Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 18/263,220

BINDER FOR ALL-SOLID-STATE SECONDARY BATTERIES, BINDER COMPOSITION FOR ALL-SOLID-STATE SECONDARY BATTERIES, SLURRY FOR ALL-SOLID-STATE SECONDARY BATTERIES, SOLID ELECTROLYTE SHEET FOR ALL-SOLID-STATE SECONDARY BATTERIES AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME, AND ALL-SOLID-STATE SECONDARY BATTERY AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Jul 27, 2023
Priority
Jan 29, 2021 — JP 2021-012932 +1 more
Examiner
AKRAM, IMRAN
Art Unit
1725
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Eneos Materials Corporation
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
1-2
OA Rounds
5m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allowance Rate
624 granted / 970 resolved
-0.7% vs TC avg
Strong +43% interview lift
Without
With
+43.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
1013
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
72.0%
+32.0% vs TC avg
§102
25.5%
-14.5% vs TC avg
§112
1.6%
-38.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 970 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant's election with traverse of Group I, claims 1-4 in the reply filed on 3/12/26 is acknowledged. The traversal is on the ground(s) that there is no serious search burden. This is not found persuasive because search burden is not a requirement in 371 PCT restriction practice. The requirement is still deemed proper and is therefore made FINAL. Claim Interpretation Prior to presenting the art rejections below, the Office takes note of how the claims are interpreted. Claim 1 recites a composition comprising a copolymer of an aromatic vinyl unit and a conjugated diene unit. These are the positive recitations. The Office does not consider an aromatic vinyl unit patentably distinct from an aromatic vinyl compound because the instant specification does not provide special definitions for unit vs compound and the unit can be a compound and vice versa (via broadest reasonable interpretation). This is true for conjugated diene unit vs conjugated diene compound, as well. Further, the claim recites that the copolymer composition has a storage elastic modulus and loss tangent within certain ranges. Instant Table 1 discloses that the claimed ranges encompass the preferred materials of 1,3-butadiene and styrene. And something which is old does not become patentable upon the discovery of a new property (MPEP 2112 I). Therefore, the properties—and the manner in which they are measured—does not patentably distinguish the claimed composition from the same composition disclosed in the prior art. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Sone (US 2013/0260241 A1). Regarding claim 1, Sone discloses a composition comprising: a copolymer comprising 1,3-butadiene (paragraph 60) and styrene (paragraph 62). Something which is old does not become patentable upon the discovery of a new property (MPEP 2112 I). The manner in which the properties are measured does not change the intrinsic properties. Regarding claim 2, the instant specification states that α is the hydrogenation ratio (paragraph 90). Sone discloses a hydrogenation ratio of .65 (paragraph 199). Regarding claim 3, Sone discloses that the styrene content is 0-50% (paragraph 62). Regarding claim 4, Sone discloses a functional group containing a nitrogen atom, an oxygen atom, a silicon atom, a germanium atom, a tin atom or a combination thereof (paragraph 20). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to IMRAN AKRAM whose telephone number is (571)270-3241. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9a-5p. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Basia Ridley can be reached at 571-272-1453. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /IMRAN AKRAM/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1725
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 27, 2023
Application Filed
Apr 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12626993
CASE, BATTERY, POWER CONSUMING DEVICE, AND METHOD FOR ASSEMBLING CASE
3y 2m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12627002
SEPARATOR FOR ELECTROCHEMICAL DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME
3y 1m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12614792
METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING AN ALUMINUM CASE OF A BATTERY
3y 10m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12614716
2,5-Dimercapto-1,3,4-Thiadiazole (DMTD) Zinc Salt Derivatives
3y 2m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12603383
TRACTION BATTERY PACK VENTING SYSTEMS WITH ENCLOSURE ASSEMBLY INTEGRATED VENT EXHAUST CHANNELS
5y 4m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+43.1%)
3y 3m (~5m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 970 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month