
3y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 158 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month