Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 18/262,281

TERMINAL AND RADIO BASE STATION

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Jul 20, 2023
Priority
Jan 21, 2021 — nonprovisional of PCTJP2021002066
Examiner
RAHMAN, SHAH M
Art Unit
2413
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation
OA Round
2 (Final)
81%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 81% — above average
81%
Career Allowance Rate
388 granted / 479 resolved
+23.0% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+24.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
534
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.9%
-36.1% vs TC avg
§103
60.2%
+20.2% vs TC avg
§102
20.5%
-19.5% vs TC avg
§112
10.0%
-30.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 479 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 05/28/2026 has been placed in record and considered by the examiner. Summary This action is in reply to Applicant’s Amendments and Remarks filed on 04/06/2026. Claims 6-12 are pending. Claims 10-12 are withdrawn. Claims 6-9 are being considered for examination. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments filed on 04/06/2026 with respect to claims 6-9 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Regarding claim 6, Applicant’s presented argument that Ashraf is completely silent regarding the recited transmission of a measurement request instructing the terminal to measure the first time difference. Rather, Ashraf merely describes the gNB transmitting a downlink reference signal and the UE performing the measurement in response to receiving that signal. Therefore, Ashraf fails to disclose the abovementioned limitation of amended independent claim 6. (REMARKS, Pages 8-9) The Examiner respectfully disagrees and presents that Ashraf discloses- [0036] Typically, RTT can be performed using three signals: (1) DL reference signal such as PRS, (2) UL reference signal such as SRS, and (3) Rx-Tx measurement reporting as illustrated in the example of FIG. 2. As illustrated in the example of FIG. 2, a gNB may signal PRS to a UE, and the SRS and/or Rx-Tx measurement from the UE is signalled to the gNB. However, some problems may arise with this procedure. For example, the over-the-air (OTA) signals are costly and, therefore, it is desirable to use as little as possible signals to reduce at least overhead and increase the efficiency. For a single Rx-Tx based PD estimation, at least one UL and one DL reference signal is needed. Also, additional resources are needed, on top of the resources needed for reference signals transmission, for reporting the measurements. [0038] Some example embodiments provide a Rx-Tx RTT estimation procedure with reduced signaling, e.g., utilizing just two signals (instead of 3). According to certain embodiments, a UE is configured to predict its transmission time and, after having determined the reception time of the DL reference signal (e.g., PRS), the UE can compute the Rx-Tx measurement report, then send the reference signal and the Rx-Tx measurement report in the same transmission. As a result, instead of separately sending the reference signal (e.g., SRS) and Rx-Tx measurement message, an embodiment can combine the reference signal and the Rx-Tx measurement value in a single transmission. Fig. 3 PRS from gNB to UE indicating UE keeping track of ΔRx-Tx, [0040] As illustrated in the example of FIG. 3, the gNB may prepare the DL reference signal and may record the time stamp, t0, and transmit the reference signal to the UE at the recorded time. For example, the transmitted reference signal may be PRS…. [0041] in the example of FIG. 3, the UE may receive the DL reference signal and record the reception time, which is shown as t1 in the example of FIG. 3. The UE may then predict the transmit timing, t2. To do so, the UE may consider the allocated resources, applied difference between DL to UL transmission timing, and/or UE internal timing errors resulting from, for example, UE clock drift. Based on the detection time t1 and estimated transmission time t2, the UE may calculate the estimated Rx-Tx measurement by (t2-t1) [0042] Next, as shown in the example of FIG. 3, the UE may transmit a shared channel, such as for example, PUSCH with DM-RS, towards the gNB. The transmitted UL signal may contain the estimated Rx-Tx…. In above, [0036, 0038] Ashraf discloses a protocol requiring reduced overhead and signaling/messaging for propagation delay (PD) or Rx-Tx RTT estimation at procedure utilizing just two signals instead of 3 signals of Fig. 2. For the protocol, UE is configured to predict its transmission time and, after having determined the reception time of the DL reference signal (e.g., PRS), the UE can compute the Rx-Tx measurement report, then send the reference signal and the Rx-Tx measurement report in the same transmission, which indicates that the UE is configured to consider the PRS in an implied request for starting the protocol process of estimating/computing Rx-Tx time difference measurement between a gNB PRS reception time and corresponding estimated uplink reference signal transmission time to gNB and reporting the estimated measurement in a PUSCH with DM-RS as disclosed in Fig. 3 and [0040-0042]. Accordingly, amended claim 6, and similarly claims 7-9 are rejected. NOTICE for all US Patent Applications filed on or after March 16, 2013 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 6-9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102 (a)(2) as anticipated by Ashraf et al. US 20240057004 A1 with priority of us-provisional-application US 63139476, hereinafter ‘ASHRAF’). Regarding claim 6, ASHRAF teaches a base station ( Fig. 3 gNB, [0039] FIG. 3 illustrates an example signaling diagram of a RTT based propagation delay estimation procedure for PD compensation, according to an embodiment. It should be noted that, according to certain embodiments, the procedure depicted in the example of FIG. 3 can be reversible between the gNB and the UE. Fig. 9 apparatus 10, [0074] FIG. 9 illustrates an example of an apparatus 10 …… apparatus 10 may be a network node, …. base station, …. next generation Node B (NG-NB or gNB)) comprising: a transmitter (Fig. 9 Apparatus 10 with Transceiver 18) that transmits a measurement request instructing to measure a first time difference between a transmission timing of a first signal and a reception timing of a second signal at a terminal, to the terminal ( [0036] Typically, RTT can be performed using three signals: (1) DL reference signal such as PRS, (2) UL reference signal such as SRS, and (3) Rx-Tx measurement reporting as illustrated in the example of FIG. 2. As illustrated in the example of FIG. 2, a gNB may signal PRS to a UE, and the SRS and/or Rx-Tx measurement from the UE is signalled to the gNB. [0038] Some example embodiments provide a Rx-Tx RTT estimation procedure with reduced signaling, e.g., utilizing just two signals (instead of 3). According to certain embodiments, a UE is configured to predict its transmission time and, after having determined the reception time of the DL reference signal (e.g., PRS), the UE can compute the Rx-Tx measurement report, then send the reference signal and the Rx-Tx measurement report in the same transmission. As a result, instead of separately sending the reference signal (e.g., SRS) and Rx-Tx measurement message, an embodiment can combine the reference signal and the Rx-Tx measurement value in a single transmission. Fig. 3 PRS from gNB to UE indicating UE keeping track of ΔRx-Tx, [0040] As illustrated in the example of FIG. 3, the gNB may prepare the DL reference signal and may record the time stamp, t0, and transmit the reference signal to the UE at the recorded time. For example, the transmitted reference signal may be PRS…. [0041] in the example of FIG. 3, the UE may receive the DL reference signal and record the reception time, which is shown as t1 in the example of FIG. 3. The UE may then predict the transmit timing, t2. To do so, the UE may consider the allocated resources, applied difference between DL to UL transmission timing, and/or UE internal timing errors resulting from, for example, UE clock drift. Based on the detection time t1 and estimated transmission time t2, the UE may calculate the estimated Rx-Tx measurement by (t2-t1) [0042] Next, as shown in the example of FIG. 3, the UE may transmit a shared channel, such as for example, PUSCH with DM-RS, towards the gNB. The transmitted UL signal may contain the estimated Rx-Tx…. (Construed that the PRS transmission at t0 indicates to the UE or terminal an measurement request instructing to measure a first time difference between a transmission timing of at t2 of a first signal the PUSCH (DMRS)+ Rx-Tx measurement and a reception timing of a second signal PRS from gNB or base station at t1 at the UE/terminal or ΔRx-Tx)); a receiver (Fig. 9 Apparatus 10 with Transceiver 18) that receives a measurement result including time difference information indicating the first time difference from the terminal, based on reception of the measurement request ( Fig. 3, gNB at t3 receives DMRS + Rx-Tx or ΔRx-Tx the first signal in response to PRS the second signal from UE the terminal, [0042] Next, as shown in the example of FIG. 3, the UE may transmit a shared channel, such as for example, PUSCH with DM-RS, towards the gNB. The transmitted UL signal may contain the estimated Rx-Tx….); and a processor (Fig. 9 Apparatus with Processor 12, [0076] FIG. 9, apparatus 10 may include a processor 12 for processing information and executing instructions or operations) that acquires a second time difference between a reception timing of the first signal and a transmission timing of the second signal at a base station ( Fig. 3, [0042] Next, as shown in the example of FIG. 3, the UE may transmit a shared channel, such as for example, PUSCH with DM-RS, towards the gNB. The transmitted UL signal may contain the estimated Rx-Tx……. The gNB may detect the subframe and record the reception time stamp t3 (based on the PUSCH with DM-RS). Based on the available time stamps t0 and t3, the gNB can calculate Rx-Tx as (t3−t0). As the gNB has all necessary parameter values required to calculate the propagation delay (PD) which is ½ of the downlink and uplink Rx-Tx differences at gNB and UE), wherein the control unit calculates a propagation delay with the terminal and performs propagation delay compensation, based on the first time difference and the second time difference ( Fig. 3, PD=1/2 RTT = ½ x (gNBRx-Tx + ΔRx-Tx), [0042] As the gNB has all necessary parameter values required to calculate the propagation delay (PD) which is ½ of the downlink and uplink Rx-Tx differences at gNB and UE. Afterward, the gNB may apply the PD compensation value as the offset to adjust its system frame number (SFN) boundary timestamp.). Regarding claim 7, the claim is interpreted mutatis mutandis of claim 6, and rejected for the same reason as set forth for claim 6. Regarding claim 8, ASHRAF teaches a terminal (Fig. 3, UE, [0039] FIG. 3 illustrates an example signaling diagram of a RTT based propagation delay estimation procedure for PD compensation, according to an embodiment. It should be noted that, according to certain embodiments, the procedure depicted in the example of FIG. 3 can be reversible between the gNB and the UE. Fig. 9 apparatus 20, [0086] FIG. 9 further illustrates an example of an apparatus 20 according to another embodiment. In an embodiment, apparatus 20 may be a node or element in a communications network or associated with such a network, such as a UE, communication node, mobile equipment (ME), mobile station, mobile device, stationary device, IoT device, or other device)) comprising: a receiver (Fig. 9 apparatus 20 with Transceiver 28) that receives a measurement request instructing to measure time difference information indicating a first time difference between a transmission timing of a first signal and a reception timing of a second signal at the terminal, from a base station ( Fig. 3 PRS from gNB to UE indicating UE keeping track of ΔRx-Tx, [0040] As illustrated in the example of FIG. 3, the gNB may prepare the DL reference signal and may record the time stamp, t0, and transmit the reference signal to the UE at the recorded time. For example, the transmitted reference signal may be PRS…. [0041] in the example of FIG. 3, the UE may receive the DL reference signal and record the reception time, which is shown as t1 in the example of FIG. 3. The UE may then predict the transmit timing, t2. To do so, the UE may consider the allocated resources, applied difference between DL to UL transmission timing, and/or UE internal timing errors resulting from, for example, UE clock drift. Based on the detection time t1 and estimated transmission time t2, the UE may calculate the estimated Rx-Tx measurement by (t2-t1) [0042] Next, as shown in the example of FIG. 3, the UE may transmit a shared channel, such as for example, PUSCH with DM-RS, towards the gNB. The transmitted UL signal may contain the estimated Rx-Tx….); and a transmitter (Fig. 9 apparatus 20 with Transceiver 28) that transmits a measurement result including time difference information indicating the first time difference to the base station, based on reception of the measurement request ( Fig. gNB at t3 receives DMRS + Rx-Tx or ΔRx-Tx the first signal in response to PRS the second signal from UE the terminal, [0042] Next, as shown in the example of FIG. 3, the UE may transmit a shared channel, such as for example, PUSCH with DM-RS, towards the gNB. The transmitted UL signal may contain the estimated Rx-Tx….), wherein a propagation delay with the terminal is calculated and propagation delay compensation is performed by the base station, based on the first time difference, and a second time difference between a reception timing of the first signal and a transmission timing of the second signal at the base station ( Fig. 3, PD=1/2 RTT = ½ x (gNBRx-Tx + ΔRx-Tx, [0042] Next, as shown in the example of FIG. 3, the UE may transmit a shared channel, such as for example, PUSCH with DM-RS, towards the gNB. The transmitted UL signal may contain the estimated Rx-Tx……. The gNB may detect the subframe and record the reception time stamp t3 (based on the PUSCH with DM-RS). Based on the available time stamps t0 and t3, the gNB can calculate Rx-Tx as (t3−t0). As the gNB has all necessary parameter values required to calculate the propagation delay (PD) which is ½ of the downlink and uplink Rx-Tx differences at gNB and UE. Afterward, the gNB may apply the PD compensation value as the offset to adjust its system frame number (SFN) boundary timestamp.). Regarding claim 9, ASHRAF teaches a system (Fig. 3, [0039] FIG. 3 illustrates an example signaling diagram of a RTT based propagation delay estimation procedure for PD compensation, according to an embodiment. It should be noted that, according to certain embodiments, the procedure depicted in the example of FIG. 3 can be reversible between the gNB and the UE.) in which a base station (Fig. 3 gNB, Fig. 9 apparatus 10, [0074] FIG. 9 illustrates an example of an apparatus 10 …… apparatus 10 may be a network node, …. base station, …. next generation Node B (NG-NB or gNB) comprises: a first transmitter (Fig. 9 Apparatus 10 with Transceiver 18) that transmits a measurement request instructing to measure a first time difference between a transmission timing of a first signal and a reception timing of a second signal at a terminal, to the terminal (Fig. 3 PRS from gNB to UE indicating UE keeping track of ΔRx-Tx, [0040] As illustrated in the example of FIG. 3, the gNB may prepare the DL reference signal and may record the time stamp, t0, and transmit the reference signal to the UE at the recorded time. For example, the transmitted reference signal may be PRS…. [0041] in the example of FIG. 3, the UE may receive the DL reference signal and record the reception time, which is shown as t1 in the example of FIG. 3. The UE may then predict the transmit timing, t2. To do so, the UE may consider the allocated resources, applied difference between DL to UL transmission timing, and/or UE internal timing errors resulting from, for example, UE clock drift. Based on the detection time t1 and estimated transmission time t2, the UE may calculate the estimated Rx-Tx measurement by (t2-t1) [0042] Next, as shown in the example of FIG. 3, the UE may transmit a shared channel, such as for example, PUSCH with DM-RS, towards the gNB. The transmitted UL signal may contain the estimated Rx-Tx…. (Construed that the PRS transmission at t0 indicates to the UE or terminal an measurement request instructing to measure a first time difference between a transmission timing of at t2 of a first signal the PUSCH (DMRS)+ Rx-Tx measurement and a reception timing of a second signal PRS from gNB or base station at t1 at the UE/terminal or ΔRx-Tx)); a receiver (Fig. 9 Apparatus 10 with Transceiver 18) that receives a measurement result including time difference information indicating the first time difference from the terminal ( Fig. gNB at t3 receives DMRS + Rx-Tx or ΔRx-Tx the first signal in response to PRS the second signal from UE the terminal, [0042] Next, as shown in the example of FIG. 3, the UE may transmit a shared channel, such as for example, PUSCH with DM-RS, towards the gNB. The transmitted UL signal may contain the estimated Rx-Tx….); and a processor (Fig. 9 Apparatus with Processor 12, [0076] FIG. 9, apparatus 10 may include a processor 12 for processing information and executing instructions or operations) that acquires a second time difference between a reception timing of the first signal and a transmission timing of the second signal at the base station ( Fig. 3, [0042] Next, as shown in the example of FIG. 3, the UE may transmit a shared channel, such as for example, PUSCH with DM-RS, towards the gNB. The transmitted UL signal may contain the estimated Rx-Tx……. The gNB may detect the subframe and record the reception time stamp t3 (based on the PUSCH with DM-RS). Based on the available time stamps t0 and t3, the gNB can calculate Rx-Tx as (t3−t0). As the gNB has all necessary parameter values required to calculate the propagation delay (PD) which is ½ of the downlink and uplink Rx-Tx differences at gNB and UE), and the terminal (Fig. 3, UE, [0039] FIG. 3 illustrates an example signaling diagram of a RTT based propagation delay estimation procedure for PD compensation, according to an embodiment. It should be noted that, according to certain embodiments, the procedure depicted in the example of FIG. 3 can be reversible between the gNB and the UE. Fig. 9 apparatus 20, [0086] FIG. 9 further illustrates an example of an apparatus 20 according to another embodiment. In an embodiment, apparatus 20 may be a node or element in a communications network or associated with such a network, such as a UE, communication node, mobile equipment (ME), mobile station, mobile device, stationary device, IoT device, or other device)) comprises: a second transmitter (Fig. 9 apparatus 20 with Transceiver 28) that transmits the measurement result including time difference information indicating the first time difference to the base station, based on reception of the measurement request ( Fig. gNB at t3 receives DMRS + Rx-Tx or ΔRx-Tx the first signal in response to PRS the second signal from UE the terminal, [0042] Next, as shown in the example of FIG. 3, the UE may transmit a shared channel, such as for example, PUSCH with DM-RS, towards the gNB. The transmitted UL signal may contain the estimated Rx-Tx….), wherein the processor of the base station calculates a propagation delay with the terminal and performs propagation delay compensation, based on the first time difference and the second time difference ( Fig. 3, PD=1/2 RTT = ½ x (gNBRx-Tx + ΔRx-Tx), [0042] As the gNB has all necessary parameter values required to calculate the propagation delay (PD) which is ½ of the downlink and uplink Rx-Tx differences at gNB and UE. Afterward, the gNB may apply the PD compensation value as the offset to adjust its system frame number (SFN) boundary timestamp.). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure: Awad et al. (US 20230141032 A1), describing APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR TRANSMISSION OF TIMING INFORMATION Thota; Jayashree (US 11153838 B1), describing Time Synchronization Enhancements For Integrated 5G-TSN Networking THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SHAH M RAHMAN whose telephone number is (571)272-8951. The examiner can normally be reached 9:30AM-5:30PM PST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, UN C CHO can be reached at 571-272-7919. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SHAH M RAHMAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2413
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 20, 2023
Application Filed
Feb 05, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Apr 06, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 18, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12707302
Measuring Wireless Network Quality of Service on Mobile Devices
2y 10m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12684431
METHOD, COMPUTER PROGRAM AND APPARATUS FOR SELECTING A BEAM FOR HANDOVER
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12677289
FREQUENCY SELECTIVE PRECODER INDICATION IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12666473
PATH SECTION BETWEEN UU AND PC5
3y 10m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12665664
SYSTEMS, APPARATUS, ARTICLES OF MANUFACTURE, AND METHODS FOR PRIVATE NETWORK MOBILITY MANAGEMENT
2y 12m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
81%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+24.8%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 479 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month