Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 18/263,471

METHODS FOR INCREASING VIRAL TRANSDUCTION OF CELLS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 28, 2023
Examiner
TAKENAKA, RISA
Art Unit
1632
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
The Trustees of Dartmouth College
OA Round
1 (Non-Final)
15%
Grant Probability
At Risk
1-2
OA Rounds
4y 3m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 15% of cases
15%
Career Allow Rate
2 granted / 13 resolved
-44.6% vs TC avg
Strong +100% interview lift
Without
With
+100.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 3m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
52
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.0%
-34.0% vs TC avg
§103
30.2%
-9.8% vs TC avg
§102
23.6%
-16.4% vs TC avg
§112
31.1%
-8.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 13 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions Applicant’s election without traverse of Group II, drawn to claims 99, 104, and 113-127, in the reply filed on 01/29/2026 is acknowledged. Priority The instant application is a 371 of PCT/US2022/014369 filed 01/28/2022, which claims benefit of 63/143,286 filed 01/29/2021. Information Disclosure Statement The US patent application publication 20200255801A1 (Daisuke et al.) cited in the IDS filed 01/23/2025 has not been considered. US 20200255801A1, titled “Method for the in vitro preparation of dermal papilla and hair follicle equivalents,” lists Khalid Bakkar and Theebah Sellathurai as the two inventors. “US 20200255801A1 (Daisuke et al.)” is presumed to be a typographical error for US 20200255802A1, which lists Daisuke Kitamura as an inventor and is cited in the IDS filed 01/29/2026. Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: There are two tables in the specification (p 27 and 29-30), both of which are labeled and referred to as Table 2 (p 26, line 30; p 29, line 21). The first table should be titled (p 27) and referenced (p 26, line 30) as Table 1. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Interpretation Claims 124 and 126 are product-by-process claims. Product-by-process claims are not limited to the manipulations of the recited steps, only the structure implied by the steps. See MPEP 2113. In the instant case, the method steps of claims 123 or 99 do not clearly impart additional structural limitations to the products of claims 124 and 126, respectively. Therefore, claims 124 and 126 are interpreted as “a population of primary B cells transduced with a lentiviral vector.” The phrase “pharmaceutical composition comprising the population of cells” (claims 125 and 127) is not defined in the specification. Therefore, the broadest reasonable interpretation of this phrase, which includes a composition comprising the population of cells in saline, PBS, or culture medium, is used for the purposes of examination. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 99, 104, 113, and 126-127 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gong (Molecular Therapy Methods & Clinical Development, 2020, 17: 634-646; cited in IDS 07/28/2023), in view of Janssens (Human Gene Therapy, 2003, 14(3): 263-276). Regarding claims 99 and 126-127: Gong teaches a method of transducing NK cells by contacting the cells with statins and a lentiviral vector (Abstract). Gong teaches that low-density lipoprotein-receptor (LDLR), the receptor of vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV), is expressed at low levels on NK cells. Gong teaches that transduction efficiency of NK cells with VSV-G pseudotyped lentivirus is augmented by statins that induce higher low-density lipoprotein-receptor (LDLR) expression (Abstract). Gong teaches that in both NK-92 cells and primary NK cells, the transduction efficiency increased after treatment with statins that induce higher LDLR expression, especially with rosuvastatin (Abstract). Gong teaches that the LDLR expression levels in human B and T lymphocytes can be influenced using compounds compatible with in vitro culture, including statins (Results, para 1). The method of Gong comprises transduction of NK cells. Gong does not teach a method of transducing primary B cells. Janssens teaches that human primary B cells can be transduced by VSV-G pseudotyped lentiviral vectors (Abstract). Janssens teaches that gene transfer into primary B cells is a promising strategy to cure genetic diseases associated with B-cell dysfunction, and that long-lasting transgene expression in B cells is of particular interest for immunotherapy for its potential to induce specific immune activation or tolerance (p 263, col 1). It would have been prima facie obvious for a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to have modified the method of Gong by transducing primary B cells instead of NK cells. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification because Janssens teaches that lentiviral gene transfer into primary B cells is a promising strategy to cure genetic diseases associated with B-cell dysfunction and is of particular interest for immunotherapy. One of ordinary skill in the art would have had a reasonable expectation of making this modification because Janssens teaches that primary B cells can be transduced by VSV-G pseudotyped lentiviral vectors, and Gong teaches that LDLR expression levels in human B cells can be influenced using compounds compatible with in vitro culture (Results, para 1). Regarding claim 104: Following the discussion of claim 99, Gong teaches the use of rosuvastatin at a final concentration of 20 μM, 5 μM, and 0.5 μM (Materials and Methods, “Co-culture of NK Cells with Statins and Non-Statin Compounds”). The lentiviral vector taught in Gong is a VSV-G pseudotyped vector (Abstract). Janssens teaches isolating human CD19+ primary B cells from the mononuclear cell population of donor blood (reads on human naïve B cells) (p 265, col 1, para 3 – col 2, para 1). Regarding claim 113: Following the discussion of claim 99, Gong teaches the use of Atorvastatin, fluvastatin, pravastatin, rosuvastatin, and simvastatin (Materials and Methods, “Co-culture of NK Cells with Statins and Non-Statin Compounds”). Claim(s) 99 and 114-125 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Gong (Molecular Therapy Methods & Clinical Development, 2020, 17: 634-646; cited in IDS 07/28/2023), in view of Janssens (Human Gene Therapy, 2003, 14(3): 263-276) and Su (Journal of Immunology, 2016, 197(10): 4163-4176). Gong, in view of Janssens, renders obvious claim 99. Regarding claims 114-115 and 118-121: Gong, in view of Janssens, does not teach co-incubating primary B cells with one or more cytokines prior to or simultaneously with the one or more statins. Su teaches a B-cell culture system in which B-cell populations are expanded on stromal feeder cells that express low levels of CD154 (also called CD40 ligand or CD40L) (claims 118-119) in medium containing the recombinant human cytokines IL-2 (50 ng/mL), IL-4 (10 ng/mL), IL-21 (10 ng/mL), and BAFF (10 ng/mL) (Results, para 1; Materials and Methods, “CD culture system,” para 1) (claims 114-115, 120-121). Su teaches that this culture supports extensive B cell proliferation, with ∼103-fold increases following 8 days in culture and 106-fold increases when cultures are split and cultured for 8 more days (Abstract). It would have been prima facie obvious for a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to have modified the method of Gong, in view of Janssens, by co-incubating the primary B cells with IL-2 (50 ng/mL), IL-4 (10 ng/mL), IL-21 (10 ng/mL), and BAFF (10 ng/mL) on feeder cells that express CD40 ligand, as taught in Su. One of ordinary skill in the art would have been motivated to make this modification because Su teaches that a B-cell culture system in which B-cell populations are expanded on stromal feeder cells that express low levels of CD40 ligand in medium containing the recombinant human cytokines IL-2 (50 ng/mL), IL-4 (10 ng/mL), IL-21 (10 ng/mL), and BAFF (10 ng/mL) supports extensive B cell proliferation (Results, para 1; Materials and Methods, “CD culture system,” para 1; Abstract). One of ordinary skill in the art would have had a reasonable expectation of making this modification because Su teaches that primary B cells can be co-incubated with feeder cells and cytokines. Regarding claims 116-117 and 122-125: Following the discussion of claim 99, Gong teaches the use of Atorvastatin, fluvastatin, pravastatin, rosuvastatin, and simvastatin (Materials and Methods, “Co-culture of NK Cells with Statins and Non-Statin Compounds”). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Risa Takenaka whose telephone number is (571)272-0149. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 12-7 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Peter Paras can be reached at (571) 272-4517. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /RISA TAKENAKA/ Examiner, Art Unit 1632 /PETER PARAS JR/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1632
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 28, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12565658
CD33 TARGETED CHIMERIC ANTIGEN RECEPTOR MODIFIED T CELLS FOR TREATMENT OF CD33 POSITIVE MALIGNANCIES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 1 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

1-2
Expected OA Rounds
15%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+100.0%)
4y 3m
Median Time to Grant
Low
PTA Risk
Based on 13 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month