Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/262,802

DISPLAY SUBSTRATE, PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR, AND DISPLAY DEVICE

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jul 25, 2023
Examiner
LEE, NATHANIEL J.
Art Unit
2875
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
BOE TECHNOLOGY GROUP CO., LTD.
OA Round
2 (Final)
63%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 7m
To Grant
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 63% of resolved cases
63%
Career Allow Rate
514 granted / 814 resolved
-4.9% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 7m
Avg Prosecution
41 currently pending
Career history
855
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
57.8%
+17.8% vs TC avg
§102
25.1%
-14.9% vs TC avg
§112
13.6%
-26.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 814 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment The amendment filed on 26 December 2025 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 26 December 2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. In response to applicant's arguments against the references individually, one cannot show nonobviousness by attacking references individually where the rejections are based on combinations of references. See In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413, 208 USPQ 871 (CCPA 1981); In re Merck & Co., 800 F.2d 1091, 231 USPQ 375 (Fed. Cir. 1986). In the present case, applicant argues that Yu does not teach “wherein after the display substrate is bent: the second sub-rigid substrate is disposed opposite to the first sub-rigid substrate in a thickness direction, and the second sub-rigid substrate is located at an edge region of the first sub-rigid substrate; the display function layer in the display region is a planar structure and is disposed on a side of the first sub-rigid substrate away from the second sub-rigid substrate; a distance from an edge of a side of the first sub-rigid substrate away from the bending region to the bending region is greater than a distance from an edge of a side of the second sub-rigid substrate away from the bending region to the bending region”. The examiner disagrees. Um teaches “wherein after the display substrate is bent (Figs. 13b, 13c): the second sub-rigid substrate (170 in 2A) is disposed opposite to the first sub-rigid substrate (170 in 1A) in a thickness direction (see Figs. 13b, 13c), and the second sub-rigid substrate is located at an edge region of the first sub-rigid substrate (see Figs. 13b, 13c); the display function layer (100) in the display region (1A) is a planar structure (see Figs. 13b, 13c) and is disposed on a side of the first sub-rigid substrate away from the second sub-rigid substrate (see Figs. 13b, 13c); a distance from an edge of a side of the first sub-rigid substrate away from the bending region to the bending region is greater than a distance from an edge of a side of the second sub-rigid substrate away from the bending region to the bending region (see Figs. 13b, 13c)”. Applicant’s arguments, see page 10 part B, filed 26 December 2025, with respect to the 35 USC 112(b) rejections of claims 24-27 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The rejection of claims 24-27 under 35 USC 112(b) has been withdrawn. Specifically, the amendment to the claims resolves the problem by explaining what ‘k’ is and specifying that a laser lift off step is used. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 19-23, 28-38 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Um et al. (US 2017/0323779 A1) in view of Yu et al. (US 2020/0225699 A1). With respect to claim 19: Um teaches “a display substrate (100+175+190), comprising: a display region (1A), a bending region (BA) and a bonding region (2A), wherein the display substrate is bent along the bending region (see Figs. 13b, 13c), such that the bending region is bent on a backlight side of the display region of the display substrate (see Figs. 13b, 13c); the display substrate comprises a rigid substrate (170), and a flexible film layer (180) and a display function layer (100) sequentially stacked on the rigid substrate (see Fig. 13a); the rigid substrate has an opening (175OPW) in the bending region to expose the flexible film layer in the bending region (see Figs. 13); wherein the rigid substrate comprises a first sub-rigid substrate (170 in 1A; see Figs. 13) and a second sub-rigid substrate (170 in 2A; see Figs. 13), the first sub-rigid substrate is at the display region (see Figs. 13), and the second sub-rigid substrate is at the bonding region (see Figs. 13b, 13c); wherein after the display substrate is bent (see Figs. 13b, 13c): the second sub-rigid substrate is disposed opposite to the first sub-rigid substrate in a thickness direction (see Figs. 13b, 13c), and the second sub-rigid substrate is located at an edge region of the first sub-rigid substrate (see Figs. 13b, 13c); the display function layer in the display region is a planar structure (see Figs. 13b, 13c) and is disposed on a side of the first sub-rigid substrate away from the second sub-rigid substrate (see Figs. 13b, 13c); a distance from an edge of a side of the first sub-rigid substrate away from the bending region to the bending region is greater than a distance from an edge of a side of the second sub-rigid substrate away from the bending region to the bending region (see Figs. 13b, 13c)”. Um does not specifically teach “the display substrate further comprises a first light absorption portion in the display region and on one side of the display region close to the bending region; and the first light absorption portion is on one side of the rigid substrate facing away from the flexible film layer or on one side of the rigid substrate facing the flexible film layer”. However, Yu teaches “the display substrate further comprises a first light absorption portion in the display region (651) and on one side of the display region close to the bending region (see Fig. 2); and the first light absorption portion is on one side of the rigid substrate facing away from the flexible film layer or on one side of the rigid substrate facing the flexible film layer (see Fig. 2)”. It would have been obvious at the time that application was effectively filed for one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the display apparatus of Um with the light absorption portion of Yu in order to prevent patterns caused by the edges of the rigid substrates from being visible from the outside (Yu paragraph 129)”. With respect to claim 20: Um in view of Yu teaches “The display substrate according to claim 19 (see above)”. Um does not specifically teach “further comprising a second light absorption portion in the bonding region and on one side of the bonding region close to the bending region; and the second light absorption portion is on the side of the rigid substrate facing away from the flexible film layer or on the side of the rigid substrate facing the flexible film layer”. However, Yu teaches “the display substrate according to claim 19 (see above), further comprising a second light absorption portion (652) in the bonding region and on one side of the bonding region close to the bending region (see Fig. 2); and the second light absorption portion is on the side of the rigid substrate facing away from the flexible film layer or on the side of the rigid substrate facing the flexible film layer (see Fig. 2)”. It would have been obvious at the time that application was effectively filed for one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the display apparatus of Um with the light absorption portion of Yu in order to prevent patterns caused by the edges of the rigid substrates from being visible from the outside (Yu paragraph 129)”. With respect to claim 21: Um in view of Yu teaches “The display substrate according to claim 20 (see above)”. Um does not specifically teach “wherein a material of the first light absorption portion comprises an inorganic material; and/or a material of the second light absorption portion comprises an inorganic material”. Yu teaches “wherein a material of the first light absorption portion comprises an inorganic material (paragraph 22); and/or a material of the second light absorption portion comprises an inorganic material (paragraph 22)”. It would have been obvious at the time that application was effectively filed for one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the display apparatus of Um with the light absorption portion of Yu in order to prevent patterns caused by the edges of the rigid substrates from being visible from the outside (Yu paragraph 129)”. With respect to claim 22: Um in view of Yu teaches “the display substrate according to claim 19 (see above)”. Um does not specifically teach “wherein a boundary of one side of the first light absorption portion close to the bending region and a boundary of the side of the display region close to the bending region have a preset distance therebetween”. Yu teaches “wherein a boundary of one side of the first light absorption portion close to the bending region and a boundary of the side of the display region close to the bending region have a preset distance therebetween (d4; see Fig. 3)”. It would have been obvious at the time that application was effectively filed for one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the display apparatus of Um with the light absorption portion of Yu in order to prevent patterns caused by the edges of the rigid substrates from being visible from the outside (Yu paragraph 129). With respect to claim 23: Um in view of Yu teaches “the display substrate according to claim 19 (see above)”. Um does not specifically teach “wherein a width of a light absorption layer (w1) is greater than or equal to 1 mm”. Yu teaches “wherein a width of a light absorption layer (w1) is greater than or equal to 1 mm (paragraph 149)”. It would have been obvious at the time that application was effectively filed for one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the display apparatus of Um with the light absorption portion of Yu in order to prevent patterns caused by the edges of the rigid substrates from being visible from the outside (Yu paragraph 129). With respect to claim 28: Um in view of Yu teaches “the display substrate according to claim 21 (see above)”. Um does not specifically teach “wherein the first light absorption portion is arranged to be the same as the second light absorption portion in layer and material”. Yu teaches “wherein the first light absorption portion is arranged to be the same as the second light absorption portion in layer (see Fig. 2) and material (paragraph 22)”. It would have been obvious at the time that application was effectively filed for one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the display apparatus of Um with the light absorption portion of Yu in order to prevent patterns caused by the edges of the rigid substrates from being visible from the outside (Yu paragraph 129). With respect to claim 29: Um in view of Yu teaches “the display substrate according to claim 28 (see above)”. Um does not specifically teach “wherein the first light absorption portion and the second light absorption portion are arranged on one side of the rigid substrate facing the flexible film layer”. Yu teaches “wherein the first light absorption portion and the second light absorption portion are arranged on one side of the rigid substrate facing the flexible film layer (Fig. 2)”. It would have been obvious at the time that application was effectively filed for one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the display apparatus of Um with the light absorption portion of Yu in order to prevent patterns caused by the edges of the rigid substrates from being visible from the outside (Yu paragraph 129). With respect to claim 30: Um in view of Yu teaches “the display substrate according to claim 19 (see above)”. Um further teaches “the display substrate further comprises: a first buffer adhesive (part of 193 covering the sidewall of 175 in area 1a) covering a side wall (see Fig. 13a) of the first sub-rigid substrate (170) facing the opening (175OP)”. With respect to claim 31: Um in view of Yu teaches “the display substrate according to claim 30 (see above)”. Um further teaches “further comprising: a second buffer adhesive (part of 193 covering the sidewall of 175 in area 2a)) covering a side wall of the second sub-rigid substrate facing the opening (see Fig. 13a)”. With respect to claim 32: Um in view of Yu teaches “the display substrate according to claim 19 (see above)”. Um further teaches “wherein the display function layer comprises: a buffer layer (110) on one side of the flexible film layer away from the rigid substrate (Fig. 13a); a plurality of first wires (213) on one side of the buffer layer (110) away from the flexible film layer (100); a first insulating layer (130) on one sides of the first wires away from the flexible film layer (see Fig. 3); a plurality of second wires (215) on one side of the first insulating layer away from the flexible film layer (see Fig. 3), wherein each first wire is connected with at least one second wire through a first via hole penetrating through the first insulating layer (at 213a, 213b); a second insulating layer (140) on one sides of the second wires away from the flexible film layer (see Fig. 3); and a light emitting diode (300) on one side of the second insulating layer away from the flexible film layer (see Fig. 3), wherein the light emitting diode is connected with the second wires through a second via hole (at 215b) penetrating through the second insulating layer (see Fig. 3)”. With respect to claim 33: Um teaches “a display apparatus (100M), comprising a plurality of display substrates (100) spliced together (see Fig. 2a), wherein each display substrate comprises: a display region (1A), a bending region (BA) and a bonding region (2A), wherein the display substrate is bent along the bending region (see Fig. 12), such that the bending region is bent on a backlight side of the display region of the display substrate (see Fig. 12); the display substrate function layer (300) sequentially stacked on the rigid substrate (175); the rigid substrate has an opening (175OP) in the bending region to expose the flexible film layer (100) in the bending region (see Fig. 9a) wherein the rigid substrate comprises a first sub-rigid substrate (170 in 1A; see Figs. 13) and a second sub-rigid substrate (170 in 2A; see Figs. 13), the first sub-rigid substrate is at the display region (see Figs. 13), and the second sub-rigid substrate is at the bonding region (see Figs. 13b, 13c); wherein after the display substrate is bent (see Figs. 13b, 13c): the second sub-rigid substrate is disposed opposite to the first sub-rigid substrate in a thickness direction (see Figs. 13b, 13c), and the second sub-rigid substrate is located at an edge region of the first sub-rigid substrate (see Figs. 13b, 13c); the display function layer in the display region is a planar structure (see Figs. 13b, 13c) and is disposed on a side of the first sub-rigid substrate away from the second sub-rigid substrate (see Figs. 13b, 13c); a distance from an edge of a side of the first sub-rigid substrate away from the bending region to the bending region is greater than a distance from an edge of a side of the second sub-rigid substrate away from the bending region to the bending region (see Figs. 13b, 13c)”. Um does not specifically teach “the display substrate further comprises a first light absorption portion in the display region and on one side of the display region close to the bending region; and the first light absorption portion is on one side of the rigid substrate facing away from the flexible film layer or on one side of the rigid substrate facing the flexible film layer”. However, Yu teaches “the display substrate further comprises a first light absorption portion (651) in the display region (DA) and on one side of the display region (see Fig. 2) close to the bending region (FR); and the first light absorption portion is on one side of the rigid substrate (501) facing away from the flexible film layer or on one side of the rigid substrate facing the flexible film layer (see Fig. 2)”. It would have been obvious at the time that application was effectively filed for one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the display apparatus of Um with the light absorption portion of Yu in order to prevent patterns caused by the edges of the rigid substrates from being visible from the outside (Yu paragraph 129)”. With respect to claim 34: Um teaches “a method for preparing a display substrate (throughout reference), wherein the display substrate comprises a display region (1A), a bending region (BA) and a bonding region (2A), and the bending region is between the display region and the bonding region (see Fig. 3); and the method comprises: forming a flexible film layer (100) on a first surface of a rigid substrate (175); forming a display function layer (all layers from 110 to 520; see Fig. 3) on one side of the flexible film layer away from the rigid substrate (see Fig. 3); removing the rigid substrate (Figs. 4a, 4b) in the bending region by adopting a laser lift-off process (paragraph 75) from one side of a second surface of the rigid substrate (see Fig. 4b); and bending the display substrate in the bending region (see Fig. 10), such that the display function layer of in bonding region and the display function layer in the display region are on different surfaces of the display substrate (see Fig. 10); wherein the rigid substrate comprises a first sub-rigid substrate (170 in 1A; see Figs. 13) and a second sub-rigid substrate (170 in 2A; see Figs. 13), the first sub-rigid substrate is at the display region (see Figs. 13), and the second sub-rigid substrate is at the bonding region (see Figs. 13b, 13c); wherein after the display substrate is bent (see Figs. 13b, 13c): the second sub-rigid substrate is disposed opposite to the first sub-rigid substrate in a thickness direction (see Figs. 13b, 13c), and the second sub-rigid substrate is located at an edge region of the first sub-rigid substrate (see Figs. 13b, 13c); the display function layer in the display region is a planar structure (see Figs. 13b, 13c) and is disposed on a side of the first sub-rigid substrate away from the second sub-rigid substrate (see Figs. 13b, 13c); a distance from an edge of a side of the first sub-rigid substrate away from the bending region to the bending region is greater than a distance from an edge of a side of the second sub-rigid substrate away from the bending region to the bending region (see Figs. 13b, 13c)”. Um does not specifically teach “the method further comprises: forming a first light absorption portion on the first surface of the rigid substrate before forming the flexible film layer on the first surface of the rigid substrate; or, forming a first light absorption portion on the second surface of the rigid substrate before forming the flexible film layer on the first surface of the rigid substrate; or, forming a first light absorption portion on the second surface of the rigid substrate after forming the display function layer and before removing the rigid substrate of the bending region by adopting a laser lift-off process; wherein the first light absorbing portion is in the display region and on one side of the display region close to the bending region, and the first light absorption portion is configured to absorb light comprising a waveband of a laser light”. However, Yu teaches “the method further comprises: forming a first light absorption portion (651) on the first surface of the rigid substrate (501) before forming the flexible film layer (100) on the first surface of the rigid substrate (see Fig. 3; the light absorption layer necessarily has to be formed before the flexible film is formed because it is between the rigid substrate and the flexible film) or, forming a first light absorption portion on the second surface of the rigid substrate before forming the flexible film layer on the first surface of the rigid substrate; or, forming a first light absorption portion on the second surface of the rigid substrate after forming the display function layer and before removing the rigid substrate of the bending region by adopting a laser lift-off process; wherein the first light absorbing portion is in the display region and on one side of the display region close to the bending region (see Fig. 3), and the first light absorption portion is configured to absorb light comprising a waveband of a laser light (paragraph 130)”. It would have been obvious at the time that application was effectively filed for one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the display apparatus of Um with the light absorption portion of Yu in order to prevent patterns caused by the edges of the rigid substrates from being visible from the outside (Yu paragraph 129). With respect to claim 35: Um in view of Yu teaches “the method according to claim 34 (see above)”. Um does not specifically teach “further comprising: forming a second light absorption portion on the first surface of the rigid substrate before forming the flexible film layer on the first surface of the rigid substrate; or, forming a second light absorption portion on the second surface of the rigid substrate before forming the flexible film layer on the first surface of the rigid substrate; or, forming a second light absorption portion on the second surface of the rigid substrate after forming the display function layer and before removing the rigid substrate of the bending region by adopting the laser lift-off process; wherein the second light absorbing portion is in the bonding region and on one side of the bonding region close to the bending region, and the second light absorption portion is configured to absorb light comprising a waveband of a laser light”. However, Yu teaches “further comprising: forming a second light absorption portion (652) on the first surface of the rigid substrate (502) before forming the flexible film layer on the first surface of the rigid substrate (see Fig. 3; the light absorption layer necessarily has to be formed before the flexible film is formed because it is between the rigid substrate and the flexible film); or, forming a second light absorption portion on the second surface of the rigid substrate before forming the flexible film layer on the first surface of the rigid substrate; or, forming a second light absorption portion on the second surface of the rigid substrate after forming the display function layer and before removing the rigid substrate of the bending region by adopting the laser lift-off process; wherein the second light absorbing portion is in the bonding region and on one side of the bonding region close to the bending region (see Fig. 3), and the second light absorption portion is configured to absorb light comprising a waveband of a laser light (paragraph 130); wherein the first light absorption portion and the second light absorption portion are formed at the same time (in the Fig. 16 embodiment, at least, the two light absorption portions are necessarily formed at the same time since they are combined as layer 650)”. It would have been obvious at the time that application was effectively filed for one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the display apparatus of Um with the light absorption portion of Yu in order to prevent patterns caused by the edges of the rigid substrates from being visible from the outside (Yu paragraph 129). With respect to claim 36: Um in view of Yu teaches “the display substrate according to claim 19 (see above)”. Um teaches “no light absorption portion is provided in the bending region (see Figs. 13) With respect to claim 37: Um in view of Yu teaches “the display apparatus according to claim 33 (see above)”. Um does not specifically teach “wherein the display substrate further comprises: a second light absorption portion in the bonding region and on one side of the bonding region close to the bending region; wherein the second light absorption portion is on the side of the rigid substrate facing away from the flexible film layer or on the side of the rigid substrate facing the flexible film layer, wherein a material of the first light absorption portion comprises an inorganic material; and/or a material of the second light absorption portion comprises an inorganic material”. However, Yu teaches “a second light absorption portion (652) in the bonding region (932) and on one side of the bonding region close to the bending region (see Fig. 2); wherein the second light absorption portion is on the side of the rigid substrate (502) facing away from the flexible film layer or on the side of the rigid substrate facing the flexible film layer (see Fig. 2); wherein a material of the first light absorption portion comprises an inorganic material; and/or a material of the second light absorption portion comprises an inorganic material (paragraph 22)”. It would have been obvious at the time that application was effectively filed for one of ordinary skill in the art to modify the display apparatus of Um with the light absorption portion of Yu in order to prevent patterns caused by the edges of the rigid substrates from being visible from the outside (Yu paragraph 129). With respect to claim 38: Um in view of Yu teaches “the display apparatus according to claim 37 (see above)”. Um further teaches “further comprising a flexible circuit board in the bonding region (100); wherein the flexible circuit board in the bonding region is disposed on a side of the second sub-rigid substrate away from the first sub-rigid substrate (see Figs. 13b, 13c)”. Claims 24-27 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Um in view of Yu as applied to claims 19-21 above, and further in view of Namkung et al. (US 2015/0263300 A1) and Lee et al. (US 2016/0126224 A1). With respect to claim 24: Um in view of Yu teaches “the display substrate according to claim 21 (see above)”. Um does not specifically teach “wherein the opening is formed by adopting a laser lift-off technology; wherein the inorganic material comprises a semiconductor material, and a band gap Eg of the semiconductor material meets the following conditions: Eg≤hkc/λ; wherein λ is a wavelength of laser light used when a laser lift-off technology is used to form the opening, h is a Planck constant, k is a constant a value of k is 1.6*10-19J/eV, and c is a speed of light”. However, Namkung teaches that a laser lift-off technology may be used to form the opening (III) in a similar display substrate (see Figs. 3b-3c), and Lee teaches a laser-lift off method in which a light absorption portion (1102) comprises inorganic materials having a band gap smaller than that of the laser (paragraph 172), which is what the claim requires (Eg=hc/λ is the generic equation for band gap and applicant’s value for k is merely the conversion factor from eV to J. Accordingly, the equation Eg≤hkc/λ means that the materials have a band gap smaller than that of the laser). It would have been obvious at the time that application was effectively filed for one of ordinary skill in the art to form the opening in Yu’s display using a laser lift-off method as suggested by Namkung due to the art recognized suitability of the laser for the purpose of forming such openings (Namkung paragraph 90) and to include inorganic materials having a band gap smaller than that of the laser as suggested by Lee in order to protect the light emitting elements on the display substrate from the laser (Lee paragraph 169). With respect to claim 25: Um in view of Yu, Namkung and Lee teaches “the display substrate according to claim 24 (see above)”. Um does not specifically teach “wherein the semiconductor material comprises a metal oxide semiconductor or a silicon semiconductor”. However, Lee teaches “wherein the semiconductor material comprises a metal oxide semiconductor (paragraph 172) or a silicon semiconductor” It would have been obvious at the time that application was effectively filed for one of ordinary skill in the art to form the opening in Um’s display using a laser lift-off method as suggested by Namkung due to the art recognized suitability of the laser for the purpose of forming such openings (Namkung paragraph 90) and to include inorganic materials having a band gap smaller than that of the laser as suggested by Lee in order to protect the light emitting elements on the display substrate from the laser (Lee paragraph 169). With respect to claim 26: Um in view of Yu, Namkung and Lee teaches “the display substrate according to claim 25 (see above), Um does not specifically teach “wherein the silicon semiconductor comprises polycrystalline silicon or monocrystalline silicon”. However, Lee teaches “wherein the silicon semiconductor comprises polycrystalline silicon or monocrystalline silicon (the silicon semiconductor and metal oxide semiconductor were presented in the alternative, thus only one of the two is needed to anticipate the limitation “wherein the semiconductor material comprises a metal oxide semiconductor or a silicon semiconductor, wherein the silicon semiconductor comprises polycrystalline silicon or monocrystalline silicon”, which is taught by Lee’s disclosure of metal oxide semiconductors)”. It would have been obvious at the time that application was effectively filed for one of ordinary skill in the art to form the opening in Yu’s display using a laser lift-off method as suggested by Namkung due to the art recognized suitability of the laser for the purpose of forming such openings (Namkung paragraph 90) and to include inorganic materials having a band gap smaller than that of the laser as suggested by Lee in order to protect the light emitting elements on the display substrate from the laser (Lee paragraph 169). With respect to claim 27: Um in view of Yu, Namkung and Lee teaches “the display substrate according to claim 26 (see above)”. Um does not teach “wherein a thickness of the first light absorption portion is 300 angstroms to 3000 angstroms; and a thickness of the second light absorption portion is 300 angstroms to 3000 angstroms”. However, Lee teaches “wherein a thickness of the first light absorption portion is 300 angstroms to 3000 angstroms (paragraph 173); and a thickness of the second light absorption portion is 300 angstroms to 3000 angstroms (paragraph 173)”. It would have been obvious at the time that application was effectively filed for one of ordinary skill in the art to form the light absorption portion of Um in view of Yu to the thickness taught by Lee in order to provide the protection function described by Lee (Lee paragraph 173). Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Chen (US 20090021666 A1), which teaches a folding display. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Contact Information Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to NATHANIEL J. LEE whose telephone number is (571)270-5721. The examiner can normally be reached 9-5 EST M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, ABDULMAJEED AZIZ can be reached at (571)270-5046. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /NATHANIEL J LEE/ Examiner, Art Unit 2875 /ABDULMAJEED AZIZ/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2875
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 25, 2023
Application Filed
Sep 26, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Dec 26, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 22, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604608
DISPLAY PANEL AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598832
DETECTION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589373
ULTRASHORT LASER SYNTHESIS OF NANOPARTICLES OF ISOTOPES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12551589
LIGHTING DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12531229
EXCIMER LAMP, LAMP UNIT, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING EXCIMER LAMP
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
63%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+22.1%)
2y 7m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 814 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month