DETAILED ACTION
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102
The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action:
A person shall be entitled to a patent unless –
(a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention.
Claim(s) 1, 2, 4, 7-13, 15 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102a1 as being anticipated by Yamanobe (JP 2006110426 A).
Regarding claim 1, Yamanobe discloses an industrial drying apparatus for drying board precursor to form gypsum board, wherein said industrial drying apparatus comprises at least one electric heater (16) (see top of pg. 7 disclosing a power supply for the heaters).
Regarding claim 2, Yamanobe discloses the industrial drying apparatus of claim 1, wherein said industrial drying apparatus comprises a heating control system (26) configured to control an output of the at least one electric heater.
Regarding claim 4, Yamanobe discloses the industrial drying apparatus of claim 1 wherein said industrial drying apparatus further comprises at least one humidity modifier (fan 24).
Regarding claim 7, Yamanobe discloses the industrial drying apparatus of claim 1, wherein the at least one electric heater is arranged to, in use, dry the board precursor via radiative heat transfer (Fig. 1, 22).
Regarding claim 8, Yamanobe discloses the industrial drying apparatus of claim 1, wherein the at least one electric heater is arranged to, in use, dry the board precursor via convective heat transfer (heater 16 works with the fan 24 to blow hot air over the gypsum).
Regarding claim 9, Yamanobe discloses the industrial drying apparatus of claim 1, wherein said industrial drying apparatus comprises a plurality of electric heaters (16).
Regarding claim 10, Yamanobe discloses the industrial drying apparatus of claim 9, wherein each electric heater within said plurality of electric heaters is configured to be independently controlled (bottom of pg 6- top of pg. 7).
Regarding claim 11, Yamanobe discloses the industrial drying apparatus of claim 9, wherein electric heaters (16) are located at a plurality of discrete positions within said industrial drying apparatus (Fig. 1).
Regarding claim 12, Yamanobe discloses the industrial drying apparatus of claim 1, wherein said industrial drying apparatus comprises an air recovery unit (the air recovery unit could be a single IR heater 16, whereas the other IR heaters 16 could constitute the plurality of electrical heaters recited in claim 1).
Regarding claim 13, Yamanobe discloses the industrial drying apparatus of claim 12, wherein said air recovery unit comprises a supplementary electric heater.
Regarding claim 15, Yamanobe discloses a method of drying board precursor to form gypsum board, the method comprising the steps of: providing the industrial drying apparatus of claim 1; providing board precursor (gypsum slurry 5); placing the board precursor into said drying apparatus (Fig. 1, 15); exposing the board precursor to heat from the at least one electric heater; and drying the board precursor to form gypsum board.
Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.
The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows:
1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art.
2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue.
3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art.
4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness.
Claim(s) 5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yamanobe (JP 2006110426 A).
Regarding claim 5, Yamanobe discloses the industrial drying apparatus of claim 4, except wherein said industrial drying apparatus comprises a humidity control system for controlling the output of the at least one humidity modifier.
However, Official Notice is taken that a controller for controlling a humidity modifier (fan) is well-known and common knowledge, and it would have been obvious to a person skilled in the art at the time of effective filing of the application to modify Yamanobe to include a humidity control system for controlling the output of the at least one humidity modifier, so that the fan speed can be controlled, resulting in an optimal heating and evaporation rate.
Claim(s) 3, 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yamanobe (JP 2006110426 A) in view of Li (CN 106813485 A).
Regarding claim 3, Yamanobe discloses the industrial drying apparatus of claim 2, except wherein said heating control system comprises at least one temperature sensor located within said industrial drying apparatus.
However, Li teaches a drying apparatus (Fig. 1), wherein the heating control system comprises at least one temperature sensor (5) located within the industrial drying apparatus.
It would have been obvious to a person skilled in the art at the time of effective filing of the application to modify Yamanobe wherein said heating control system comprises at least one temperature sensor located within said industrial drying apparatus. The motivation to combine is so that the drying conditions can be precisely monitored and controlled.
Regarding claim 6, Yamanobe discloses the industrial drying apparatus of claim 5, except wherein said humidity control system comprises at least one humidity sensor located within said industrial drying apparatus.
However, Li teaches a drying apparatus (Fig. 1), wherein the humidity control system comprises at least one humidity sensor (11) located within said industrial drying apparatus.
It would have been obvious to a person skilled in the art at the time of effective filing of the application to modify Yamanobe wherein said humidity control system comprises at least one humidity sensor located within said industrial drying apparatus. The motivation to combine is so that the drying conditions can be precisely monitored and controlled.
Conclusion
Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JASON LAU whose telephone number is (571)270-7644. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8:00-5:00.
Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice.
If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael Hoang can be reached at 571-272-6460. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300.
Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000.
/JASON LAU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3762
Prosecution Insights